B.C.-Washington border communities rally for peace amid rising political tensions
The towering Peace Arch monument, standing on the Canada-U.S. border between Surrey, B.C., and Blaine, Wash., bears two inscriptions: "Children of a Common Mother" on the U.S. side, and "Brethren Dwelling Together in Unity" on the Canadian side.
On Saturday morning, dozens of residents from both countries gathered at its base for a rally calling for unity and friendship amid rising tensions between Canada and the U.S.
Attendees held signs condemning U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated remarks about annexing Canada as the 51st state, while others sang songs and chanted slogans, hoping diplomacy and goodwill would prevail over the strained relations between the two neighbours.
Among them, a trio from the Bellingham-based activist group Raging Grannies dedicated a song to the bond between the two nations.
Attendees held signs hoping diplomacy and goodwill would prevail over the strained relations between the two neighbours. (Sohrab Sandhu/CBC)
"We understand the situation and support the things you do, the rage you feel is really just, though we will miss you until it's over..." they sang.
Haidee Landry, one of the event's organizers from Langley, B.C., said the gathering, dubbed the "Peace, Love, and a Handshake" rally, was about showing solidarity while making it clear that Canada will remain a strong and sovereign nation.
"We want them to still come … come for a coffee, come for a meal, we still love you," she said of B.C.'s American neighbours. "But we don't want to live with you, we don't want to be your roommates."
Landry added that many Americans she has spoken to disagree with the steps taken by the Trump administration and have voiced their support for Canada. But Canadians, she said, are firm in their decision to avoid cross-border travel as an act of resistance.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the nine-hectare Peace Arch park that straddles the 49th parallel served as a loophole for loved ones separated by border closures. Now, Landry said, the park is once again a meeting place for those seeking common ground.
The Canada-U.S. Peace Arch border crossing in Surrey, B.C., where people from both sides of the border gathered Saturday. (Ben Nelms/CBC)
Mary Lou Steward, mayor of Blaine, Wash., a border town of about 6,200, said the decision by many Canadians to avoid entering the U.S. is already taking an economic toll.
"People are seeing their business down 30 per cent," said Steward, who was also in attendance. "We value the Canadians coming across, I understand they're angry … we'll get beyond this, we'll work hard to repair the relationship, which this monument stands for."
Len Saunders, an immigration lawyer in Blaine, said the absence of Canadian shoppers is striking.
"This is like COVID all over again," he told CBC News during an interview earlier this week. "You can see it in the Costco parking lot, at Trader Joe's. Canadians are voting with their wallets right now. That's what's happening."
Recent data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shows a sharp decline in cross-border travel, with nearly 500,000 fewer Canadian travellers entering the U.S. in February compared to the same month last year.
The number of B.C. drivers heading south through the Peace Arch border crossing has also dropped significantly this year, according to data from the Whatcom Council of Governments. A rolling 30-day average of crossings through the border shows about a 25 per cent decrease compared to 2024.
WATCH | B.C. cross-border traffic drops 25% amid tariffs and Trump's threats:
"We're only two months into a four-year administration. If they keep this up there will be no Canadians coming down here — there will be a 100 per cent boycott of this country," Saunders said.
For some attendees Saturday, the rally was a way to push back against the rhetoric coming from Washington, D.C.
"I am sorry, Canada … most of us do not agree with what Trump is doing," said Jim Kosa, a Bellingham resident. "It's atrocious the way that my country is treating Canada."
As the rally concluded, participants lined up for a handshake, reminiscent of a postgame tradition in sports. (Sohrab Sandhu/CBC)
As the rally wrapped up, attendees formed a line and shook hands, mirroring a kind of postgame handshake.
