logo
‘Like water off duck's back': Vadodara court on Nagpur cops' apology over non-execution of warrant in alimony case

‘Like water off duck's back': Vadodara court on Nagpur cops' apology over non-execution of warrant in alimony case

Indian Express08-05-2025
Even as it likened their apology to the court to 'water off duck's back', following their failure to execute warrants issued against a Nagpur businessman in the case of outstanding maintenance dues to his Vadodara-based wife, a family court here recently recalled and set aside its earlier order directing filing of FIR against two officers of Maharashtra Police.
The officers included the Superintendent of Police (SP), Rural, Harsh Poddar and an inspector of the police station concerned.
The order noted the submissions of the advocates representing the officers and drew attention to an email sent on April 2 by the SP to the court to tender 'his unconditional apology by explaining the detailed facts about gross negligence…on the part of the Police Inspector, Cyber Cell as well as Police Inspector Umred Police station and other concerned… for not drawing his attention toward (the) show cause notice and warrants as issued…'
Although the Vadodara Family Court Judge P H Singh accepted the 'unconditional apology' of the two officers, in its order dated April 30, he likened the same to 'water off duck's back.'
Stating that it had initiated the exercise to 'give justice to the original application — a destitute wife, whose right was deprived due to not serving distress warrant', the court noted that the purpose had been fulfilled as the accused was arrested and produced before the family court on April 2.
'The (husband) was taken into judicial custody and later on, the opponent had paid the entire outstanding amount due…,' the court said.
'Therefore, considering the facts, though the facts averred and submitted in the unconditional apology (of Nagpur Rural SP) is an afterthought… it is like water off a duck's back, and though this court is of the view that the conduct of (Nagpur Rural SP, PI Umred and PI Cyber Cell) is not condonable, then also… the main purpose to initiate all exercise was to give justice to the original applicant…' the order noted.
On April 2, the court had convicted and sentenced the 40-year-old husband to approximately six years in prison in three cases of recovery of maintenance, filed by his 36-year-old estranged wife for an unpaid amount of Rs 18.60 lakh.
The Nagpur-based man, who was produced before the family court by the Maharashtra Police on April 2, following the court's March 29 direction to lodge an FIR against the police officers for 'intentionally disobeying court directions', was facing a total of nine years in prison for non-payment of a total monthly maintenance amount of approximately Rs 33 lakh to his estranged wife.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In Noida, shopkeeper handed 3 years in jail for molesting Class 11 student
In Noida, shopkeeper handed 3 years in jail for molesting Class 11 student

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

In Noida, shopkeeper handed 3 years in jail for molesting Class 11 student

Noida: A Special Pocso court handed a man three years of rigorous imprisonment (RI) for molesting a class 11 student in 2014. The minor had come to the accused's Ghaziabad shop to get printouts of some school study material when the convict had molested her. The accused was fined Rs 5,000 along with a prison term by the additional district and sessions cum special Pocso court on Tuesday. An FIR was registered against the man under section 354A IPC (sexual harassment) and section 7/8 Pocso Act (sexual assault of a minor) with the Kavinagar police by the victim's mother soon after the girl informed her about being harassed by a boy working at the cybercafe. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida | Gold Rates Today in Noida | Silver Rates Today in Noida After registering the case, cops arrested the accused and, after investigation, filed the chargesheet on Dec 4, 2014. The court framed the charges and began the trial in the matter on March 1, 2017. The prosecution presented five witnesses in support of their arguments, including the victim, her parents, and the investigating officer, while the defence also produced three independent witnesses and negated the version of the prosecution. The girl, in her examination-in-chief, deposed before the court that she went to the cybercafe to get some pages printed as part of her schoolwork. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo Refusing all the charges, the defence presented a completely different version of the story and testified to it through three independent witnesses—all shopkeepers in the neighbouring shops who claimed to have witnessed the incident. The defence counsel claimed that the girl took out prints but was not ready to pay money. Prosecutor (Pocso) Satish Sharma argued that the defence never cross-examined the victim about her links with the SHO. The court concluded that the defence, in their initial arguments, tried to prove that since the shop was congested, the accused unintentionally touched the teenager. "If the matter was linked to money not being paid and a case lodged falsely, the defence would not have tried to prove that 'accidental touch' in the first place," the court observed. The court of judge Lal Babu Yadav also agreed that since the deposition of the mother was recorded in court after four years of the incident, and the victim's deposition was recorded after ten years, general inconsistencies in the statements could not be ruled out. Declaring the accused guilty on Aug 11, the court sentenced him to three years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 5,000 under section 7/8 of the Pocso Act. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

Five handed life term for 2022 showroom murder in Gurgaon, court dismisses ‘political rivalry'
Five handed life term for 2022 showroom murder in Gurgaon, court dismisses ‘political rivalry'

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Five handed life term for 2022 showroom murder in Gurgaon, court dismisses ‘political rivalry'

