The Guardian view on alcohol and public health: the drinks industry must not control the narrative
In recent years, obesity has dominated discussions of the rising burden of chronic illness. But alcohol, too, is expected to feature in sections of the plan dealing with public health. Alcohol-related deaths in the UK reached a record high of 10,473 in 2023, with men more than twice as likely to die as women, and over-55s drinking far more than younger adults. The highest death rates are in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
In his review of the crisis facing the NHS, Lord Darzi highlighted that the rise in deaths in England coincided with alcohol's increasing affordability. By contrast, in Scotland, research suggests – though it does not definitively prove – that the introduction of minimum unit pricing has led to fewer deaths and hospitalisations.
Pressure for a tougher approach from policymakers to alcohol is also growing internationally. Two years ago the World Health Organization (WHO) made a public statement that there is no safe amount of alcohol. Last month, in Amsterdam, a new European Health Alliance on Alcohol was launched. It plans to campaign for the reduction of alcohol-related injuries and illnesses. Later this year, a UN general assembly meeting on non-communicable diseases is expected to include discussion of alcohol-related illness.
If governments decide to act in response to such pressure, the options open to them include minimum pricing, taxes, advertising restrictions and stricter guidelines (in the UK, adults are recommended not to exceed 14 units a week, while pregnant women are advised not to drink at all). Other public health interventions include specialist clinics and other local services for those who are already addicted or ill.
Before last year's election, Labour ruled out minimum unit pricing in England, although this was introduced by a Labour administration in Wales. If this decision has not already been reviewed in connection with the 10-year health plan, then it should be.
But lobbyists will ensure that this and other challenges to the industry won't be easy. Last month, the Guardian reported on how new restrictions on ultra-processed foods were watered down under pressure from the Food and Drink Federation. While the guidance to retailers was softened under the last government, these changes have not been reversed by Labour. Unsurprisingly, a government that has staked its reputation on economic growth is a good listener to businesses.
Rules and regulations are not the only factor shaping habits and behaviour. The drinks industry is also pushing back with advertising campaigns that reach over politicians' heads and seek to influence the public directly. Central to these efforts is a message that moderate drinking is not harmful. While this is in direct contradiction to the WHO's stance, it may appeal to a public that enjoys drinking. Ministers must ensure that accurate information about risks is out there, too, and that government decisions are guided by health, not lobbying.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The current testing system for prostate cancer is failing too many men
SIR – Congratulations on your campaign (Leading Article, July 26) for a targeted screening programme for prostate cancer. My own diagnosis earlier this year made me realise that a national screening test is urgently needed. I was (and still am) asymptomatic, and have no known family history. I requested a PSA test from my GP following a chance meeting with an acquaintance who had recently been diagnosed with localised advanced prostate cancer – he had originally decided against a test, but was persuaded after learning of Sir Chris Hoy's experience. I am now being treated for localised advanced (high risk) prostate cancer. Your reports of men having to request a PSA test from their GP several times, even with symptoms, are appalling. A friend of a family member had a similar experience. He had experienced typical symptoms and went to see his GP, who gave him various blood and other tests, but notably not a PSA test. Having sought a second opinion privately, he was then diagnosed with prostate cancer, which has spread throughout his body. I know men who have received an unenthusiastic response from their GP; other men are completely ignorant of the cancer and its symptoms. The status quo is a disaster for men. I fully support your campaign and your call for better training and awareness for GPs. Geoff Stevens Harrogate, North Yorkshire SIR – I was repeatedly refused the PSA test by GPs on the grounds that the test was too sensitive and unreliable. I eventually managed to persuade a GP to comply, but only because I refused to be placed on statins, which were to be prescribed for no other reason than my age. The results of the test were elevated but, after treatment, at least I am now one of those who will die with, hopefully not of, prostate cancer. The worst irony of my experience was the revelation, from the nurse specialist who took my family history, that because my mother and maternal grandmother had both died of breast cancer, I was in a higher risk category. Had I known this, I might have convinced previous GPs to test my PSA earlier and maybe even qualified for prostatectomy, like younger friends and relatives with whom I have compared notes, thereby avoiding the unpleasant side effects of radiotherapy. Dermod Malley Halstead, Essex SIR – All men need to be tested for prostate cancer. My husband had no signs or symptoms, but we had lost a friend to the disease, so our enlightened GP ordered a PSA test which indicated that my husband, then 55, had a problem. Our son has been tested since he was 45 years old. My husband and his specialist fought it for 22 years but sadly he lost his battle in 2019. Marilla Blenkin Ashford, Kent
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Now shut migrant protest hotel: As demonstrators clash again in Epping, Tories demand that Labour listen to local concerns and move asylum seekers
Labour faced mounting pressure last night to shut the asylum hotel at the centre of angry protests. But ministers stayed silent as senior Tories joined demands for migrants to be removed from The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, over 'legitimate' concerns about crime. As frustrated organisers of the growing demonstrations said they would not stop until it was closed, fresh clashes broke out outside the hotel yesterday, despite a heavy police presence to separate rival groups of protesters. The demonstrations were triggered after Ethiopian man Hadush Kebatu was charged with sexually assaulting a schoolgirl just days after he arrived in Britain in a Channel dinghy. Police chiefs have already described the unrest at The Bell as a 'signal flare' for another summer of disorder. Epping Council voted unanimously last week to urge the Government to close it. But Treasury minister James Murray refused to comment yesterday when asked why the Government has not listened to the demands. He told Sky News: 'I'm not going to comment on specific cases, but I do understand people's frustration. 