PM Anwar pays courtesy call on Sabah Governor Musa
KOTA KINABALU: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim today paid a courtesy call on Sabah Yang Dipertua Negeri Tun Musa Aman at Istana Seri Kinabalu here.
Anwar arrived at the palace at around 11 a.m., shortly after the special aircraft carrying him landed at Terminal Two of Kota Kinabalu International Airport at 10.35 am to begin a one-day working visit to the state.
He signed the guest book before holding a four-eyed meeting with Musa in the Special Visitors' Hall.
This was Anwar's first courtesy call on Musa since his appointment as the new Sabah Governor in January.
The half-hour meeting concluded with a luncheon in the palace's dining hall.
After the meeting at Istana Seri Kinabalu, Anwar proceeded to Tawau to officiate the Closing Ceremony of the Sabah MADANI Rakyat Programme (PMR) 2025 at Dataran Majlis Perbandaran Tawau.
While in Tawau, the Prime Minister is also scheduled to hand over the completed Tamu Desa Sabah project, present the Sabah Entrepreneur Excellence Awards and launch the Solar MADANI Programme.
Anwar and Sabah Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor are also expected to conduct a walkabout to observe the services provided by federal agencies and departments participating in the programme.
The Prime Minister is scheduled to return to Kuala Lumpur later this evening.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysian Reserve
3 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Nobody is above the law, says High Court
Anwar filed his application on May 23, asking whether a sitting PM has limited immunity from civil lawsuits under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution by FARAH SOLHI THE Kuala Lumpur (KL) High Court's dismissal of Prime Minister (PM) Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's application to refer a constitutional question to the Federal Court — specifically on procedural immunity from civil liabilities — strongly affirms that no one is above the law. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain ruled that Anwar's claim of being deprived of personal liberty, based on the assertion that the suit filed against him was vexatious and politically motivated, is untenable. In delivering her brief judgement on June 4, the judge held that none of the Federal Constitution articles cited in Anwar's application gave rise to any real, substantial or justiciable constitutional questions. Roz Mawar said Anwar had not demonstrated that he is being denied legal protection afforded to others, or that any legal provisions operate unequally against him. 'The questions posed are speculative (and) not necessary for the disposal of this case, nor do they concern the interpretation or validity of any constitutional provision. 'From a judicial perspective, the proposed questions do not appear to meet the threshold of genuine constitutional controversy,' she said, while also awarded former research assistant Mohammed Yusoff Rawther RM20,000 in costs. Anwar also questions whether courts are constitutionally required to protect public officials from lawsuits when no crime is proven (pic: Media Mulia) Roz Mawar further ruled that constitutional supremacy demands all persons, including public office holders, be equally subject to the rule of law, and that not every question touching or quoting the Federal Constitution warrants referral, as the Federal Court is not a forum for speculative advisory opinions. She added that Anwar's affirmed readiness to proceed with the trial, as submitted by his counsels during the application hear- ing on June 3, indicated no evidence that the suit impairs his ability to perform his constitutional duties. The trial will proceed as scheduled on June 16, as the court found no special circumstances warranting a postponement. Constitutional Questions Raised in Anwar's Application Anwar filed his application on May 23, questioning whether a sitting PM has qualified immunity from civil suits under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution. This pertains to alleged private acts committed prior to his appointment, where the continuation of such litigation, he argued, would impair the effective discharge of his executive functions and undermine the constitutional separation of powers. Anwar also questioned whether the High Court's decision to allow the civil suit, based on private allegations but pursued in a political context, would violate the constitutional guarantee of equality before the law under Article 8(1) which relates to the fundamental rights to equal treatment. Anwar also questioned, under Article 5(1), whether a sitting PM should be protected from lawsuits that are politically motivated or poorly timed, particularly if they relate to actions taken before assuming office, lack clear legal merit, but could damage reputation and hinder the ability to govern. He further raised the issue of whether courts are constitutionally required to shield public officials from such lawsuits when no crime has been proven. In response, Roz Mawar said Article 5(1) does not extend to mere inconvenience, reputational risks or constitutional burden arising from civil proceedings, noting that Anwar's rights were not violated as he remains at liberty, with no restrictions on his movement or legal capacity. 