Costa Mesa Council approves 40-unit Victoria Place, after planning commission denial
During its earlier consideration of the condominium complex — which would be included in a rare and never-initiated residential overlay district allowing commercial properties to be used for housing — the planning commission denied the proposal in a 5-2 vote during a June 9 meeting.
Commissioners contended the 1.77-acre parcel qualifies for rezoning under the voter-backed Measure K initiative and, as such, could potentially be more thoroughly developed to meet Costa Mesa's housing needs than what they regarded as the archaic mish-mash of alternative approaches and deviations placed before them.
There's just one hitch. The citywide rezoning of certain commercial corridors under Measure K, passed in 2022, hasn't happened and is only now in the visioning stages. So while a transformation of the partially vacant site, currently home to a lighting store and boat storage facilities, into needed housing might be a welcome one, ideas on how to optimize that shift differ.
Furthermore, the City Council initially reviewed the plan in a screening nearly one year ago, providing feedback on open space, landscaping and pedestrian safety, suggestions that were incorporated into an amended version of the plan.
'You were responsive to what we said in August,' Mayor John Stephens told applicant WMC Partners' Tony Weeda ahead of the July 15 vote. 'And it wouldn't be fair play, in my opinion, to lay some other objectives on you that we wouldn't express in August.'
The approval of Victoria Place — named after the small side street it fronts — allows for 18 duplexes and four detached residences, each comprising roughly 2,700 square feet in three stories with a ground-floor work space, two-car garage, balcony and rooftop deck standing 39 feet, 6 inches in height. Although they are ownership dwellings, nothing would prevent an owner from renting out a unit.
Fitting those units on the smallish lot requires setback reductions, a shrinking of space in between buildings and in garage width and a reduction in parking spaces, from the 150 required to just 103. Those entitlements and others will be codified in a site-specific master plan under the city's residential incentive overlay district, created in 2016 but never applied until now.
Don Lamm — a consultant for WMC who also served as Costa Mesa's deputy city manager and developmental services director from 1986 to 2009 — told the council what planning commissioners saw as too-abundant 'deviations' might be instead viewed as viable alternatives for breathing life into an underutilized area.
'This is simply a very nice [40-unit] condominium project on a property that really needs to be recycled or redeveloped,' Lamm said. 'In reality, these deviations are good because it's the incentive the applicant needs to build this project to provide these new housing units.'
Two people who spoke during the public comments portion of the meeting criticized the project as an inefficient use of the land and for the potential increased vehicle traffic it could present for residents.
'There's no clear expectation, either for the public or developer, no ideal to conform to that reflects what the city and public would like to see in the future,' said Costa Mesa resident and City Hall critic Cynthia McDonald. 'The planning commission got it right — this needs to be rethought.'
Council members, however, favored the project, making minor modifications so that a landscaped peninsula out front, to remain under the city's purview, would be protected from vehicle traffic and steps would be taken to add architectural elements to the ends of the units fronting Victoria Place.
Stephens said the development will transform a site that is currently blighted.
