Millions of Brits on DWP Universal Credit warned over important new rule change
Millions of Universal Credit claimants have been issued with a warning over a rule change being forced "through". National disability charity Sense has raised concerns ahead of the Universal Credit Bill passing through the House of Lords and all remaining stages of the legislation later today.
Sense remains deeply worried about the Universal Credit alterations this bill aims to implement, which will result in some disabled people assessed as facing the greatest employment barriers being £47 a week worse off if they make claims after these modifications take effect.
James Watson-O'Neill, chief executive at the national disability charity Sense, said: "We're grateful to everyone who campaigned to secure important concessions on this bill, but we remain deeply concerned about the impact these changes will have on disabled people who claim Universal Credit in the future.
"When over half of disabled people with complex needs who rely on benefits can't afford essential bills, cutting support should never have been on the table.
"We want the government to scrap its proposal to remove the health-related element of Universal Credit for disabled people under 22. This would leave thousands of young disabled people with complex needs £100 a week worse off – an unacceptable blow to those who already face significant barriers and extra costs. Any future benefits reforms must be co-produced with disabled people.
"We have the ideas and expertise as disabled people, and as organisations working alongside disabled people, to make the benefits system fairer and more effective – now it's time for the government to listen."
Birmingham Live reports that James continued: "The government has promised to tackle the barriers preventing disabled people from entering employment – such as negative attitudes from employers, the lack of assistive technology in JobCentres, and the unlawful denial of reasonable adjustments.
"We welcome this commitment, but we will hold the government to account to ensure these changes are delivered effectively and in genuine collaboration with disabled people."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
43 minutes ago
- Times
Palestine pledge could break the law, top lawyers warn Starmer
Some of Britain's most prominent lawyers have warned Sir Keir Starmer that his government's pledge to recognise a Palestinian state risks breaking international law. Their intervention, signed by 40 members of the House of Lords, said a Palestinian state would not meet the criteria for recognition as set out under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933. The letter, seen by The Times, was sent to Lord Hermer, the attorney-general and the government's top legal adviser. The signatories point out that Starmer's pledge risked undermining the government's commitment that international law goes 'absolutely to the heart' of its foreign policy. Among those who signed the letter were seven KCs, including Lord Pannick, one of the UK's most respected lawyers. Pannick represented the government in its Supreme Court battle over the Rwanda relocation scheme. The peers, including some of parliament's most prominent Jewish voices, wrote to Hermer: 'We call on you to advise him [Starmer] that this would be contrary to international law. 'You are on record as saying that a commitment to international law goes absolutely to the heart of this government and its approach to foreign policy. 'You have said that a selective 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience. 'Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law. We look forward to your response.' The 1933 treaty, signed in the Uruguayan capital, laid out the four key criteria for statehood in international law. The treaty says a state must possess a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. The letter added that there is no certainty over the borders of a proposed Palestinian state, while the government would face difficulty continuing to recognise millions of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza as 'refugees', given recognition of statehood would mean they were in their own territory. They also argued that there is no functioning single government, and it has no capacity to enter into diplomatic relations. Hamas is a proscribed terror group in the UK. Among the 40 peers to sign the letter were prominent legal figures including Lord Collins of Mapesbury, a former Supreme Court judge, Lord Verdirame KC, a leading barrister and professor in international law, Lord Faulks KC, a leading human rights lawyer, and Lord Banner KC, whose report on radical planning reforms are being accepted by Starmer to speed up major infrastructure projects. Labour signatories include Lord Mendelsohn, Lord Turnberg, Lord Shamash and Lord Winston, while Lord Harrington of Watford, the former refugee minister, and Lord Walney, the government's former adviser on political violence and disruption, also signed the letter. Former cabinet ministers include Lord Pickles, Lord Lansley, Lord Ellis KC, Lord Hamilton of Epsom and Baroness Foster of Oxton. Several former Labour attorney-generals are also said to be supportive of the letter. Starmer insisted on Wednesday that Britain's recognition of Palestinian statehood is 'not a gesture' but will secure a viable two-state solution as he embarked on a diplomatic push to secure support for his Middle East peace plan. In a round of calls with world leaders, Starmer said 'recognition needed to be rooted in a process of change that made a material difference to the situation on the ground'. He told his Australian counterpart, Anthony Albanese, that 'recognition was not a gesture, but a driver for real change that ensured a viable two-state solution', Downing Street said. Starmer also stressed the need for a ceasefire, the release of all hostages, the acceleration of aid and ensuring Hamas played no role in a future state. Starmer's announcement has been widely criticised by both Jewish groups and the families of Britons who were held captive, and who have accused the government of reducing hostages to a 'bargaining chip'. On Wednesday evening, Sir Ephraim Mirvis, the Chief Rabbi, accused Starmer of fundamentally undermining the peace and security of both Israelis and Palestinians and said that the announcement at a time when hostages remain captive can 'only disincentivise Hamas from agreeing to a ceasefire'. Writing in The Times, Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative Party leader, warned that Starmer's 'knee-jerk recognition of Palestinian statehood will embolden our enemies at abroad and at home'. The letter was announced after Palestine Action won permission to challenge its ban by the UK government. The High Court ruled that the decision by Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, to proscribe the group as a terrorist organisation should be reviewed in the courts. Huda Ammori, Palestine Action's co-founder, lodged a bid to challenge the proscription, which was made under anti-terror legislation. The proscription was announced by Cooper after the group claimed responsibility for breaking into RAF Brize Norton on June 20 and inflicting millions of pounds of damage to two Voyager aircraft. In a major ruling at the High Court, Mr Justice Chamberlain said it was 'reasonably arguable' that the proscription 'amounts to a disproportionate interference' of Ammori's rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. He concluded that a substantive hearing at the High Court should be held in order to decide the legality of the decision to proscribe the group. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, said: 'The court has confirmed the continuation of the proscription order against Palestine Action Group in line with its previous judgement, while allowing permission for a further hearing under the normal judicial review procedures. 'The decision to proscribe was based on strong security advice and the unanimous recommendation by the expert cross-government Proscription Review Group. This followed serious attacks the group has committed, involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage.' She added: 'Those who seek to support this group may yet not know the true nature of the organisation. But people should be under no illusion — this is not a peaceful or non-violent protest group.'
