
Astonishing act of bravery that sparked a revolution for gay people
It's the kind of article which, if it were printed in a newspaper today, would raise eyebrows precisely because there is nothing the slightest bit shocking about it. A group of four gay men, sitting in a room, talking about their lives - especially as June is when we now celebrate Pride month.
But the story that appeared in the Sunday Pictorial - the paper that would become the Sunday Mirror - 65 years ago this month, was both brave and revolutionary. And it would help change the course of history. Back then, homosexuality was considered to be both a crime and a mental illness, and gays and lesbians were vilified, attacked and pitied.
The only time they were even mentioned in the media was in reports of 'gross indecency' trials - sometimes for just holding a man's hand in public.
It was unthinkable, then, that a national newspaper might allow a group of homosexuals any column inches to defend themselves or talk openly about their lives, loves and feelings.
But when readers opened their Sunday Pictorial on June 26, 1960, that's exactly what they saw.
Presenting them as 'The Men In The Wolfenden Report' - a government-commissioned report published in 1957, which recommended the decriminalisation of homosexual acts - the newspaper said it had brought together 'four self-confessed homosexuals' in a Harley Street consulting room.
'One man in every 25 in Britain today is a homosexual. A shocking figure?', the story began. 'These men live in towns and villages all over the country. The problem of homosexuality is not confined to the big cities.'
It went on: 'What are homosexuals like? Can they be cured? Would a change in the law free them to increase in number? Are they a basic danger to society?'
The newspaper chose not to use the men's real names or show their faces, even though three of them had already taken the brave step of coming out publicly, by writing a signed letter to several newspapers two weeks earlier.
Instead, in a sign the newspaper didn't think the British public were ready for full disclosure, they were assigned different names, ages and professions.
One was estate agent Roger Butler, a forgotten pioneer of the gay rights movement, who is believed to be the first man to come out voluntarily to the entire British public.
In what reporter John Knight described as 'a meeting of brutal frankness, often charged with bitter emotion', the men talked calmly about their lives, offering succinct and compelling defences to questions such as whether their 'disease' could be cured and if there was a link between homosexuality and paedophilia.
''The normal homosexual is revolted by men who run after little boys, just as a normal man, presumably, is revolted by men who chase little girls,' explained Roger, named in the story as Steven G, 27, 'a technical clerk and homosexual'.
He added: 'Usually, homosexuals are attracted to men of their own age, although an older man may be in love with a younger man.
'Offences against young boys, however, are in a completely different category. The offenders should be sternly punished. They don't represent homosexuals. They are a sick minority.'
When another of the men, described as an eminent surgeon, was asked if he wanted to be 'cured' he replied: 'This is an illogical question to people like myself. How can you want to be cured of something you know is incurable?'
Another, called Leslie S, added: 'I don't want to be cured now. I tried desperately for years to become normal. I was married for five years, but it was unfair to my wife because I had no normal desires.'
And when the question 'How can you tell if a man is homosexual?' was put to them, the surgeon pointed out just how many people in Britain were gay but unable to live freely. 'If all homosexuals were recognisable, then the streets would be crowded with mincing queers,' he said. 'There are 1,000,000 of us, remember.'
The groundbreaking article - and the role of the paper that became The Sunday Mirror in changing Britain's gay rights laws - was unearthed by authors Christopher Stephens and Louise Radnosfsky as they researched their new book The Light of Day, a biography about Roger Butler.
Christopher says the newspaper's stance was way ahead of its time. He says: 'Up until then the 'homosexual problem' was talked about as a 'social infection.' The whole of the debate around gay rights was couched in this idea of a disease which was undermining the social fabric of Britain, and infecting our institutions.
'Even those people who were fighting for reforms to the law didn't like homosexuals very much. They pitied them more than anything and saw them as a pathetic group who were never going to live a normal life, so let's just leave them alone because they're not doing that much harm.'
Louise adds: 'It really was revolutionary for the Pictorial, at that time, to give four gay men a chance to speak for themselves, and to speak honestly.
'It was surprising, even shocking to me, a newspaper giving this opportunity to gay men. I'm not sure I would have believed it could have until I landed on it.
