Opening statements start in ‘rape' retrial of Harvey Weinstein
Opening statements began in Harvey Weinstein 's rape retrial, five years after his original #MeToo trial delivered a searing reckoning for one of Hollywood's most powerful figures.
The case is being retried because an appeals court threw out the landmark 2020 conviction.
Advertisement
The retrial is happening at the same Manhattan courthouse as the first trial, and two accusers who gave evidence then are expected to return.
Weinstein's retrial is playing out at a different cultural moment than the first, which happened during the height of the #MeToo movement.
Along with the charges being retried, he faces an additional allegation from a woman who wasn't involved in the first case.
The jury counts seven women and five men, unlike the seven-man, five-woman panel that convicted him in 2020, and there's a different judge.
Advertisement
The #MeToo movement, which exploded in 2017 with allegations against Weinstein, has also evolved and ebbed.
At the start of Weinstein's first trial, chants of 'rapist' could be heard from protesters outside.
TV lorries lined the street, and reporters queued for hours to get a seat in the packed courtroom.
His lawyers decried the 'carnival-like atmosphere' and fought unsuccessfully to get the trial moved from Manhattan.
Advertisement
This time, over five days of jury selection, there was none of that.
Those realities, coupled with the New York Court of Appeals' ruling last year vacating his 2020 conviction and 23-year prison sentence, because the judge allowed evidence about allegations Weinstein was not charged with, are shaping everything from retrial legal strategy to the atmosphere in court.
Weinstein, 73, is being retried on a criminal sex act charge for allegedly forcibly performing oral sex on a movie and TV production assistant, Miriam Haley, in 2006 and a third-degree rape charge for allegedly assaulting an aspiring actor, Jessica Mann, in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013.
Weinstein also faces a criminal sex act charge for allegedly forcing oral sex on a different woman at a Manhattan hotel in 2006.
Advertisement
Prosecutors said that the woman, who has not been named publicly, came forward days before his first trial but wasn't part of that case.
They said they revisited her allegations when his conviction was thrown out.
The Associated Press does not generally identify people alleging sexual assault unless they consent to be named, as Ms Haley and Ms Mann have done.
Weinstein has pleaded not guilty and denies raping or sexually assaulting anyone.
Advertisement
His acquittals on the two most serious charges at his 2020 trial, predatory sexual assault and first-degree rape, still stand.
Lindsay Goldbrum, a lawyer for the unnamed accuser, said Weinstein's retrial marks a 'pivotal moment in the fight for accountability in sex abuse cases' and a 'signal to other survivors that the system is catching up — and that it's worth speaking out even when the odds seem insurmountable'.
This time around, the Manhattan district attorney's office is prosecuting Weinstein through its Special Victims Division, which specialises in such cases, after homicide veterans helmed the 2020 version.
At the same time, Weinstein has added several lawyers to his defense team — including Jennifer Bonjean, who is involved in appealing his 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles.
She helped Bill Cosby get his conviction overturned and defended R Kelly in his sex crimes case.
'This trial is not going to be all about #MeToo.
'It's going to be about the facts of what took place,' Weinstein's lead lawyer, Arthur Aidala, said recently.
'And that's a big deal.
'And that's the way it's supposed to be.'
But there has already been some talk of #MeToo.
A prosecutor asked prospective jurors whether they had heard of the movement.
Most said they had, but that it would not affect them either way.
Others went further.
A woman opined that 'not enough has been done' as a result of #MeToo.
A man explained that he had negative feelings about it because his high school classmates had been falsely accused of sexual assault.
Another man said he viewed #MeToo like other social movements: 'It's a pendulum.
'It swings way one way, then way the other way, and then it settles.'
