FSSAI 'Promise', Irked Sangh Affiliates: Double Trouble For Centre As US Pushes For GM Crops
Last Updated:
New Delhi is deeply concerned about the US's insistence that India permit the import of genetically-modified (GM) products, which are widely controversial in India.
As India and the United States navigate complex negotiations over a Bilateral Trade Agreement concerning agricultural products, a particularly sensitive issue has emerged – agriculture. The US aims to introduce its apples, corn, and soybeans into the Indian market. However, New Delhi is deeply concerned about the US's insistence that India permit the import of genetically-modified (GM) products, which are widely controversial in India. To date, BT Cotton is the only GM crop approved for commercial cultivation in India, since 2002.
New Delhi's concerns are well-founded, with both legal and political dimensions. In 2017, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) assured the Supreme Court that no GMOs were allowed in the country. However, the following year, this stance was somewhat adjusted.
In 2007, the Union Health Ministry had issued a notification directing the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) to continue regulating GM food as the FSSAI had not yet formulated the necessary regulations or had the required domain expertise. Consequently, the GEAC transferred nine applications for the import of herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant soybean and rapeseed oils from Monsanto Holdings, Dow AgroSciences, and Pioneer Hi-Bred Seeds to the FSSAI.
In August 2017, the Supreme Court instructed the FSSAI to create regulations and guidelines for GM food articles and to seek Parliament's approval for them. Yet, by 2018, the FSSAI was still in the process of doing so, according to its own admission.
The current trade negotiations have hit a new hurdle with the US steadfast on pushing GM maize and GM soybeans, neither of which are legally permitted in India. Government sources suggest that any alteration in this stance could trigger judicial intervention and provoke the ire of the extensive farmers' lobby in India, who view GM crops as detrimental. Consequently, the government is cognizant of the significant political costs involved in altering the status quo for a trade deal.
As discussions continue between New Delhi and Washington DC, this impasse might delay the agreement beyond the anticipated July 8 deadline, after which new tariffs of 26 per cent are set to be implemented in the absence of a trade deal.
WHY WILL IT ANGER RSS AFFILIATES?
Even the faintest hint of compromising on the issue of GM crops will first face opposition from within – particularly from affiliates of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). The Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM), the RSS's economic wing, has been a vociferous critic of GM crops and foods in India for an extended period.
Ashwani Mahajan, the Co-Convenor of SJM, elaborates, 'There are three reasons we oppose GM crops. Firstly, the incidence of cancer in the US is 350 per 100,000 people, compared to 100 per 100,000 in India, largely due to prevalent GM crops in the US. Do we want that? Secondly, our food exports, particularly to European nations that have banned GM foods, stand at $50 billion. If we permit GM crops, they will inevitably infiltrate our food system, jeopardising our exports. Lastly, there are numerous voices within the government against GM crops."
Recently, a NITI Aayog working paper recommended that the Centre import genetically modified agricultural products like maize and soybean. Coincidentally, the US is also advocating for the inclusion of these GM products in India. In response, another Sangh affiliate, the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh (BKS), launched a vehement critique against the NITI Aayog, accusing it of capitulating to US demands.
Mahajan adds that the Modi government seems to be standing firm on this issue. 'According to my information, the Centre isn't going that way, for which I am thankful," he states.
WHAT ARE GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS?
Genetically Modified (GM) crops are plants whose genetic material has been altered using biotechnology to introduce desirable traits. This modification is done by inserting genes from other organisms to improve resistance to pests, diseases, or environmental conditions, or to enhance nutritional value and shelf life. Unlike traditional crossbreeding, GM technology allows precise changes at the DNA level.
