Labour defends net-zero policies after Blair criticism
The government has defended its net-zero policies after Sir Tony Blair said limiting fossil fuels was "doomed to fail" and a new approach was needed.The former Labour prime minister argued the debate on climate change had become "irrational" and people in rich countries no longer wanted to make financial sacrifices "when they know that their impact on global emissions is minimal".His comments have been seized on by opposition parties as an attack on Sir Keir Starmer's plan to achieve net zero carbon emissions in the UK by 2050.But Labour ministers insist the drive to net zero will not involve any financial sacrifices and have minimal impact on people's lives.
It comes as a highly critical report by the independent Climate Change Committee says Labour has made very little progress in preparing the UK for the growing threats posed by rising temperatures since coming to power.Environment Secretary Steve Reed told Times Radio that Sir Tony had made "a valid and important contribution" to the climate change debate."I agree with much of what he said, but not absolutely every word and dot and comma of it," he added."But this government is moving to clean energy because it's best for Britain. It's more energy security for Britain."He said the government's plan to replace nearly all fossil fuels for electricity generation with wind, solar and wave energy by 2030 was aimed at breaking the UK's "dependency" on "fossil fuel dictators" like Vladimir Putin and it would lead to lower energy bills.In a report by the Tony Blair Institute, Sir Tony argues that the expected global rise in fossil fuel use and the doubling of airline travel over the next 20 years undermines current climate policies."These are the inconvenient facts, which mean that any strategy based on either 'phasing out' fossil fuels in the short term or limiting consumption is a strategy doomed to fail," he wrote.The report says existing carbon targets should be kept in place to give certainty to business but a rethink of how they are achieved was urgently needed.It says the focus should instead be on emerging technologies such as carbon capture and storage and nuclear fusion - and new international effort to persuade the world's biggest economies, such as China and India, to cut their emissions.
Conservative shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said it sent a "clear message" to the government that it needs to "rethink" its approach to net zero.Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch recently ditched her party's support for net zero by 2050, which the party had pursued in government.Atkins said there was "consensus across the board" on the need to protect the environment, but that "we have to take the public with us".Sir Tony's intervention has highlighted divisions in Labour over net zero.Some on the right of the party argue that the government is not doing enough to support workers and save jobs in the oil and gas sector in the transition to clean power.But Labour-supporting environmental campaigners have accused Sir Tony of handing ammunition to the Conservatives and Reform UK.One told the BBC the publication of his report on the eve of local elections was a sign that Sir Tony was losing influence over Sir Keir Starmer."This is an oddly public and oddly-timed intervention that would usually be made by someone struggling for access," he added.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
41 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Assisted dying: Medical students voice opposition as some MPs urge vote delay
It is currently expected the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will have its third reading on Friday, with MPs voting to either send it through to the House of Lords or to stop it progressing any further. It would be the first vote on the overall Bill to take place since November, when the proposed legislation passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 on a historic day which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales. But, days ahead of third reading, a group of Labour MPs opposed to the Bill have written to Commons leader Lucy Powell asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. They added that it 'alters the foundations of our NHS, the relationship between doctor and patient, and it strips power away from Parliament, concentrating it in the hands of future secretaries of state for health'. They also raised concerns that MPs might not have a copy of the final Bill by the time they vote, as some outstanding amendments will still be being considered on Friday morning. The MPs, including Dame Meg Hiller, wrote: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' Their letter came as medical students sent their own to MPs, citing concerns about the Bill. The student doctors, from universities across the UK, said: 'We do not oppose dignified death – far from it. We oppose a Bill that risks offering death in place of care, that widens health inequalities, that places vulnerable patients in danger, and that reshapes the ethical foundation that our profession is built upon without any clear support. 'As future doctors, we may not yet be the voice of this profession – but we will be. And we are asking to be heard.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater is the sponsor of the Bill (Jordan Pettitt/PA) But doctor and MP Simon Opher, who backs the Bill, said it is 'no surprise that medical students, like GPs and most other professionals, have a range of opinions on assisted dying'. He referenced one survey he said had been shared with him and showed a majority of medical students supported assisted dying in cases of terminal illness and unbearable suffering. The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards. As it stands, the Bill would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue. Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against. Last week, a majority of MPs approve a new clause, tabled by Dame Meg, to ensure medics cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. Her separate amendment to prevent health workers from bringing up the issue with adults patients before they have raised it was voted down. A ban on advertising assisted dying should the Bill pass into law was also supported.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Lefties abandon Stella Creasy's abortion amendment
