Baghdad-Beirut flights sell out ahead of Nasrallah funeral
The pro-Iran group has called for a huge turnout when Nasrallah, killed in a September Israeli strike, is laid to rest in the Lebanese capital on Sunday.
'Iraqi Airways will increase its flights to Beirut from one flight a day to two, starting on February 20,' said transport ministry spokesperson Maytham al-Safi, citing heightened demand ahead of the funeral.
An Iraqi airline official told AFP that 'all seats on Iraqi Airlines flights from Baghdad to Beirut are booked'.
A source from Lebanon's Middle East Airlines (MEA) reported increased flights between Baghdad and Beirut from Friday to Tuesday.
The airlines' websites show that Iraqi Airways flights are fully booked until Sunday, with MEA nearly sold out.
Iraqi lawmakers and officials are expected to attend Nasrallah's funeral privately, an Iraqi official said.
Representatives from pro-Iran Iraqi factions, Hezbollah's longstanding allies in the Tehran-led 'axis of resistance', are also expected to participate.
Beirut airport will close for four hours during the funeral.
Hezbollah has said 79 countries would be involved in the commemoration, either officially or through 'popular' support.
Sunday's funeral will also honor Hashem Safieddine, a senior Hezbollah figure who had been chosen to succeed Nasrallah, before he was killed in an Israeli strike in October.
After decades at the helm of the group once seen as invincible, the killing of the charismatic Nasrallah sent shock waves across Lebanon and the wider region.
Since Nasrallah's death, portraits of him, either alone or alongside other slain pro-Iran commanders, have been displayed throughout Baghdad and other areas of the Shiite-majority country.
On Sunday afternoon, thousands are expected to attend a 'symbolic' procession for Nasrallah in Baghdad's northwestern neighborhood of Kadhimiya, which is home to a Shia shrine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
3 hours ago
- Leaders
Al Jazeera Holds Vigil for Journalists Killed in Gaza Airstrike
Al Jazeera journalists held a solemn vigil at the network's headquarters in Doha on Monday, mourning five of their colleagues killed in an Israeli airstrike in Gaza the previous night. The victims, including prominent correspondent Anas al-Sharif, reporter Mohammed Qreiqeh, and cameramen Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and Moamen Aliwa, were reportedly targeted while sheltering in a tent in Gaza City. Dozens of staff gathered inside Al Jazeera's Arabic studio, displaying photos of the slain journalists and vowing to continue their coverage of the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas, now in its 22nd month. Among those attending was Wael al-Dahdouh, the network's Gaza bureau chief, who previously lost his wife and children to Israeli strikes. Also present was Fadi Al Wahidi, a cameraman who was left paralyzed after being shot in the neck while reporting in the territory. 'Every time we lose a colleague, we lose a part of this journalistic family,' al-Dahdouh told AFP. 'Despite our solidarity and protests, the attacks persist in defiance of international law.' Rejecting Israel's Claims The Israeli military confirmed the strike that killed al-Sharif, alleging he was a Hamas operative posing as a journalist—a claim strongly rejected by Al Jazeera. Senior presenter Tamer Almisshal, who oversees Gaza coverage, dismissed the Israeli accusation as 'baseless,' saying such claims often follow the deaths of Palestinian journalists. 'Israel wants to silence the truth by killing those who report it,' he said. Al-Sharif had previously been the subject of public threats and disinformation campaigns. In July, the Committee to Protect Journalists urged protection for him, accusing the Israeli military of targeting him online. With foreign media largely unable to access Gaza, international outlets—including AFP—rely heavily on local Palestinian journalists for frontline reporting. According to Reporters Without Borders, over 200 journalists have been killed in Gaza since the war began, including several from Al Jazeera. Al-Dahdouh described the dire conditions facing journalists still working inside the besieged enclave. 'They endure threats, fear, hunger, and displacement,' he said. 'Some have become unrecognisable, having lost half their body weight—but their dedication to this mission keeps them going.' Short link : Post Views: 41
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
US slams Iran over Houthi Red Sea attacks, calls on UN to hold accountable violators of arms embargo
NEW YORK CITY: The US on Monday accused Iran of fueling maritime insecurity in the Red Sea by supplying weapons and other materials to the Houthis in Yemen, following the latest deadly attacks on commercial vessels last month. Speaking during a UN Security Council debate on maritime security, Washington's acting ambassador, Dorothy Shea, condemned the Houthis for the recent attacks that resulted in the sinking of two commercial ships, the deaths of crew members and the taking of hostages. Iran 'poses a threat to maritime security through its support for the Houthis and other terrorist groups and its seizure of vessels transiting international waters,' Shea told council members. 'Just last month, the Houthis attacked and sank two commercial vessels, resulting in loss of life, injury to sailors, and the capture of hostages.' She reiterated the US demand that Tehran releases all detained vessels, including the MSC Aries, a container ship linked to an Israeli billionaire. It was seized by Iranian forces in April 2024 while transiting the Gulf of Oman, in what Tehran described as retaliatory action following Israeli airstrikes in Syria. The vessel, chartered by the Mediterranean Shipping Company, had a crew of 25, mostly Indian nationals. They were held for several weeks by Iranian authorities before being released but the ship remains impounded. 