French court to decide if al-Assad can be tried for Syrian chemical attacks
If the judges at the Cour de Cassation lift al-Assad's immunity on Friday, it could pave the way for his trial in absentia over the use of chemical weapons in Ghouta in 2013 and Douma in 2018.
It could also set a precedent to allow the prosecution of other government leaders linked to atrocities, human rights activists and lawyers say.
Al-Assad has retained no lawyers for these charges and has denied he was behind the chemical attacks.
The opposition has long rejected al-Assad's denial, as his forces were the only side in the ruinous, nearly 14-year civil war to possess sarin.
A ruling against al-Assad would be 'a huge victory for the victims', said Mazen Darwish, president of the Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression, which collected evidence of war crimes, quoted by The Associated Press news agency.
'It is not only about Syrians; this will open the door for the victims from any country and this will be the first time that a domestic investigative judge has the right to issue an arrest warrant for a president during his rule.'
He said the ruling could enable his group to legally go after government members, like launching a money laundering case against former Syrian Central Bank governor and Minister of Economy Adib Mayaleh, whose lawyers have argued he had immunity under international law.
Brutal crackdown
For more than 50 years, Syria was ruled by Hafez al-Assad and then his son, Bashar.
During the Arab Spring, rebellion broke out against their rule in 2011 across the country of 23 million, igniting a brutal civil war that killed more than half a million people, according to the the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). Millions more fled to Lebanon, Jordan, Turkiye and Europe.
The al-Assad dynasty also fomented sectarian tensions to stay in power, a legacy driving renewed recent violence in Syria against minority groups, despite promises that the country's new leaders will carve out a political future for Syria that includes and represents all its communities.
As the International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for leaders accused of atrocities – such as Russia's Vladimir Putin in Ukraine, Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu in Gaza, and Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines – the French judges' ruling could empower the legal framework to prosecute not just deposed and exiled leaders but those currently in power.
The Syrian government denied in 2013 that it was behind the Ghouta attack, but the United States subsequently threatened military retaliation, then settled for a deal with Moscow for al-Assad to give up his chemical weapons stockpile, opening the way for Russia to wield huge influence in the war-torn nation.
Al-Assad survived more than a decade longer, aided militarily by Russia and Iranian-aligned groups, including Hezbollah, before being overthrown by rebel groups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
8 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
‘Just unrealistic': EU's $250B US energy pledge faces major doubts
Agencies The European Union's commitment to purchase $250 billion worth of U.S. energy annually is seen as unrealistic, according to analysts, as it would require diverting most U.S. energy exports to Europe while the EU has limited control over the import decisions of its companies. The U.S. and the EU struck a framework trade deal on Sunday, which will impose 15% U.S. tariffs on most EU goods. The deal included a pledge for the EU to spend $250 billion annually on U.S. energy – imports of oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and nuclear technologyfor the next three years. Total U.S. energy exports to all buyers worldwide in 2024 amounted to $318 billion, U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) data showed. Of that, the EU imported a combined $76 billion of U.S. petroleum, LNG and solid fuels such as coal in 2024, according to Reuters' calculations based on Eurostat data. More than tripling those imports was unrealistic, analysts said. Arturo Regalado, senior LNG analyst at Kpler, said the scope of the energy trade envisioned in the deal 'exceeds market realities.' 'U.S. oil flows would need to fully redirect toward the EU to reach the target, or the value of LNG imports from the US would need to increase sixfold,' Regalado said. There is strong competition for U.S. energy exports as other countries need the supplies and have themselves pledged to buy more in trade agreed to a 'major expansion of U.S. energy exports' in its U.S. trade deal last week, the White House said in a statement. South Korea has also indicated interest in investing and purchasing fuel from an Alaskan LNG project as it seeks a trade deal. Competition for U.S. energy could drive up benchmark oil and gas prices and encourage American producers to favour exports over domestic supply. That could make fuel and power costs more expensive, which would be a political and economic headache for U.S. and EU leaders. Neither side has detailed what was included in the energy deal – or whether it covered items such as energy services or parts for power grids and EU estimates its member countries' plans to expand nuclear energy would require hundreds of billions of euros in investments by 2050. Its nuclear reactor-related imports, however, totalled just 53.3 billion euros ($61.70 billion) in 2024, trade data shows. The energy pledge reflected the EU's analysis of how much U.S. energy supply it could accommodate, a senior EU official said, but that would depend on investments in U.S. oil and LNG infrastructure, European import infrastructure and shipping capacity. 