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Nigel Farage watchdog probe 'centres on mysterious fishing boat'
Reform leader Nigel Farage is being investigated by Parliament's standards commissioner over an alleged breach of rules around declaring interests - and it's understood to centre around a fishing boat Nigel Farage is being investigated by Parliament's standards watchdog amid questions over whether he owns an undeclared fishing boat, The Mirror understands. The Reform UK leader bragged in April that he was the only MP "that has a financial stake in the commercial fishing industry" - revealing he owns a commercial boat with a skipper. But there is no mention of this in his register of interests. In an interview with GB News, Mr Farage said he was 'heavily invested' in fishing. He told the network - which employs him to host a weekday show: 'I'm the only member of Parliament that has a financial stake in the commercial fishing industry… I own a commercial fishing boat… I have a skipper who runs that boat.' It comes days after Mr Farage unveiled an ex-Tory who made racist remark on WhatsApp as its newest defector. He went on to say that he makes no money on the vessel, stating in The Telegraph: 'I don't run it myself. I'm rather too busy. I have a skipper that runs that boat, and I'm not making any money on it. I can promise you, the rules and regulations put upon our small commercial fleet since Brexit are worse than they were as members of the European Union.' Daniel Greenberg, the parliamentary standards commissioner, launched an inquiry into the Reform leader over an apparent "registration of interest' matter. It concerns a potential breach of Rule 5 of the MPs' code of conduct - which requires MPs to declare changes to their interests within 28 days. Since being elected Mr Farage has declared a massive £933,173.76 in outside income on top of his MP salary - currently £93,904. He also receives around £4,000 a month writing articles for the Telegraph media group. Reform UK said the investigation, announced on the commissioner's website yesterday(WED) morning, was opened following an allegation by a member of the House of Lords. In June campaign group Hope Not Hate demanded to know: "Where's the boat, Nigel?" It called on Mr Farage to clarify how long he had been sailing the high seas. The controversial party leader told The Independent the probe was in relation to a complaint by a peer, who he did not name. He told the newspaper: "It is not to do with any undeclared income". A spokesman for the Reform boss said: 'Following a complaint from a member of the House of Lords, the Commissioner for Standards is doing his job.' Rule 5 of the MPs' code states: 'Members must fulfil conscientiously the requirements of the House in respect of the registration of interests in the Register of Members' Financial Interests. 'New Members must register all their current financial interests, and any registrable benefits (other than earnings) received in the 12 months before their election within one month of their election, and Members must register any change in those registrable interests within 28 days.' The Mirror has contacted Mr Farage and Reform UK for comment.
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Nigel Farage under investigation by parliamentary standards commissioner
The Reform UK leader is being investigated over a possible break of rule five, which relates to registration of an interest. The parliamentary commissioner for standards, Daniel Greenberg, opened an investigation on Monday, according to the Parliament website. A spokesperson for Mr Farage said: 'Following a complaint from a member of the House of Lords, the Commissioner for Standards is doing his job.' According to the MP's code of conduct, rule five requires that new members should register their interests and and benefits they received in the 12 months before entering Parliament within one month of being elected. It also says that MPs must register any changes to their interests. It says: 'Members must fulfil conscientiously the requirements of the House in respect of the registration of interests in the Register of Members' Financial Interests. 'New Members must register all their current financial interests, and any registrable benefits (other than earnings) received in the 12 months before their election within one month of their election, and Members must register any change in those registrable interests within 28 days.'