A real cheery week in the Commons is looming for our lucky legislators. There's assisted dying, grooming gangs and a welfare row to enjoy. But tomorrow attention will switch to abortion, with Labour MPs now pushing to 'decriminalise' the practice in England and Wales. Unfortunately, a bit of a row has broken out between Tonia Antoniazzi and Stella Creasy, both of whom have tabled competing amendments to the Criminal Justice Bill. Antoniazzi's measure would allow abortion for any reason up to birth while maintaining criminal sanctions for doctors performing late-term or sex-selective procedures. Creasy, however, has adopted the more hard-line position of full decriminalisation in all circumstances. The pair sparred earlier this month on the floor of the House of Commons. Now, the race is on to see who can get more signatures for their amendment…. Sadly for Stella, it seems she has lost once again. For some 14 left-leaning Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs who previously backed her amendment have since withdrawn their names. They are, according to the parliamentary order paper, Peter Swallow, Antonia Bance, Freddie van Mierlo, Luke Taylor, Adam Jogee, Liz Jarvis, Rachel Taylor, Sarah Smith, Jacob Collier, Alison Hume, Kirith Entwistle, Layla Moran, Helen Hayes and Dr Rosena Allin-Khan. This list was accurate up to Friday evening. All except Allin-Khan have put their names to Antoniazzi's amendment instead. With Speaker Hoyle likely to call only one of the two Labour MPs, it looks like Creasy has demonstrated her reverse Midas touch in politics once again….
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
More than 100,000 people sign Scope's petition against government disability cut
Volunteers from learning disability charity Scope today handed a petition to the government with the voices of 100,0000 people opposing the cuts to welfare and PIP. Today, members of the charity gathered at Downing Street after receiving the backing of people across the UK and the disabled community. In March, Labour announced plans to save £5bn a year by overhauling the welfare system, plans which have been called 'barbaric' by campaigners. Volunteers for the charity included Rachel Batton, 53, from Cardiff, who, if the government papers are given the green light, her PIP cuts would be halved. She told Metro she was 'really scared' about the future and in 'constant stress waiting on tenterhooks' awaiting what cuts the government is going to make. Rachel has classical type EDS (Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome). EDS impacts Rachel by causing joint and muscle pain, easy bruising, frequent dislocations, and severe fatigue. She also has Multiple Sclerosis (MS), which further affects her mobility and fatigue. She said she felt 'resilient' but that there was a 'black cloud' over her everyday. She said: 'You feel like you're walking through treacle, just because your symptoms are getting worse and things and your pain is getting significantly worse. 'I can't remember a time when my pain was as bad as this, because I'm stressing about it every single day.' Rachel receives Personal Independence Payment (PIP) at the enhanced rate for daily living and the standard rate for mobility. Without PIP, Rachel would not be able to afford to manage the extra costs she is faced with. It's like, it feels like this is a tick box exercise, and the decision has already been made, and they're not going to change their mind but we've got to try.' 'It's like, it feels like this is a tick box exercise, and the decision has already been made, and they're not going to change their mind but we've got to try.' Rachel has a number of disability related extra costs and the amount of money she is about to receive from the government is going to be halved, she said. She needs frequent hot baths and consistent heating to manage her symptoms. Fatigue and mobility issues make food preparation difficult, so she relied on more expensive pre-cut ingredients and ready meals Scope said in the petition: 'Needing more financial support is not a choice. Disabled people often live in pain and in fear of losing vital support. 'After years of rising prices, many disabled people are already on the brink. Cutting disability benefits will deal another catastrophic blow to disabled people's lives.' Jessica Leigh, campaigns manager at disability equality charity Scope, said: 'We're here to urge the government to drop these catastrophic plans to rip billions from the welfare budget. 'Life costs a lot more when you're disabled, and these cuts will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work, as in Rachel's case. 'Without PIP, she won't be able to afford the things she needs to manage her conditions and the pain which comes with them, meaning she could no longer be able to work. 'The government must listen to disabled people and change course.' Last year, Scope research found that on average, disabled households need an additional £1,010 a month to have the same standard of living as non-disabled households. If you want to find out more information about the petition visit: Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Jamie Vardy next club odds: Striker will be in demand after leaving Leicester and could head north of the border MORE: 'Monster' 18ft python rescued along with three others after being found dumped in woods MORE: Astrid & Miyu launch unmissable summer sale on jewellery for a limited time only
