logo
Tasmanian Labor says it's confident Jess Munday is eligible to contest this month's state election

Tasmanian Labor says it's confident Jess Munday is eligible to contest this month's state election

The Tasmanian Labor Party says speculation about the eligibility of one of its Franklin candidates Jess Munday should be over, after the party released legal advice stating she was able to contest the July 19 state election.
The Liberals have claimed the Unions Tasmania secretary's position on the WorkCover Tasmania board means she falls foul of section 32 of the state's Constitution Act, and is ineligible to be elected.
It released legal opinion from barrister Chris Gunson SC that said he believed Ms Munday was ineligible to nominate for Franklin, and to be elected as an MP, because of her appointment to WorkCover Tasmania's board.
Mr Gunson said an application to the Supreme Court of Tasmania contesting her eligibility would be "likely to succeed" and would likely lead to the results in Franklin being "declared void", and a by-election held.
He said it was possible Ms Munday's involvement in Labor's statewide election campaign could lead to the Supreme Court declaring all election results void, sending voters back to the polls again, but he said it was "impossible to make any reasonable assessment of that risk" at this stage.
"To do so would be merely speculative absent all necessary facts," Mr Gunson's opinion, provided to the ABC, said.
But on Friday afternoon Labor released its own advice, prepared by former solicitor-general Michael O'Farrell SC, which found the act "does not operate to prohibit Ms Munday from being capable of being elected to, or of holding a seat in the House of Assembly".
The argument surrounds Section 32 of the state's Constitution Act, with the Liberals arguing Ms Munday is ineligible because she holds an "office of profit under the Crown".
Labor points to an amendment passed in 1944, the Constitution (State Employees) Act, which states that the section does not apply to people who hold "any office of profit or employment in the public service of the state, or in any business or undertaking carried on by any person, body or authority on behalf of the state".
In his opinion Mr O'Farrell said he did not think "there can be any doubt that the WorkCover Board is engaged in an undertaking, and carries that out as a body or authority on behalf of the state".
"Accordingly, in my view, Ms Munday is a person to whom [the 1944 amendment] applies," his opinion said.
On Friday morning Liberal MLC Jo Palmer criticised Labor for not producing legal advice earlier, saying voters casting their ballots at pre-poll booths around the state needed to know whether Ms Munday was eligible.
She did not answer whether the party would lodge a Supreme Court challenge to Ms Munday's eligibility, while a Liberal spokesperson said the party was considering its options.
The party would have 90 days after the election to lodge an appeal.
Labor MLC Sarah Lovell said there was no question over Ms Munday's eligibility, and the Liberal Party's questioning of it had "blown up in their face".
"We have been 100 per cent confident in Jess Munday's eligibility as a candidate, there has been no question for us because we understand the law, we know there are provisions in the act that leave no doubt over her eligibility to be a candidate," Ms Lovell said.
"We have sought advice today because the Liberal Party has stooped to such lows and that behaviour needs to be called out.
"This was the only way to call that out, there should be no question for anyone now about Jess's eligibility to be a candidate."
Ms Munday accused the Liberals of engaging in "Trump style politics of misinformation and negativity and desperation that don't belong in Tasmanian politics".
"I have always had confidence in my eligibility and my ability to represent the people of Franklin well in the parliament," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kalgoorlie remembers 'maverick' federal MP Graeme Campbell
Kalgoorlie remembers 'maverick' federal MP Graeme Campbell

ABC News

time2 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Kalgoorlie remembers 'maverick' federal MP Graeme Campbell