'It's exactly on point with language we had in Measure K, which we all fought so hard to get passed to change our kind-of outdated land use into housing,' he said. 'Could it be better? I don't know. [But] it's going to be a huge improvement when we drive by.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Banks-McLaughlin joins crowded Fayetteville mayoral race, citing need for new leadership
Fayetteville City Council member Courtney Banks-McLaughlin said she was preparing to run for a fourth term representing District 8 when the political tides shifted. After observing the field of mayoral candidates and evaluating what she called 'a need for change in the city's political environment,' Banks-McLaughlin made the decision to withdraw from her district race and refile for mayor. The filing period for Fayetteville's nonpartisan mayoral race was from noon July 7 to noon July 18. The primary election is set for Oct. 7, and the general election is Nov. 4. 'I observed those who were running, their strengths, and started thinking about their decision-making,' she said in a phone interview Aug. 7. 'And I really, truly feel that our city needs a change in the political environment.' Banks-McLaughlin joins a crowded field of 10 candidates, including several of her current City Council colleagues — Council member Mario Benavente, Mayor Pro Tem Kathy Jensen, and incumbent Mayor Mitch Colvin, who also made a surprise filing for a fifth term. 'The mayor just generated a lot of buzz and attention to himself,' Banks-McLaughlin said of Colvin's decision. But she said her focus isn't on the noise, but on the people. 'My goal is just to stay committed to the community,' she said. 'I'm in this race for the people in the community, the things they want to see take place. I'm here to advocate and fight for them.' Advocating for progress: Infrastructure, jobs and partnerships Banks-McLaughlin, who has served three terms on the council, said her campaign platform centers on four key areas: infrastructure, public safety, affordable housing and economic development. At the heart of her platform is for Fayetteville to help Cumberland County move out of its designation as a 'tier one' economically distressed community. 'That's the whole goal: to be able to move our city and county out of a tier one to a tier two,' she said. 'With new leadership like myself, we can get out of that tier one and move to a two-tier community.' To do that, she said, Fayetteville must invest in water access, electricity, transportation and other critical infrastructure improvements that would attract high-quality employers and residents alike. 'You have to have the water. You have to have the electricity,' she said. 'We need to make sure that we have that in place.' Though some of those services are managed at the county level, Banks-McLaughlin emphasized the need for stronger partnerships. 'We still have some communities that are still in need of sewage, connecting to the city,' she said. 'Some of the things I'm speaking of are county responsibilities, but in order to get from a tier one, we have to have some strong collaboration, because all of that affects the city.' She said economic development also requires higher-quality jobs. 'We always say it's a military town, but just like we have in Raleigh, we need the Triangle Park here in our city,' she said. 'Good-paying salary jobs where people can be able to make it and afford the cost of living here in our community.' Addressing homelessness and public safety Banks-McLaughlin said she wants to see the city step up its role in addressing homelessness, particularly by contributing to shelter space and collaborating with the county's larger efforts. 'Where are these people going for shelter? Where are they going to lay their head down to rest at night?' she asked. 'That's where I feel that we can collaborate as far as some beds.' She said that in the past, she had pushed for the city to help provide resources for the homeless community, such as shelter beds, but failed to gain support. 'It's unfair for veterans who have served ... to have nowhere to go,' she said. 'It's sad to walk downtown and see homeless people roaming around, people living in tents and abandoned areas.' She also called for continued support for Fayetteville's Office of Community Safety and for programs that connect youth and community members with law enforcement. Banks-McLaughlin has a personal connection to the issue of public safety: her daughter was a victim of gun violence. 'I think we're somewhat going in the right direction,' she said. 'I think we just need to move a little bit faster.' She also cited her appointment to the Governor's Crime Commission as evidence of her statewide collaboration and experience shaping public safety policy. 'I've been working with legislators to try to help pass laws to help with the gun violence and the crime that's happening in our community,' she said. Transparency, communication and the power of representation Banks-McLaughlin said one of the most important roles of a mayor is to improve communication — not just among elected officials and agencies, but with the community. 'I would love to see us promote what's going on within the city,' she said, citing phone alert systems as possible tools for better engagement. 'That's the way to be transparent and keep people in the know.' She also said public trust can only be rebuilt when officials explain how decisions are made rather than announcing decisions after the fact. 