Landry said the event will return next weekend to keep the dialogue open and reaffirm their commitment to maintaining the friendship between the two nations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
24 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Patriot Mobile Congratulates Trump Mobile on Its New Launch
Grapevine, TX, June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Patriot Mobile, America's only Christian conservative wireless provider that has, for over 12 years, given back to organizations fighting for America's freedom, today congratulates the Trump Mobile team on launching their new business. 'As trailblazers of the Red Economy back when it was still an uncharted path, Patriot Mobile welcomes more businesses to join us in shaping a values-driven marketplace,' said Glenn Story, Patriot Mobile Founder and CEO. 'Our mission remains as strong as ever. We remain the only wireless provider that is both Christian and conservative. God is at the helm of our business, and we pray for the Trump organizations success.' Founded in 2013, Patriot Mobile has been standing on the front lines defending our God-given rights and freedoms through multiple presidential administrations. The company's mission is to relentlessly fight for our God-given rights and freedoms and to glorify God always. Patriot Mobile contributes millions of dollars every year to organizations that fight for liberty. Patriot Mobile's four pillars of giving are the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the sanctity of life and we support our military and our first responders. 'We are so proud to support organizations that have had such an impact on America. Susan B. Anthony for Life, Students for Life, Concerned Women for America, and Embrace Grace have saved hundreds of thousands of babies. First Liberty and Alliance Defending Freedom have made great strides in landmark cases defending our constitutional rights. Gun Owners of America, Women for Gun Rights and the NRA are on the front lines protecting our Second Amendment. Folds of Honor, Boot Campaign, Warrior Rising and Soldier Strong are working hard to help our veterans,' said Jenny Story, Patriot Mobile COO. 'These are just some examples of the many organizations we have supported over the years. You can see others on our website.' As one of the very few organizations that has been standing in the gap for every American that believes freedom is worth fighting for, Patriot Mobile has never wavered in the face of consistent, repeated attacks in standing for faith, family, and freedom. Patriot Mobile continues to deliver exceptional wireless service on all three major networks at competitive prices backed by top-tier all U.S. based customer service. For more information, go to Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Hamilton Spectator
29 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Drop in Canadian tourists hurting U.S., say northeast governors
FREDERICTON - New England governors say tariffs and rhetoric by the United States government toward Canada is taking a bite out of tourism. The governors made the comments in Boston, following a meeting with a group of Canadian premiers. Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey says tourism numbers for her state and others such as Maine, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont are down between 20 and 60 per cent. She also says that there are real concerns about safety or disruptions for travellers who cross into the United States. Ontario Premier Doug Ford says he is asking Canadians to avoid travel to the U.S. even though he loves America and Americans. Ford and other leaders from Quebec, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador attended the meeting after getting invitations from Healey. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 16, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Is Regime Change Possible in Iran?
Israel's campaign to set back Iran's nuclear program reflects a shared, if mostly unspoken, ambition among Western and Arab allies: to end Iran's clerical regime. The terrible record of regime change efforts by the West has long muted such hopes—but Israel's early successes in the war are giving them interesting new life. The assessment of whether the regime might actually collapse is certainly a factor in America's calculations of how much deeper to involve itself. Washington's stated position of non-involvement is, of course, implausible. Israel would never have acted against U.S. wishes—it depends on America for the spare parts that keep its air force running, a diplomatic shield at the United Nations, legal cover against international tribunals, and critical support in intercepting Iranian missile and drone retaliation. That Israel also struck right around the 60-day deadline President Donald Trump had given Iran for engaging in useful talks—which Iran brazenly flouted—also points in the direction of coordination. But on the other hand, Trump is averse to military action and the United States has vulnerable military personnel, assets, and bases scattered across the region. That said, only the United States has the bunker-busting capability to fully take out the most fortified elements of Iran's nuclear program: the underground facilities at Natanz and Fordow. There is a scenario, after Israel does everything else, in which such an option may look attractive. It is reasonable to expect the Trump administration to first try a return to diplomacy, but of a more muscular variety than it had telegraphed in recent months. The U.S. previously seemed to be headed towards a renewed version of the Obama-era nuclear deal that Trump walked away from (unwisely, in my view) in 2018. But that was before the humiliation the regime has endured since Israel began its strikes Friday. Israeli jets have controlled Iran's skies, having wiped out air defenses; a host of senior figures, including the heads of the military and Revolutionary Guards as well as the top nuclear scientists, have