'These figures, again, are not taken out of thin air. So yes, they require investments,' said the senior official, who declined to be named. 'Yes, it will vary according to the energy sources. But these are figures which are reachable.' There was no public commitment to the delivery, the official added, because the EU would not buy the energy – its companies would. Private companies import most of Europe's oil, while a mix of private and state-run companies import gas. The European Commission can aggregate demand for LNG to negotiate better terms, but cannot force companies to buy fuel. That is a commercial decision.'It's just unrealistic,' ICIS analysts Andreas Schröder and Ajay Parmar said in written comments to Reuters. 'Either Europe pays a super high non-market reflective price for U.S. LNG or it takes way too much LNG volumes, more than it can cope with.' The United States is already the EU's top supplier of LNG and oil, shipping 44% of EU LNG needs and 15.4% of its oil in 2024, according to EU data. Raising imports to the target would require a U.S. LNG expansion way beyond what is planned through 2030, said Jacob Mandel, research lead at Aurora Energy Research. 'You can add on capacity,' Mandel said. 'But if you're talking about the scale that would be necessary to meet these targets, the $250 billion, then it's not really feasible.' Europe could buy $50 billion more of U.S. LNG annually as supply increases, he said. The EU has already said it could import more U.S. energy as its plan advances to end Russian oil and gas imports by EU imported around 94 million barrels of Russian oil last year – 3% of the bloc's crude purchases – and 52 billion cubic metres (bcm) of Russian LNG and gas, according to EU data. For comparison, the EU imported 45 bcm of U.S. LNG last year. Higher EU fuel purchases would, however, run counter to forecasts for EU demand to decline as it shifts to clean energy, analysts said. 'There is no major need for the EU to import more oil from the U.S., in fact, its oil demand peaked a number of years ago,' Schröder and Parmar said.
Qatar Tribune
8 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Spanish black olive exporters face more hurdles with new US tariffs
Agencies Spanish black olive exporters, already subject to harsh tariffs since U.S. President Donald Trump's first term, are warning it will be difficult to survive an extra 15% they now face after the European Union reached a trade deal with the U.S. EU goods now face import tariffs of 15% – half of Trump's threatened rate, but much more than Europeans had hoped for – after striking a trade deal with Trump on Sunday. Spain, the world's top table olive exporter, has seen its share of the U.S. black olive market plummet from 49% in 2017 to 19% in 2024 after Trump imposed tariffs of more than 30% at the request of Californian olive growers. The measures only affected black olives and don't apply to green olives, olive oil or semi-processed farmers have taken steps to increase green olive sales and to diversify their markets since the tariffs were first imposed, but warn that the additional increase will be hard to swallow. 'It would be unviable (for black table olives),' said Eduardo Martin, secretary of Asaja, a Spanish local farmers' association in southern Seville province, a region that produces the most olives. The initial trade measures coincided with a severe drought that forced Spanish producers to cut around 400,000 work shifts for pickers out of a total of 2.5 million, according to industry estimates. Sales of Spanish black olives to the U.S. dropped by 70% in the first year.'The worst was the first year,' said Gabriel Cabello, president of Andalusia's Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives in Seville province. 'In the second year, we learned that this was here to stay and that we had to do things differently.' To mitigate losses, Spanish exporters shifted focus to Europe and the Middle East, regions with a tradition of consuming table olives. They also ventured into Asian markets, while switching to shipping more green olives to the U.S. because they are subject to lower tariffs. Tariffs also spurred innovation, with some Spanish exporters selling black olives stuffed with salmon or cheese for the first time, which helped boost sales in Europe and Asia, Cabello said. Still, the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture estimates it has lost 239.6 million euros ($278.51 million) in black olive sales since the tariffs were introduced, nearly a third of the 707 million euro total export value from the last harvest. Among the 25 Spanish exporters active before the tariffs, only four major players remain, according to Asemesa, Spain's Association of Table Olive Sevilla, one of the larger players with the financial resources to lobby the U.S. for lower rates, expanded green olive exports and successfully reduced black olive tariffs to 10% from 31%. The company successfully demonstrated that it received fewer European subsidies than the U.S. had estimated. Its U.S. sales have been gradually growing since 2023. 