'We literally have to be honest and tell a story to explain how it got to that end,' she said. 'We want to build that trust with our community, and we've got to be honest about what's taking place.' That trust, she said, starts with representation. If elected, Banks-McLaughlin would be the first female mayor of Fayetteville in decades. 'Women lead on an everyday basis,' she said. 'You don't see it as much in the political arena, but that's embedded in me. Women bring more compassion to the table versus men.' From District 8 to citywide Banks-McLaughlin originally filed to run for re-election in her district, but said she decided to step aside and pursue the mayoral seat after seeing who else had filed. 'I just responded to the field,' she said. 'I started thinking about their decision-making and knew our city needed something different.' She said she wouldn't have made the switch unless she had confidence in the people stepping up to run in her place, particularly her handpicked replacement for District 8, Rodney Garvin. The other candidates for District 8 are Mahmoud A. (Travis) Hamed, Shaun McMillan and Robbie Poole. 'I wouldn't have it no other way,' she said. 'The community, those who voted for me, they trust my judgment. I wanted to ensure that me running for mayor didn't mean leaving them without the right person.' When asked how it feels to run against her fellow council members, Banks-McLaughlin said simply: 'We all have different styles of leadership. May the best person win.' This article originally appeared on The Fayetteville Observer: Courtney Banks-McLaughlin running for mayor of Fayetteville in 2025 Solve the daily Crossword
CBS News
14 hours ago
- CBS News
Stanislaus County commission approves annexing 300 acres on southeast side of Oakdale
The California city of Oakdale could be seeing one of its biggest expansions in years with the addition of new homes, businesses and thousands of new residents. There is opposition to the plan, which aims to add 300 acres to the city's southwest side. However, the project, Sierra Pointe, just got the green light from the Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission. It would bring close to 900 homes, more than a million square feet of shops and offices and about 2,500 new residents. Councilman Jarod Pitassi cast the only "no" vote at City Hall, saying many people already living within that area keep livestock, which could come into conflict with city code. Patasi also says the city isn't ready for this much growth. "We already have a lot of traffic in town, especially peak hours of people dropping off kids, going to work," he said. Neighbors echoed similar concerns during the commission meeting. The developer's team says that won't happen and promises existing homes will keep their irrigation water. Pitassi said that for him, it's about slowing down and planning ahead. "Let's not put the cart before the horse, and if we want to grow, which is inevitable, we will and we shouldn't to an extent. But how are we doing it right? And how are we making sure that future generations aren't going to be impacted by the rush of building a ton of houses at one time?" he said. The annexation isn't final just yet. The local agency formation commission is in a 30-day reconsideration period. After those thirty days, they'll schedule a protest hearing where property owners can object to the annexation.
Politico
18 hours ago
- Politico
How LA's business-labor ballot faceoff ends
WHAT'S THE DEAL? — Business leaders and powerful service unions are at each other's throats in Los Angeles in a retaliatory tit-for-tat that began with passage of a new $30 minimum wage for tourism workers and has now launched six separate measures toward the 2026 ballot. What each side hopes to accomplish in the spiraling conflict is an open question, as Emily explored in a story this weekend, leaving some in the Southland to wonder whether they're seeing a well-worn playbook for shaping policy in the Capitol now being deployed in city halls. Ever since state law changed a decade ago to allow proponents to quash their measures once qualified, there's been a pattern of 'labor and business filing competing ballot initiatives and using it as a negotiation tactic,' said Los Angeles political consultant Michael Trujillo. 'What you're seeing is just a very long-held strategy of using ballot initiatives making its way to LA.' Mayor Karen Bass has begun meeting with business-side groups to discuss a potential deescalation. The groups filed a referendum in late May to overturn the minimum-wage law and a subsequent proposal in July to repeal the city's $750-million-per-year gross-receipts tax. 'I think we're always amenable to sit down and figure out what the compromise is,' said Greg Plummer, who owns a 250-employee concession company at Los Angeles International Airport. 'But we don't want a Band-Aid solution.' At the other side of a negotiating table would be Unite Here Local 11, which lobbied for the so-called 'Olympic Wage' and responded to the citizens-veto referendum by targeting its backers' bottom lines. The four countermeasures otherwise have little in common; one penalizes companies for their CEO pay, another makes it harder to build sports arenas and concert halls. The powerful service union has already used the California ballot-measure leverage playbook in Los Angeles. In 2022, the powerful service union qualified an initiative for the 2024 ballot that would have forced local hotels to rent vacant rooms to homeless people. But labor leaders agreed to drop the measure about a year later when the City Council passed tighter regulations on the development of new hotels. Conversations with people involved in the business-side measures indicate a handful of potential points for negotiation. They'd want to see Unite Here withdraw its initiatives from the ballot, for one. But they would also likely want the City Council to agree to slow implementation of the new $30 wage law, giving businesses more time to comply — much like councilors did in 2015, when then-Mayor Eric Garcetti signed a $15 minimum wage bill into law. 