
Democrats, Divided on Trans Issues, Struggle to Speak in One Voice
Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post
President Donald Trump signs an executive order banning transgender athletes from participating in women's sports at the White House in February.
Prominent Democrats are pushing their party to rethink its approach to transgender issues, particularly when it comes to women's sports, at times warning they have fallen out of step with the public and need to recalibrate for future elections.
Some elected officials and strategists have urged Democrats to embrace restrictions on trans athletes. Many others want to strike a more sympathetic tone toward those who oppose trans competitors' participation after an election in which President Donald Trump and other Republicans used the issue to cast Democrats as out-of-touch.
But another swath of the party views this trend as a dangerous shift – an abdication of Democrats' values and a capitulation to Trump, who has moved in his second term to curtail trans rights.
Across the country, Democrats are far less eager than Republicans to talk about trans issues – an indicator of the political vise they feel they are in as they confront GOP attacks and pressure from opposing camps in their party. The issue flared again this past week after a trans athlete won gold at a high school track and field championship in California. Many Democrats say the debate over trans athletes in women's sports should be left to school districts and sports groups.
'It's a hard and really legitimate conversation for people to have and for communities to have,' said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Connecticut). 'And I think this speaks to a broader problem that our party has. We look at people who, you know, don't line up with us on a host of social and cultural issues, and we judge them pretty harshly too often.'
As Trump vowed 'large scale fines' over trans teen AB Hernandez's medals in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) – who broke with much of his party this year on trans athletes – stayed quiet. A representative for former vice president Kamala Harris, who is now eyeing a potential run for California governor or another White House bid, did not respond to a request for comment on the matter. Several other potential Democratic presidential contenders did not reply to requests to clarify their views on trans athletes' participation. On Capitol Hill, Democratic lawmakers often appeared wary of wading into the subject on the spot, even as many denounced Trump's rollbacks of LGBTQ rights at the outset of Pride Month.
Trump and Republicans are eager to bring it up. 'A Biological male competed in California Girls State Finals, WINNING BIG, despite the fact that they were warned by me not to do so,' Trump wrote last week on social media after Hernandez was allowed to compete at the California championship. He threatened 'large scale fines.'
Most Americans support protecting trans people from discrimination in jobs, housing and public spaces, according to a Pew Research Center survey early this year. At the same time, polls show that most support banning gender transition care for minors and oppose trans athletes participating in women's sports. One recent poll found that 89 percent of Republicans, 74 percent of independents and 44 percent of Democrats believe that someone's gender is determined by their sex at birth.
Democratic strategists say they are trying to figure out how to blunt anti-trans attacks in the midterms and beyond. Some argue Democrats are allowing a political vulnerability to fester by mostly avoiding the subject. Third Way, a center-left think tank, is urging Democrats to embrace some restrictions on trans athletes while also taking the position that local groups and school districts, not politicians, should make the rules about participation in sports.
'There's absolutely no question that Republicans were able to use this issue to paint Democrats as a whole, and the Harris campaign, as way outside the cultural mainstream,' Jon Cowan, the co-founder and president of Third Way, said of trans issues. 'And since the election, there's been no kind of reckoning or redirection on the part of the party.'
But some trans rights advocates see a party backing further away from a moral debate. 'They're absolutely moving to the right,' Charlotte Clymer, a trans activist and Democratic operative, said of the party. 'If not by specifically taking anti-trans positions, then by the increasing silence.'
Others are advising candidates to call trans issues a distraction and redirect to other topics such as Republican proposals to cut Medicaid spending. Some Democrats are casting Republicans as 'anti-freedom' and accusing them of interfering with parents and doctors. Strategists have said they plan to study ways to combat the kinds of targeted attacks centering on trans issues that Trump's campaign used to try to make inroads with minority voters. Trump's team believed their ads on gender identity were effective with Black men, for instance, and highlighted reactions from that demographic in one commercial criticizing Harris's comments on gender transition care.
Pete Buttigieg, who made history as an openly gay presidential candidate and could run again in 2028, called for 'empathy' in a recent podcast appearance – empathy for trans students in a 'terrifying' position but also 'empathy for people who sincerely want to make sure that sports are safe and fair.'
Leigh Finke, the first trans woman elected to the state legislature in Minnesota, said she sympathizes with the political bind many Democrats feel they are in. She called the issue of trans competitors in women's sports 'a trap,' said Democrats should focus on other things such as economic inequality and emphasized how rare trans athletes are: The president of the National Collegiate Athletic Association recently estimated that fewer than 10 are competing across NCAA sports.
But Finke also argued the backlash to trans athletes in women's sports is part of a broader Republican movement to 'get trans people out of all civic spaces and social spaces.' If Democrats cede ground on sports, 'they'll just move on to the next space,' she said.
The issue was front-and-center in last year's election. Ads for Trump told voters that 'Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you.' A Washington Post analysis of data compiled by AdImpact shows that Republicans spent nearly $215 million on network TV ads that targeted transgender rights, at least $111 million of which specifically mentioned sports.