'The act requiring a defendant to respond to a claim, however politically sensitive, does not implicate Article 5(1), and no precedent has extended its ambit to encompass exposure to civil litigation,' she said. She also found Anwar's questions regarding Article 8(1) to be without merit, saying that the provision serves as a shield, not a sword for immunity, it guarantees equal legal treatment, not exemption from the law, as established in precedent cases. 'The defendant has not shown any discriminatory conduct by the courts or the law. The plaintiff's (Yusoff Rawther's) suit was filed under the same procedural and substantive law applicable to all Malaysians and foreigners alike in this country,' she added. Roz Mawar said while Article 39, which pertains to executive authority, is a structural allocation of powers and does not confer any personal immunity on the PM or Cabinet ministers. It does not suggest, either expressly or implicitly, that executive authority includes protection against personal civil liability. She also said Anwar's arguments contending Article 43 were flawed, as no immunity is implied under the said article. This provision, she added, pertains solely to appointments and tenure, and does not prescribe or imply immunity from judicial proceedings. 'No clause in Article 43 shields a sitting PM from accountability for private acts committed prior to assuming office,' she said, adding that constitutional silence does not equate to immunity. The judge also said that the mind map produced by Anwar's legal team, intended to illustrate their theory of constructive harm to the office, has no textual or jurisprudential basis, nor does any provision in the Constitution imply immunity for the PM from civil litigation. 'The defendant's legal team could not clearly anchor this proposed doctrine to any particular article or legal test. The argument, at best, may be rooted in policy concerns rather than constitutional law,' she said. While Article 39, which pertains to executive authority, is a structural allocation of powers, it does not confer any personal immunity on the PM or Cabinet ministers Is Seeking Immunity a Violation of Constitutional Rights? Senior lawyer Datuk Seri Rajan Navaratnam said every individual, including the sitting PM, who feels aggrieved is entitled to approach the courts for determination of a subject matter. However, there are certain limitations to matters raised, as courts are bound by precedent decisions and administration of justice is subject to specific rules and procedures. 'It is for the courts to determine whether such an action (of raising legal questions) has merit or otherwise. 'Article 8 of the Constitution states that all persons are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law. In other words, no one is above or exempt from the legal framework,' he told The Malaysian Reserve (TMR). However, the Constitution does not afford immunity from court proceedings to any individual, except under Article 183, which provides that no action can be initiated against the Yang diPertuan Agong or a State Ruler without the consent of the Attorney General (AG). Therefore, it can be said that even Article 183 does not provide absolute immunity, as the discretion lies with the AG. Meanwhile, senior lawyer Datuk Seri Dr Jahabardeen Mohamed Yunoos, affirming Rajan's view, said there are various legal mechanisms in place to weed out frivolous suits and those that attempt to abuse the judicial process. He noted that the law does accord certain forms of immunity, but these are limited — primarily to judges or individuals acting in a judicial capacity, as stipulated under Section 14 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. This provision states that judges and others performing judicial functions cannot be sued for actions taken in the course of their duties, even if those actions exceeded their authority, provided they genuinely believed they had such authority at the time. Yusoff Rawther (centre) is currently under police detention after being charged under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 for allegedly trafficking 305g of cannabis What's Next? Anwar's counsel, Datuk Seri K Rajasegaran told TMR on June 5 that they have filed a notice of appeal to the Appellate Court immediately following the High Court's decision. However, he confirmed that his team