Ministers vow to tackle ‘entrenched divides' in A-level results
A-level results published on Thursday showed an improving national picture, with a higher proportion of young people gaining top grades. But the improvements faded outside London, the south-east and big cities.
While one in three entries from 18-year-olds in London gained A* or A grades, fewer than one in four did so in the north-east of England, where results remain below pre-pandemic levels seen in 2019.
London's advantage means that the university application rate for its students remains considerably above all other English regions, even as record numbers of school leavers accepted offers to begin higher education courses this autumn.
The Department for Education said that the results 'have exposed inequalities which continue to exist in the education system', which it aims to tackle in a schools white paper later this year.
Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, said: 'Every single young person collecting their results should have the opportunity to pursue their dreams – whether that starts with further study, university, an apprenticeship or the world of work – but too often, opportunities depend on background rather than talent.
'The entrenched divide in outcomes seen over the last few years and the lack of progress for children from white working-class backgrounds is particularly concerning.'
Carl Cullinane, director of research at the Sutton Trust, which campaigns to improve social mobility through education, said: 'If the government is going to break down barriers to opportunity, the growth in regional inequalities must be reversed.
'It's positive that increasing numbers of young people from the most deprived areas are getting into university. This is important, because gaining a university degree remains the surest route to social mobility. However, today's figures show the gap between the most and least deprived areas remains wide, and worse than before the pandemic in 2019.'
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: 'Schools and colleges face severe funding and staffing shortages, and these students were affected by the disruption of the pandemic earlier in their education. They have overcome the odds and we salute the fantastic efforts of our brilliant education staff.
'However, we continue to see big differences in attainment between regions, reflecting socioeconomic factors which represent a massive challenge, not only for the education sector but our society as a whole.
'We have to stop merely talking about these issues and actually address them with investment in communities suffering from generational disadvantage. This cannot be solved by schools and colleges alone but must also involve action to boost the opportunities available for young people.'
More than 28% of entries in England gained an A or A* grade, while 9.4% gained the top A* grade, higher rates than in 2024 or 2019, the last year before the disruption of the Covid pandemic when 25.2% of entries received top grades.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Ofqual, the exam regulator for England, rejected accusations of grade inflation, saying that the increase in top grades was the result of fewer students taking A-levels, and young men in particular shifting towards subjects such as physics, maths and economics with greater success.
Amanda Swann, Ofqual's executive director for general qualifications, said that 'any change in numbers achieving a grade is entirely due to a change in student performance, not a change in the standard expected', with this year's cohort of students appearing to be academically stronger than last year's.
Results in Wales followed a similar pattern to England's, with declining numbers of students taking A-levels and top grades rising among the remaining stronger candidates. For the second year in row the proportion of A* grades rose, to 10.5%.
In Northern Ireland, 8.7% of entries achieved an A*, compared with 8.2% in 2024, while 30.4% of entries achieved grades A* or A, fractionally higher than last year.
More than 200,000 students across the UK also received BTec level 3 qualifications, but a breakdown of results was not available. One in five working-age adults in the UK has at least one BTec, although the popular qualification remains under threat from government policy in England.