'And it was risky for the men too. There was no certainty about how the men would be presented, and it could easily have been a set up, especially given how newspapers normally covered the topic. It turned out to be the first time gay men were allowed a voice in a national newspaper.'
The Pictorial was one of Britain's biggest newspapers selling over a million copies a week and the story changed the way the public saw gay men and propelled the gay rights movement forward.
Just three days later, the British parliament voted on the recommendations of the Wolfenden report, that homosexuality for people over 21 should be decriminalised. It didn't pass, with 99 Ayes to 213 Noes, but among those in favour were some MPs no-one had expected, including Enoch Powell and a certain Margaret Thatcher.
Louise says: 'It was defeated in the Commons, even though the government's own committee had recommended the changes, because there was still no political appetite to change the law. People just weren't brave enough.
'The Home Secretary at the time, Rab Butler, was known to be sympathetic, but even he didn't want to put his face to the campaign, because he was worried about how it might look politically, and whether people would vote for him if he did.
'Again it shows the climate against homosexuality at the time, and bravery of a publication like this one to allow gay men to speak up.'
It took seven more years before, in 1976, the 1967 Sexual Offences Act finally decriminalised homosexual acts between consenting adults. The Act, which passed after a lengthy debate, received Royal Assent on July 21, 1967, marking a significant step in the history of LGBT+ rights.
Christopher, who knew Roger Butler before his death in 2011, says the bravery of the gay rights pioneer - should never be forgotten.
He says: 'He was a very humble man, a quiet, shy revolutionary who didn't like taking much credit, and whose contribution to gay rights has now largely been forgotten.
'He was the ever Brit to come out in public - and even while homosexuality was still a crime. And because of that Pictorial article, was in 1960 one of the four most famous homosexuals in the country.
'He established coming out as a political act, and we saw that become a fundamentally important part of gay rights campaigning in the 1970s.
'But he started to lose his sight in 1960 and had lost it completely by 1966, so by the time the law had actually changed he had had to withdraw from that world, learning to instead live as a blind man in 1960s Britain.
'But he was such an important part of the gay law reform movement and left a massive legacy which should be remembered and celebrated today.'
The Light of Day: The first man to come out at the dawn of gay liberation, by Christopher Stephens and Louise Radnofsky, Headline Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
16 minutes ago
- Metro
Netflix viewers race to watch 'mesmerising' drama based on true story
It looks like Netflix subscribers are discovering a Sheridan Smith crime drama that first aired on ITV in 2012, based on a shocking true crime story. Mrs Biggs is climbing up the streamer's ranking of the platform's top 10 TV shows – making a convincing argument for a late summer binge watch. Sheridan Smith – who has so many British dramas to her name it can be easy to let one slip – stars in this five-part drama, which is based on the true story of the Great Train Robbery. The drama focuses on the relationship between Charmian, played by Smith, and her husband Ronnie Biggs, played by Daniel Mays. It follows everything from their first lovestruck meeting and the fateful 1963 train heist, to its aftermath and their eventual divorce in 1976, after Biggs fathered a child in Brazil. We see the petty crook meet his soon-to-be wife on, of all places, a train. 'The future is full of possibilities,' he tells her. 'The past will only drag you down.' Wake up to find news on your TV shows in your inbox every morning with Metro's TV Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your show in the link we'll send you so we can get TV news tailored to you. With that, the Biggs couple set off on a crime spree before they eventually decide to settle down for a quiet married life. That is, until the 'one last job' pops up in the chance to join the train robbers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Some labelled the drama a sanitised version of events, but it was inspired by a letter Biggs sent to his wife following the death of their son Nicholas. Biggs's ex-wife Charmian was also a consultant on the show. The show's writer and executive producer Jeff Pope said he wanted to set out a romantic tale, rather than a romanticised one. 'We show Ron as perhaps a little too wilfully optimistic and Charmian is the cold voice of reason throughout. It absolutely would be a danger of a piece like this to romanticise it,' he told The Guardian. 