Harris largely steered clear of gender identity in her campaign – saying when pressed that she was 'not going to put myself in the position of doctor' – but Republicans zeroed in on past comments, including her support for making gender-affirming surgery available to federal prisoners and detained migrants.
After the election, some Democrats, including Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Massachusetts), suggested their party was out of step and said they opposed trans athletes in women's sports. The backlash was fierce: Moulton's campaign manager resigned, local Democrats threatened a primary challenge and a protest sprang up in Moulton's hometown.
More recently, Newsom – a potential 2028 presidential candidate who led Democrats on gay rights early in his career – suggested on his podcast that 'it's deeply unfair' for trans athletes to participate in women's sports. His comment drew pushback from fellow liberals that continued at the California Democratic Convention last weekend.
'Shame on any of us who throws a trans child under the bus,' former Democratic vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz said in a speech there. 'That child deserves our support. Don't worry about the pollsters calling it distractions, because we need to be the party of human dignity.'
The controversy over California's track and field championship has put Newsom back in the spotlight. Trump noted Newsom's comments on fairness last week while accusing his blue state of violating an executive order aimed at banning trans athletes from women's sports. The two played phone tag, Newsom's office said, but had not connected.
Ahead of the track meet, Newsom's office praised rule changes at the California Interscholastic Federation, an independent nonprofit, that allowed additional women to participate after a trans athlete qualified. When Hernandez, the trans athlete, finished first in the high jump, she shared the gold medal with two other women.
That did not satisfy Trump. And some Democrats said the California sports association's rule changes meant to address complaints about fairness were not a broad solution.
'It doesn't work for team sports,' said Finke, the Minnesota lawmaker. 'It's not a policy solution as much as it is trying to work around an individual crisis.'
Some LGBTQ rights advocates said most Democrats have not wavered on trans issues and praised politicians such as Maine Gov. Janet Mills (D), who vocally defied Trump's executive order on trans athletes.
Early this year in Congress, only two Democratic lawmakers voted for a Republican bill to ban transgender athletes from women's sports. Many others said federal lawmakers should stay out of the issue.
Democratic strategist Mark Riddle said his group recently found that voters across the political spectrum responded positively to a comment that Rahm Emanuel, a possible 2028 Democratic candidate, made at a conference this year: 'I am done with the discussion of what locker room kids use. I am done with the discussion of bathrooms. We better start having a conversation about the classroom.'
'Voters want to move on from the culture wars,' Riddle said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Times
19 minutes ago
- Japan Times
The MAGA odd couple turns combustible
Relationship status: It's complicated. The simmering feud between U.S. President Donald Trump and tech titan Elon Musk has gone public, sending Tesla's stock tumbling then rebounding, calling his government contracts into question and leaving Trump possibly in a more commanding position over the world's richest man. But really, who knows what to make of this always-odd pairing between two erratic men? Late Thursday, Musk signaled he was open to a detente. Reports of a Friday phone call surfaced and were then dismissed by Trump, and all against the backdrop of pleadings from a MAGA world riven by the prospect of their leaders turning on each other. Yet little is permanent in Trump world, except for chaos and disruption. Where this goes from here and how it ends is anyone's guess, but what's clear is that the political friendship that saw two of the world's most powerful men attached at the hip at the beginning of Trump's presidency has now become an unstable mess. This, of course, is no way to run a country. The daylong brawl starkly revealed what had always been plainly obvious: This relationship is transactional and has always smelled of corruption, with Musk's $270 million campaign contribution buying him a powerful foothold in the government, including billions in contracts and access to data and the inner workings of federal agencies. It was only last week that Trump gifted Musk with a golden key to the White House, saying his "service to America has been without comparison in modern history' and commemorating his final day as a special government employee. But that send-off couldn't paper over the increasing cracks in the friendship. Musk had become a political liability to Trump, even as the president became a business liability to the world's richest man. The union has cost Musk billions, damaging his brand and leading him to suggest he was done with politics. "I think I've done enough,' Musk said in a Bloomberg interview last month when asked about his political spending on Trump and the Republican cause. The billionaire, who operates the Building America's Future PAC, had vowed to spend $100 million on the midterms, though that's now in doubt. And in ceding such power to Musk, Trump marred the first 100 days of his presidency with erratic cuts, mistakes and walk-backs that led to infighting among staff and cabinet members who couldn't control Musk. His Department of Government Efficiency was largely a failure, with costs likely outweighing savings, federal spending continuing to rise and the Trump administration now undoing some of DOGE's firings. In the days after his official tenure wrapped up, Musk then proved just how uncontrollable he was, training his fire on Trump's massive reconciliation bill, calling it an "abomination.' "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' Musk, the wannabe kingmaker, threatened on X on Tuesday. But the feud has the potential to be as damaging to both men as their unlikely friendship proved to be. At stake for Trump is the kind of muscle, megaphone and money that only Musk can bring, given his status among the powerful techno right bros who fueled Trump's campaign and the GOP more broadly. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote on X. "Such ingratitude.' Most of Trump's political alliances have had a sell-by date, but his relationship with Musk has been like no other. For Trump, Musk was a force multiplier, magnifying his stature and bringing other billionaires, tech bros and regular bros along with him. But in challenging Trump, and particularly by bringing up his connection to Jeffrey Epstein, Musk tests his power over MAGA and puts himself — and his companies — at risk of canceled contracts and potentially even federal government investigations. Trump holds tremendous power over Musk's vast wealth. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' This was scorched earth, revealing Trump's strong hand and Musk's big weakness. Ultimately, MAGA belongs to Trump. As for the massive bill, it will still likely pass in some form, though Musk has now put a spotlight on the worst parts of it — it adds $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade and is hardly MAGA. Meanwhile, some Democrats have suggested that Musk is a potential free agent and should be courted and brought into the fold. But that would be a mistake. An alliance with Musk is akin to having a tiger by its tail in a very small and crowded tent. There are no good choices and the only certainty is chaos. Nia-Malika Henderson is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.