In England nearly 12,000 young people received results for T-levels, vocational qualifications first introduced in 2020 that have struggled to attract students. Although entries have increased substantially, T-levels remain less popular than A-level PE. The DfE also revealed that 27% of students originally enrolled on the two-year course dropped out or failed to complete it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment furious flag-raiser confronts workers tearing down St George's Cross on orders of council that prided itself on Palestinian banners - as Starmer backs patriotic locals
This is the moment a furious Londoner confronted workers tearing down St George's Crosses on the orders of a local council - as Sir Keir Starmer waded into the row. Tower Hamlets in east London previously prided itself on its displays of Palestine flags, but said any England banners attached to council property by an online movement called 'Operation Raise the Colours' would be promptly removed. The initiative has spread to towns and cities including Bradford, Newcastle, Norwich and Swindon - with activists putting up English flags and Union Jacks in defiance of council bans. A man was today filmed confronting workers removing the flags in Tower Hamlets, asking an official: 'Who's your boss who's asked you to do it?' When the official refused to answer, he continued: 'The whole of the Isle of Dogs has paid for these flags to be hung, for you to authorise for them to be taken down. What about all the Palestine flags?' Turning to a nearby police officer, he added: 'The rest of the flags that we have brought with our own money he has thrown in the bin, that's theft.' Downing Street today backed people flying British or English flags in their local communities, although - amid the ongoing rows between residents and some councils - No10 declined to comment on 'individual cases'. Sir Keir Starmer 's official spokesman said: 'I haven't asked him about specific cases or specific councils, but the PM has always talked about his pride in being British, the patriotism he feels. He's talked about that previously and he's talked about it most recently when the Lionesses had their successful campaign in the Euros.' Asked if Sir Keir was in support of people putting up English flags, his official spokesman replied: 'Absolutely.' He highlighted how St George flags are flown in Downing Street 'every time' England's men's or women's football teams play in important games. Campaigners were today seen painting roundabouts in Birmingham in England colours after officials sparked fury last week by tearing down St George's Crosses in the south of the city over claims they posed a safety risk. Operation Raise the Colours supporters filmed themselves putting up England flags in Tower Hamlets last night, but this morning workers from the local council were pictured this morning swiftly removing them with metal poles. Tower Hamlets is led by Lutfur Rahman of the pro-Palestine Aspire Party, and previously refused to remove hundreds of Palestine flags that were hanging from lamp posts and council buildings in the borough so as not to 'destabilise community cohesion'. Mr Rahman - who was previously found guilty of electoral fraud - finally ordered them to be removed last year after Jewish locals complained they were intimidating and divisive. Susan Hall, the head of the Conservative group in the London Assembly and a former candidate for London mayor, called the decision to remove the flags 'outrageous'. 'They've allowed Palestinian flags to fly there - why on earth are they taking England flags down?' she told the Daily Mail. 'If they accept other flags going up, why can't they allow British ones?' Former Conservative Party leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith said the council had got itself into an 'unnecessary mess'. 'The Cross of St George is part of the Union flag. British flags should be allowed to be put up because this is Britain,' he told the Daily Mail. 'The accusation is they leave some flags up but want you to take down flags that are relevant to the UK. 'They need to make it clear what the rules are and apply them to everyone. 'If the rules are that you need permission to put flags up then they should make that clear rather than appearing to focus on UK flags.' Tyrone, a cleaner who works for Tower Hamlets council, was tasked this morning with cutting down England and Union Jack flags from lampposts and dumping them in the rubbish. But his colleague decided to leave and finish his job tomorrow due to the amount of abuse he and his colleague had been receiving from frustrated locals. When the Daily Mail approached for a chat, Tyrone was surrounded by agitated residents urging him to stop. 'This is a f***ing joke' one of them shouted, before adding: 'We're going put them back up anyway.' Tyrone told the Mail: 'I was sent here by my managers to take these flags down. 'I don't know the significance of these flags but I've been taking them down and getting abuse by people who are telling me to ''leave it!'.' 