
Colleges Big And Small Issue Bonds Amid Political Chaos And Trump's Higher Ed Assault
Harvard University has issued $1.18 billion in bonds so far in 2025.
As the Trump administration wages its war on American colleges, schools are shoring up liquidity and taking on new debt while they wade through financial uncertainty. Debt issuance—tax-exempt and taxable—has increased this spring, says Jennifer Johnston, a senior vice president and director of municipal bonds research research at Franklin Templeton. '2024 was a record issuance year and we are currently going to outpace that if this trend keeps up,' she says. 'Last week we saw what was the second largest week of issuance, and it's all coming at a time, [summer], where issuance usually slows.' According to data from investment firm Janney Montgomery Scott, 99 colleges and universities have issued $20.8 billion in public debt so far this year, up from $17 billion by 71 institutions at the same time last year.
The elite, name-brand schools—which have borne the brunt of Trump's attacks on higher education revenue, especially to research dollars—are beefing up their liquidity while they can, explains Jessica Wood, a senior director at ratings agency S&P Global. Despite its $50-plus billion endowment Harvard, Trump's current favorite target, has issued bonds twice this year, totaling $1.18 billion. Other 'wealthy' top schools, MIT, Northwestern, Princeton, Stanford and Yale have also issued new debt this spring. The group as a whole, which have endowments totaling $152 billion, or more than $2.1 million on average per student, have issued no less than $3.45 billion in both tax exempt and taxable municipal bonds. 'We are seeing a lot of higher education institutions issuing taxable debt, which gives a borrower more flexibility in terms of what they're going to use the proceeds for,' says Johnston. 'We've seen a lot of the Ivies issuing debt for cash purposes to sock away for the future.'
But smaller colleges are also entering the bond market, worried about market uncertainty and potential limitations on access to tax-exempt debt. While it wasn't included in the final version of the House of Representatives' 'big, beautiful bill,' there have been efforts by Congress to change the tax law to rid individual colleges of their tax-exempt status or make it harder for schools to access tax-exempt municipal bonds. Schools are also issuing debt they had planned for the fall in an effort to get ahead of any federal policy changes. 'They're not pinched in terms of liquidity, but they're trying to keep options open,' Wood says of the smaller schools. 'So some capital projects that they might have funded from their own reserves, if they have a little bit of debt capacity right now, they're exploring that as an option.'
Dozens of colleges sold or will sell bonds this month. Among them are Holy Family University in Philadelphia, which issued $13.7 million in tax-exempt bonds last week to finance capital projects, including the construction of a new welcome center and field house, and renovations to the nursing building. The Catholic University of America in Washington D.C. issued $111 million in bonds to refinance existing debt and pay for capital projects, including facilities upgrades. Suffolk University in Massachusetts issued $110 million in tax-exempt bonds, some of which will fund a $42.5 million total renovation of the humanities building. In Kansas, Washburn University issued $25.3 million in bonds for facilities upgrades and debt refinancing.
Despite the myriad political attacks, S&P remains confident in top schools. The outlook for small, tuition-dependent colleges is more tenuous. 'We have a bifurcated outlook on the sector for the year,' Wood says. 'What it means is that we're negative for less selective, less flexible, lower rated institutions that tend to be more regional, but we remain stable for the higher end of institutions.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-Breakdown of U.S. tariffs on China since Trump's first term
BEIJING (Reuters) -Billions of dollars of Chinese goods have been impacted by additional U.S. tariffs since 2018, initially under the first Donald Trump presidency and later under the Biden administration. Returning to the White House this year, Trump has imposed even more duties on China. The U.S. tariffs range from those imposed under Section 301 of its trade act due to what Washington claims are unfair Chinese trade practices, to duties under Section 232 levied for national security reasons. This year, Trump has imposed another 20% levies on all Chinese goods, saying Beijing has not done enough to stop the flow of fentanyl into the United States. So-called reciprocal tariffs, under which the U.S. will match duties imposed by other countries, have also been levied in a bid to rebalance trade flows. Below are the U.S. tariffs on China effective as of June 12, 2025: Tariff Rate Products Effective date Reciprocal 10% All Paused for 90 days until Aug 10, 2025 Fentanyl 20% All Mar 4, 2025 Section Up to List 1: Pharmaceuticals, July 6, 2018 301 25% iron and steel, aluminium, vehicles and aircraft, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus and more. List 2: Vehicles, Aug 23, 2018 railway or tramway locomotives, aircraft and their parts, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus and more. List 3: Prepared May 10, 2019 foodstuffs, beverages, mineral products, fertilizers, wood products, textiles, precious and base metals, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, machinery and mechanical appliances and more. List 4A: Prepared Feb 14, 2020 foodstuffs, beverages, mineral products, fertilizers, footwear, wood products, ceramic products, glass, textiles, precious and base metals, machinery and mechanical appliances, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, art, antiques and more. In September 2019, the U.S. imposed 15% tariffs on more than $120 billion of Chinese goods under Section 301, which it then halved to 7.5% less than six months later. The 25% U.S. tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods under the earlier List 1-3 remain unchanged. In September 2024, the U.S. Trade Representative under the Biden administration announced additional tariffs of 25-100% on 14 product groups following a four-year review of the Section 301 tariff actions. The levies were imposed on strategic Chinese sectors or sectors where the United States has made significant domestic investments. Additional tariffs on goods under Section 301: Effective date EVs 100% Sep 27, 2024 Solar cells, syringes and 50% needles Non-lithium-ion battery parts, 25% lithium-ion electrical vehicle batteries, other critical minerals, ship-to-shore cranes, steel and aluminium products, facemasks Semiconductors 50% Jan 1, 2025 Lithium-ion non-electrical 25% Jan 1, 2026 vehicle batteries, medical gloves, natural graphite, permanent magnets In addition to the above duties, the first Trump administration in 2018 imposed a range of tariffs under Section 232 aimed at restricting goods deemed a threat to national security, including all aluminium and steel imports, shutting most Chinese suppliers out of the U.S. market. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
