Cheltenham restaurant to close as making money 'is impossible'
A restaurant owner says "it is impossible to make money in hospitality anymore" following the announcement of the closure of her business.French restaurant Domaine 16, in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, survived the pandemic after opening on Regent Street in 2019, but will offer its last service to customers on Friday.The news follows the recent closure of The Find coffee house on the same road, with the owners saying they were unsure if it would ever reopen."Sometimes you've got to say it's time to go, you've done everything you could, but it's game over," said Stephanie Ronssin, owner of Domaine 16.
"I invested all my money and the reason for closing is I don't have any more money to invest," she added.Ms Ronssin said the closure was tough to take as the restaurant had been successful, with "amazing" reviews and many customers.
"Unfortunately, for the last two years, the margins have been reduced and reduced."The cost of utilities has gone through the roof, the cost of food has gone through the roof, so basically we're making enough just to be at zero."You don't want to put your prices too high because you still want customers in, so it's a vicious circle," she said.The closure has led to other restaurant owners in Cheltenham urging people to support local independent businesses.Pak-Wai Hung, who runs 288 Bar and Wok on the High Street, said the business had just experienced its worst three months in 20 years.
"It's not sustainable mentally or financially. We may be the bosses but we still have our mortgages to pay and children to look after, all of those pressures," he said.Mr Hung said he had started to wonder whether to keep running the restaurant, but he wanted to try and keep going.He said: "You pay your landlord, pay your VAT, pay your staff and whatever's left you pay yourself. We're getting to the point where I'm earning less than the pot washer. "We choose it because we have a passion, but after a while that passion fades and becomes a burden. "But we're going to try, we have to do new things, we have to innovate, we're part of the community."HM Treasury has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
What are the government's planned welfare changes?
A significant number of Labour MPs are threatening to vote against the government's working-age welfare reform plan when it comes before the House of Commons next reforms are designed to reduce the overall working-age welfare bill by about £5bn a year by the end of the rebel MPs have signed an amendment to the legislation that makes a series of objections, including a lack of official consultation and impact Verify explains the detail of the reforms and their possible impact. Which benefits would be cut? The government wants to save money by:making it harder for people to access Personal Independence Payments (Pip)cutting the rate of incapacity benefitIncapacity benefit - which is mainly paid through the health element of Universal Credit - goes to those deemed to be unable to work for health benefit is set to be reduced by 50% in cash terms for new claimants from April 2026. For existing claimants, it is due to be held flat in cash terms until 2029-30 - meaning payments will not rise in line with inflation. The government estimates these two changes will save £3bn a year by the end of the is paid to people with a long-term physical or mental health condition or a disability and who need support. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has acknowledged that almost 20% of recipients are in work. The government plans to make it more difficult for people to claim the "daily living" element of Pip from 2026-27. Under the current assessment system, claimants are scored on a zero to 12 scale by a health professional on everyday tasks such as washing, getting dressed and preparing are the Pip and universal credit changes and who is affected?Under the proposed change, people would need to score at least four on one task, ruling out people with lower scores who would previously have qualified for the benefit. The government estimates this will save an additional £4.5bn a year from the welfare bill by the end of the decade. Why is the government trying to cut welfare spending? It is concerned about the rise in the number of people claiming working-age benefits in recent years and the implications of this trend for the public Autumn, the government projected that the numbers of working-age claimants of Pip in England, Scotland and Wales would rise from 2.7 million in 2023-24 to 4.3 million in 2029-30, an increase of 1.6 that time, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government's official forecaster, projected that the overall cost of the working-age benefit system would rise from £48.5bn in 2024 to £75.7bn by would have represented an increase from 1.7% of the size of the UK economy to 2.2%, roughly the size of current spending on defence. Ministers argue that this rising bill needs to be brought under control and that changes to the welfare system are part of that is worth noting though that - even after factoring in the planned cuts - the OBR still projected this bill to continue to rise in cash terms to £72.3bn by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) still projected the total number of working-age Pip recipients to rise by 1.2 million between 2023-24 and 2029-30 - after the cuts. In this sense, the main effect of the Pip cuts would be to reduce the increase in claimants that would otherwise have occurred. What would the impact of the reforms be? The government's official impact assessment estimates that about 250,000 additional people (including 50,000 children) will be left in "relative poverty" (after housing costs) by 2030 because of the that assessment included the impact of the government deciding not to proceed with welfare reforms planned by the previous Conservative administration, which government analysts had judged would have pushed an additional 150,000 people into charities and research organisations have suggested this means the government's 250,000 estimate understates the impact of its own reforms, since the previous administration's reforms were never actually Porter from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation has suggested the actual poverty impact of the government's changes could therefore be up to 400,000 (adding the 250,000 figure to the 150,000 figure to generate an estimate of the total numbers affected).However, the