'They ask me, ''What has Britain become?' and say ''Don't take them down' and ''The mayor's a w****r''. 'And they get annoyed because they say the Palestinian flags were left up for weeks and months but the English flags have been removed straight away. 'But I'm just doing my job and I'm not going to let them hinder me from what I am doing. 'But my colleague is going [because of the abuse] and I need someone to watch my back while I'm doing this. 'So we will come back tomorrow around 6.30am to remove the rest when there aren't so many people around who will get upset. 'Palestinian, Jamaican, English whatever my job is to keep the road clean.' Previous displays of Palestine flags across the east London borough prompted a legal challenge from campaign group UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), which said they could ' intimidate Jewish people' and 'encourage violence against them '. Sue Reid for the Daily Mail revealed in a report last year how some local Jewish people were so frightened they were making plans to move. 'We feel they would like to see the back of us,' one successful Jewish woman in her 40s, who lives in the area, said. 'Anti-Semitism is being normalised here in Tower Hamlets. The majority seem to think this is perfectly all right.' One mother in her early 50s said: 'I am the mother of a boy who goes to primary school in the borough. We have lived here for four years but we are leaving, even to go abroad, before he goes to secondary.' The Palestine flags were put up after Israel's invasion of Gaza in 2023. But Mr Rahman - mayor of Tower Hamlets - announced a year later that he had made the 'difficult' decision to order the removal of the flags after they became the focus of 'media attacks'. He had previously rejected the suggestion they were symbols of division. Mr Rahman was kicked out of office in 2015 after an election court found him guilty of a series of charges, including electoral fraud and spiritual intimidation of voters. Approximately 39.9 per cent of people in the borough are Muslim, the largest proportion of any local authority area in the UK. A number of St George's flags have been put up across Tower Hamlets over recent days. In response, a spokesman for the council vowed to remove them. 'We are aware members of the public have been putting up St George's flags on various structures,' the spokesman said. 'While we recognise people wish to express their views, we have a responsibility to monitor and maintain council infrastructure. 'Where flags are attached to council-owned infrastructure without permission, they may be removed as part of routine maintenance.' But David Simmonds MP, Shadow Minister for Housing, Communities and Local Government, told the Mail: 'Tower Hamlets Council dragged their feet on taking down unlawful Palestinian flags, yet the moment people put up the flag of England or Union Jacks they send staff out to rip them down. 'Any two-tier perception – that councils turn a blind eye to foreign political banners but crack down on our national flags – is deeply corrosive to social cohesion. Where there are laws restricting what is put up on street furniture, they should be forced equally. 'We should never be ashamed of our own national flags. Conservatives will always defend the right of people to fly them proudly: they should be symbols that unite us all.' Operation Raise the Colours began on Facebook and has spread across the country. It appears to have its roots in Birmingham, where scores of British flags sprung up in the suburb of Northfield. Birmingham City Council quickly confirmed it would begin ripping them down and claimed they posed a safety risk despite flying high above the traffic. A backlash to the decision deepened further after officials privately admitted they were too scared to take down Palestine flags without extra security. In a leaked email obtained by the Mail, council cabinet member Majid Mahmood said of the Palestine flags hanging from lampposts in February: 'We are taking these down, but we need the support of the police due to issues that have cropped [up] when we first tried to take them down.' Critics also pointed out that the city's library was being lit up in the colours of the Pakistan flag to mark the anniversary of the country's independence, followed by the Indian flag. Government guidance published in 2021 states that flags 'are a very British way of expressing joy and pride ' and that they wanted to see 'more flags flown, particularly the Union flag'. An extract from the guidance reads: 'It is a symbol of national unity and pride. The government has recently issued guidance encouraging the flying of the Union Flag on all UK government buildings throughout the year, alongside other national and local flags. 'We are keen for local authorities and other local organisations to follow suit. We have made it easier for the Union Flag to be flown alongside other flags, so organisations can highlight their local identities, as well as their national identities, and celebrate special days or events which champion civic pride.'
