Industry calls to safeguard independence of EU cybersecurity agency
In May, the Commission began gathering feedback on a revision to the bloc's 2019 Cybersecurity Act (CSA), which is being revamped in line with efforts to simplify existing rules.
The proposal aimed to give the Athens-based ENISA a bigger mandate, including over the drafting of cybersecurity certification schemes, through which companies can demonstrate that their ICT solutions include the right level of cybersecurity protection for the EU market.
Since 2019, the Commission requested three of these voluntary certification schemes: on baseline ICT products, 5G and cloud services, of which only the first has yet been adopted.
The certification for cloud services (EUCS) turned into a political battle over sovereignty requirements. France has led resistance and wants to be sure that it can continue to use its own scheme – SecNum Cloud – after the adoption of EUCS.
Tech industry association CCIA said ENISA's role in the certification scheme development 'should be explicitly grounded in technical independence, allowing it to make non-political decisions that reflect industry realities and cybersecurity best practices.'
This was echoed by US tech company Amazon which said that the voluntary certification frameworks should be 'based purely on technical criteria'.
'We strongly believe that introducing non-technical factors could undermine the framework's effectiveness and create unnecessary barriers to innovation,' it added.
Global consumer electronics company Lenovo, also warned against introducing non-technical criteria 'such as vendor nationality, ownership, or headquarters location—in cybersecurity risk assessments or certification schemes.'
'These measures risk undermining EU principles of non-discrimination, market access, fair competition, and proportionality, while offering little benefit to actual cybersecurity outcomes,' it said.
There have been calls and plans from the Commission to increase the bloc's independence of suppliers from outside the EU. In the upcoming Cloud and AI Development Act, for example, the Commission plans to strengthen the EU's position in the industry.
In the European Parliament lawmakers are also calling for measures to boost technological sovereignty and guarantee the bloc's independence and security by protecting its strategic infrastructure and reducing dependence on non-European technology providers.
ENISA mandate
The Commission began seeking feedback from industry and national governments on the functioning and scope of work of ENISA last year, as reported, in a bid to modify the agency's mandate and financial support.
There seems to be support to increase its funding among the participants to the consultation. For example, Eco, a German association for the internet industry, said that the agency hadn't grown in terms of staff despite its expanded remit.
'Given the current geopolitical security challenges and the scale of global cyber threats, its financial resources remain limited compared to other EU bodies. [...] It is important to boost ENISA's role as the independent expert on European Cybersecurity. In order to operate independently and attract necessary resources, staff, and experts to the benefit of its mandate, ENISA has to leverage its public standing among the global community,' the contribution said.
Henna Virkkunen, the EU Commissioner for technology, said earlier this year that she will carry out a so-called Digital Fitness Check – expected before the end of 2025 -- which will assess whether all existing tech rules are burdensome to companies, and identify areas for simplification. The CSA is expected to be part of that.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
5 minutes ago
- Euronews
Where in Europe did wealth per adult grow fastest in 2024?
The net worth of citizens varies significantly across Europe, and it changes every year. What really matters is how the changes compare when adjusted for inflation. Wealth per adult increased in a huge majority of European countries between 2023 and 2024, while a few saw declines, according to UBS's Global Wealth Report 2025. Changes measured in local currencies are shown in both average and median values — we focus on the median for deeper analysis, which isn't affected by extreme outliers, while briefly mentioning averages. Hungary recorded the highest real growth in median wealth per adult between 2023 and 2024, rising by 18.6%. The growth also reached 15% or above in several other countries, including Lithuania (16.9%), Sweden (15.3%), Italy and Latvia (both 15%). In the report, among EU member states, candidate countries, EFTA members, and the UK, only Turkey and Belgium saw a decline