'Not one business leader has said, 'Don't do the $30 minimum wage.' We have said, 'Do it in the right way,'' said Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Association, which represents business interests in the San Fernando Valley. 'A 55-percent increase over the course of three years is just not sustainable. No business can do that.' Negotiations, of course, require both parties involved to come to the proverbial table — and leaders of Unite Here seem less inclined to do so than their industry counterparts. Union co-president Kurt Petersen told Playbook last week that he sees the airline and tourism companies' decision to launch the referendum as a sign they weren't operating in good faith. 'I don't know what's left to negotiate,' he told Playbook. 'They had their chance, they decided to betray those negotiations, and our members are looking forward to getting a lot more done at the ballot next year.' NEWS BREAK: UC Board of Regents meet this afternoon in emergency closed-door meeting on how to respond to the Trump administration's $1 billion fine … Gifford Fire in San Luis Obispo County grows to 117,000 acres ... President Donald Trump defends his decision to sell chipmaker Nvidia an export control license. Welcome to Ballot Measure Weekly, a special edition of Playbook PM focused on California's lively realm of ballot measure campaigns. Drop us a line at eschultheis@ and wmccarthy@ or find us on X — @emilyrs and @wrmccart. TOP OF THE TICKET A highly subjective ranking of the ballot measures — past and future, certain and possible — getting our attention this week. 1. Redistricting (2025?): Gov. Gavin Newsom is pushing ahead with his plan to put mid-decade redistricting before California voters in a November special election, writing in a letter to Trump this morning that, 'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California.' All eyes will be on Democrats' proposed maps, which are slated for release ahead of the Legislature's return next week. 2. Bay Area transit (2026?): Both the San Mateo and Santa Clara county transit agencies voted late last week to join the mega-regional ballot measure to fund BART and other public transportation in the Bay Area. The development is a major victory for the tax proposal, which will now come before voters in five counties. 3. Affordable housing bond (2026?): The $10 billion bond to fund affordable housing appears — along with other ballot-related legislation like SB 42, which would allow public financing of elections — to have stalled behind redistricting in the Capitol's queue, for at least the first portion of the Legislature's return. The bond has passed the Assembly but has thus far made little progress in the Senate. 4. Voter ID (2026): Assemblymember Carl DeMaio's grassroots organization says it has recruited 10,000 volunteers to collect signatures for an initiative that would require government-issued identification to vote. Reform California says it will launch a bus tour and rallies across the state beginning Oct. 12. 5. Minimum wage (Los Angeles, 2026?): It will take another month to determine the future of an airline- and hotel-backed referendum that kicked off the LA ballot war. The city clerk is now conducting a hand count of 140,000 signatures submitted in late June by the LA Alliance for Tourism, Jobs and Progress after a random sample fell short of the validity rate required to qualify outright. 6. Calexit (2028?): Among those who enjoyed Will's POLITICO Magazine profile of Calexit's CEO Xavier Mitchell, which exposed his criminal history and pattern of deceit, is apparently Yes California, the group that founded the state's modern sovereignty movement. Over the past week, the group has posted increasingly weird AI-generated videos about the Mitchell controversy, writing in one post on X that 'the people behind CalExit these days are idiots.' 7. Measure CL (Culver City, 2025): The Culver City Chamber of Commerce has endorsed the half-cent sales tax increase on an all-mail Aug. 26 special election ballot. The organization may boast the most prestigious membership of any small city's chamber: It includes Apple, Amazon Studios, and Sony Pictures. SCHEDULING WINDOW TIME'S UP FOR NOVEMBER BALLOT: While the Legislature has until Aug. 22 to pass a redistricting package in time to come before voters on Nov. 4, other governments around California won't have the same flexibility to rush their priorities onto a newly scheduled special-election ballot. Local measures must be approved at least 88 days before an election — meaning last Friday was the last possible day to do so. WHATEVER HAPPENED TO ... RIDESHARE DRIVERS (2020): After spending $204 million to classify their drivers as private contractors via Prop 22, Uber and Lyft are now putting pressure on senators to defeat a bill heading to the appropriations committee that would allow gig workers to unionize. The group, now calling itself the Protect