'It will get laughed out of court if it's a slushfest. In the first episode, they steal, he strikes her, we acknowledge the fact he had a criminal record; further down the line, Charmian has an abortion by another man. We don't pull back, we don't flinch.' In 1963, millions were robbed from a Royal Mail train en route to London from Glasgow. With the help of inside information, the gang of crooks toyed with the train signal system to get the train to stop so they could board. £2.61million was nabbed, which was worth about £62million in 2023. Most of the cash was never recovered. The gang hid at a farm after the robbery, but police found the spot, including a Monopoly board they had used which was covered in incriminating fingerprints. The evidence led to the eventual arrest and conviction of most of the gang. Praised at the time of its release for the quality of the acting and the excitement of the episodes, TV viewers have shared their positive reception over the years, as Mrs Biggs has been available on ITVX as well as Netflix. Taking to X, @AshWoody90 praised: 'Mrs Biggs on Netflix, possibly one the best things I have ever watched.' @elliot_gonzalez commended the creative partnership between the show's writer and star, writing: 'Jeff Pope and Sheridan Smith should always work together. Mrs Biggs, The Widower, Cilla and now The Moorside. All outstanding work.' More Trending @TVChatty wrote: 'All week I've been watching Mrs Biggs on ITV3. Why did I not watch it first time? Fantastic story and great acting. Really enjoyed it.' @lizcurran echoed: 'Sheridan Smith is wonderful in Mrs Biggs – she is one of my favourite actors. Utterly mesmerising – always.' A version of this article was originally published on August 15. View More » Mrs Biggs is available on Netflix and ITVX. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Netflix thriller hailed 'pure greatness' confirms season 2 after weeks in top 10 MORE: Katisha's Love Is Blind decision doesn't make her a villain MORE: One of the biggest movie franchises ever drops on Netflix starring beloved late actor


The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
DOJ to begin turning over Jeffrey Epstein probe files: GOP chairman
The Justice Department was not immediately available for comment on what records it might turn over. On Aug. 5, Comer issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for records related to Epstein, the longtime Trump friend who died by suicide in 2019 as he was awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. Republicans on the House Committee have also issued deposition subpoenas to former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as well as former top federal law enforcement officials including James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Robert Mueller, William Barr, Jeff Sessions and Alberto Gonzales. Those are scheduled to get underway this month. Those subpoenas seek testimony "related to horrific crimes perpetrated by Jeffrey Epstein," Comer, a Kentucky Republican, said when they were issued. The Oversight Committee voted July 23 to issue the subpoenas and to also seek the DOJ files, answering calls from lawmakers and voters alike for more information on Epstein and who else might have been involved in his underage sex-trafficking ring. While Trump supporters and MAGA influencers have said they want to see the names of prominent Democrats rumored to be in the files, Trump himself is likely in them, at least on flight logs from Epstein's private jet, according to already disclosed court records and other documents. The DOJ promise to hand over files follows weeks of intensifying drama and rare dispute between President Donald Trump, who had a long friendship with Epstein, and his MAGA base. Last month, the DOJ and FBI issued a joint statement saying they would not release Epstein investigative documents in their possession after months of promises by Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel to make that information public. The subpoenas appear to cover when Epstein allegedly sexually assaulted young women with the help of associate Ghislaine Maxwell, which dates back more than two decades. More: Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell quietly moved out of Florida federal prison Maxwell was interviewed over two days last month about what she knows about the case by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former Trump personal defense lawyer. The interviews were held in Tallahassee, Florida, where the former British socialite is serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls. She has since been moved to a minimum-security federal prison "camp" in Texas, prompting criticism from Democrats who charge that the Trump administration is giving her preferential treatment. It's unclear what exactly Maxwell told Blanche during the closed-door interviews, but her defense attorney, David Markus, said his client answered all of the government's questions, including those of about 100 different people. On July 23, a federal judge in Florida rejected a bid from the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony from 2005 and 2007 tied to a federal investigation into Epstein, who hanged himself in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges, an autopsy concluded. Maxwell is seeking to overturn her conviction and has filed a petition with the Supreme Court, which the Justice Department has opposed. Markus said he believes Ghislaine deserves relief and has appealed online to Trump for consideration, but said no such offer has been made. When asked if he would consider pardoning Maxwell, Trump told reporters, "It's something I haven't thought about."