Kyodo News
an hour ago
- Kyodo News
Japan's top negotiator eyes U.S. trip this week for 6th tariff talks
KYODO NEWS - 4 hours ago - 13:30 | All, Japan Japan's top tariff negotiator is arranging a visit to the United States later this week for a sixth round of ministerial-level talks aimed at securing concessions over a series of tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump, a government source said Monday. The fourth trip in as many weeks by Ryosei Akazawa, minister in charge of economic and fiscal policy, would come ahead of an envisioned meeting between the leaders of Japan and the United States at the time of the three-day Group of Seven summit in Canada from June 15. Akazawa is expected to meet U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick again, after holding talks with them last week in Washington, the source said. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's government is urging the Trump administration to remove the additional tariffs, saying they are having a serious impact on Japan's export-oriented economy, which has been languishing as an important national election looms this summer. Following the fifth round of talks with U.S. officials, Akazawa told reporters that discussions on tariff issues between Japan and the United States are progressing, but the two sides have "yet to find common ground." After returning to Tokyo on Sunday, Akazawa pledged to continue "intensive" deliberations on trade expansion, non-tariff barriers and bilateral cooperation on economic security, with Trump expected to continue pursuing protectionist policies. Akazawa, who met with Ishiba on the day of his return to report the outcome of his visit, said the Japanese and U.S. leaders may talk directly once the ministerial-level negotiations reach a point where an agreement is in sight. Under Trump's so-called reciprocal tariff regime, announced on April 2, nearly every nation in the world has been hit with a baseline duty of 10 percent, with Japan facing an additional country-specific tariff of 14 percent for a total rate of 24 percent. Japan has also been affected by Trump's extra 25 percent tariff on automobiles, along with other sector-specific levies imposed on national security grounds. Tokyo presented a package of proposals to Washington over the period since the first ministerial meeting in mid-April. The package includes joint supply chain efforts on semiconductors and critical minerals, cooperation in shipbuilding, greater U.S. farm imports and streamlined safety rules for foreign-made cars, sources close to the matter said. Related coverage: Japan, U.S. yet to find common ground on tariffs but want quick deal Japan, EU eye launch of "competitive alliance" scheme to boost trade Japan calls for tariff rethink in talks with U.S. commerce chief


Japan Today
3 hours ago
- Japan Today
Japan's tariff negotiator arranging 6th U.S. trip for this week
The U.S. and Japanese flags flutter outside a government building in Washington. Japan's top tariff negotiator is arranging a visit to the United States later this week for a sixth round of ministerial-level talks aimed at securing concessions over a series of tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump, a government source said Monday. The fourth trip in as many weeks by Ryosei Akazawa, minister in charge of economic and fiscal policy, would come ahead of an envisioned meeting between the leaders of Japan and the United States at the time of the three-day Group of Seven summit in Canada from June 15. Akazawa is expected to meet U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick again, after holding talks with them last week in Washington, the source said. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's government is urging the Trump administration to remove the additional tariffs, saying they are having a serious impact on Japan's export-oriented economy, which has been languishing as an important national election looms this summer. Following the fifth round of talks with U.S. officials, Akazawa told reporters that discussions on tariff issues between Japan and the United States are progressing, but the two sides have "yet to find common ground." After returning to Tokyo on Sunday, Akazawa pledged to continue "intensive" deliberations on trade expansion, non-tariff barriers and bilateral cooperation on economic security, with Trump expected to continue pursuing protectionist policies. Akazawa, who met with Ishiba on the day of his return to report the outcome of his visit, said the Japanese and U.S. leaders may talk directly once the ministerial-level negotiations reach a point where an agreement is in sight. Under Trump's so-called reciprocal tariff regime, announced on April 2, nearly every nation in the world has been hit with a baseline duty of 10 percent, with Japan facing an additional country-specific tariff of 14 percent for a total rate of 24 percent. Japan has also been affected by Trump's extra 25 percent tariff on automobiles, along with other sector-specific levies imposed on national security grounds. Tokyo presented a package of proposals to Washington over the period since the first ministerial meeting in mid-April. The package includes joint supply chain efforts on semiconductors and critical minerals, cooperation in shipbuilding, greater U.S. farm imports and streamlined safety rules for foreign-made cars, sources close to the matter said. © KYODO