App-Based Drivers & Services coalition, has argued that AB 1340 violates the intent of voters that gave Prop 22 its majority. The bill introduced by Assemblymembers Buffy Wicks and Marc Berman would give drivers collective-bargaining rights, a possibility originally limited by the ballot initiative but later reopened after a state appeals-court decision. The coalition has argued that the bill would make rideshare services 'less affordable and less accessible for the millions of Californians' and require companies to share drivers' personal information. Those arguments have failed to slow the bill, which has cruised through transportation committees in both houses. ON OTHER BALLOTS Tenants' rights groups in Massachusetts filed an initiative last week that would tie annual rent increases to cost-of-living growth, overturning a 1994 ballot referendum banning rent control in the state ... An Oregon initiative to privatize liquor sales, a measure identical to a failed 2022 proposal but from different proponents this time, received its ballot title from the state's justice department ... Local Republican leaders in Idaho are launching an initiative effort to repeal the state's 6-percent tax on food items after a legislative push on the issue failed ... Seattle voters will weigh in this November on an initiative that would tax businesses' gross receipts versus revenues, a move the City Council made after seeing Seattle's economic forecast improve slightly ... And an initiative to ban private fireworks in Switzerland is gaining some new momentum after a new poll — released just ahead of the country's firework-filled national holiday — found 68 percent of Swiss voters support it. POSTCARD FROM ... … SANTA ROSA: A century-old North Bay commuter school wants to ask the voters of the Sonoma County Junior College District for a near-billion-dollar bond to update aging infrastructure, including a Great Depression-era building that houses its art department. But while affordability concerns push down polling numbers elsewhere for new taxes and borrowing, Santa Rosa Junior College is counting on its deep connections even beyond its county lines to ease its way to passage in 2026. 'We are huge in our community,' said Kate Jolley, the school's vice president of finance and administrative services. 'It's not the same throughout the state, we really have something special here.' In the 106 years since its founding as a feeder school for UC Berkeley, Santa Rosa Junior College has established itself as one of the best community colleges in the state. WalletHub last year ranked it 16th out of 653 on its list of the country's 'Best & Worst Community Colleges.' But all those years of service have also taken a toll on campus facilities, including an unrenovated, approximately 85-year-old 'heritage' building constructed by the federal Works Progress Administration during the Great Depression. The community-college district that encompasses all of Sonoma County as well as parts of Marin and Mendocino has approved two bonds for facilities maintenance and renovations since 2002, but that money for infrastructure is now drying up. Support for such funding measures was once nearly automatic, especially in progressive areas like this. But in May a local group called the Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers was able to defeat a 52-cent per-square foot parcel tax in a small Marin school district that previously had been undefeated when asking its community for more money. Instead of asking voters to approve a new tax, Santa Rosa Junior College is now exploring whether an extension of the existing bond would sit better with a penny-pinching electorate. The college has commissioned Bay Area pollster FM3 to study voter attitudes as it decides how to fund its way into another century. 'We are hoping that the relationship we have in our community will help move us forward,' Jolley said. 'And if not, we will hear that.' LETTER OF THE DAY … MEASURE G: In 2024, Measure G was a Los Angeles County charter amendment that created a task force now working to transform the structure of local government. In the past, the letter G has been used to identify a range of local-level ballot measures across the state, including those to: Grant San Francisco city employees two weeks of vacation after one year's service, and three weeks after five years (1948, failed) ... Set rates for a service that would allow Richmond residents to watch television over cables from 'one master antenna' (1968, failed) … Extend rent-control protections for Berkeley tenants in three- and four-unit properties (1982, passed) … Convert a 72-acre oceanfront bluff in Half Moon Bay into a 'passive park' (1989, passed) … Impose term limits for Fresno's mayor (1996, passed)… Allow Mendocino County residents to grow up to 25 marijuana plants for personal use (2000, passed) … Enact a 2-percent utility users tax in Morgan Hill (2008, failed) ... Require voter approval for any land designation changes in Goleta for agricultural parcels more than 10 acres (2012, passed) ... Change the city of Escondido from a general law city to a charter city (2014, failed) ... Protect 'scenic corridors' and 'vista points' along Highway 50 through El Dorado County's zoning plan (2016, failed) ... Increase the Calaveras County hotel tax to fund general services (2018, passed) ... Limit City Council salary increases in Carlsbad (2020, passed) ... And approve a business tax for commercial cannabis companies in Corona (2022, passed).
