
Trump administration weighs adding 36 countries to travel ban, memo says: Reuters
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is considering significantly expanding its travel restrictions by potentially banning citizens of 36 additional countries from entering the United States, according to an internal State Department cable seen by Reuters.
Earlier this month, the Republican president signed a proclamation that banned the entry of citizens from 12 countries, saying the move was needed to protect the United States against "foreign terrorists" and other national security threats.
The directive was part of an immigration crackdown Trump launched this year at the start of his second term, which has included the deportation to El Salvador of hundreds of Venezuelans suspected of being gang members, as well as efforts to deny enrollments of some foreign students from U.S. universities and deport others.
In an internal diplomatic cable signed by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the State Department outlined a dozen concerns about the countries in question and sought corrective action.
"The Department has identified 36 countries of concern that might be recommended for full or partial suspension of entry if they do not meet established benchmarks and requirements within 60 days," the cable sent out over the weekend said.
The cable was first reported by the Washington Post.
Among the concerns the State Department raised was the lack of a competent or cooperative government by some of the countries mentioned to produce reliable identity documents, the cable said. Another was "questionable security" of that country's passport.
Some countries, the cable said, were not cooperative in facilitating the removal of its nationals from the United States who were ordered to be removed. Some countries were overstaying the U.S. visas their citizens were being granted.
Other reasons for concern were the nationals of the country were involved in acts of terrorism in the United States, or antisemitic and anti-American activity.
The cable noted that not all of these concerns pertained to every country listed.
"We are constantly reevaluating policies to ensure the safety of Americans and that foreign nationals follow our laws," a senior State Department official said, declining to comment on specific internal deliberations and communications.
"The Department of State is committed to protecting our nation and its citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process," the official said.
The countries that could face a full or a partial ban if they do not address these concerns within the next 60 days are: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cote D'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
That would be a significant expansion of the ban that came into effect earlier this month. The countries affected were Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.
The entry of people from seven other countries - Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - has also been partially restricted.
During his first in office, Trump announced a ban on travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Greg Abbott To Sign Texas Property Tax Bill: What To Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Governor Greg Abbott is expected to sign new legislation offering property tax relief to homeowners in the state struggling with rising bills, on Monday. If endorsed by voters in November, the measures pushed forward by the GOP-led Texas legislature would significantly lower the cost of homeownership for millions of Lone Star State residents, including seniors and disabled owners, at a cost of over $3 billion. It would also dramatically slash revenues for local governments funding crucial public services, which the state would have to make up for. Why Do Texas Lawmakers And Abbott Want To Cut Property Taxes? While the Lone Star State is known for its relatively low tax environment, homeowners actually pay some of the highest property taxes in the country. These are levied by local governments and used for funding schools, streets, roads, police and fire protection. The governing body of each of these local governments sets its own tax rate based on a property's appraised value. But property taxes all across the U.S. have surged in step with home values since the pandemic, when historically low mortgage rates sparked a homebuying frenzy which had its epicenter in some of the country's most affordable states, including Texas. Between 2019 and 2023 alone, median property taxes in the Lone Star State rose by 26 percent, according to data by Cotality, formerly CoreLogic. Gov. Greg Abbott speaks during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025, in Austin, Texas. Gov. Greg Abbott speaks during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025, in Austin, of 2025, Texas homeowners are paying the seventh-highest property taxes in the nation, according to SmartAsset, at an effective rate of 1.63 percent. That is a lot higher than the national average, which stands at 0.90 percent, with the typical Texas homeowner paying $3,872 annually in property taxes. Abbott has long been trying to lower the property tax burden on Texas homeowners, signing in 2023 what was then the largest property tax cut in the state's history at $18 billion. But that intervention barely helped the many homeowners struggling with rising bills, and the Republican governor called for lowering property taxes as a priority during this year's legislative session. What Is In The New Package Of Property Tax Cuts? The package of property tax cuts that Abbott is expected to sign on Monday at the Robson Ranch clubhouse in Denton includes two bills recently passed by the Texas House and Senate that would back two constitutional amendments. One bill, SB 4, would raise the existing homestead exemption from $100,000 to $140,000 for all homeowners, while the other, SB 23, would raise it to $200,000 for those with disabilities or those aged 65 and above. "You've always heard that mantra, 'I don't want to rent my home—after it's paid for — from my school district,' " Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said after the two bills passed the Texas legislature. "Well, seniors, to the average senior out there, you're never going to have to do that again." SB includes a provision guaranteeing school districts would not lose funding due to the lower property taxes, trying to answer criticism that the cuts would harm public services. It would be up to the state to raise the difference—which is estimated at $3.5 billion. What Happens After Abbott Signs The Legislation? In order to implement the constitutional amendments approved by the legislation, voters would have to back the homestead exemption hikes in November. Texas Senator Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, who introduced the legislation, will be attending the signing ceremony on Monday. He said that he hopes there will be a "record turnout by the public" to get these tax cuts "enshrined" in the Texas constitution. Newsweek contacted Abbott's office and Bettencourt's office for comment by email on Monday morning.