While GM crops can boost yields and reduce pesticide use, they also raise concerns about environmental impact, food safety, and corporate control of seeds, sparking global debates over their adoption and regulation.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
FSSAI genetically modified crops India-US trade deal rss
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 26, 2025, 11:10 IST
News india FSSAI 'Promise', Irked Sangh Affiliates: Double Trouble For Centre As US Pushes For GM Crops
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India seizes 39 containers with Pakistani-origin goods routed via UAE
The anti-smuggling arm of the Finance Ministry, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), has seized 39 containers carrying 1,115 metric tonnes of goods worth around Rs 9 crore, of Pakistani origin, that were being routed to India via the UAE in the backdrop of the Pahalgam terror attacks, the government said in a statement on Thursday. This came after the government had terminated direct trade with Pakistan, marked by the closure of the Integrated Check Post (ICP) at Attari on April 24, following the Pahalgam terror attack. Later, the government banned direct or indirect import or transit of goods originating in or exported from Pakistan on May 2. 'DRI launched an operation codenamed Operation Deep Manifest, targeting the illegal import of Pakistani-origin goods routed through third countries, primarily via Dubai, UAE. The operation has so far led to the seizure of 39 containers carrying 1,115 metric tonnes of goods valued at approximately Rs 9 crore. One of the partners of an importing firm was arrested on June 26,' the Ministry of Finance said in a statement. The Indian Express had reported on May 16 that the DRI had begun seizing in-transit goods originating from Pakistan after Customs authorities increased scrutiny in the wake of the Pahalgam terrorist attack. The Ministry of Commerce had last year raised the issue of Pakistani dates and dry fruits entering India through the UAE after the two countries signed a free trade agreement in 2022. Despite these stringent measures, some importers have attempted to bypass the policy by 'misdeclaring the origin of goods' and manipulating related shipping documents, the statement said. 'In two separate cases, these consignments were seized at Nhava Sheva Port. The consignments were falsely declared as being of UAE origin, masking their Pakistani provenance. However, investigations revealed that these goods actually originated from Pakistan and were merely transshipped via Dubai for import into India,' the Ministry said. The government stated that investigations conducted so far had uncovered cargo movement trails from Karachi Port, Pakistan, and transshipments at Jebel Ali Port, Dubai – en route to Indian ports. Furthermore, money transfers and financial linkages with Pakistani entities were traced, raising serious concerns about illicit financial flows. 'The entire modus operandi was orchestrated through a complex web of transactions involving Pakistani and UAE nationals, aimed at obscuring the true origin of the goods – namely Pakistan.' According to estimates by the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), around $10 billion worth of Indian goods reach Pakistan via trans-shipment hub routes. Tensions between the two countries – particularly after the 2019 Pulwama attack – reduced bilateral trade from Rs 4,370.78 crore in 2018–19 to Rs 2,257.55 crore in 2022–23. However, trade rebounded to Rs 3,886.53 crore in 2023–24, the highest in the past five years. Notably, total cargo movement also declined from 49,102 consignments in 2018–19 to just 3,827 in 2022–23, the data shows. In dollar terms, annual India–Pakistan trade has shrunk to around $2 billion over the past five years – a small fraction of the $37 billion trade potential estimated by the World Bank. India's overall goods trade stands at $430 billion, while Pakistan's is approximately $100 billion. The curbing of trade marks a significant shift from the late 1990s, when India took the initiative to boost bilateral trade by extending Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status to Pakistan in 1996, leading to a surge in trading volumes. However, Pakistan never reciprocated by granting the same status to India. In 2019, India revoked Pakistan's MFN status following the Pulwama terrorist attack. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Interim govt's responsibility to protect Hindus: India on Dhaka temple destruction
India on Thursday expressed 'dismay' at the 'destruction' of a temple in Dhaka, and underlined that 'it is the responsibility of the interim government of Bangladesh to protect Hindus, their properties, and religious institutions'. According to MEA official spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, 'We understand that extremists were clamoring for demolishing the Durga temple in Khilkhet, Dhaka.' 'The interim government, instead of providing security to the temple, projected the episode as illegal land use … and they allowed the destruction of the temple today. This has resulted in damage to the deity before it was shifted,' he said. 