Cancer: Toxic air in the kitchen: Gas stoves found to emit "cancer-causing" benzene indoors
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
But beneath those glowy blue and orange flames lies a growing public health concern.
A New study published, titled
,' reveals that these everyday appliances release Benzene, a well-documented carcinogen, directly into household air during use. As indoor air pollution gains urgent attention, the latest research uncovers just how dangerous this can be.
The suspect in question
Benzene is a volatile organic compound that is listed as a Group 1 human carcinogen by the World Health Organization.
It is an aromatic, colorless, or light-yellow liquid chemical at room temperature and is mainly used as a solvent in chemical and pharmaceutical applications.
How are individuals exposed to benzene?
Employees in manufacturing industries that handle benzene are exposed to its highest concentrations, even though exposure has been decreased by federal and state laws over the last few decades. If you smoke, be careful! 90% of benzene exposure results from cigarette smoking.
It is present in common products like glues, adhesives, and cleaning agents.
How was the study conducted
Researchers used the National Institute of Standards and Technology's CONTAM model to recreate how benzene emitted from gas and propane stoves disperses in a variety of typical U.S homes, ranging from smaller apartments to larger houses.
The team further applied the U.S EPA's health risk assessment framework to estimate incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) and other health impacts.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
And they particularly found that leukemia is associated with benzene exposure.
What were the key findings
Benzene travels to bedrooms and living rooms
Due to high intake relative to body weight, kids face nearly double the cancer risk compared to adults.
Ventilation helps but is not enough. Even with good ventilation, modelled benzene levels sometimes remained above safe limits
Among 6.3 million U.S residents exposed to the highest-emitting stoves, the study estimates 16-69 additional leukemia cases per year could occur under high-use conditions.
Further, this study is the first to quantify these long-term cancer risks using a full risk assessment approach. It highlights that gas stoves emit not only carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides but also carcinogens that can silently accumulate over time.
The bigger problem is: What about the people who live in disadvantaged communities where residents may live in small, poorly ventilated spaces with older gas stoves?
For decades, gas stoves have been marketed as superior for culinary performance, but the cost may be far steeper than anyone has ever realized. With alternatives now widely available, it may be the time to reconsider what we bring into our kitchen; after all, safety begins at home.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
6 hours ago
- NDTV
Lung Cancer No More Smokers' Disease: Experts Reveal How Everyone Is Affected, Even Children
August 1 is annually observed as World Lung Cancer Day to raise awareness about the type of cancer that originates in the lungs and spreads to other parts of the body. Smoking is one of the primary causes of lung cancer, but alarming trends suggest that lung cancer can "no longer be seen as a smoker's disease" as it is affecting men, women and even children who don't smoke. "While smoking remains the leading cause, globally and in India, a concerning number of patients diagnosed today have never smoked a cigarette, and it's on the rise," Dr Srivatsa Lokeshwaran, Lead Consultant and Head of Department - Interventional Pulmonology and Lung Transplant, Aster Whitefield Hospital, Bengaluru, told NDTV. This growing trend is supported by Indian studies and global data that suggests a change being driven by environmental, occupational and/or genetic risk factors. A Lancet study, published in 2022, found that long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) caused an increase in the incidence rate of non-small cell lung cancer in non-smokers in urban and industrialised regions. In most Indian cities like Delhi, Bengaluru, and Kanpur, pollution levels have become too high to be considered acceptable by the World Health Organization (WHO). Air pollution would not merely irritate lung tissues; it can also damage DNA, thus, potentially creating cancer by the chronic exposure to pollutants such as soot, nitrogen dioxide, and benzene. Are Children At Risk? Can They Get Lung Cancer Or Other Severe Lung Diseases? Dr Shishir Bhatnagar, Senior Consultant - Paediatrician and Neonatologist at Cloudnine Group of Hospitals, Noida, told NDTV that lung cancer as such in children is "not very common". The cancers in the lungs are basically carcinoids, adenocarcinomas and subtle pleuropulmonary blastomas. Most of these cancers may have their origin rarely from smoking and genetic factors. "More commonly in children, the lungs are affected by inflammation and infections. The inflammations are basically contributory and they are responsible for creating conditions like asthma and bronchitis," Dr Bhatnagar said. "Infections like bronchopneumonias, bronchitis, bacterial bronchitis and bronchiolitis are also contributed to by the environmental factors, including smoking and environmental smoke and dust." The smoking at the microbiological level can affect the immune system and weaken it by affecting the annular macrophage system. It also disturbs the microbiome of the airways, thereby increasing the biological injuries in them. At the cellular level, it affects the DNA and makes it more prone to inflammation and cancer. According to Dr Bhatnagar, the bigger issue is the serious lung harm from environmental exposures during early childhood. Children who live in high pollution neighbourhoods, and/or have been exposed to passive smoke, unclean fuels, or multiple respiratory infections as infants, potentially have sustained damage to their lungs, some of which may lead to chronic disease (bronchiectasis, asthma, lung cancer) in the future. A study published in 2023 in The New