ALIEN: EARTH Video Teases Mysterious Link Between New Character and Franchise Legacy — GeekTyrant
Set years before the events of Alien , the upcoming FX series explores the early days of the corporate arms race that would shape the future of humanity. While Alien introduced Weyland-Yutani as the shadowy force pulling the strings from behind the scenes, Alien: Earth will widen the scope to show the company fighting for dominance against other hungry players like Lynch, Dynamic, Threshold, and Prodigy.
Prodigy is led by the enigmatic and eccentric Boy Kavalier, played by Samuel Blenkin, and this video gives us a taste of what to expect form the character. In the teaser, Kavalier addresses the competition:
'I'd be lying if I said I wasn't aware of Weyland-Yutani. Everyone in this game is. But I don't emulate them. I don't envy them. I don't fear them. I think they're playing catch-up.'
That's a bold claim in a universe where Weyland-Yutani has always played god with human lives, but Kavalier might have something to back it up. Prodigy's breakthrough is wild as they're transferring human consciousness into synthetics, essentially creating a new form of sentient life.
A catastrophic crash near Prodigy City brings chaos and horror, as alien monsters are unleashed into the world. That's when we meet Wendy, played by Sydney Chandler, the first human-synthetic hybrid. She takes charge, leading other synthetics in a desperate hunt to eliminate the alien threat. But this wouldn't be an Alien story without a deadly twist — there's a Xenomorph in the mix, and it's not going down without taking a few heads with it.
Kavalier's motives also remain murky. While Wendy and the others fight to survive, he seems more interested in capturing the alien than saving his creations. That obsession could spell doom for everyone involved.
Alongside Blenkin and Chandler, Alien: Earth features a solid cast including Timothy Olyphant as Kirsh, Alex Lawther as CJ, Lily Newmark as Nibs, and Essie Davis as Dame Silva. The series is created by Noah Hawley, with Ridley Scott producing.
Alien: Earth premieres with its first two episodes on FX and Hulu on August 12.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
22 minutes ago
US should put nuclear reactors on moon before other countries do, acting NASA administrator says
Nuclear power on the moon is critical to the United States' space exploration and national security goals, and the U.S. government should "move quickly" to build reactors there before its terrestrial rivals, according to a directive issued by Transportation Secretary and acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy, which was obtained by ABC News. One full "day" on the moon is two weeks of light followed by approximately two weeks of darkness (in Earth time). Nuclear energy, referred to as fission surface power, or FSP, in the directive, is a "sustainable" and "high-powered" energy source that can survive through the lunar night and be deployed on other celestial bodies, like Mars, according to Duffy. "Since March 2024, China and Russia have announced on at least three occasions a joint effort to place a reactor on the Moon by the mid-2030s," Duffy said in the directive. "The first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first." When reached for comment by ABC News, NASA said, "We'll let these directives speak for themselves." The directive, dated July 31, calls for a "Fission Surface Power Program Executive" to be named within 30 days who will implement and oversee the project and will report directly to the NASA administrator. It does not say what exactly the nuclear reactors would power on the moon. Politico was the first to report on this directive. A second directive, issued on the same day by Duffy, aims to speed up the development of replacements for the International Space Station, which is set to retire by 2030. While NASA has never used a fission nuclear reactor in space, it has been using nuclear material to power spacecraft since the 1960s. Known as radioisotope thermoelectric generators, or RTGs, these systems use the heat generated by the decay of plutonium-238, a nuclear element, to create electricity for powering spacecraft and rovers. Currently, NASA's Curiosity rover on Mars is using an RTG system for its power. In recent years, billions of dollars have been spent developing a new kind of nuclear reactor called Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). These reactors produce less power than traditional reactors, but are significantly smaller in size. SMRs are still being developed in the U.S. and there are no units currently in operation.