government's impact assessment cautions against simply adding the two figures together, noting that "some people are affected by more than one [reform] measure", meaning this approach risks double counting account of this, the Resolution Foundation think tank has estimated that the net effect of the government's reforms would mean "at least 300,000" people entering relative poverty by 2030. What about the impact on employment? The government has claimed that its reforms are not just about saving money, but helping people into Rachel Reeves told Sky News in March 2025 that: "I am absolutely certain that our reforms, instead of pushing people into poverty, are going to get people into work. And we know that if you move from welfare into work, you are much less likely to be in poverty."To this end, the government is gradually increasing the standard allowance in Universal Credit - the basic sum paid to cover recipients' living costs - by £5 a week by is projected to be a net benefit to 3.8 million households and the government argues it will also increase the incentives for people to work rather than claim incapacity government is also investing an extra £1bn a year by 2029-30 in additional support to get people out of inactivity and into employment. What are the rebels' objections? The rebel MPs say disabled people have not been consulted on the proposed also say there has been no evaluation of the overall employment impacts by the is true that the government has not consulted disabled people on the specific cuts to Pip and incapacity benefits, though it is now consulting on the broader reform is also the case that the OBR has not yet done a full employment impact assessment, though the forecaster says it will do one before the Autumn the Resolution Foundation has done its own estimate of the employment impact of the overall reform estimates the total increase in employment could be between 60,000 and 105,000, although it stressed that these figures are highly positive employment figure contrasts with the 800,000 people who are projected to lose part of their Pip payments by 2029-30 and the 3 million people families who will see a cut in their incapacity benefits. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Victorian pharmacist's shop sells for almost £17,000 at auction
A Victorian pharmacist's shop has sold for £16,950 at an auction in shop, which dates back to the 1880s, was split into 10 separate lots and sold to a mixture of private collectors and institutions at Cotswold Auction Company in Cirencester on Wednesday.A total of more than 100 items were sold from Darrin Baines' collection of Georgian and Victorian apothecary items, described as one of the largest in the UK."There was lots of interest from people in the room, on the telephone and online bids were very busy - and not just in the UK, but internationally too," said Cotswold Auction Company auctioneer Niall Fry. "There was a good buzz in the room," he Fry said some of the smaller glass items and advertising signs also did well, and seller Darrin Baines was "very pleased" with the results."It's just really fascinating and a privilege to handle [the collection]," added Mr Fry."We get quite a lot of large collections, but to get such niche items in large quantities is quite rare." 'Ceiling fell on us' Mr Baines, a professor of health economics, amassed the sizable collection over the past 25 bought and relocated the Victorian pharmacist's shop to his house in Leominster in Herefordshire from Norfolk."I found [it] in Upwell in the Fens. It had been in the same family for 150 years," he said."I went with a carpenter and a friend and dismantled the shop myself, and when we took one of the really big cabinets out, the ceiling fell on us because it was holding the ceiling up."Mr Baines said he decided to get rid of the collection after selling his house and passion had previously taken up two floors of his home, in what he described as a "museum".
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Getty drops copyright allegations in UK lawsuit against Stability AI
Getty Images dropped copyright infringement allegations from its lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Stability AI as closing arguments began Wednesday in the landmark case at Britain's High Court. Seattle-based Getty's decision to abandon the copyright claim removes a key part of its lawsuit against Stability AI, which owns a popular AI image-making tool called Stable Diffusion. The two have been facing off in a widely watched court case that could have implications for the creative and technology industries. Tech companies have been training their AI systems on vast troves of writings or images available online, citing 'fair use' or 'fair dealing' legal doctrines in the United States and United Kingdom. Getty was among the first to challenge those practices with copyright infringement lawsuits in the United States and the United Kingdom in early 2023. In its lawsuit, Getty alleged that Stability's use of its images infringed its intellectual property rights, including copyright, trademark and database rights. However, Getty's move indicates that the company didn't think its copyright allegations would succeed. After witness and expert testimony, Getty made the 'pragmatic decision to pursue only the claims for trade mark infringement, passing off and secondary infringement of copyright,' according to a written copy of its closing arguments. Getty continues to accuse Stability of infringing its trademark because its AI model was trained on images that included Getty's watermarks, which were sometimes reproduced by the image generator. Getty also alleges that Stability indirectly infringed its copyright because even if Stability's AI models were trained outside of Britain, it still faces local laws if the models produced images in the country. But Stability has argued that because training of the AI model technically happened elsewhere, on computers run by U.S. tech giant Amazon, the case doesn't belong in the United Kingdom. London-based Stability said welcomed Getty's move. 'We are pleased to see Getty's decision to drop multiple claims after the conclusion of testimony,' the company said in a statement. "We are grateful for the time and effort the UK court has put forth to address the important matters in this case. We look forward to the court's final judgment.' Closing arguments are expected to last until the end of the week. A written decision from the judge expected at a later date.