England Journal of Medicine demonstrated that children exposed to high levels of PM2.5, impaired lung function, asymmetrically slowed lung development, and had the potential for life-long impairment related to lung function. Serious Concerns Over Vaping Experts are also concerned about the rising trend of vaping. Dr Bhatnagar said that vaping is some sort of mechanism where the toxins produced are less and are not equivalent to smoking. "The toxins are less, but they have high nicotine dependence. There are very high chances that in adolescence this can become a trouble, and it is actually a problem these days," he said, further adding that vaping can contribute and can actually go on to smoking. "Children may not have early symptoms of cancer, but a persistent cough, wheezing without being diagnosed with asthma, recurrence of pneumonia, or even chest pain of unknown origin, must be taken seriously," Dr Bhatnagar said. Children must be protected from indoor air pollution, and also reduce exposure to passive smoke, while treating infections early, as lung health is often forgotten. Major Causes Of Lung Cancer The most frequent cause is smoking, responsible for more than 70 per cent of cases and 90 per cent of diagnoses. "Tobacco smoke harbours more than 60 carcinogens, and the risk is directly proportional to the intensity of smoking. The world's second-largest consumer of tobacco is India, which has 267 million consumers of tobacco, and tobacco is responsible for 27% of all cancers," Dr Vinayak Maka, Consultant - Dept of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Institute of Oncosciences, Ramaiah Memorial Hospital, told NDTV. For all causes except tobacco, environmental and occupational risk factors are important: Passive Smoking: Significantly boosts risk. Radon Gas: The Second greatest risk factor after smoking, particularly in smokers. Occupational Exposure: Chemicals like asbestos, arsenic, and beryllium raise risk, especially among smokers. Genetic Influence: Family health history is one of the major contributing factors in making a person more vulnerable. Air Pollution: A high-risk factor; Delhi alone has witnessed an increase in lung cancer cases due to pollution. Diet and Processed Foods: Studies have found that an intake of ultra-processed foods leads to a 41 per cent higher risk, undermining the role played by diet. Regular Screening And Early Detection Dr Raja Dhar, Director & HOD - Pulmonology, CMRI Kolkata, weighed in on the strength of regular screening and early detection. He told NDTV, "Regular screening is also key, particularly for those at greater risk, because it enables us to catch problems early on, when treatment works best. Lung cancer too often gets diagnosed too late, but if we can detect it early, the likelihood of successful treatment is greatly enhanced."
Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
WHO declares Hepatitis D virus as "carcinogenic": What does this mean amidst rising liver diseases
The World Health Organization has declared Hepatitis D as cancer-causing. This announcement coincides with World Hepatitis Day. WHO urges global action against viral hepatitis to reduce liver cancer deaths. Hepatitis affects millions worldwide, causing numerous deaths annually. Early detection and management are crucial. India faces a significant burden of viral hepatitis cases. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have classified the hepatitis D virus (HDV) as carcinogenic to humans. HDV has joined hepatitis B and C on the list of cancer-causing agents. On Monday, during the occasion of World Hepatitis Day, July 28, 2025, WHO urged governments and partners to accelerate efforts to eliminate viral hepatitis as a public health threat and reduce liver cancer deaths. Hepatitis (B, C, and, D) affects over 300 million people globally and claims 1.3 million lives each year, mainly from liver cirrhosis and cancer. "Every 30 seconds, someone dies from a hepatitis-related severe liver disease or liver cancer. Yet we have the tools to stop hepatitis,' Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, said in a statement. Viral hepatitis (types A, B, C, D, and E), is the major cause of acute liver infection. Hepatitis B, C, and D can result in chronic infections that increase the risk of liver cirrhosis, liver failure, or liver cancer. Yet most people with hepatitis don't know they're infected. What is Hepatitis D Hepatitis D, also known as delta hepatitis, is a rare but severe liver infection caused by the Hepatitis D virus. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop In Chittagong - Watch What Happens Happy in Shape Undo It is rare because it can only infect people who are already infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV). HDV can only occur as a co-infection or superinfection in people who are HBV-positive. Hepatitis D is carcinogenic The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has recently classified hepatitis D as carcinogenic to humans. Compared to HBV alone, HDV has a two- to six-fold higher risk of liver cancer, making it a serious infection. By classifying HDV as carcinogenic, the health organizations are hoping to raise awareness, improve screening, and expand access to new treatments for hepatitis D across the globe. 'WHO has published guidelines on testing and diagnosis of Hepatitis B and D in 2024, and is actively following the clinical outcomes from innovative treatments for hepatitis D,' Dr Meg Doherty, incoming Director of Science for Health at WHO, said. What is the treatment for HDV? Oral medication can treat Hepatitis C within 2 to 3 months, while effectively controlling hepatitis B with lifelong treatment. The treatment options for HDV, on the other hand, are still developing. Major progress in preventing liver cirrhosis and cancer deaths depends on further steps in managing the global burden such as vaccination, testing, harm reduction, and treatment. In a 2024 report , the WHO had said that India had over 3.5 crore cases of viral hepatitis, including 2.98 crore hepatitis B cases, in 2022, which accounts for 11.6% of the total disease burden globally that year. 7 Ways to check for fatty liver at home Liver diseases are on the rise globally, and HDV being classified as carcinogenic has raised concerns. It adds to the urgency to address this growing crisis, as co-infections exacerbate liver damage and cancer risk. Regular screening and early detection of co-infections, including HDV, will be crucial in reducing the global burden of viral hepatitis