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Reeves considers replacing stamp duty with new property tax
The Treasury is considering a new tax on the sale of homes worth more than £500,000 as a step towards a radical overhaul of stamp duty and council tax, the Guardian has been told. As Rachel Reeves prepares the ground for tax rises in this autumn's budget, senior ministers have tasked officials to study how a new 'proportional' property tax could be implemented and model its impact before reporting back to ministers, who have been briefed on the proposals. Officials are initially examining a potential national property tax, which would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes, sources said. They are also studying whether, after the national tax, a local property tax could then replace council tax in the medium term in an effort to repair battered local authority finances. No final decisions have been made. A national tax could be implemented during this parliament, while it is understood an overhaul of council tax would take longer, at least requiring Labour to win a second term in office. The policy options are being considered as part of a large tranche of work within the Treasury aimed at tapping into the vast cumulative rise in house prices in recent years which risks entrenching inequalities and making council tax – which is based on early 1990s property values – more unfair. If the plans came to fruition, they could provide valuable political cover for Reeves, both in terms of raising extra revenue without breaking Labour's pledge to not raise levies on working people, and as policies that would be likely to appeal to many of the party's MPs and members. There has been increasing pressure on the chancellor to consider more wealth-based taxes, notably from the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, and the additional tax on more expensive homes could be presented in this light. The national tax would be paid by owner-occupiers on houses worth more than £500,000 when they sell their home. The amount paid would be determined by the value of the property, with the rate set by central government, which would directly collect the proceeds via HMRC. It would not replace stamp duty on second homes. Current rates of stamp duty vary depending on whether someone is a first-time buyer and are banded in steps upward depending on the value of the property being bought and sold. It would take time to phase in a replacement to stamp duty, and a range of options are being considered for phasing in changes. The revenue raised by stamp duty on primary residences varies considerably from year to year, depending on housing market conditions. Last financial year it raised £11.6bn according to government figures. Over time, it is believed the new national property tax would be a more reliable, consistent source of revenue and ultimately raise the same amount as stamp duty. The levy would only impact about a fifth of property sales, compared with about 60% with current levels of stamp duty, which is paid by the buyer of a home. The average price of a home in the UK was £272,664 in July, according to Nationwide. Sources said that Treasury officials are, in part, drawing on the findings of a 48-page report from centre-right thinktank Onward, which was published in August last year. Onward's report proposes a dual approach of a national and local 'proportional property tax' on property, based on its value. It is written by Tim Leunig, who worked as a government adviser for more than a decade and was closely involved with devising the furlough scheme during the Covid-19 pandemic. Leunig wrote: 'These proposals would make it easier and cheaper to move house, for a better job, or to be near family, as well as being fairer. It should not be the case that a terrace house in Burnley pays more than a mansion in Kensington – and it wouldn't be under these proposals.' The government has already showed signals of adopting some of the steps towards council tax Leunig laid out in his report: 'The first step would be to end the overfunding of various councils in affluent areas of inner London, particularly Westminster, Wandsworth and Kensington and Chelsea councils.' This is similar to the approach laid out this summer in a consultation on how to redistribute from richer to poorer councils. The idea of a new local annual property levy to replace council tax was also proposed by Onward. That plan would see owners, rather than the residents, of a property worth up to £500,000 paying varying rates of tax dependent on the value of their home. They would pay a minimum of £800 a year and the funds this generates would go directly to local councils, whose finances have been severely stretched in recent years. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Rayner has already raised the prospect of ramping up redistributions of funds to address regional inequalities, which she has argued are exacerbated by the existing council tax system, which replaced the poll tax in 1993. A spokesperson for the Treasury said: 'As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.' Economists from the right and left of the political spectrum have heavily criticised stamp duty and council tax. In June, the government launched a consultation on how to reform the allocation of funds raised by council tax. Labour said the 'fair funding review' aims to fix the 'broken funding system we inherited' which has 'left local authorities across the country in crisis'. The strategy has already met a backlash after it emerged deprived inner-city London councils stand to lose millions of pounds. The IFS, an economic thinktank, has said that while reform was very much needed, the proposed changes in the government's funding review appeared to run counter to an 'expectation that deprived and urban areas would win at the expense of more affluent and rural areas, the government's baseline funding reform proposals are not particularly redistributive to poor, urban areas of England'. While any wealth-related tax could provoke strong criticism from rightwing opponents, ministers have shown willingness to ignore such criticism for policies which generally affect wealthier people, such as adding VAT on private school fees and changes to inheritance tax for some farms. If billed as a part of a longer-term replacement of stamp duty, this could also be helpful given the existing levy is unpopular and widely seen as a blunt tool and a block on the property market. Using property taxes as a replacement for council tax would be complex to implement and almost inevitably require a second term in office, but there is an increasing acceptance among all the main parties that the current system for local government funding is obsolete and unviable. Labour has already committed to the biggest shake-up of council structures in England for decades, but does not want to oversee the predicted series of local authorities declaring effective bankruptcy, especially as many will be run by the party. The Guardian last week revealed that the Treasury is also looking at ways to raise more money from inheritance tax in attempt to ease pressure on the country's finances, ahead of Reeves's autumn budget.