'We cannot give up on the world's largest consumer market for black olives,' said Agro Sevilla CEO Julio Roda. In a twist, Aceitunas Guadalquivir, another major Spanish olive producer, acquired Bell-Carter Foods, one of the two leading U.S. companies that had advocated for the tariffs, according to a statement issued in 2022. The company is among several Californian companies that have imported raw olives from Spain, which are exempt from the tariffs, according to Asemesa. Aceitunas Guadalquivir did not reply to a Reuters request for comment about such exports. 'When California has low production, they import raw olives to finish processing them in the U.S., mostly from Spain,' said Asemesa's Secretary General Antonio de Mora. Spain exported 6,300 tons of semi-processed olives in 2024 alongside 36,000 tons of green olives and 9,800 tons of black olives.
Al Jazeera
12 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
UK plans to recognise Palestine in September unless Israel halts Gaza war
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has told his cabinet that the United Kingdom will recognise the state of Palestine by September unless Israel takes 'substantive steps' to end its war on Gaza and commits to a lasting peace process. According to a government statement issued after an emergency cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Starmer said the move could come before the United Nations General Assembly in New York unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire, halts plans to annex parts of the occupied West Bank, and supports a political path towards a two-state solution. '[Starmer] reiterated that there is no equivalence between Israel and Hamas and that our demands on Hamas remain, that they must release all the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, accept that they will play no role in the government of Gaza, and disarm,' the statement added. Starmer interrupted ministers' summer holidays to discuss a draft European-led peace initiative and plans to increase humanitarian aid to Gaza, where the UN has warned of looming famine. While past UK governments have supported Palestinian statehood 'when the time is right', none has publicly tied it to a specific deadline or laid out preconditions so explicitly. Israel lashed out at the UK following the announcement, calling it a 'reward for Hamas' that would only undermine diplomatic efforts to end the war on Gaza. In a statement posted on X, Israel's Foreign Ministry claimed the UK's move would damage any chance of a ceasefire. Israel broke the last negotiated ceasefire in March. Starmer informed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of the plan in a phone call before making it public, Reuters reported. Details of the conversation have not been disclosed. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has denied having any talks with Starmer about Britain's recognition plans. 'We never did discuss it,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Tuesday. 'The right time' The proposal, backed by growing voices within Starmer's own Labour Party, would mark a major shift in the UK's position, as successive governments have long delayed recognition, citing the need for 'the right time'. With pressure mounting from within Starmer's own party, his position appears to have shifted. More than half of Labour's backbench MPs have signed a letter urging the government to formally recognise a Palestinian state as leverage to push Israel towards peace. Speaking to reporters, Starmer defended the timing and conditions of the announcement, saying the decision was driven by the 'intolerable situation' in Gaza and a fear that the two-state solution was slipping out of reach. 'This is intended to further that cause,' he said. 'It's done now because I'm particularly concerned that the idea of a two-state solution is reducing and feels further away today than it has for many years.' He added that recognition of Palestine would be part of an eight-point peace plan the UK has been developing with European partners. Last week, French President Emmanuel Macron said France would formally recognise Palestine as a state, becoming the largest and most influential European nation to do so. European Union members Norway, Spain and the Republic of Ireland have previously said they recognise the State of Palestine. Labour MP Sarah Champion, who organised the letter to Starmer, said there will never be a perfect moment to recognise Palestinian statehood, but warned this might be the last chance. 'What we do have, however, is the perfect storm to prevent a two-state solution ever happening,' she said. 'It is now or never if we believe in Palestinians' right to recognition.'