None of them is on the jury.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
14 hours ago
- NBC News
Florida set to execute man convicted of raping and killing a woman 3 decades ago
A man convicted of raping and killing a woman three decades ago after kidnapping her from a supermarket parking lot in Florida is scheduled to be executed Tuesday. Anthony Wainwright, 54, is scheduled to receive a lethal injection at Florida State Prison near Starke. He was convicted in the April 1994 killing of 23-year-old Carmen Gayheart, a mother of two young children, in Lake City. Wainwright would be the sixth person put to death in Florida this year. The state also executed six people in 2023, but only carried out one execution last year. There are four executions scheduled around the country this week, including another one on Tuesday in Alabama. On Monday, an Oklahoma judge granted a temporary stay of execution for a man scheduled to be put to death Thursday. Richard Hamilton, the other man convicted in Gayheart's killing, was also sentenced to death. But he died on death row in January 2023 at the age of 59. Gayheart's sister, who plans to attend the execution, said three decades is too long to wait for justice. 'It's ridiculous how many appeals they get,' Maria David told The Associated Press, adding that each step of the appeals process reopened her family's wounds. 'You have to relive it again because they have to tell the whole story again.' Wainwright and Hamilton escaped from prison in North Carolina, stole a green Cadillac and burglarized a home the next morning, taking guns and money. Then they drove to Florida and when the Cadillac began to have problems in Lake City, they decided to steal another vehicle. They confronted Gayheart, a community college student, on April 27, 1994, as she loaded groceries into her blue Ford Bronco, according to court documents. They forced her into the vehicle at gunpoint and drove off. They raped her in the backseat and then took her out of the vehicle and tried to strangle her before shooting her twice in the back of the head, court filings say. They dragged her body several dozen yards from the road and drove off. The two men were arrested in Mississippi the next day after a shootout with police. A jury in 1995 convicted Wainwright of murder, kidnapping, robbery and rape and unanimously recommended that he be sentenced to death. Wainwright's lawyers have filed multiple unsuccessful appeals over the years based on what they said were problems with his trial and evidence that he suffered from brain damage and intellectual disability. Since his execution was scheduled, his lawyers have argued in state and federal court filings that his execution should be put on hold to allow time for courts to hear additional legal arguments in his case. In a filing with the U.S. Supreme Court, his lawyers argue that his case has been 'marred by critical, systemic failures at virtually every stage and through the signing of his death warrant.' Those failures include flawed DNA evidence that wasn't disclosed to the defense until after opening statements, erroneous jury instructions, inflammatory and inaccurate closing arguments and missteps by court-appointed lawyers, the filing says. The filing also says that a jailhouse informant who testified at Wainwright's trial finally admitted last month that he and another informant had testified in exchange for lighter sentences, a fact that had not been disclosed to the defense. The Supreme Court on Monday denied Wainwright's final appeals without comment. David, Gayheart's sister, said she feels cheated that Hamilton died before the state could execute him. She said she was 'overcome with emotion' when she heard the governor had signed a death warrant for Wainwright. Her parents both died while waiting for justice to be served, she said, but she plans to be there to witness the final chapter of her family's tragedy. 'There's nothing that would keep me from seeing this all the way through,' she said. Her sister loved animals and surprised her by training to become a nurse rather than a veterinarian, David said. Gayheart was two years younger than her sister but became a mother first, and David said she marveled at her sister's patience with her young children. 'She was here, she mattered, she should be remembered, and she was loved,' David said of her sister. Over the years, she has kept a book where she put every court filing, from the initial indictment through the latest appeals. 'I'm looking forward to getting the last pieces of paperwork that say he's been executed to put into the book and never having to think about Anthony Wainwright ever again,' she said.