'The United States calls for Iran to release the vessels it still holds, including the MSC Aries,' Shea said, as she urged all UN member states to comply with the arms embargo on the Houthis. She accused Iran and other countries of violating this embargo by supplying the group with rockets, munitions and other components used in attacks on shipping in the Red Sea. 'This council must impose meaningful consequences for sanctions violations and seek additional ways to cut off the international funding and resources fueling the Houthi weapons programs,' Shea said. Under UN Security Council Resolution 2216, adopted in 2015, all member states are prohibited from supplying arms, ammunition and related materiel to Houthi forces. The embargo remains in place despite calls from some humanitarian groups for an easing of restrictions to meet civilian needs. The UN Verification and Inspection Mechanism, established in 2016, is tasked with inspecting all commercial cargo entering Yemen through Red Sea ports to ensure compliance with the embargo. Despite this measure, several reports by the UN's Panel of Experts have documented the continuing flow of arms to the Houthis, including missile components and drones believed to originate in Iran. This year, the US and the UK launched limited airstrikes on Houthi targets in Yemen following a string of maritime attacks. The group's campaign has continued, however, demonstrating access to a growing arsenal of anti-ship ballistic and cruise missiles. Shea said the US has 'overwhelmingly borne the costs' of defending freedom of navigation in the Red Sea and called for greater sharing of this burden, including financial support for the Verification and Inspection Mechanism.
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan's humanitarian crisis
DUBAI: Afghan refugees are returning in their thousands — few of them by choice or with a destination in mind. Many of the youngest have never set foot in Afghanistan before. Others are returning to find their homes and livelihoods no longer exist. What were once considered places of refuge from the unrelenting turmoil back home, neighboring states are now expelling Afghans in waves of forced returns that are pushing crisis-wracked Afghanistan to the brink. According to Babar Baloch, global spokesperson for the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone, including 1.6 million from Iran and more than 352,000 from Pakistan. Sami Fakhouri, head of delegation for Afghanistan at the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, witnessed the impact first-hand. 'We are anticipating that an additional 1 million people, possibly more, may return from Iran to Afghanistan by the end of this year,' he told a briefing in Geneva. 'The majority didn't have a say in coming back. They were put on buses and driven to the border.' Fakhouri said he had seen busloads of families being dropped off at the Islam Qala border in Herat province in recent days, many with no idea where to go. He also sounded the alarm over a critical funding shortfall. The IFRC's $31.4 million appeal to support returnees is only 10 percent funded. 'Whether we can maintain support at this pace is a real concern,' he said. At the same time, Afghanistan is in no position to absorb the influx of people after four decades of war, occupation, civil unrest and economic crisis have left the country extremely fragile. The US military withdrawal and the return of the Taliban government in 2021 led to Afghanistan's global isolation, a freeze on foreign aid and assets, and the near-collapse of public services. Compounding these challenges is one of the worst droughts Afghanistan has seen in decades, which has devastated crops, depleted water sources, and crippled rural livelihoods. With more than half the population reliant on agriculture, many returnees have little to go back to in their home villages — forcing them to remain in transit areas or drift toward overcrowded cities. Aid agencies warn that without climate-resilient recovery plans, the drought will deepen food insecurity and drive even more internal displacement. These overlapping crises have already pushed more than two-thirds of the population into poverty. Baloch described the expulsions as 'a broader, worrying regional trend,' adding that 'refugee-hosting countries have issued return orders with deadlines for Afghans to depart, or face deportation.' Since those announcements, the situation for Afghans in both Iran and Pakistan has deteriorated rapidly. These mass returns follow a shift in regional policy, beginning in March when Iran issued a deadline for undocumented Afghans to leave or face arrest. In June, Pakistan launched its second phase of deportations targeting unregistered Afghans. Both countries cited national security concerns and internal pressure to expel large refugee populations. Pakistan has defended its forced expulsions, with Talal Chaudhry, an adviser to Islamabad's Interior Ministry, stating in April that the policy targets only 'illegal foreigners.' In February, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan rejected claims that Afghan nationals were being mistreated during the repatriation process. 'In this connection, we also extensively engaged the Afghan side to ensure the smooth repatriation of Afghan nationals,' he told Voice of America. Iran, meanwhile, has justified its expulsions as a response to national security and economic pressures, particularly following its recent conflict with Israel. Rhetoric on social media has increasingly blamed Afghans for shortages and social issues. Abdul Rahman Rashid, the Taliban government's deputy minister for refugees and repatriation, has rebuked host countries for the mass expulsions. And described the removal of Afghans as a 'serious violation of international norms, humanitarian principles, and Islamic values.' 