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
Projections Of Future Global Warming Exaggerated: Trump-Vetted Scientists
A new report from the US Department of Energy says projections of future global warming are exaggerated, while benefits from higher levels of carbon dioxide such as more productive farms are overlooked. It concludes, at odds with the scientific mainstream, that policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions risk doing more harm than good. Released Tuesday, the report is part of an effort by the Trump administration to try to end the US government's authority to regulate greenhouse gases. It's the output of scientists known for contradicting the consensus embodied in volumes of research by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, whose work is approved by virtually every nation. Publishing an alternate approach to the science of global warming on the same day that the Environmental Protection Agency said it plans to revoke the endangerment finding - a determination that greenhouse gases harm public health and welfare - marks a step up in the administration's war on regulations. Since its adoption in 2009, the endangerment finding has become the bedrock of many US environmental rules. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said repealing the finding would "end $1 trillion or more in hidden taxes on American businesses and families." Climate experts say it will hobble the country's efforts to rein in rising temperatures and lessen the impacts, such as more intense storms, droughts and wildfires. The federal government's own research shows climate-fueled extreme weather is already causing $150 billion in losses a year in the US. In its proposed rule to nix the finding, the EPA references the Energy Department's report more than two dozen times. Energy Secretary Chris Wright wrote in the report's foreword that he had commissioned it and selected the authors to form a working group. The agency's support for the contrarian research stands in contrast to the broad rollback of other climate work under President Donald Trump. Since his inauguration in January, hundreds of scientists have been dismissed from agencies, including some who had focused on climate change. The EPA recently moved to shutter its main scientific research arm, which has been a crucial tool for policymaking. The US canceled a landmark climate change report, the sixth National Climate Assessment, and has taken down numerous webpages on climate science. Some of those were related to previous National Climate Assessments - studies that hundreds of researchers spent years painstakingly compiling. The new report's authors include Steven Koonin, a fellow at Stanford's Hoover Institution who wrote a 2021 booking arguing that climate science is "unsettled"; Roy Spencer, a University of Alabama in Huntsville scientist and senior fellow at the climate-denying group Cornwall Alliance; and Judith Curry, a climatologist formerly of Georgia Tech who testified to a Senate committee in 2023 that climate change has been mischaracterized as a crisis. An Energy Department spokesperson said the report's authors "represent diverse viewpoints and political backgrounds and are all well-respected and highly credentialed individuals." The spokesperson added that the report "was reviewed internally by a group of DOE scientific researchers and policy experts from the Office of Science and National Labs," and that there will be a 30-day comment period for the public to weigh in. Ann Carlson, an environmental law professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, said the report presents a series of arguments the administration can draw on to contend "public health and welfare is not endangered by emissions that come from the auto sector, from the trucking sector, from the electricity sector." Rather than denying climate change is occurring, Carlson said, "What they're trying to say instead is, 'Well, it's not so bad. It's really expensive to mitigate. And that expense actually harms people more than anything we could do" to slow it down. That's in keeping with past comments by members of Trump's cabinet that have downplayed global warming or public concern about it. Carlson said the report is "a wholesale assault" on climate science and previous policy. Zeke Hausfather, the climate lead at Stripe Inc. and a research scientist at nonprofit Berkeley Earth, has contributed to major US and international climate reports. He described the Energy Department publication as "scattershot" and said it "would not pass muster in any traditional scientific peer review process." That the administration released it after taking down webpages hosting "the actual, congressionally mandated National Climate Assessments," he said, is "a farce." The report is a "package of punches" against the scientific consensus that previously grounded US climate policy, and against that policy itself, said Jennifer Jacquet, a professor of environmental science and policy at the University of Miami. "It's really surreal to think that's where we are in 2025." The EPA will have to go through the lengthy federal rulemaking process to try to abolish the endangerment finding. If the proposed rule is finalized, legal challenges are inevitable. The issue could end up before the Supreme Court, which ruled in 2007's Massachusetts v. EPA that greenhouse gases were pollutants the EPA could regulate under the Clean Air Act. Getting the court, which now has a conservative supermajority, to overturn the 2007 decision may be the endgame, said Carlson. The effort would be risky but could succeed, she said. "I think on every front, the arguments that the [EPA] administrator is going to make - based on the DOE report - are extremely weak," said Carlson. "But we also have a court that's very hostile to environmental regulation."