'We are dismayed that such incidents continue to recur in Bangladesh. Let me underline that it is the responsibility of the interim government of Bangladesh to protect Hindus, their properties, and religious institutions,' Jaiswal said. On trade issues with Bangladesh, he said, 'the trade-related amendments announced by India in respect of Bangladesh were based on Bangladesh's own quest for fairness, equal treatment, and reciprocity. We await resolution of the underlying issues pending with the Bangladeshi side for a long time. These issues have been raised by India at several structured meetings earlier, including at the Commerce Secretary-level talks.' In May this year, India decided to put restrictions on Bangladesh products to be exported to north-east India and overseas, in what is being seen as a reciprocal move after Dhaka has been imposing non-tariff barriers on Indian exports to Bangladesh. This also comes a month and half after Bangladesh interim government's chief advisor Prof Muhammad Yunus had called north-east India as 'landlocked' and that they have 'no way to reach' the Bay of Bengal. India has imposed port restrictions on specified Bangladesh exports to India across all land customs stations (LCSs) or integrated check posts (ICPs) in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram; and through Changrabandha and Fulbari in northern Bengal. The products include readymade garments, wooden furniture, plastics, juice, bakery and confectionery items, and cotton yarn among others. Separately, in respect of readymade garments port restrictions are to apply to Bangladesh exports to India across all landports, permitting imports through Kolkata and Nhava Sheva seaports only. On the negotiations for renewal of the Ganges water treaty with Bangladesh, which is going to expire in 2026, the MEA spokesperson said, 'Both India and Bangladesh, we share 54 rivers, which also includes the Ganga. To discuss all relevant issues that form part of this cooperation, the two countries have a bilateral mechanism in place, which is the Joint Rivers Commission. We also have consultations of concerned state governments, representatives in our own internal consultations on such issues to frame our approach. We are prepared to engage with Bangladesh on all matters in an environment that is conducive for mutually beneficial dialogue.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Rajnath refuses to sign SCO communique over exclusion of Pahalgam attack
Defence Minister Rajanth Singh on Thursday refused to sign a joint communique of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) at a meeting of its defence ministers in Qingdao, China, because it had omitted the Pahalgam terror attack and had not explicitly addressed India's concern over Pakistan-backed cross-border terrorism. While Singh demanded including the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, in which terrorists killed 26 people, in the communique, the Pakistani delegation insisted on the document having a paragraph on militant activities in Balochistan. Pakistan had in the past accused India of fomenting militancy in Balochistan. 'The SCO Defence Ministers' meeting took place in China. We understand that the member countries could not reach a consensus on certain issues and hence the document could not be finalised,' Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said here. The SCO operates under the framework of consensus, and Singh's refusal to endorse the document resulted in the SCO defence ministers' conclave in this Chinese port city ending without a joint communique. India became a full member of the SCO in 2017. Its other members include Kazakhstan, China, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Iran, and Belarus. Singh is on a two-day visit to China, the first by an Indian defence minister since the Galwan River valley clash in 2020. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had skipped the previous SCO summit in 2024, in Astana. China will host this year's SCO summit in Tianjin. Expectations are that Modi will attend it, given India and China's recent efforts at improving their ties after he and Chinese President Xi Jinping met in Russia in October. National Security Adviser Ajit Doval met Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing on June 23 on the sidelines of a meeting of the security-council secretaries of the SCO. Singh separately met Russian Defence Minister Andrey Belousov in Qingdao, and said in a social media post that the talks would boost Russia-India ties. In his address at the conclave, Singh took a swipe at Pakistan for its relentless support to cross-border terrorism and underlined the need to bring 'perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of terrorism to justice'. 'Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. The SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations,' he said. The defence minister, who arrived in Qingdao on Wednesday, laid down the broad contours of India's 'transitional shift' in its policy against terrorism and urged the SCO member nations to unite in combating and shun 'double standards'. 'Dealing with these challenges requires decisive action. It is imperative that those who sponsor, nurture, and utilise terrorism for their narrow and selfish ends must bear the consequences,' he said. Singh also said that the pattern of the Pahalgam terror attack matched Lashkar-e-Taiba's previous terror attacks in India. 'During the Pahalgam terror attack, victims were shot after they were profiled on religious identity. The Resistance Front, a proxy of United Nations-designated terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba claimed responsibility for the attack,' he said. 'The joint statement of the Council of SCO Heads of State on 'Countering Radicalisation leading to Terrorism, Separatism and Extremism' issued during India's chairmanship symbolises our shared commitment,' he stated.
