Opinion: Political water cooler talk
The Legislature came out swinging against public employee unions this session. The bill passed the full House and a Senate committee before being slowed down. Why are these workers targeted and what is the likely outcome?
COWLEY: The divisive relationship between the UEA and Republican-led Legislature has added fuel to this fire. Unions are inherently political in nature, and that political power has disproportionately been deployed to benefit Democrats, but union members aren't necessarily the stalwarts of liberal values they once were. Many union workers voted for Trump. Unions are made up of blue-collar workers who are feeling the sting of inflation at the grocery store and gas pump. Many are gun owners. That all sounds pretty Republican to me, so why are some unions, particularly the UEA, still carrying the banner of Democrat causes? The Legislature doesn't want liberal union leadership speaking for all public employees. My suggestion: Address the problem, but leave the police and firefighters out of it.
The Legislature introduced a substitute bill that would require a recertification vote every five years granting the union collective bargaining authority on behalf of all employees, union and non-union. The bill does not impact the right to join a union.
PIGNANELLI: 'I learned from my father to respect the dignity of work and the dignity of working people.' — Donald Trump
When in private legal practice, I was honored to represent many Utahns — hired by a public agency — in various employment disputes and wage negotiations. These included school employees (i.e. custodians, school bus drivers, secretaries, etc.), police officers and firefighters.
I advocated for them in multiple settings with elected or prominent appointed officials. The associations to which they belonged retained me or provided support otherwise. Almost always, the agency on the other side enjoyed professional assistance. Thus, such trade organizations help level the playing field for these good people.
Public employees have statutory protections, but navigating sometimes turbulent waters requires external help. Fellow citizens who protect our children and keep us all safe have the right to associate with their colleagues to also help them. The freedom of association provided in our federal and state constitutions recognizes these fundamental considerations.
True to his campaign promises, Trump froze billions of dollars of federal funding about to go out the door. A federal court has halted the action for now, but if Trump prevails, how will this impact Utah?
COWLEY: Promises made, promises kept. Trump said for years on the campaign trail that he would drastically cut government spending. Why is anyone surprised that he is actually doing it? Perhaps because we have heard this perennial promise from just about every presidential candidate, but none have followed through.
Cutting spending is a great rallying cry for those worried about our ballooning national debt, but when it comes down to the brass tacks, there is a real price to be paid for all these cost-cutting measures. Each federal program, no matter how obscure, has a constituency that deeply cares about it. Many are happy to see pork cut until it is their golden goose headed to slaughter.
Trump's goals to address the national debt, reestablish domestic manufacturing dominance and restore border security aren't achievable without some sacrifices — withholding federal funds and implementing tariffs. Time will tell how much fiscal pain voters are willing to endure to see these principles come to fruition.
In a tight budget year, this freeze would make the Legislature's constitutional obligation to balance the budget even harder.
PIGNANELLI: About a quarter of our state budget is from federal sources, and much more is spent in Utah through other activities. Such reliance on Washington, D.C., is replicated in the other states, thus explaining consternation with Trump's freeze on grants.
Interest payments on the national debt are now the highest spending category in the federal budget. Although the philosophical underpinnings of Trump's actions are rational, he once again selected a sledgehammer over a more productive scalpel. This was disturbing to members of both parties. Yet, Trump is signaling that much more discomfort is in the future if the usual talk of reducing the deficit translates into action.
Trump's cabinet is almost complete, having endured Senate interrogations, but three nominees still remain. Will RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel get the green light, and what is Utah's delegation saying about them?
COWLEY: Moderate Republicans feel pressure to not rubber stamp every single Trump cabinet appointee and policies. They may use these last few appointees to make a stand. Utah's Sen. Curtis expressed his concern with Tulsi, RFK has drawn criticism from both the left and right for his stance on vaccines, and Patel faced one of the most contentious Senate inquisitions yet. Protestations and feigning apprehension, then voting for these cabinet members, may be enough for moderates to demonstrate their independence from Team Trump without incurring its ire.