The Independent
21 hours ago
- The Independent
Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public
Jurors in Harvey Weinsteinn 'ssex crimes retrial appear to be moving past some interpersonal tensions and focusing on one of his three accusers as deliberations stretch into a fourth day Tuesday. At the end of Monday's session, jurors requested to start off Tuesday with electronic copies of emails and other evidence pertaining to Jessica Mann — the accuser with arguably the most complex history with Weinstein. During days of testimony, Mann said the Oscar-winning movie producer raped her in 2013 amid a consensual relationship that continued for years afterward. Weinstein's lawyers emphasized that she kept seeing him, accepting invitations and sending warm messages to him. Mann said she 'compartmentalized' the pain he caused her. Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty to all the charges in the case. In addition to the rape charge, he's accused of sexually assaulting two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola. Weinstein didn't testify during the current trial, but maintained through his attorneys that he had completely consensual encounters with his accusers, who wanted his help building show business careers. Weinstein was one of the movie industry's most powerful figures until a series of sexual misconduct allegations against him became public in 2017, fueling the #MeToo movement and eventually leading to criminal charges. The jury is made up of seven women and five men. Their closed-door discussions began Thursday and apparently have been fractious at times. One juror asked Friday to be excused because he felt one member of the group was being treated unfairly. Monday began with two jurors giving contrasting takes on the atmosphere in the deliberation room. First, the foreperson complained to the judge, prosecutors and defense lawyers that some jurors were 'pushing" others to change their minds, talking about Weinstein's past and going beyond the charges. The foreperson didn't specify what was said. Trial evidence has included some testimony about allegations outside the scope of the current charges, such as mentions of the groundswell of claims against the ex-studio boss in 2017. Another juror soon asked to speak to the court. In her estimation, things were 'going well' and jurors were 'making headway.' By the end of Monday, the jury as a whole said in a note that it was 'making good progress.' Weinstein originally was convicted in New York in 2020 of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on Haley. Sokola's allegation was added last year, after New York state's highest court overturned the 2020 conviction and sent the case back for retrial. Meanwhile, Weinstein is appealing a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles. The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named.
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Jurors in Harvey Weinstein trial reportedly fighting among themselves
The New York jury deciding whether to convict disgraced film mogul Harvey Weinstein of sex crimes appears divided, with some jurors reportedly launching verbal attacks against each other and also considering information not brought up in the recent male and seven female jurors have deliberated for three days over whether to find Weinstein guilty of rape and criminal sex acts. His 2020 conviction was thrown out last morning in court began with a note from the foreperson that read: "I need to talk to you about a situation which isn't very good."Weinstein's lawyers then filed for a mistrial, which the judge denied, and details emerged about the unfolding drama. After discussions with attorneys on Monday, Judge Curtis Farber later called the jury's foreperson back to the court's robing room to discuss the issue. The foreperson told him that, even though juries are only supposed to consider evidence and testimony presented during the trial, some jurors were trying to convince others of their point of view by bringing up parts of Weinstein's public history, according to a court transcript. "They are pushing people, talking about his past," the foreperson said. Jurors were "not on the same page" and some were "attacking" others, trying to change their minds, the foreperson added, according to the transcript. Judge Farber said he would give jurors a new instruction telling them that their deliberations relate only "to the three crimes". "That is the only thing that it can be used for in their deliberations, only the evidence introduced at this trial," he told the attorneys, according to the transcript. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York in 2020. The case was overturned last year when an appeals court found the 73-year-old did not receive a fair trial because a judge allowed testimony from women who made allegations against him beyond the charges at hand. Prosecutors then filed sexual assault charges again in September. The appeals ruling hung over the retrial, making the court extremely cautious about allowing allegations against Weinstein from outside the realm of the case. The drama comes after one juror told the judge last week that others had been speaking badly outside the courthouse about a fellow juror, and that they had "shunned" the person. "It's playground stuff," he said. The young man asked to be dismissed because he did not think deliberations were "fair and just", but the judge kept him on the jury also sent a note Monday morning asking Judge Farber to reread the concept of reasonable doubt and rules of deliberation "especially in terms of avoiding a hung jury". Typically in New York, if a jury in a criminal trial is not able to reach a unanimous verdict - as is required to convict or acquit the defendant - the judge may give them an Allen charge, an instruction to go back to deliberations to try once again to reach a verdict. Eventually, a hung jury can result in a mistrial. The jurors left at the end of Monday without a verdict, but sent a note saying they were "making progress", and requesting to revisit some evidence and be given "coffee for the morning for energy".The trial centred on three women - a former television production assistant, an aspiring actress, and a model - who accused Weinstein of using his power in Hollywood to sexually abuse total, Weinstein has been accused of sexual misconduct, assault and rape by more than 100 women. While not all reports resulted in criminal charges, a separate sex crimes conviction for Weinstein in California means he is likely to spend the rest of his life in decision by his accusers to come forward, and his subsequent conviction in New York, galvanised the #MeToo movement against sex abuse by powerful men.