is still awaiting a date or case management notice from the Appellate Court. He added that they will file a notice of urgency together with an application to stay (postpone) the High Court's proceedings. Pending any decision by the higher courts, the High Court will proceed with the matter, following Roz Mawar's dismissal of Rajasegaran's oral application for postponement on June 4. Yusoff Rawther filed a suit against Anwar in July 2021, claiming he was sexually assaulted by the latter on Oct 2, 2018, at Anwar's residence. He made a statutory declaration and lodged a police report regarding the incident in 2019. However, he was later accused of attempting to damage the PM's political career and reputation through the police report. The plaintiff, who was Anwar's research assistant, stated in his affidavits that the allegations had affected his mental health. He is seeking general, aggravated and exemplary damages, along with interest, costs and other relief the court deems appropriate. Yusoff Rawther is currently under police detention after being charged under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 for allegedly trafficking 305g of cannabis found in his vehicle near the mosque at the police contingent headquarters on Sept 6, 2024. He was also charged under Section 36(1) of the Firearms Act 1960 for possession of two imitation firearms. The High Court is scheduled to deliver its decision at the end of the prosecution case on his charges on June 12. This article first appeared in The Malaysian Reserve weekly print edition
BusinessToday
a day ago
- BusinessToday
Five Key Takeaways That Defined The 46th ASEAN Summit
The 46th ASEAN Summit, hosted in Kuala Lumpur (KL) under Malaysia's chairmanship, marked a critical juncture for the 10-member regional bloc as it confronts rising geopolitical headwinds, economic protectionism and internal instability. Held under the theme 'ASEAN Matters: Inclusivity and Sustainability', the summit brought together Southeast Asian leaders for high-level deliberations aimed at strengthening regional cooperation and preparing ASEAN for an increasingly complex global environment. Here are five key takeaways that defined the summit: Vision 2045: KL Declaration Sets Long-Term Strategic Roadmap A highlight of the summit was the adoption of the KL Declaration on ASEAN 2045: Our Shared Future, which lays out a long-term strategic vision for the bloc through the next two decades. The roadmap reaffirms ASEAN's foundational principles of non-interference and consensus while outlining enhanced ambitions in areas such as digital transformation, green development, economic resilience and security cooperation. The declaration aims to ensure ASEAN remains relevant and united in the face of shifting global power dynamics and disruptive technologies. It envisions a more adaptive and agile ASEAN that can act decisively on transboundary issues like climate change, cybersecurity and public health. ASEAN Responds to US Tariff Hikes with Unified Economic Front Recent tariff hikes by the US targeting exports from six ASEAN countries cast a shadow over the summit. In response, ASEAN leaders agreed to adopt a coordinated approach to trade negotiations with Washington, aiming to mitigate the impact on regional supply chains and economic recovery. Malaysian Prime Minister (PM) and ASEAN Chair Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim announced the formation of a regional task force to study and negotiate on the matter, emphasising that ASEAN would not allow external economic pressure to divide the bloc. The move signals a maturing ASEAN that seeks to collectively defend its economic interests amid growing global trade tensions. Deepening Strategic Ties with China and the GCC The summit also served as a platform to enhance ASEAN's external partnerships. Notably, it hosted the 2nd ASEAN-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-GCC-China Summit, reflecting ASEAN's intent to diversify economic partnerships beyond traditional Western allies. Anwar mentioned in his opening remarks during the ASEAN-GCC Summit that, in 2023, the GCC was ASEAN's seventh largest trading partner, with total trade reaching US$130.7 billion and foreign direct investment inflows were US$390.2 million. Anwar then stressed a stronger ASEAN-GCC relationship will be key to enhancing interregional collaboration, building resilience and securing sustainable prosperity for the peoples. The same sentiment was echoed by Chinese Premier Li Qiang who urged for closer collaboration, citing the untapped potential between ASEAN, the GCC and China as the trade value is expected to experience an average growth of 30%, reaching a total of US$18 billion by 2032. Despite accounting for nearly a quarter of the world's population and economic output, the three regions only account for 5% of global trade. Hence, the