in median wealth per adult. Turkey stands out with a sharp 20.9% drop, while Belgium recorded a more moderate fall of 5.6%. Of Europe's five largest economies, Italy saw the highest real growth in wealth per adult at 15% whereas the UK had the lowest at 5.3%. France (10.3%), Germany (9.5%), and Spain (9%) fell in between. Switzerland, the wealthiest country per adult, saw a 7.7% increase. Sweden and other Nordic countries also recorded strong growth, each exceeding 10%. Outside Europe, South Korea (13.9%), Australia (10.7%), Canada (9.6%), and Japan (8.6%) saw significant gains in 2024. The increase in the US was more moderate at 2.3%. China and Russia recorded notable declines of 6.3% and 8.2%, respectively. Looking at average wealth change instead of median, several European countries saw declines. Both Turkey (–14.6%) and Belgium (–0.3%) saw smaller average declines in comparison to their median values. Luxembourg (–1.3%), Estonia (–2.3%), France (–1.8%), and the UK (–3.6%) also recorded decreases. Drivers behind changes in Turkey's asset prices So, what explains Turkey's sharpest decline in wealth per adult between 2023 and 2024? Prof. Hakan Kara of Bilkent University in Ankara, and former chief economist at the Central Bank of Turkey, suggests that to understand this trend, one must look back over the past five years. He noted that between 2020 and 2023, an environment of abundant credit and extremely low real interest rates led to a significant surge in asset prices. 'This period witnessed a major transfer of wealth from savers to borrowers, and from fixed-income households to corporations. The Foreign Exchange Protected Deposit scheme (KKM) further reinforced this dynamic. As wealth inequality rose rapidly, only a narrow segment of the population—those with access to credit or pre-existing savings—was able to benefit from the asset price boom,' he explained. By mid-2023, with the normalisation of interest rates, a real correction in asset prices began. As housing, land, stock, and bond prices declined in real terms, a corresponding erosion of real wealth was observed. 'We can see the 2023-24 period as a correction of the 2020-22 period', he added. Five-year changes: Austria records the largest decline 'Real' changes in wealth per adult from the beginning of 2020 to the end of 2024 reveal longer-term trends. Austria emerges as a major outlier, with median wealth per adult falling by 18%. The Netherlands (–2.3%) and Estonia (–0.1%) followed. In Europe, Cyprus recorded the highest increase at 43.9%, followed by Denmark, Latvia, and Lithuania — each with gains of over 30%. Real median wealth per adult growth also exceeded 25% in Malta, Slovenia, Norway, Bulgaria, and Portugal. Germany saw the highest rise among Europe's top five economies, with a 20.1% increase. Italy recorded the lowest at 4.7%. Spain (17.8%) and the UK (16.3%) posted strong growth, while France saw a more moderate increase of 10.5%. Major non-European countries reported significant growth, with the US leading at 45.8%, followed by Russia (35.1%) and South Korea (31%). In average terms, the picture changes completely. Several countries saw declines in wealth per adult. Cyprus, which recorded the highest growth in median wealth, emerged as the outlier with a –24.9% drop in average wealth per adult. Other significant drops occurred in Austria (–13.1%), Malta (–11.3%), Estonia (–10.6%), Italy (–9.4%), and Ireland (–7.8%). Switzerland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Belgium, Romania, and Slovakia also recorded comparatively moderate declines. The impact of high inflation 'The contraction in real average wealth per adult in this period was mainly due to high inflation in the concerned countries, particularly so in Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands, but also in Italy, albeit to a slightly lesser extent', the report noted. The growth in the size of the adult population was a further contributing factor, primarily in the Netherlands and, to a smaller degree, in Switzerland according to the report. In Switzerland's case, currency depreciation was the primary factor, followed by inflation. What do divergences suggest? Divergences are striking in several countries, where changes in average and median wealth per adult differ significantly. For example, in Switzerland, slightly negative growth in average wealth per adult compares with a 14% rise in median wealth per adult, while in Italy the figures are respectively –10% and almost +5%. 'These divergences suggest slower wealth growth at the higher end of the spectrum than in the middle section of the wealth distribution,' the report pointed out. The same dynamic was at work in Germany and the UK, too.
LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
'European citizens under US sanctions are being erased economically and socially within the EU'
In recent months, the US has added several judges and International Criminal Court prosecutors to the list of "Specially Designated Nationals" maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which is responsible for enforcing US international financial sanctions. On July 9, Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, joined them on the list. The individuals listed have had their assets frozen in the US, and American nationals and companies are prohibited from doing business with them. Neither criminals nor fugitives, but rather respected professionals in international law who have been sanctioned – not for wrongdoing, but for carrying out their duties, in ways that are clearly displeasing to Washington. This development is not just a diplomatic affront; it is an alarming signal. A small but growing number of European citizens – who are innocent under all legal standards of the European Union (EU) – also appear on the OFAC list. They are not under investigation in their own countries. No court has convicted them. And yet, they and their families have been treated as pariahs. Not only in the US, but – more seriously still – in their own countries, within the EU itself. These individuals have become Europe's living dead: legally alive, but erased economically and socially. They are victims of a kind of "civil death" penalty. Their inclusion on the OFAC list, often for opaque or arbitrary reasons, triggers a cascade of consequences far beyond American borders. It is in Europe that banks close their accounts; that IT companies cut off access to email, software, and cloud services; that delivery companies refuse to drop packages at their door. Families have been ruined. Careers destroyed. However, it is perhaps understandable that people subject to OFAC sanctions should be restricted in their travel to, or trade with, the US. After all, it is the prerogative of the US government to exercise sovereignty on its own territory. It is unacceptable, however, that European citizens – some of them above any suspicion in the eyes of their own authorities – lose everything at home due to excessive caution on the part of European companies. These businesses blindly enforce US sanctions. Two trends explain the phenomenon.
France 24
8 hours ago
- France 24
Trump, EU chief to meet Sunday in push for trade deal
In a drive to slash his country's trade deficits, Trump has vowed to hit dozens of countries with punitive tariff hikes if they do not hammer out a pact with Washington by August 1. The EU -- which is facing an across-the-board levy of 30-percent -- has been pushing hard for a deal with Trump's administration, while also planning retaliation should talks fall short. Von der Leyen first announced the meeting, writing on X: "Following a good call with POTUS, we have agreed to meet in Scotland on Sunday to discuss transatlantic trade relations, and how we can keep them strong." Arriving on UK soil late Friday, Trump confirmed he would meet the head of the European Commission, which has been negotiating with Washington on behalf of the 27-nation bloc. "I'll be meeting with the EU on Sunday, and we'll be working on a deal," he told reporters as he touched down at Prestwick Airport near Glasgow. "Ursula will be here -- a highly respected woman. So we look forward to that," Trump said. "We'll see if we make a deal," added the president -- who reiterated earlier comments saying the chance of a deal was "50-50", with sticking points remaining on "maybe 20 different things." "But we're meeting ... with the European Union. And that would be, actually, the biggest deal of them all, if we make it," he said. The high-level meeting follows months of negotiations between top EU and US trade officials, and days of signals suggesting the sides were moving towards an agreement. According to multiple European diplomats, the agreement under consideration would involve a baseline 15-percent US levy on EU goods -- the same level secured by Japan this week -- and potential carve-outs for critical sectors. Von der Leyen's spokesperson Paula Pinho said "intensive negotiations" had been taking place at technical and political level in the run up to Sunday's meeting. "Leaders will now take stock and consider the scope for a balanced outcome that provides stability and predictability for businesses and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic," she said. 'In Trump's hands' Hit by multiple waves of tariffs since Trump reclaimed the White House, the EU is currently subject to a 25-percent levy on cars, 50 percent on steel and aluminium, and an across-the-board tariff of 10 percent, which Washington threatens to hike to 30 percent in a no-deal scenario. The EU wants to avoid sweeping tariffs inflicting further harm on the European economy -- already suffering from sluggish growth -- and damaging a trading relationship worth an annual 1.6 trillion euros ($1.9 trillion) in goods and services. EU member states gave the European Commission a mandate to pursue a deal to avoid hefty US tariffs, with retaliation held out as a last resort if talks fail. Seeking to keep up the pressure in the final stretch of talks, EU states on Thursday backed a package of retaliation on $109 billion (93 billion euros) of US goods including aircraft and cars -- to kick in in stages from August 7 if there is no deal. Most states prefer a deal to no deal -- even with undesirable levies of 15 percent -- but exemptions are key, with aircraft, steel, lumber, pharmaceutical products and agricultural goods under discussion, diplomats said. Concerning steel, diplomats say a compromise could allow a certain quota to enter the United States, with amounts beyond that taxed at 50 percent. Since launching its tariffs campaign, Trump's administration has so far unveiled just five agreements, including with Britain, Japan and the Philippines. While EU hopes have been rising for a deal, the approaching August 1 deadline also comes with a sense of deja-vu: earlier this month, EU officials also believed they were on the cusp of a deal, before Trump hiked his tariff threat to 30-percent.