'And whilst, obviously, there can never be any place for criminal violence, there's absolutely a right for people to protest about this.' It came after polling found that immigration has overtaken the economy to become voters' biggest concern about the country after the NHS. The survey by Opinium found 49 per cent of people put immigration among their top three concerns – a seven-point increase since May. Meanwhile, Sir Keir Starmer could also come under pressure to act from Donald Trump when they meet in Scotland today, after the US President said he had 'sealed our borders' in America and urged Europe to follow suit. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp told the Mail: 'Ministers must recognise the strength of feeling from the public about this hotel, listen to their genuine and real concerns, and shut it down. 'The Government has lost control of our borders. They need to listen to the public anger on this issue and deport all illegal immigrants immediately upon arrival. 'I am furious we are being overwhelmed by illegal immigrants. What has happened at The Bell is a consequence of that.' Opposition leader Kemi Badenoch said 'agitators' were coming in to whip up trouble, telling GB News: 'The Conservatives have been calling for that hotel to be closed down, because you have to show people there is a response when they have legitimate concerns.' Kebatu, 38, is due to be tried for allegedly trying to kiss a schoolgirl as she ate pizza in Epping on July 7, eight days after he arrived in the UK. He denies sexual assault, inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity and a charge of harassment. There were more ugly scenes outside The Bell yesterday when up to 1,000 demonstrators clashed. Around 400 protesting against the migrants – mostly locals – gathered after lunch, with counter-protesters, including of pro-Palestine groups and trade unions, arriving at around 4pm, and staying for barely an hour. Despite police from 31 forces including Merseyside and Lancashire separating them, at least three people were arrested. Sarah White, 40, who organised the protest against the hotel, said: 'We won't stop. Today has been a great opportunity for our voices to be heard. We've got the message out there that we don't want these hotels. 'This, I think, has been the biggest – there's more to come. We need to feel safe – we don't currently. It's shocking. We won't stop until that hotel is closed.' Maureen Chapman, 73, said she felt 'under threat', adding: 'I have grandchildren living locally. We want this closed and we won't stop until it is. Despite police from 31 forces including Merseyside and Lancashire separating them, at least three people were arrested 'These people moaning, would they want it at the end of their street?' The Home Office said: 'The Government is reducing expensive hotel use as part of a complete overhaul of the asylum system. 'From over 400 asylum hotels in summer 2023, costing almost £9million a day, there are now less than 210. We want them all closed by the end of this Parliament. 'People rightly want to see a robust and effective asylum system and we have a duty to support people who would otherwise be destitute and sleeping rough while their case is decided.'
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nine million Britons can afford to invest but lack 'emotional capacity' for risk
Britain has a problem. Millions of people are holding money in cash savings, and as a result are losing out on the potential long-term returns from investing. More than half of adults, 58 per cent, and equivalent to some 31.4million people are unwilling to face short-term losses on investments because they have low 'emotional' capacity for risk, new data from Interactive Investor reveals. Of course, watching your hard-earned cash fall in value when invested is tough to take, and for many this money is needed in case of emergencies, or simply to pay for day-to-day expenses. However, a third of those who said they didn't have the emotional capacity to take investment risk, as many as nine million people, do have the financial resilience to do so. Interactive Investor said this leads to these people 'under-investing', with 71 per cent of the 3,000 people surveyed owning no investments outside of their pension. Data from the Bank of England reveals that in May an eye-watering £280billion worth of cash was sitting in UK bank accounts earning no interest Richard Wilson, chief executive of Interactive Investor, said: 'Our research has unearthed a safety-first instinct among savers that presents a serious challenge for the UK. 'Millions of people have the financial capacity to invest, but don't believe it's worth the risk - over a lifetime that's likely to have a serious impact on their financial resilience. 'The dangers of not taking any risk are fast climbing up the political and regulatory agenda, and analysis shows that Britain has the lowest levels of equity ownership outside of pensions of any G7 country, with a disproportionate amount in cash and property.' In fact, as few as 12 per cent of people have a high emotional capacity for risk. A slightly higher proportion, 19 per cent, had a high risk tolerance. That phrase refers to how willing people are to accept the possibility of losses in favour of higher returns in the long term. Still, around 57 per cent of people still scored low for risk tolerance, meaning that they aren't willing to take risks for rewards in the long term, even when financially stable. Greg Davies, head of behavioural finance at Oxford Risk, said: 'Most people invest too little and take less risk than they could safely afford. This isn't about logic - it's about emotion. Emotional discomfort with short-term market ups and downs leads even financially resilient investors to underinvest. 'For those with high financial capacity, the emotional gap is often greatest: they could afford to aim higher, but their feelings hold them back.' Data from the Bank of England reveals that in May an eye-watering £280billion worth of cash was sitting in UK bank accounts earning no interest. The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has launched a campaign to promote retail investing among ordinary people, promoting investing over holding large sums of money in cash. Meanwhile, 'targeted support' reforms will come into play next year, offering tailored recommendations based on what people in similar financial circumstances are doing with their money. Along with this came fears that the Chancellor would scrap the cash Isa in a bid to push more towards investing. On the news that this wouldn't be the case - for now at least - savers breathed an audible sigh of relief. At the same time though, many resigned themselves to continuing to miss out on much higher returns. Interestingly, just three per cent said they would have a higher tolerance for investing if cash Isa tax benefits were slashed. Meanwhile, 41 per cent said they would invest if they had more money, while 16 per cent said they would do so if they understood investments better. While it Is recommended that savers only invest cash that they can afford to lose, as well as making sure that they build up an emergency pot and cash savings before doing so, many are sitting on cash pots earning no interest. Even when held in high interest accounts like cash Isas, the value of cash savings is gradually eroded as inflation outpaces the rates paid out by banks. Craig Rickman, personal finance expert at Interactive Investor, added: 'While people should only take on as much risk as is right for them, short-term emotional barriers often mean we don't take the risk that's right for our long-term needs.
