Two key Bengal cricket board officials face allegations of financial misconduct
In another development, CAB Treasurer Prabir Chakraborty has been accused of a conflict of interest. A complaint filed by the Wari Club was referred by the Ombudsman back to the Apex Council, which has now forwarded it again to the Ombudsman for a formal investigation. Chakraborty has also been directed to submit a Utilization Certificate (UC) detailing how club funds were spent.One of the more explosive allegations against Das includes misusing CAB's resources by routing Town Club players' food bills through the association's canteen account. He has also been accused of taking money from players in exchange for promises of Bengal team selection. The Aditya School of Sports has filed a complaint claiming that Das accepted Rs 4 lakh from them in return for a promise of CAB club affiliation.When contacted, Debabrata Das declined to comment, citing that the matter is sub judice.These developments come at a time when CAB is under growing pressure to maintain transparency and accountability. The Apex Council's decisions signal a crucial step towards restoring integrity and public trust in Bengal cricket's administration.- Ends
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
29 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Lok Sabha passes Manipur Appropriation Bill, 2025
Synopsis The Lok Sabha approved the Manipur Appropriation Bill, 2025. This happened despite opposition members' sloganeering regarding Bihar electoral rolls. The bill allows funds from Manipur's Consolidated Fund for the current financial year. Nirmala Sitharaman criticized the opposition for disrupting proceedings. She highlighted an additional allocation of Rupees 2,898 crore for Manipur. ANI Lok Sabha passes Manipur Appropriation Bill The Lok Sabha on Thursday passed the Manipur Appropriation Bill, 2025, amid sloganeering by opposition members over revision of Bihar electoral after the passing of the Bill by voice vote, Lok Sabha proceedings were adjourned for the Appropriation Bill, 2025 authorises payment and appropriation of certain sums from and out of the Consolidated Fund of the State of Manipur for the services of the current financial mentioned Bill was passed without any discussion as opposition members did not relent. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman slammed the opposition over disrupting the Lok Sabha proceedings and said while they talk of Manipur, they do not want money to go to the state, which is under President's rule. Speaking on the Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2025, Sitharaman said, "When the government brings a Budget for Manipur - allocating funds for its development - the Opposition neither listens to it nor has the courage to engage with it."She announced that the government has made an additional allocation of Rs 2,898 crore for Manipur, of which Rs 1,667 crore will be spent under the Capital Head and Rs 1,231 crore under the Revenue additional fund allocation is said to support rehabilitation of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), security-related expenditure, deployment charges for CAPFs, prepayment of high-interest loans and additional support under SASCI.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Parasakthi' producer Aakash Baskaran's Tasmac case, Madras High Court slaps Rs. 30,000 fine on ED
In April, enforcement officials conducted raids at the Tasmac headquarters and several liquor factories in connection with a large-scale fraud allegedly taking place at the Tasmac Corporation. Authorities said that a fraud of around ₹1,000 crore had taken place at that time. Searches were conducted at the homes and offices of 'Parasakthi' producer Aakash Baskaran and businessman Vikram Ravindran in connection with the matter. At the end of the investigation, Vikram Ravindran's assets were sealed. Here's a detailed report. Aakash Baskaran and Vikram Ravindran move court to lift asset seal Aakash Baskaran and Vikram Ravindran filed a case in the Madras High Court against this action. In this case, they demanded that the enforcement department's action be stayed and that the seal placed on their properties be removed. According to Nakkheeran, during the trial, Aakash Baskaran was ordered to return the seized documents, and an order was issued to temporarily halt further proceedings. ED seeks more time during August 6 hearing The case came up for hearing again on August 6. On this occasion, the lawyer appearing for the Enforcement Directorate said that the reply petition has not yet been prepared. Therefore, he requested more time. The judges expressed their strong dissatisfaction with this. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mr. Bala's Powerful Intraday Strategy Revealed – No More Guesswork TradeWise Learn More Undo The judges also strongly criticized that not responding even after being granted time twice was not proper practice. Court imposes Rs. 30,000 fine on ED for procedural lapse The Enforcement Directorate stated that it was required to file a joint response and requested that time be granted only this time. But the judges opposed it and imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000 each, for a total of ₹30,000 on the enforcement department. The court ordered that this amount be paid to the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court's relief fund and adjourned the next hearing of the case to the 20th.
The Print
42 minutes ago
- The Print
ED attaches Rs 29,176 from bank account used to receive ISIS funds for 2022 Mangaluru IED blast
At one time, the account received more than Rs 3 lakh of which the terror module had spent more than Rs 2 lakh. It was part of the overall funds passed on to terror accused Mohammed Shariq and his aides, including Syed Yasin, the ED spokesperson said. The bank account was used to allegedly fund various nefarious activities such as online purchase of items to assemble an Improvised Explosive Device (IED), hiring hideouts in Mysuru city as well as in conducting reconnaissance of different places in Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnataka, an ED spokesperson said Wednesday. New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has attached the money lying in the bank account of the 2022 Mangaluru bomb blast accused, who allegedly used to receive funds from his ISIS handler. The account came under the ED lens after the Karnataka police booked Shariq alias Premraj, a resident of Shivamogga district, for orchestrating an IED blast near Kankanady railway station in Mangaluru on 20 November, 2022. From the spot, the local police had found a pressure cooker, 9-volt batteries and circuits generally used for assembling IEDs. In the further course of investigation, chemicals, mechanical tools and electrical items—required to assemble IEDs—were seized from Shariq's rented accommodation in Mysuru. Days later, the case was handed over to the National Investigation Agency (NIA). In its charge sheet, the NIA submitted that Shariq was on the way to plant the IED concealed in pressure cooker outside Manjunatha temple in Dharmasthala. However, the IED went off because the timer was set at nine seconds instead of an initially planned time of 90 minutes, leaving Shariq with 40 percent burn injuries. All these accused are in judicial custody and are now facing trial. Also Read: 'Bare allegations'—how Malegaon ruling debunked ATS & NIA's theories on RDX, conspiracy meetings Online DIY classes A couple of months before the blast, the Shivamogga police booked Shariq, Yasin and Munir Ahmed alias Maz on the charge of hatching a conspiracy to spread the ISIS ideology. The trio, according to the FIR, was working to bring Sharia law as they believed India never really got independent. The trio had stored explosives and exploded a bomb outside Yasin's house in Shivamogga, it added. The NIA registered a case on 15 November, 2022—five days before the Mangaluru IED blast mistakenly triggered by Shariq. An ISIS handler with the pseudonym 'Colonel' radicalised the trio along with at least nine other youth from across Karnataka and gave them instructions through applications such as Wickr and Telegram on how to assemble IEDs, according to the counter-terrorism agency. The handler, it said, had also trained them online on carrying out reconnaissance of sensitive targets such as power sub-stations, railways, telephone access points, as well as business and industries belonging to individuals of the Hindu community. The handler had arranged payment channels through cryptocurrency, which were sold and deposited into mule bank accounts opened with Fino Payments Bank, the NIA alleged. Through the same method, the accused received Rs 2.86 lakh, while funds amounting to Rs 41,680 were collected in cash from PoS (Point of Sale) agents. The money was used to purchase items online to assemble the IED, for hiring hideouts in Mysuru city and other locations, and also for conducting reconnaissance in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Karnataka, the NIA said. The police seized Rs 39,228 in cash from Shriq's bag when he was admitted to a hospital after being injured in the IED blast. The remaining Rs 29,176 in Yasin's bank account was disabled on the ED's instruction. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: Web of spoof sites, scam call centres. Crypto theft racket modus operandi in focus amid ED crackdown
