&w=3840&q=100)
Trump officials seek to end school desegregation orders; parents push back
Ferriday High is 90 per cent Black. Vidalia High is 62 per cent white.
For Black families, the contrast between the schools suggests we're not supposed to have the finer things, said Brian Davis, a father in Ferriday. It's almost like our kids don't deserve it, he said.
The schools are part of Concordia Parish, which was ordered to desegregate 60 years ago and remains under a court-ordered plan to this day. Yet there's growing momentum to release the district and dozens of others from decades-old orders that some call obsolete.
In a remarkable reversal, the Justice Department said it plans to start unwinding court-ordered desegregation plans dating to the Civil Rights Movement. Officials started in April, when they lifted a 1960s order in Louisiana's Plaquemines Parish. Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the department's civil rights division, has said others will bite the dust.
It comes amid pressure from Republican Gov Jeff Landry and his attorney general, who have called for all the state's remaining orders to be lifted. They describe the orders as burdens on districts and relics of a time when Black students were still forbidden from some schools.
The orders were always meant to be temporary school systems can be released if they demonstrate they fully eradicated segregation. Decades later, that goal remains elusive, with stark racial imbalances persisting in many districts.
Civil rights groups say the orders are important to keep as tools to address the legacy of forced segregation including disparities in student discipline, academic programs and teacher hiring. They point to cases like Concordia, where the decades-old order was used to stop a charter school from favouring white students in admissions.
Concordia is one where it's old, but a lot is happening there, said Deuel Ross, deputy director of litigation for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. That's true for a lot of these cases. They're not just sitting silently.
Debates over integration are far from settled
Last year, before President Donald Trump took office, Concordia Parish rejected a Justice Department plan that would have ended its case if the district combined several majority white and majority Black elementary and middle schools.
At a town hall meeting, Vidalia residents vigorously opposed the plan, saying it would disrupt students' lives and expose their children to drugs and violence. An official from the Louisiana attorney general's office spoke against the proposal and said the Trump administration likely would change course on older orders.
Accepting the plan would have been a death sentence for the district, said Paul Nelson, a former Concordia superintendent. White families would have fled to private schools or other districts, said Nelson, who wants the court order removed.
It's time to move on, said Nelson, who left the district in 2016. Let's start looking to build for the future, not looking back to what our grandparents may have gone through.
At Ferriday High, athletic coach Derrick Davis supported combining schools in Ferriday and Vidalia. He said the district's disparities come into focus whenever his teams visit schools with newer sports facilities.
It seems to me, if we'd all combine, we can all get what we need, he said.
Others oppose merging schools if it's done solely for the sake of achieving racial balance. Redistricting and going to different places they're not used to ... it would be a culture shock to some people," said Ferriday's school resource officer, Marcus Martin, who, like Derrick Davis, is Black.
The district's current superintendent and school board did not respond to requests for comment.
Federal orders offer leverage for racial discrimination cases
Concordia is among more than 120 districts across the South that remain under desegregation orders from the 1960s and '70s, including about a dozen in Louisiana.
Calling the orders historical relics is unequivocally false, said Shaheena Simons, who until April led the Justice Department section that oversees school desegregation cases.
Segregation and inequality persist in our schools, and they persist in districts that are still under desegregation orders, she said.
With court orders in place, families facing discrimination can reach out directly to the Justice Department or seek relief from the court. Otherwise, the only recourse is a lawsuit, which many families can't afford, Simons said.
In Concordia, the order played into a battle over a charter school that opened in 2013 on the former campus of an all-white private school. To protect the area's progress on racial integration, a judge ordered Delta Charter School to build a student body that reflected the district's racial demographics. But in its first year, the school was just 15 per cent Black.
After a court challenge, Delta was ordered to give priority to Black students. Today, about 40 per cent of its students are Black.
Desegregation orders have been invoked recently in other cases around the state. One led to an order to address disproportionately high rates of discipline for Black students, and in another a predominantly Black elementary school was relocated from a site close to a chemical plant.
The Justice Department could easily end some desegregation orders
The Trump administration was able to close the Plaquemines case with little resistance because the original plaintiffs were no longer involved the Justice Department was litigating the case alone. Concordia and an unknown number of other districts are in the same situation, making them vulnerable to quick dismissals.
Concordia's case dates to 1965, when the area was strictly segregated and home to a violent offshoot of the Ku Klux Klan. When Black families in Ferriday sued for access to all-white schools, the federal government intervened.
As the district integrated its schools, white families fled Ferriday. The district's schools came to reflect the demographics of their surrounding areas. Ferriday is mostly Black and low-income, while Vidalia is mostly white and takes in tax revenue from a hydroelectric plant. A third town in the district, Monterey, has a high school that's 95 per cent white.
At the December town hall, Vidalia resident Ronnie Blackwell said the area feels like a Mayberry, which is great, referring to the fictional Southern town from The Andy Griffith Show. The federal government, he said, has probably destroyed more communities and school systems than it ever helped.
Under its court order, Concordia must allow students in majority Black schools to transfer to majority white schools. It also files reports on teacher demographics and student discipline.
After failing to negotiate a resolution with the Justice Department, Concordia is scheduled to make its case that the judge should dismiss the order, according to court documents. Meanwhile, amid a wave of resignations in the federal government, all but two of the Justice Department lawyers assigned to the case have left.
Without court supervision, Brian Davis sees little hope for improvement.
A lot of parents over here in Ferriday, they're stuck here because here they don't have the resources to move their kids from A to B," he said. You'll find schools like Ferriday the term is, to me, slipping into darkness.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Former US Attorney Catherine Hanaway appointed as Missouri's next attorney general
Former US Attorney Catherine Hanaway was appointed Tuesday as Missouri's next attorney general, vowing a tough-on-crime approach as her predecessor leaves for a job with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe announced Hanaway's appointment just a day after Attorney General Andrew Bailey said he was stepping down to join President Donald Trump's administration as the FBI's co-deputy director. The change in Missouri's top law enforcement job will take effect September. 8. 'Fighting crime is — and will remain — job one for this office' Hanaway said. Hanaway has deep roots in Missouri politics and extensive ties as a private practice attorney to corporate clients that will cause her to recuse from some cases as attorney general. Hanaway first won election to the Missouri House in 1998 and led the GOP takeover of the chamber in the 2002 elections as the state began a gradual transition from a political tossup to a GOP stronghold. She served as Missouri's first and only woman House speaker before losing a bid for secretary of state in 2004. She was appointed the next year by President George W. Bush as US attorney for the eastern district of Missouri, which she held until 2009. She lost a Republican primary for governor in 2016. As a partner at the Husch Blackwell law firm, Hanaway has represented global chemical manufacturer Bayer in lobbying for legislation that would provide a legal shield against mounting claims that it failed to warn customers that its popular Roundup weedkiller can allegedly cause cancer. Husch Blackwell also represents Invenergy, which is attempting to use eminent domain to acquire land for a high-voltage transmission line to carry wind-generated power from Kansas across Missouri and Illinois to an electric grid in Indiana. Bailey has opposed the project, and Hanaway said she will recuse herself as the attorney general's office continues a civil investigation into it. Bailey, a staunch Trump supporter, has served as attorney general since January 2023 and won election last November to a full four-year term. Hanaway said she intends to serve the remainder of Bailey's term and seek election herself in 2028. Bailey brought an aggressive approach to the attorney general's office. He pursued numerous legal challenges against Democratic President Joe Biden's administration on policies ranging from student loan forgiveness to environmental rules, immigration actions and transgender rights measures. He also pursued conservative causes in his home state, threatening legal action against private gyms over bathroom policies, demanding that public schools ban drag shows and defending the state's anti-abortion regulations in the face of a voter-approved constitutional amendment establishing a right to abortion. Hanaway praised Bailey but placed a greater emphasis on criminal cases than civil litigation while talking to reporters Tuesday. Missouri's attorney general job has become a quick stepping stone for aspiring politicians. Less than a year after winning election as attorney general in 2016, Republican Josh Hawley launched a challenge to Democratic US Sen. Claire McCaskill. After Hawley won election to the Senate in 2018, Republican Gov. Mike Parson appointed state Treasurer Eric Schmitt to serve the remainder of Hawley's term. Schmitt won election to his own term as attorney general in 2020, but then quickly announced he was running to replace retiring US Sen. Roy Blunt in the 2022 elections. After Schmitt won the Senate race, Parson appointed Bailey — an Army veteran serving as the governor's general counsel