'The scale and manner in which Afghan refugees have been forced to return to their homeland is something Afghanistan has never before experienced in its history,' Rashid said in Kabul on July 31. For the hundreds of thousands now crossing back into Afghanistan each month, the journey does not end at the border. Many are stepping into a future marked by uncertainty, deprivation and loss, without hope, safety or dignity. Even so, the pace of returns has surged in recent weeks. On July 4 alone, more than 50,000 people crossed into Afghanistan from Iran — a dramatic increase from the daily average of 5,000 between January and June. From July 10 to 16, the average was more than 29,000 per day. Inevitably, the scale of arrivals has overwhelmed aid operations at border crossings. 'Our teams are at the borders, receiving and assisting streams of exhausted, hungry, and scared people every day,' Baloch told Arab News. 'Staff and structures are absolutely inundated,' he said, adding that the UN agency has deployed additional personnel and is distributing essential relief items, hot meals, and emergency financial assistance to meet immediate needs. 'But amid funding constraints, and given the scale and pace of returns, we will not be able to sustain support for more than a few weeks,' said Baloch. In addition to the operational burden, the nature of these returns has raised serious concerns. Many of those arriving say they had little choice. Baloch described the situation as 'a complex protection crisis,' noting that returns are taking place under difficult and often involuntary conditions. He said many Afghans felt forced to leave after seeing others deported, and 'returnees who arrived in the country in recent months have been sharing concerning stories of increased restrictions, harassment and discrimination.' Once back, many find themselves in provinces that lack even the most basic services, forcing thousands into temporary transit sites, informal settlements, or already strained households. Many arrive without identity papers, making access to support even more difficult. 'Immense challenges lie ahead for returnees — from accessing documentation, housing, healthcare and education, to rebuilding their lives in a country they do not know,' said Baloch. Those challenges are already visible. Shelter is scarce, and schools and clinics are either closed or inaccessible to women and girls. Meanwhile, job opportunities are limited — especially for those who have spent years or decades abroad. 'For women and girls in particular, life in Afghanistan brings extreme restrictions,' said Baloch. Under the Taliban government, most secondary schools and universities remain closed to girls. Women are banned from most forms of employment, including in the nongovernmental organization sector. For many returnee women, it means a life of near-total invisibility. Even female aid workers have been forced into the shadows. One Afghan humanitarian worker, speaking anonymously to a UN publication, described living in fear while continuing to serve her community. 'I feel depressed,' she said. 'As an aid worker, I don't feel safe, and I am afraid for my life… I am worried that I might be targeted because of my job.' She described being stopped at checkpoints, harassed for not having a male guardian, and being unable to access work or support systems freely. 'It is so unfair to be deprived of your rights because of your gender. Working is not only my dream or a human right, it is also the way I support my family. Women are half of a country … Let us work, let us learn, let us live.' Aid workers have also reported a growing number of unaccompanied or separated children among recent returnees — some born abroad and unable to navigate legal systems or school enrolment. Data for June published by UNICEF, the UN children's fund, indicates that more than 5,000 unaccompanied or separated Afghan children returned from Iran, many arriving without guardians or legal identity. The lack of functioning child protection mechanisms places these vulnerable children at risk of exploitation, statelessness, and abuse at a critical stage in their lives. Human rights experts have also warned of broader risks facing returnees. Richard Bennett, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in Afghanistan, has said the nation 'is not a safe country for returnees, given the constantly deteriorating human rights situation since the Taliban seized control.' Rights groups have documented cases in which returnees — particularly those with foreign residency or links to international organizations — have faced interrogation or detention upon arrival, fueling fears of surveillance and reprisals. Despite urgent warnings from aid agencies, the international response has fallen short. The UNHCR has appealed for $71 million to support returnees in the region over a nine-month period. The IFRC and other aid actors have made separate appeals for immediate assistance at border crossings and for longer-term reintegration support. But donor interest remains weak, with many countries reducing their funding to Afghanistan over governance concerns and competing global crises. Roza Otunbayeva, the UN secretary-general's special representative for Afghanistan, called the mass returns 'a test of our collective humanity,' warning of further displacement, famine, and instability without urgent action. She called for an 'integrated approach' that combines emergency aid with long-term support for return areas, and stressed that regional dialogue with Iran, Pakistan, and Central Asian states is essential to ensure returns remain voluntary, safe, and dignified. Baloch echoed those concerns. 'We are in touch with the authorities in Iran and Pakistan. UNHCR urges countries in the region to ensure protection for Afghans and that returns to Afghanistan are voluntary, safe, and dignified.' 'We are also calling on the international community to urgently and substantially increase funding — to meet both critical needs at the border upon arrival, and provide longer-term assistance to help returnees settle in Afghanistan,' he said.