Gurgaon: A city court has sentenced five men to life imprisonment for a brazen murder that took place in broad daylight at a clothing brand store in Old Gurgaon three years ago. The murder, which occurred in 2022, was a result of personal enmity, according to the prosecution. The case, which gripped the city due to its audacity and the involvement of high-profile people, concluded with the district court also imposing a fine of Rs 3 lakh on each convict. Sukhbir Singh, a resident of Sohna, was brutally attacked inside Raymond showroom. Those convicted include the brother-in-law of the deceased. Those sentenced to life term include Yogesh alias Sheelu, Chaman alias Pawan, Deepak alias Deepu, Ankul and Rahul. You Can Also Check: Gurgaon AQI | Weather in Gurgaon | Bank Holidays in Gurgaon | Public Holidays in Gurgaon | Gold Rates Today in Gurgaon | Silver Rates Today in Gurgaon Initially, charges were framed against 20 people, including the brother of a prominent JJP leader from Sohna. However, after a thorough trial, 15 accused were acquitted due to a lack of credible evidence linking them to the crime. Except for the five persons who committed the murder, all others were accused of criminal conspiracy. Narender Jain, counsel for the complainant, said on Sept 1, 2022, Sukhbir Singh, vice-president of Sohna Market, was shot dead inside the showroom near Agrawal Dharamshala. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo Sukhbir was politically active in Sohna. Sukhbir, along with his cousin Rajender, was inside the showroom to purchase clothes. At around 3.30pm, four-five people barged inside the showroom and shot Sukhbir dead. The incident was recorded on CCTV camera. Sukhbir had two marriages. Chaman, the brother of one of Sukhbir's wives, did not have a cordial relationship with Sukhbir and planned and executed the murder. During the investigation, Rahul, the nephew of the deceased, alleged Sukhbir was killed due to political rivalry and even blamed a JJP leader, who contested the assembly election from Sohna assembly seat in 2019 on its ticket, for the murder. Pushpa, the wife of the deceased, alleged that accused Joginder and his brother Rohtas financially aided the accused Chaman for the commission of the murder of deceased Sukhbir due to political rivalry. Prashant Yadav, counsel for the accused, argued Joginder and Rohtas were falsely implicated in this case to gain political mileage. Pushpa became a councillor one month after the murder of her husband Sukhbir. No complaint was filed by Sukhbir against Chaman or any other accused. There is no evidence that Joginder and his brother financially helped Chaman. "The case is based upon false and fabricated evidence," said Yadav. The prosecution gave two motives: Chaman, brother-in-law of Sukhbir, was unhappy because his sister Pushpa married Sukhbir against the wishes of the family and became Sukhbir's second wife. Chaman also blamed Sukhbir for selling his family land at a cheaper rate. The second reason given was political vendetta between Sukhbir and Joginder and his brother Rohtas. It was alleged that they financially aided Chaman to kill Sukhbir. Additional sessions judge Sunil Kumar Dewan, rejecting the political rivalry theory, pointed out that until 2022, the deceased continued attending all the functions in the family of Rohtas and accused Joginder. He also pointed out that no complaint was made, nor was any security sought. "There is no reliable evidence to show any political rivalry," said the court. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

Fradusters cheat retired govt accountant out of Rs1.5cr in online share fraud
Fradusters cheat retired govt accountant out of Rs1.5cr in online share fraud

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Fradusters cheat retired govt accountant out of Rs1.5cr in online share fraud

1 2 Pune: Online fraudsters cheated a retired central govt accountant out of Rs1.57 crore after promising him handsome returns on investment in online trade of shares. The retired official, an employee of Wadgaon Sheri, lodged a complaint with the Cyber police on Tuesday. According to the police, he received a message on his messaging application in March urging him to invest in stocks to generate handsome income. Senior inspector Swapnali Shinde of the cyber police said, "The suspects promised the victim over 20% profit in just a few months. The retired official read the message and decided to contact its sender. His number was then added to a group on the messaging application. He then contacted the group admin, who promised to help him in trading shares and generating profit." You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune | Gold Rates Today in Pune | Silver Rates Today in Pune According to the FIR, the suspects sent him documents of their share trading firm on the messaging application. It had seals and stamps of the company. They even claimed that their firm was registered with the Sebi. The complainant, after getting the seals and stamps, trusted the group admin. "The suspects then told the victim to download a stock trading application. He downloaded it and started trading shares with tips from the suspects," the FIR stated. The suspects then promised to help the victim buy high-value shares and shared six bank account details with him. The retired govt official transferred money to these accounts on 11 occasions, the FIR stated. "In all, he transferred Rs 1.57 crores. The victim's application showed a sum of Rs2.93 crore as the collective sum of his investment and profit generated on the app. When he decided to sell off the shares for profit, the suspects demanded various fees and taxes. The victim then realised the cheating and approached the police. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store