Scientific American
an hour ago
- Scientific American
NASA's Plan for a Nuclear Reactor on the Moon Could Be a Lunar Land Grab
NASA could soon go nuclear on the moon. The space agency's acting administrator, Sean Duffy, has issued a directive to expedite building a nuclear reactor on the lunar surface. Duffy, a former Fox News host, is also head of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and he took over leadership of NASA in July after the Trump administration pulled its nomination of the private astronaut and businessman Jared Isaacman. The directive, first reported by Politico, would accelerate NASA's long-simmering —and, to date, largely fruitless—efforts to develop nuclear reactors to support space science and exploration. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The space agency has pursued various projects over the years, most recently in 2022, when it by awarded three $5 million contracts to companies crafting designs for small, space-ready reactors meant for lunar operations in the mid-2030s. Inspired in part by a space policy directive issued by President Trump during his first term, those were intended to produce 40 kilowatts of power—enough to sustain a small office building—and would weigh less than six metric tons. Duffy's directive is more ambitious, calling for NASA to solicit proposals for reactors that would yield at least 100 kilowatts of power and be ready for launch by late 2029. The space agency is tasked with appointing an official to oversee the effort within 30 days, and to issue its solicitation within 60 days. Lunar nights are very long—two Earth weeks—and perilously cold, making nuclear power desirable for surface operations. But according to the directive the greater impetus for the fast-tracked plan is a burgeoning partnership between China and Russia to build a nuclear-powered outpost near the moon's south pole by the mid-2030s. The sun never crests high above the horizon there, leaving some craters in permanent shadow—and valuable deposits of water ice lacing their eternally dark floors. Despite its cryogenic chill this lunar region is hotly contested, with NASA's Artemis program also targeting crewed landings there as early as 2027 as part of the Artemis III mission. Besides providing abundant electricity for surface operations, a nuclear reactor on the moon could also allow for a strategic lunar land grab. Ownership of otherworldly territory is prohibited according to the U.N. Outer Space Treaty, but the treaty also obliges spacefaring powers to exercise 'due regard' in their activities, meaning that they should not encroach on or interfere with sensitive infrastructure built there by others. A nuclear reactor placed on the lunar surface, therefore, could allow the declaration of what Duffy's directive calls a 'keep-out zone.' Although the Trump administration's acceleration of NASA's nuclear-power efforts may be welcomed by many space-exploration advocates, it comes alongside other proposals from the White House that seek to radically reshape the space agency and could be at cross purposes. These include plans for extraordinarily deep cuts to NASA's science programs, as well as an active and ongoing culling of the space agency's work force. The president's budget request for fiscal year 2026 notably zeroes out funding for a joint program between NASA and the Department of Defense to develop nuclear rocketry; it would also wind down the space agency's ability to build and deploy radioisotope power sources, which offer nuclear-derived heat and electricity sans complex and heavy reactors for robotic missions to the outer planets and other sunlight-sparse parts of the solar system. The biggest question facing NASA's latest nuclear foray, however, may be what these notional new reactors would actually power. Many experts say a 2027 launch for Artemis III is unlikely, citing factors such as the ongoing difficulties of developing a requisite lunar lander based on SpaceX's Starship rocket. With each logistical misstep or schedule delay, additional Artemis missions that would put more meaningful and power-hungry infrastructure on the moon slip further over the horizon, potentially making the entire program more vulnerable to additional rounds of budget cuts—or even outright cancellation by future administrations. It's Time to Stand Up for Science Before you close the page, we need to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and we think right now is the most critical moment in that two-century history. We're not asking for charity. If you become a Digital, Print or Unlimited subscriber to Scientific American, you can help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both future and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself often goes unrecognized.
Geek Tyrant
2 hours ago
- Geek Tyrant
ALIEN: EARTH Creator Teases Monsters Even More Terrifying Than Xenomorphs — GeekTyrant
As we get closer to the highly anticipated debut of the sci-fi horror series Alien: Earth , excitement among fans continues to build, and now, we've got some fresh details to share with you. The show's creator, Noah Hawley, recently teased that the upcoming series will unleash a brand-new breed of monsters, possibly even more terrifying than the iconic xenomorphs we've been hiding from since Ridley Scott's 1979 classic, Alien . In a conversation with ComicBook, Hawley was asked if the xenomorphs will remain the scariest threat in Alien: Earth ? His answer: 'That depends on what grosses you out the most. I think we're giving them a run for their money, certainly.' That's an interesting statement, especially considering how the xenomorphs have haunted the nightmares of audiences for decades. But fear not, classic Xonomorph fans, Hawley assures that these beloved aliens aren't taking a backseat: 'But their value is added. They are scary in the egg stage, the facehugger stage, and the chest burster stage. They got something for everyone, those xenomorphs.' Hawley also hinted at how the series' Earth-bound setting amplifies the terror, explaining: 'You bring these creatures into our natural environment. You introduce an apex predator to another balanced ecosystem. I'm really interested to see how that plays out. 'I think you saw it in the last trailer, the iconic shot of the xenomorph in the cave system. You got a visceral response to it, to feel like now they're here [on Earth].' It's clear that Alien: Earth is evolving the threat in new and horrific ways. With a the ecosystem of Earth now thrown into chaos by these apex predators, fans can expect a tension-filled narrative unlike anything we've seen before. The first two episodes of Alien: Earth will drop on August 12, 2025, with the remaining six episodes releasing weekly. Get ready to face your fears—because Earth is about to get a lot scarier. I've already watched the first episode of the series, and I loved it! I'm excited to see how the rest of the series!