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Jeremy Corbyn 'capitulated' over anti-Semitism while Labour leader, claims co-founder of his new party
'capitulated' over anti-Semitism while he was Labour leader, according to the co-founder of his new left-wing party. Zarah Sultana, who has helped launch Mr Corbyn's new outfit, criticised Labour's adoption of the international definition of anti-Semitism under his leadership. In September 2018, Labour agreed to fully adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism and all its examples. It followed a months-long party row and an unsuccessful attempt by Mr Corbyn to add his own caveat in relation to criticism of Israel. In an interview with the New Left Review, Ms Sultana was asked how 'Corbynism' could be adapted from 2015 - when Mr Corbyn was first elected Labour leader - to the present day. 'I think we're in a very different political moment,' she replied. 'We have to build on the strengths of Corbynism – its energy, mass appeal and bold policy platform – and we also have to recognise its limitations. 'It capitulated to the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, which famously equates it with anti-Zionism, and which even its lead author Kenneth Stern has now publicly criticised.' The comments by Ms Sultana, who quit Labour last month in order to set up the new left-wing party with Mr Corbyn, sparked a backlash among Jewish groups. Andrew Gilbert, the vice-president of the Board of Deputies, told the Telegraph: 'The IHRA definition has been adopted by the Government and public institutions in this country and around the world, and is supported by the overwhelming majority of British Jews as it is clear and measured in defining anti-Semitism. 'Calling the recognition of the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism a 'capitulation' is a grave insult. 'Labour's real betrayal under Corbyn was unlawfully harassing and discriminating against Jews. 'Those who seek to delegitimise and mis-define the IHRA definition in this way prove themselves to be no friend to the Jewish community and also call into question their wider commitment to anti-racism, the wellbeing of the Jewish community and social cohesion.' A spokesman for Campaign Against Antisemitism said: 'If Jews do not have the right to define the hatred that targets them, then who does? Does Zarah Sultana think that it should be herself?' Alex Hearn, the director of Labour Against Antisemitism, said: 'Zarah Sultana has fundamentally misrepresented the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism. It is unsurprising that she opposes it, given her history. 'There should be no place in a mainstream political party for the likes of Ms Sultana, and it is surprising that the Labour Party tolerated her for so long. 'Hopefully she will remain on the fringes of politics for the remainder of her career, which is where her extremist views belong.' In the same interview, Ms Sultana referred to Israel as a 'genocidal apartheid state'. Despite the backlash, she doubled down on her comments by posting on X/Twitter on Sunday night: 'The smears won't work this time. I say it loudly and proudly: I'm an anti-Zionist. Print that.' Ms Sultana and Mr Corbyn's new movement has the website with a welcome message saying 'this is your party'. But Ms Sultana sowed confusion immediately after its launch by insisting a name had not yet been chosen. She frantically posted on social media: 'It's not called Your Party.' It was explained that members would decide on the new party's name at a later date, but political opponents mocked the 'chaotic' launch. It followed claims Ms Sultana had previously caught Mr Corbyn by surprise by quitting Labour and publicly announcing their plans to found a new party. Mr Corbyn insisted the launch of the new party was 'not messy at all' and 'a totally coherent approach'.