PIGNANELLI: Curtis' mild hesitancy on Gabbard has prompted a flurry of activity. But her approval by the Senate Intelligence Committee will likely secure her Senate confirmation. This will make it easier for Kennedy and Patel.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
Did 'Big Beautiful Bill' include no tax on overtime? What to know about Trump's 'promises kept'
President Donald Trump on July 4 signed into law a megabill that he has dubbed the "Big Beautiful Bill" and includes a number of policies he promised on the campaign trail. The bill passed the House of Representatives the day before after an intense debate in the Senate, where some members of his own party voted against it with complaints on the bill's price tag and the cuts to Medicaid. But Trump touted his "promises made, promises kept," as he signed the legislation on the White House's South Lawn on the 249th Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Of those promises, the bill includes tax breaks on tips and overtime. Here is what to know: More: Will Trump's big tax bill help or hurt you? Why it could depend on your income Does the bill include no tax on overtime? Yes, the bill includes a tax break for overtime and tips. Workers will be able to deduct up to $25,000 in tips (so long as they "customarily and regularly receive them, like servers). Workers can also deduct $12,500 in overtime pay, but the temporary law ends Dec. 31, 2028, shortly before Trump leaves office. Individuals earning more than $150,000 will be eligible, but for reduced deductions. When will the tips, overtime deduction go into effect? This year. The deductions are in effect for taxable years starting Jan. 1, 2025. What no tax on tips or overtime mean for workers The deduction method means workers won't see an immediate boost in take-home pay, but the deduction could mean better news after filing taxes. The tax break sounds universal, but it's slanted toward middle- and higher-income earners — workers who owe enough federal income tax for the deductions to make a real difference. Here are some examples of how the tax breaks could shake out: But some tipped and overtime workers won't see much benefit, if any. The federal tax system is progressive: the more you make, the more you owe. That means deductions like these give the biggest benefit to those with significant taxable income. Plus, state income taxes still apply. Contributing: Zac Anderson, Bailey Schulz, Jim Sergent, Janet Loehrke, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @

Los Angeles Times
16 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump administration revokes terrorism designation of new Syrian leader's group
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is revoking the terrorism designation of a group led by Syria's new president as part of a broader U.S. engagement with the transitional government since the ouster of former leader Bashar Assad late last year. In a statement released on Monday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the move, which will take effect on Tuesday, 'recognizes the positive actions taken by the new Syrian government' under President Ahmad al-Sharaa. Earlier Monday, the Federal Register published an advance notice, which said Rubio made the decision on June 23 in consultation with the attorney general and Treasury secretary. The decision had not been previously announced, although it was made as the Trump administration has been moving to ease or end many U.S. sanctions that had been imposed during Assad's rule. The step looks to further end Syria's isolation since a lightning rebel offensive ousted the Assad family from decades of rule and gives the new government a boost as it tries to rebuild a country shattered by 13 years of civil war. The brief notice offered no details about the revocation of the foreign terrorist organization designation for the al-Nusrah Front, also known as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham. Al-Nusrah was originally designated a foreign terrorist organization for its previous affiliation with Al Qaeda. In 2017, it split and changed its name to Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, which the first Trump administration added to the initial designation. Syria has been improving relations with the United States and other Western countries following the fall of Assad in December in an offensive led by Al-Sharaa 's group. On June 30, seven days after Rubio signed the revocation, President Trump signed an executive order ending many U.S. economic sanctions on Syria, following through on a promise he made to Al-Sharaa when the two met in Saudi Arabia in May. 'This FTO revocation is an important step in fulfilling President Trump's vision of a stable, unified, and peaceful Syria,' Rubio said in his statement. Trump's executive order did not rescind sanctions imposed on Assad, his top aides, family members and officials who had been determined to have committed human rights abuses or been involved in drug trafficking or part of Syria's chemical weapons program. It also leaves intact a major set of sanctions passed by Congress targeting anyone doing business with or offering support to Syria's military, intelligence or other suspect institutions. While the Trump administration has passed temporary waivers on those sanctions, known as the Caesar Act, they can only be permanently repealed by law. Lee writes for the Associated Press.

Wall Street Journal
23 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Shares More Letters Declaring Tariff Rates for Countries
President Trump on Monday shared a half a dozen new letters informing countries of their new tariff rates, which will go into effect on Aug. 1. The letters, published on Truth Social, say that the U.S. will be enacting anywhere from 25% to 40% tariffs on a range of countries. Laos and Myanmar, for instance, will get hit with a 40% tariff starting on Aug. 1. Kazakhstan and Malaysia, on the other hand, will see each see a 25% tariff. Trump earlier on Monday published letters to Japan and South Korea that say he plans to put into effect 25% tariffs on their products coming into the United States. The letters say the countries will be allowed to continue to negotiate with the U.S., with Trump keeping open the possibility of either raising or dropping the tariff rates by the end of July.