Hamilton Spectator
24 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Wisconsin dairy farmer sues Trump administration claiming discrimination against white farmers
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin dairy farmer alleged in a federal lawsuit filed Monday that the Trump administration is illegally denying financial assistance to white farmers by continuing programs that favor minorities. The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture in federal court in Wisconsin on behalf of a white dairy farmer, Adam Faust. Faust was among several farmers who successfully sued the Biden administration in 2021 for race discrimination in the USDA's Farmer Loan Forgiveness Plan. The new lawsuit alleges the government has continued to implement diversity, equity and inclusion programs that were instituted under former President Joe Biden. The Wisconsin Institute wrote to the USDA in April warning of legal action, and six Republican Wisconsin congressmen called on the USDA to investigate and end the programs. 'The USDA should honor the President's promise to the American people to end racial discrimination in the federal government,' Faust said in a written statement. 'After being ignored by a federal agency that's meant to support agriculture, I hope my lawsuit brings answers, accountability, and results from USDA.' Trump administration spokesperson Anna Kelly did not immediately respond to an email Monday seeking comment. The lawsuit contends that Faust is one of 2 million white male American farmers who are subject to discriminatory race-based policies at the USDA. The lawsuit names three USDA programs and policies it says put white men at a disadvantage and violate the Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment by discriminating based on race and sex. Faust participates in one program designed to offset the gap between milk prices and the cost of feed, but the lawsuit alleges he is charged a $100 administrative fee that minority and female farmers do not have to pay. Faust also participates in a USDA program that guarantees 90% of the value of loans to white farmers, but 95% to women and racial minorities. That puts Faust at a disadvantage, the lawsuit alleges. Faust has also begun work on a new manure storage system that could qualify for reimbursement under a USDA environmental conservation program, but 75% of his costs are eligible while 90% of the costs of minority farmers qualify, the lawsuit contends. A federal court judge ruled in a similar 2021 case that granting loan forgiveness only to 'socially disadvantaged farmers' amounts to unconstitutional race discrimination. The Biden administration suspended the program and Congress repealed it in 2022. The Wisconsin Institute has filed dozens of such lawsuits in 25 states attacking DEI programs in government. In its April letter to the USDA, the law firm that has a long history of representing Republicans said it didn't want to sue 'but there is no excuse for this continued discrimination.' Trump has been aggressive in trying to end the government's DEI efforts to fulfill a campaign promise and bring about a profound cultural shift across the U.S. from promoting diversity to an exclusive focus on merit. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump, Paramount Global Are in 'Active Settlement Discussions' Over '60 Minutes' Lawsuit
President Trump and Paramount Global are in 'active settlement discussions' amid a lawsuit that Trump filed against the company over an interview that CBS' 60 Minutes aired last year with then-Vice President Kamala Harris. The revelation came in a motion filed Friday by Trump's attorneys asking for an extension in the deadlines in his lawsuit against Paramount Global, parent company of CBS. More from The Hollywood Reporter Mark Ruffalo, Jimmy Kimmel, Gracie Abrams, Kerry Washington and More Stars Participating in "No Kings" Protests Paramount to Cut Another 3.5 Percent of U.S. Staff As It Awaits Word On Skydance Deal Close Naveen Chopra Exits as Paramount Global CFO The motion states that both sides 'respectively submit that good cause to extend the deadlines set forth in the table below exists because the Parties are engaged in active settlement discussions, including continued mediation.' Trump alleges in the lawsuit that CBS News aired a 'heavily tampered interview' with Harris to help her in the election by editing certain answers in a way that misled viewers. Trump's team alleges that this constitutes a violation of Texas' consumer protection law covering deceptive advertising and the unfair competition prong of the Lanham Act, a trademark law. As previously reported, the two sides are currently in mediation talks to try and resolve the suit. Paramount reportedly previously offered $15 million to resolve the suit, which it also sought to dismiss earlier this year. Meanwhile, the FCC is reviewing the interview via its 'news distortion' filing comes two weeks after Paramount Global added three new board directors as it deals not only with the lawsuit, but also the proposed merger of Skydance Media and Paramount Global. Earlier this month, Paramount chair Shari Redstone revealed she had been diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire