Prosecutors ask for new execution date for Texas man in shaken baby syndrome case
Monday's request from the Texas Attorney General's Office was the first time authorities had asked for a new execution date since Roberson received a stay in October. The execution's delay followed a flurry of last-ditch legal challenges on the night of his scheduled lethal injection that were prompted by an unprecedented maneuver from a bipartisan group of Texas lawmakers who say he is innocent and was sent to death row based on flawed science.
In its five-page motion, the Texas Attorney General's Office said because the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's top criminal court, has previously denied appeals in Roberson's case, 'the criteria for setting an execution have been met.'
The attorney general's office requested a new execution date of Oct. 16.
The attorney general's office did not immediately reply to an email seeking comment Tuesday.
Court documents show the Anderson County District Attorney's Office, which had prosecuted Roberson, has agreed to let the Texas Attorney General's Office take over the case.
Roberson, 58, was convicted of the 2002 killing of his 2-year-old daughter, Nikki Curtis, in the East Texas city of Palestine. Prosecutors argued he violently shook his daughter back and forth, causing severe head trauma in what's called shaken baby syndrome. His lawyers and some medical experts say his daughter died not from abuse but from complications related to pneumonia.
Gretchen Sween, one of Roberson's attorneys, criticized the office of Attorney General Ken Paxton for asking for a new execution date when Roberson still has an appeal pending before the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that his legal team says contains 'powerful new evidence of his innocence.'
'There is no justification for the Attorney General's relentless effort to kill an innocent human being — and no state law or moral law that authorizes seeking an execution date under these circumstances,' Sween said in a statement.
In its latest appeal filed in February, Roberson's legal team said new evidence, including statements from pathologists that state the girl's death was not a homicide and question the reliability of conclusions by the medical examiner on the cause of death, show 'no rational juror would find Roberson guilty of capital murder; and unreliable and outdated scientific and medical evidence was material to his conviction.'
Roberson's attorneys have asked that a hearing be held over whether a new execution date should be set. It was not immediately known when a court hearing could be held as the case currently does not have a presiding judge as the previous judge recused herself from the case in November.
Roberson had been in a holding cell in October, a few feet away from America's busiest death chamber in Huntsville, waiting to receive a lethal injection when he was granted an execution stay after a group of Texas lawmakers issued a subpoena for him to testify before a House committee several days after he was scheduled to die.
The Texas Supreme Court ruled in November that although the subpoena was valid, it could not be used to circumvent a scheduled execution.
Roberson never testified before the House committee as Paxton's office blocked efforts to have him speak to lawmakers.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump pushes rate cut as Fed meets, second quarter data released
WASHINGTON, July 30 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Wednesday again called on the Federal Reserve to lower benchmark rates after data showed U.S. economic growth rebounded more than expected in the second quarter. "2Q GDP JUST OUT: 3%, WAY BETTER THAN EXPECTED! 'Too Late' MUST NOW LOWER THE RATE. No Inflation! Let people buy, and refinance, their homes!" Trump wrote on Truth Social as the central bank prepared to release its policy statement.
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Justice Department says Epstein and Maxwell grand juries heard from only 2 law enforcement witnesses
Just two witnesses, both law enforcement officials, testified before the federal grand juries that indicted Jeffrey Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell on sex trafficking charges, the Justice Department said in support of its request to unseal transcripts of the usually secret proceedings. In a filing late Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, officials describe the grand jury witnesses in a memorandum in response to a call from judges presiding over both cases to provide more details about their request earlier this month. Judges would have to approve any request to unseal records. Grand jury transcripts are rarely released by courts, unless they need to be disclosed in connection with a judicial proceeding. The papers filed Tuesday cite a 1997 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that said judges have wide discretion and public interest alone can justify releasing grand jury information. The Epstein grand jury heard only from an FBI agent when it met in June and July 2019, while the Maxwell grand jury heard from the same FBI agent and a New York Police Department detective when it met in June and July 2020 and March 2021, according to the submission. The memorandum was signed by Jay Clayton, the interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, and included the names of Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The request to unseal the transcripts came after the Justice Department enraged parts of President Donald Trump's base of supporters when it announced in early July it wouldn't be making public any more Epstein files. The decision not to make additional materials public shocked some Trump supporters because members of his administration had hyped the expected release and stoked conspiracies around the well-connected financier. Epstein took his own life in a federal jail in August 2019, weeks after his arrest on sex trafficking charges, officials say, but his case has generated endless attention and conspiracy theories because of his and Maxwell's links to famous people, such as royals, presidents and billionaires, including Trump. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her December 2021 conviction on sex trafficking charges that accused her of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. Last week, she sat for 1 1/2 days of interviews with Justice Department officials in Florida, answering questions 'about 100 different people,' her attorney said. Maxwell was being interviewed because of Trump's directive to gather and release any credible evidence about others who may have committed crimes, the deputy attorney general said. Trump has denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and claimed he had cut off their relationship long ago. But he faces ongoing questions about the Epstein case, overshadowing his administration's achievements. When reporters last week pressed the Republican president about possibly pardoning Maxwell, he deflected, emphasizing his administration's successes. After the request to unseal grand jury records, two former prosecutors in Manhattan told The Associated Press the transcripts would be relatively short and contain only the testimony of law enforcement witnesses talking about evidence that tracks information in the indictments. In its filing Tuesday, the Justice Department further dampened expectations the grand jury transcripts would contain new revelations when it said 'certain aspects and subject matters' contained in them became public during Maxwell's trial. The memorandum said many of the victims whose accounts relating to Epstein and Maxwell came up in grand jury testimony testified at trial consistent with what was described by the FBI agent and the NYPD detective and some information was made public through civil litigation. The government said no Epstein or Maxwell family members have come forward to express an interest in the request to unseal the grand jury transcripts, although Maxwell has indicated she will file a position with the court. The memorandum says the request to unseal the transcripts is 'consistent with increasing calls for additional disclosures in this matter.' 'There is undoubtedly a clearly expressed interest from the public in Jeffrey Epstein's and Ghislaine Maxwell's crimes," it says. 'Beyond that, there is abundant public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation into those crimes.' Under a 2008 nonprosecution agreement, Epstein pleaded guilty in Florida to state charges of soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. That allowed him to avert a possible life sentence, instead serving 13 months in a work release program. He was required to make payments to victims and register as a sex offender. Epstein was later charged by federal prosecutors in Manhattan for nearly identical allegations in 2019.