been killed; many missile launchers have been disabled and a host of nuclear sites badly damaged. Most missiles sent from Iran have been intercepted, though some did get through, killing more than 20 people in Israel. With the regime thus exposed, perhaps Trump will finally issue a long-overdue ultimatum to Iran's clerical regime—not only to hand over its enriched uranium but also to end its outrageous efforts to undermine its neighbors with proxy militias and discontinue production of long-range ballistic missiles. If this happens and Iran stuck to its old positions, a U.S. military strike becomes more plausible. And from there, it is easy to envision escalation, especially if Iran hits at American targets like the Al Udeid airbase in Qatar. At that point, undermining the regime itself—through attacks on energy infrastructure, cyberattacks, information campaigns, and more—might be openly on the table. Would any of that be defensible? Do countries not retain the right to govern themselves? Such questions are never clear—but the case for regime change in Iran is good. By nearly every standard, the Islamic Republic has lost its legitimacy. It governs without meaningful consent, relying on violent repression, censorship, and an unaccountable clerical elite. It is anti-democratic by design, structurally incapable of reform, and fundamentally at odds with the aspirations of Iran's overwhelmingly young, urban, and globally aware population. It remains standing not through popular support but because of its efficiency in suppressing dissent, its control over the economy, and the fear it instills. Internationally, Iran's legitimacy is further eroded by its rather obvious pursuit of nuclear weapons, sponsorship of terrorism, and serial violations of human rights. Smoke from an explosion in southwest Tehran billows on June 16, 2025. Smoke from an explosion in southwest Tehran billows on June 16, 2025. ATTA KENARE / AFP/Getty Images The Iranian proxy militia project has devastated the region: Hezbollah has turned Lebanon into a failed state; Hamas and Islamic Jihad have perpetuated cycles of war in Gaza and the West Bank; the Houthis have destabilized Yemen; Shiite militias in Iraq have terrorized civilians. Uncoiling these tentacles would not just restore regional balance—it would free Arab states from the permanent hostage situation engineered in Tehran. Given all this, one could certainly argue that the Iranian regime has lost its right to demand noninterference by being a menace to its region. But that still leaves the question of practicality. After all, history is littered with failed regime change efforts from outsiders. The U.S.-backed invasion of Iraq toppled Saddam Hussein, but unleashed chaos, insurgency, and years of sectarian war. In Afghanistan, 20 years of Western nation-building collapsed in 11 days, ending with the odious Taliban back in power in Kabul. The Bay of Pigs invasion was a debacle that only strengthened Cuba's Fidel Castro. The CIA-backed overthrow of Chilean socialist Salvador Allende led to decades of dictatorship and considerable regret. More recently, Libya collapsed into anarchy after the fall of Moammar Gaddafi, and U.S. attempts to influence regime change in Venezuela have gone nowhere. What these cases teach is not that regime change is always doomed, but that external actors cannot impose internal legitimacy, decency, and stability. You cannot liberate a people who aren't prepared to act—or who might see you as the greater threat. Iran is a deeply nationalistic society, even if the people despise the Islamist regime. Any intervention that appears externally driven risks strengthening the regime's narrative and provoking backlash. The Revolutionary Guards thrive on the image of Iran as a besieged fortress. A misstep could entrench them further. So while regime change is not impossible, it must ultimately be homemade. The challenge is that the clerics have constructed a dense architecture of fear, dependency, surveillance, and economic patronage that enriched the men with guns. Civil society is fragmented, the opposition in exile is divided, and many are economically tied to the state. The most plausible scenario is a palace coup: a rupture within the military, perhaps even inside the Revolutionary Guards themselves. Both organizations have suffered humiliating setbacks in recent days, and it is not inconceivable that to protect their corrupt financial interests they might dump the aging clerical leadership, beginning with 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, compelling top clerics to flee Tehran. Might Trump authorize the carefully calibrated steps that could lead to such a scenario? For all his hawkish rhetoric, America's problematic president has shown a consistent aversion to prolonged military engagements—on top of an odd disdain for his own military and even for the Western alliance. He criticized the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, avoided conflict with North Korea, and even declined to retaliate militarily after Iran shot down a U.S. drone in 2019. Yet he is also deeply drawn to dramatic successes and personal credit. Israel's successful strike campaign may prove tempting. A scenario where Trump issues a sweeping ultimatum to Iran, demands the dismantling of its missile and proxy projects, and positions himself as the architect of Iran's "freedom moment" might fit this brand. What follows could be very interesting indeed. At a moment of grave uncertainty, one thing is not in doubt: Even though a period of chaos may follow a collapse of the regime, the 90 million people of Iran deserve better than the theocratic prison they've been consigned to since 1979. Dan Perry is the former Cairo-based Middle East editor (also leading coverage from Iran) and London-based Europe/Africa editor of the Associated Press, the former chairman of the Foreign Press Association in Jerusalem, and the author of two books. Follow him at The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
