
Bangladesh's interim govt warns of authoritarianism, student protesters fear reprisals
Bangladesh's interim government, which took over after a mass uprising last year, warned on Saturday that unity was needed to 'prevent the return of authoritarianism'.
Advertisement
'Broader unity is essential to maintain national stability, organise free and fair elections, justice, and reform, and permanently prevent the return of authoritarianism in the country,' it said in a statement after a week of escalation during which rival parties protested on the streets of the capital Dhaka.
The South Asian nation of around 170 million people has been in political turmoil since ex-prime minister Sheikh Hasina was ousted by student-led protests in August 2024, ending her iron-fisted 15-year rule.
The caretaker government is led by chief adviser Muhammad Yunus, the 84-year-old Nobel Peace Prize winner.
Yunus, who returned from exile at the behest of protesters, says he has a duty to implement democratic reforms before elections, which are due by June 2026 at the latest.
Advertisement
'If the government's autonomy, reform efforts, justice process, fair election plan, and normal operations are obstructed to the point of making its duties unmanageable, it will, with the people, take the necessary steps,' the caretaker government said, without giving further details.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
21 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Bangladesh's Yunus to step down after April polls, wants to make ‘election right'
Bangladesh interim leader Muhammad Yunus said there was 'no way' he wanted to continue in power after elections he has announced for April, the first since a mass uprising overthrew the government. Advertisement The South Asian nation of around 170 million people has been in political turmoil since a student-led revolt ousted then prime minister Sheikh Hasina in August 2024, ending her 15-year rule. Yunus, asked if he was seeking any political post, the 84-year-old Nobel Peace Prize winner said there was 'no way', waving his hands in the air for emphasis. 'I think none of our cabinet members would like to do that, not only me,' he said. Yunus was answering questions on Tuesday evening after speaking at London's foreign policy think tank Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Advertisement He also said he wanted to unveil a 'big package' of proposals next month that he dubbed a 'July Charter' – one year on since the students launched the demonstrations that toppled Hasina. The aim of the package, he added, was to overhaul democratic institutions after Hasina's tenure.


South China Morning Post
3 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Why democracy vs autocracy isn't the definitive contest shaping the world
What is the fundamental contradiction shaping our world today? Some might say it's the dichotomy between democracy and autocracy – a staple of former US president Joe Biden's world view. However, that perspective seems outdated. Biden's successor, Donald Trump, is well known for being transactional. Last month he said Washington would lift sanctions on Syria, although the country's new government hasn't put it on the path to democracy. Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa has pitched a slew of positive perks, including a Trump Tower in Damascus. Also, Trump's eagerness for the US to accept the gift of a luxury Boeing 747-8 from Qatar, hardly a bastion of democracy, for use as Air Force One has raised questions about what is expected in return. Meanwhile, the United States' squeeze on academic freedoms – as evidenced by threats to revoke visas for Chinese students and international students harbouring divergent views – speaks volumes of a dystopian new normal. One would think democratic norms should encompass the embracing of pluralism and difference. An alternative reading would suggest that our times are marked by a struggle between the Global North – comprising more advanced and affluent economies – and the Global South


South China Morning Post
3 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Democracies sometimes use foreign meddling as an ‘alibi': think tank
Foreign interference in elections is a real concern but sometimes used as an 'alibi' by democracies to divert attention from domestic issues, the head of a democracy think-tank said Monday. According to a new report by Stockholm-based International IDEA, disinformation and manipulation of social media algorithms to influence results were among the major threats to democracies during election campaigns. The threat is 'exacerbated by the explicit willingness of domestic, foreign and non-state actors to engage in such activities', the report said, highlighting states such as China, Russia and Iran. Among 54 elections covered in 2024, 80 per cent experienced 'deliberate campaigns of disinformation trying to shape the electoral result', IDEA's Secretary General Kevin Casas-Zamora said. However, when politicians blame foreign influence, it risked diverting the debate from real issues, and whether such campaigns 'succeeded or not is anybody's guess', he added. 'The question of inequality, the question of how a lot of citizens feel left behind and that they're not being heard by their political institutions, deserves probably at least as much attention as the external threats that come in the shape of foreign interference or disinformation,' Casas-Zamora said.