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Who is Brian Glenn? The pro-Trump journalist who apologized to Zelenskyy over his ‘Suit' comment
Source: X Nobody has forgotten the awkward spectacle of Volodymyr Zelensky 's meeting with Donald Trump at the White House earlier this year — when Real America's Voice correspondent Brian Glenn asked the Ukrainian president why he hadn't worn a suit. What should have been a moment focused on diplomacy instead turned into a viral exchange over attire. Months later, during Zelensky's return to Washington, Glenn addressed that moment again — this time with a lighter tone and an apology. Here's what happened and how Brian Glenn is involved In their first White House meeting, Glenn suggested that Zelensky's choice to wear military-style clothing signaled disrespect for the office of the US president. In response, Zelensky had replied, 'I will wear a costume after this war will finish.' This week, as Zelensky met Trump again — after Trump's high-stakes talks with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska — Glenn revisited the subject. Spotting the Ukrainian leader in a sharp black suit, Glenn remarked that Zelensky looked 'fabulous,' before apologizing for the earlier comment. Zelensky seized the chance to turn the tables, joking that while he had changed his attire, Glenn seemed to be wearing the same suit as before, drawing laughter from the room. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo But this brings us to who exactly is Brian Glenn and is his insolence or knack for straightforwardness due to his stand as a Pro-Trump Who is Brian Glenn? Source: X Originally from East Texas, Glenn has built a career that bridges local broadcasting, conservative media, and national political reporting. He studied mass communication at Lamar University, where he was a member of the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity. He later went on to earn a master's degree in print journalism from American University in Washington, DC, eventually returning there as an adjunct professor at the School of Communication. Media career His professional journey began in local television, including roles as an account executive at KBTV Fox 4 and an account manager with Cornerstone Media. Glenn later managed programs at Right Wing Broadcasting Network, steadily carving out a niche in conservative media. Over the years, he became a vocal supporter of Donald Trump, which helped him land his current position at Real America's Voice. As chief White House correspondent, Glenn often frames coverage through a pro-MAGA lens, making him a recognizable presence at press briefings and political events. Public profile and relationships Outside of his media career, Glenn is widely known for his relationship with Georgia Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. The two began dating in early 2023, going public later that year. Their relationship has drawn attention in both political and tabloid circles, with Greene calling him a 'great resource' in navigating media battles and Glenn once referring to them as 'MAGA America's favorite couple. '


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Gavin's tit-for-tat move: Proposes special election to counter Texas redistricting; sparks GOP outrage
Gavin Newsom (AP) In retaliation to Republican-led redistricting in Texas, California governor Gavin Newsom has urged the legislature to authorise a November special election aimed at approving a new congressional map, a move critics say undermines independent redistricting, reported news agency AP. Dubbed the Election Rigging Response Act, the measure would temporarily override the citizens redistricting commission - California's independent, voter-approved body, and return power to the Democratic-controlled Legislature to redraw congressional districts. The proposed map is designed to add five Democratic seats if GOP states such as Texas redraw theirs mid-decade. Newsom said the move is necessary to "fight back" against 'Trump-driven' partisan gerrymandering. Republican leaders wasted no time in condemning the proposal, Representative Doug LaMalfa fumed that the plan was 'an absolutely ridiculous gerrymander!', sarcastically noting that under the plan, his rural district would stretch all the way to Marin County. The California GOP labelled it a 'MASTERCLASS IN CORRUPTION'. While Representative Christian Martinez, on behalf of the NRCC, branded Newsom's initiative as 'a giant middle finger to every Californian,' as quoted by the agency. Not all critics are from the right. Arnold Schwarzenegger, former Republican governor and architect of California's independent redistricting commission, denounced the move, arguing that restoring partisan control over map drawing violates both reform ideals and democratic norms. Republicans have already filed a legal challenge with the state Supreme Court, claiming that the proposal violates the state constitution and lacks adequate public scrutiny. However, legal experts from UCLA and Loyola law schools suggest that the Legislature can legally propose constitutional amendments and that federal law does not prohibit mid-decade redistricting. Gavin Newsom's redistricting gambit has ignited fierce partisan backlash and renewed debate over democratic process versus political expediency. Whether California voters support this high-stakes countermeasure in November could reshape both state and national power dynamics, and perhaps shed light on the future of reform in electoral mapping.