The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Farcical mass arrests expose Labour's failings over Palestine
Yvette Cooper has overseen a brittle form of authoritarianism which, far from preserving the status quo, is fracturing it. The Home Secretary is now reduced to suggesting that there are things the public doesn't know about the organisation, which only she does, in defence of the draconian policy. This indicates the central argument has already been lost, and the public have not been persuaded of its merits as criticism grows. The Government miscalculated by thinking the proscription would breed establishment unity and the submission of the movement. READ MORE: Police probe 'kill 'em all' banner outside Scottish asylum seeker hotel Instead, the police are being instructed to carry out farcical mass arrests that cannot be sustained by the prison and legal system. And, we see the emergence of unexpected voices of opposition, combined with a continued expansion of the Palestine movement generally. For many in the old school of the British establishment, there is something distasteful about the ban. The sight of pensioners being rounded up and carted off in police vans for the crime of holding up a sign with the words 'Palestine' and 'action' is a little too much to plausibly defend. Everyone knows that these people cannot be described as 'terrorists' with any credibility. It is absurd, and consequently, Cooper has few allies coming to her aid. But more than distaste, the British state has generally been more strategic when it comes to utilising repression. When it comes to Palestine Action, any such nuance has been thrown out of the window. This is why figures such as Andrew Neil – it is fair to say no friend of Palestine protesters – have condemned the way the episode has been handled, saying: 'Designating them as a terrorist group was just bizarre by this government. Bizarre!' Interestingly, the people who are being arrested in Parliament Square do not look or sound like the stereotype of a direct action activist. One is a retired British army officer, Colonel Chris Romberg. The 75-year-old veteran, dressed in a suit, made the point that in his view Britain was now aiding and abetting a genocide, and this was a stand he was willing to make in defence of democratic and civil rights. Sir Jonathon Porritt, a former adviser to both king and government, was also arrested and carted away. He didn't mince his words: 'This was an absolutely clear case of a government using its powers to crush dissenting voices when it is the government itself that is most reprehensible for what continues to be an absolute horror story in the world. 'What we are seeing now in Gaza has just utterly shocked people and it's completely abhorrent that we are living through a genocide on our TV screens.' We have seen all kinds of people involved in a similar way, from members of the clergy to a former professor of poetry at the University of Oxford and an 89-year-old Jewish refugee. Former Tory MP Rory Stewart has called the proscription 'mad' and points out that the prison system cannot cope with 500 people being arrested and processed – with the threat of a 14-year jail sentence – on a single Saturday afternoon. Now, Defend Our Juries is organising for 1000 people to take part on September 6. Something has got to give. To add to Cooper's woes, it is an issue which is further haemorrhaging support for the Labour Party among its own supporters. According to a recent poll, 71% of Labour members oppose the proscription. What we have then is a lethal combination – the absence of broad support; an intellectually indefensible position; a lack of infrastructure to handle the growing number of dissenters; the continued growth of the Palestine demonstrations; a legal challenge in the works. This is just the latest in a litany of failings around the issue. Under Keir Starmer, Labour have driven the UK Government into an almighty mess. They have participated in providing the political and military cover for what Cooper herself now refers to as, without a hint of irony, the 'crimes against humanity' committed by Israel in Gaza. The foundation for the banning of Palestine Action is weak, because the foundation of the whole approach to the Middle East has been wrong on every level. They know it, and we know it. And it is when a government is in that kind of a fix that they resort to bringing out the repressive functions of the state. In doing so, they have only further weakened their position. Such measures can only hope to have a chance of success if they have overwhelming public support, and a united and cohesive apparatus to see it through. Without these, the Home Secretary cuts an isolated figure. And unfortunately for her, the issue is not going away any time soon. Instead, as the atrocities continue, opposition will grow. We are now in the closing stages of the genocide. Benjamin Netanyahu is instructing the IDF to prepare for the occupation of Gaza City. There is no further argument about what the Israeli state has planned for the people there. More death and more destruction through the methods of siege and starvation, and the obliteration of the means of life. The very last people who should be deemed as terrorists are those doing what they can to stop the horror which has been unfolding daily for nearly two years. Indeed, it is the UK Government which has failed, emphatically, in its duties to prevent genocide, as instructed by the International Court of Justice. History will not be kind to those who were complicit or active in their support for this unfathomable crime. just as it will record all of those who made a stand against it.