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
First Epstein files, now Trump finds himself in another rift with GOP — this time on Gaza
Senate Republicans and President Donald Trump are once again on opposing sides about a central tenet of Republican orthodoxy: This time, on Israel and Gaza. Earlier this week, Trump directly contradicted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu refuted claims by multiple international groups saying that Gaza was at the point of starvation, calling it a ' bold-faced lie.' Trump responded during a joint press conference with U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer when he finally acknowledged that there is ' real starvation ' in Gaza. Even Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the far-right MAGA firebrand from Georgia, jumped in on it and called the war in Gaza a 'genocide,' using language that historically only progressives used to describe the war. And public opinion has largely shifted against Israel after the deadly Oct. 7, 2023 terror incursion into Israel where Hamas brutally raped and murdered 1,200 innocent people and took 251 hostages. With Joe Biden exiting the stage, Democrats are having their reckoning with the party's historic support for Israel. But many Republicans feigned ignorance. 'I haven't seen what the president said. So, was it today?' Sen. Jim Banks of Indiana, one of the more MAGA House members who got a promotion last year, responded when asked about Trump's comments by The Independent on Tuesday. The Senate remains one of the last true bastions of Republican orthodoxy on foreign policy, which is to say, support for a strong military and America having a prominent role as the enforcer of the global order. Support for Israel remains a core tenet of this style of support, both because of Christian conservatives' theology about the Holy Land and the critical strategic position of Israel in the Middle East. Republicans historically viewed Israel's placement in an area of the world rife with conflict as another asset for intelligence and security purposes. Trump represented a break from that, focusing more on 'America First' ideology wherein he adopted more isolationist rhetoric, though he still robustly backs Israel and assisted with its war with Iran. That might be why Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told The Independent to contact his office. Sen. Todd Young, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee and Marine Corps veteran, refused to answer questions. Despite the fact that Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) faces a MAGA primary challenge from Texas' wayward and scandal-ridden Attorney General Ken Paxton, read from the hymnal of the Bush Republicans. 'I think there's definitely a humanitarian crisis, but i think the blame is not Netanyahu, the blame is Hamas,' Cornyn told The Independent. When asked if that's what Trump meant, Cornyn said 'you'd have to ask him.' Despite the fact Trump relocated the US Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem in his first term and continues to support Israel militarily, he clearly views the American relationship with Israel in a far more transactional light than his Senate counterparts. During one point of Israel's war with Iran, Trump famously said ' they don't know what the f*** they're doing.' Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), the chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, told The Independent there is 'clearly a humanitarian crisis there,' said people should remember that Hamas caused this. Democrats for their part sought to exploit Trump's remarks on Gaza. Unburdened from having to defend Joe Biden's record on Gaza, numerous Democrats pointed to Trump's record to raise the suffering in Gaza. 'What we can do is continue to call upon President Trump, who now has acknowledged that people are starving to death in Gaza, to call upon Prime Minister Netanyahu to let the UN a delivery system,' Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), told The Independent. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) joined Van Hollen's letter this weekend to cease funding for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and instead resume sending money to the United Nations for food distribution. But Sanders said Trump deserves no credit. 'Look at any newspaper in America today and you see pictures of starving children, this is not a brilliant observation,' he told The Independent. Last week on the Senate floor, Sen. Amy Klobuchar delivered a speech excoriating Netanyahu. This came weeks after she met with Netanyahu during his visit to Congress. But Klobuchar said her remarks were not an about-face. 'The reason I went was to raise the lack of humanitarian aid into Gaza and that they had to have more access points,' she told The Independent. 'I think it's getting worse and worse and I know they've let some aid in but it is not enough. This is a crisis, it's a humanitarian crisis, and people are starving.' Sen Angus King, an independent from Maine who caucus with the Democrats, went one step further. On Monday evening, he released a statement that he would not support any type of aid whatsoever to Israel as long as children starved. For an even-keeled moderate, it was a stunning remark. 'They've cut off water, off and on, and they've really and they've created a situation now where it's so desperate that people are I are going after the aid in a desperate kind of way, and they're, they're using armed troops in that situation,' he told The Independent. 'They have the power to fix it. If they fix it, I'm with them until they fix it. I'm out.' But Senate Republicans will likely attack any Democrat who signed Van Hollen's letter, specifically vulnerable Democratic senators, even as some of the Democrats are Jewish supporters of Israel. One in particular: Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA), who faces a tough re-election next year.