XRP Consolidates Near $2.28 Amid Slew of Wins for Ripple, XRPL
XRP XRP traded in a narrow range over the past 24 hours, consolidating between $2.27 and $2.32 as global trade tensions and diverging central bank policies weighed on investor sentiment. The digital asset demonstrated resilience amid broader market volatility, with strong buying interest emerging at key support levels. News Background Ripple's regulatory wins in Dubai and progress on stablecoin initiatives, such as RLUSD, provide a fundamental tailwind, though traders remain wary amid volatile global conditions. Ondo Finance's Ondo Short-Term U.S. Government Treasuries (OUSG) is now live on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), expanding institutional access to the institutional-grade RWA product onchain. Digital Commercial Paper (DCP), secured by U.S. Treasuries, is now live on the XRP Ledger, enhancing efficiency and accessibility. Administered by Guggenheim Treasury Services, DCP is tokenized and managed through the Zeconomy platform, offering custom maturities up to 397 days. Price Action XRP's price fluctuated between $2.264 and $2.319, representing a 2.37% range that highlights ongoing uncertainty. The token established a high-volume support zone at $2.273-$2.280, where buyers consistently emerged, stabilizing price action despite repeated tests of lower levels. Resistance formed at $2.315, where price rejections occurred during the 11th and 22nd hours, accompanied by above-average volume. In the final hour of trading, XRP experienced a sharp 2.17% decline at 01:55, dropping from $2.285 to $2.280. However, substantial buying volume of 3.9 million units emerged, reinforcing the $2.280 floor. The 01:32 candle showed the highest volume of the session at 1.8 million, confirming buyer interest at lower levels. An ascending support trendline suggests short-term stabilization, with traders eyeing potential breakout scenarios if resistance at $2.315 can be breached. Technical Analysis Recap XRP traded between $2.264 and $2.319, a 2.37% range. High-volume support zone established at $2.273-$2.280, with consistent buyer interest. Resistance formed at $2.315, with multiple price rejections and above-average volume. XRP closed at $2.284, signaling consolidation near the middle of the range. Sharp 2.17% decline at 01:55 (from $2.285 to $2.280) on increased volume. Highest volume observed at 01:32 (1.8M), confirming buyer support at lower levels. Ascending support trendline suggests short-term stabilization and potential breakout if resistance is breached.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Residential solar installer Sunnova files for bankruptcy, plans to sell and wind down operations
This story was originally published on Utility Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Utility Dive newsletter. Sunnova, the second-largest installer of third-party owned residential solar installations by market share, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on Sunday. Although the company's customer base and revenue continued to grow, rising interest rates, inflation, tariffs and other factors had eroded the company's profit margins, rendering it unable to pay its debts, President and CEO Paul Mathews said in the bankruptcy filings. Sunnova plans to sell off 'substantially all' of the company's assets and wind-down any remaining operations following the sale, Mathews said. Sunnova said in a Monday announcement following the filing that it will accept bids on its assets and business operations for the next 45 days; after the sale, the company plans to wind-down any remaining operations and close, Mathews said in court filings. The company has already agreed to sell some assets to a holding company that has received $15 million in financing from global investment firm ATLAS SP Partners, and has also agreed to sell other assets from its new homes business unit to builder Lennar Homes for $16 million, according to the company announcement. 'Today's actions mark a critical step towards securing a value-maximizing outcome for Sunnova's stakeholders,' Mathews said in a statement Monday. 'Throughout this process, maintaining continuity of service for our customers is our top priority as we work to secure a long-term solution for our business operations under new ownership.' Matthews said he was 'incredibly grateful to our dedicated Sunnova team for their hard work and commitment. We have built an innovative power provider, and I continue to believe deeply in the future of our industry and the promise of residential solar and storage.' According to the chapter 11 bankruptcy filings, Sunnova faced 'critically tight liquidity' and expected to run out of cash this April or May if it was unable to secure additional financing. However, the company's efforts to find new lenders earlier this year were unsuccessful, a failure Mathews partially attributed in court documents to uncertainty created by Trump's executive order to freeze spending authorized by the Inflation Reduction Act. Although the courts have paused the implementation of that executive order and restored payouts under the act, the uncertainty it created meant lenders were unwilling to provide Sunnova with additional financing, Mathews said. He also said that although Sunnova grew its revenues and quadrupled its customer count between 2020-2024, market factors such as above-target inflation, prolonged high interest rates and tariffs had diminished the company's profitability. The company attempted to cut costs and free up funds to make its growing debt service payments by focusing on lower-risk installations, and by 2025 had shrunk year-over-year net losses by more than 10%, Mathews said. The company also installed new leadership, including Mathews, and laid off 50% of its workforce earlier this year. However, the new strategy was unable to make up for its previous policy of aggressive spending and borrowing in pursuit of rapid growth. By early 2025 the company was unable to pay its dealer network, which caused its contractors to stop work on projects that were in process and further curtailed the company's incoming cash flows, Mathews said. Recommended Reading Utilities' misguided opposition to community solar in California Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data