leaders agreed to boost infrastructure investment, trade liberalisation and cross-border connectivity, including in areas like digital finance and green energy. ASEAN Reaffirms Commitment to Peace in Myanmar The summit reiterated ASEAN's central role in resolving the protracted crisis in Myanmar. The ASEAN leaders supported expanding the fragile ceasefire and called for inclusive political dialogue among all stakeholders in Myanmar. The Five-Point Consensus, first introduced in 2021, was reaffirmed as the framework for peace. ASEAN continues to walk a delicate diplomatic tightrope, balancing engagement with the Myanmar military junta while maintaining credibility with the international community and pro-democracy groups. The summit also called for sustained humanitarian aid and endorsed greater involvement from ASEAN's special envoy in facilitating conflict resolution. Toward a Larger ASEAN: Timor-Leste and Papua New Guinea in Focus The summit reaffirmed ASEAN's commitment to expand its membership, recognising the progress made by Timor-Leste toward full accession. Malaysian PM Anwar suggested that Timor-Leste could officially join as early as the next ASEAN Summit in October 2025. Meanwhile, Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto proposed opening membership talks with Papua New Guinea. The proposal sparked interest but also debate, as some member states raised concerns about readiness and institutional capacity. Nonetheless, the conversation signalled ASEAN's growing ambition to broaden its geopolitical footprint and enhance its global relevance. Overall, the 46th ASEAN Summit concluded with a strong message of unity and forward-looking resolve. As global uncertainties mount, from geopolitical rivalries to economic nationalism, ASEAN's leaders demonstrated a renewed commitment to regional solidarity, strategic foresight and external diversification. While challenges such as the Myanmar crisis and trade friction with the US persist, the summit's outcomes suggest a bloc that is increasingly confident in shaping its own path on the global stage. As Malaysian PM Anwar aptly summarised, 'ASEAN must not just react to global events, it must help shape them'. Now all eyes will be on the upcoming 47th ASEAN Summit in October 2025 to find out what will be unfold. Related
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
PM urges Asean-GCC to act on Gaza
PUTRAJAYA: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has called for stronger cooperation between Asean countries and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) to end Israel's atrocities in Gaza. Speaking to reporters after performing Aidiladha prayers at Masjid Putra here yesterday, Anwar said that regional and international collective efforts are crucial to ending the prolonged conflict and the suffering of the Palestinian people. 'We've conveyed our stance (through a Wisma Putra statement), but this cannot be the effort of just one country. As we saw in recent engagements with Gulf nations, there is a shared consensus. 'So Asean, the Gulf states and a few other countries can come together to provide a clear message and exert strong pressure on the world to put a stop to it (Israel's brutality),' he said, Bernama reported. He was responding to the United States' use of its veto power on a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) draft resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the lifting of restrictions on humanitarian aid. Malaysia has expressed deep regret and disappointment over the repeated failure of the UNSC to adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and lasting ceasefire, as well as the removal of restrictions on humanitarian aid to Gaza. In a statement last Thursday, the Foreign Ministry stressed that the UNSC's repeated failure to act on one of the worst humanitarian tragedies since World War II, due to the use of veto power, is regrettable and deeply disappointing. Anwar also said that the continued actions of countries supplying arms to Israel are unacceptable and go against the principles of international law. 'It's contradictory when they issue statements of condemnation, yet continue to supply or sell weapons to Israel. Such actions violate the principles of international law and humanitarian norms. 'We strongly condemn (the atrocities) and seek diplomatic avenues to support the Palestinian struggle and help them reclaim their legitimate rights, including in Gaza,' Anwar said. Separately, Anwar said during phone conversations with leaders of other Muslim nations, including Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, they had expressed concern over the violence committed by the Zionist regime. 'All of them conveyed a clear stance, and we have agreed to continue consultations to find a resolution to this crisis as soon as possible,' he added.