Former member for the West Australian federal seat of Kalgoorlie Graeme Campbell has died, aged 86. His family posted on social media that he died early Saturday morning at Kalgoorlie Regional Hospital. Mr Campbell entered politics as a member of the Labor Party after a career as a pastoralist on the remote Nullarbor Plain. He went on to serve as the member for Kalgoorlie for 18 years, and is remembered by contemporaries as a "colourful" political maverick. Originally from Oxfordshire in England, Mr Campbell's family emigrated to Australia when he was a child. He grew up in South Australia and went on to establish Kybo Station, a remote pastoral property on the sparse Nullarbor, with his brother Rod Campbell. It was at Kybo he met his wife Michele Lelievre, now Campbell, a French woman who had stopped at the station while on a trip around Australia. Ms Campbell told the ABC in 2018 she had heard about the Campbell brothers long before heading towards the Nullarbor Plain. "I looked at him and thought, 'Definitely, I will stay,' so that was how I met him." The couple later married and moved to Kalgoorlie, where Mr Campbell worked in mining before turning his attention to politics. Mr Campbell joined the Labor Party in 1980, and was elected as the federal member for Kalgoorlie, a position he held for 17 years and 11 months. He was known for his pro-mining and anti-immigration views. In 1988, he challenged then prime minister Paul Keating and crossed the floor in opposition to the government's plan to remove company tax exemptions from gold miners. Former member for O'Connor, Tony Crook, said the move cemented Mr Campbell as a man of the people. Mr Campbell was disendorsed by the Labor Party for his outspoken views, and resigned from the party just prior to the 1996 election. He went on to run as an independent and won, retaining his seat for another two years. In a statement to the ABC, Mr Campbell's family said winning the 1996 election as an independent was one of his proudest moments. "Graeme found special connection to the people of regional Western Australia. "He was deeply honoured to be able to represent his people as the federal member for the seat of Kalgoorlie." Mr Crook said Mr Campbell's "maverick" style left an incredible legacy in Kalgoorlie politics. "For Graeme to leave [the Labor Party] and win the federal seat as an independent was huge," he said. "That was why I crossed the floor as many times as I did [in my own career]." Member for Kalgoorlie Ali Kent agreed Mr Campbell's "maverick" label was warranted. "He liked not ever conforming, he always liked to have his own way of doing things." Ms Kent said Mr Campbell's passion for local issues continued after he left politics. "Right to the end, he would be at the voting booths … he would always want to have a conversation with you," she said. Boulder resident and former chair of the Goldfields Transport Board, Doug Daws, first met Mr Campbell when he was in the Transport Workers Union and the pair came to loggerheads. Mr Daws said despite their disagreements, they went on to become good friends. "Graham was a great arguer for better things for the Goldfields … and sometimes it wasn't easy for him to do that," he said. He remembered fondly when Mr Campbell was meant to be promoting a prospective emu leather and meat farm near Wiluna. "He came to a meeting with a pair of these [emu leather] shoes on and he told everybody … they were the most uncomfortable shoes he's ever worn in his life," Mr Daws said. Mr Daws said Mr Campbell would be remembered for his tenacity and passion for the Goldfields. "He picked up causes and fought for them valiantly, sometimes against overwhelming odds … and his efforts are well recorded in the Hansard of federal parliament," he said. "He was a very able representative of this district [and] he was a hell of a good bloke. "He'll be sadly missed." Mr Campbell leaves behind his wife Michele and two sons, Ainsley and Leyland, who said they were overwhelmed with the outpouring of community sentiment. "We are honoured and thankful to have had him as our husband and father," the family statement read.

Uncertainty still surrounds government pay deals with police, teachers, and nurses and midwives
Uncertainty still surrounds government pay deals with police, teachers, and nurses and midwives

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Uncertainty still surrounds government pay deals with police, teachers, and nurses and midwives

Most people know at least one nurse, midwife, police officer or teacher. They make up a tick over 63 per cent of Queensland's key frontline workforce, and right now the state government is negotiating new pay deals with all of them. Griifith University industrial relations expert Ben French said dealing with three such influential groups all at once put the government in a "tricky spot". The situation is a result of enterprise bargaining agreements "rolling over" during the COVID-19 pandemic. "Now they've all come up at the same time for the new government," Dr French said. It's been tough going for negotiators. The police union has agreed in-principle to a deal, but the government is in conciliation with both the nurses' and the teachers' unions in front of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission (QIRC). In early August, teachers across the state went on strike for the first time in 16 years. Earlier in the month, nurses and midwives took industrial action by refusing to do tasks not related to critical care. Pandanus Petter from Australian National University's School of Business and Politics said as opposition leader, David Crisafulli was keen to paint himself as someone who would not repeat "the mistakes of the Newman era". "He positioned himself as someone who was not going to radically cut the public service," Dr Petter said. "He was saying, 'You know, what I want to do is empower the public service.' The government has offered an 8 per cent raise over three years to the police and teachers, while nurses and midwives have been offered an 11 per cent wage rise. This "fairly prescriptive model" has come with various add-ons and extras for each industry, Dr French said. He said these one-off payments "that are not part of the actual increase" are a way the government can save money down the track. "If you get a pay rise and you get an increase, it's on the base rate … the next time you come around your base rate is higher and you can build on that," he said, adding bonus payments did not feed into employees' super or overtime. Already those differing extras have caused friction. The Queensland Nurses' and Midwives' Union (QNMU) publicly derided the government for offering some police officers an $8,000 retention bonus over two years. Secretary Sarah Beaman said it was "outrageous" that the government had already struck a "better deal" with the police union after months of negotiating with the QNMU. The nurses and midwives EBA nominally ended on March 31, while the teachers and police ended on June 30. "Does this government have a problem with nurses and midwives?" Ms Beaman asked. Dr French said none of the three deals were set in stone. The state legislation allows for six months of negotiations from the day the EBA nominally ends or three months from the beginning of conciliation. After that, the parties can apply for arbitration, where the QIRC will decide what's fair. In the case of nurses and midwives, who are chasing a 13 per cent wage rise they say will deliver "nation-leading pay", the last scheduled conciliation meeting is September 2. At the behest of QIRC deputy president John Merrell, the QNMU agreed to pause industrial action until then, but said they would take further steps if negotiations failed. The Queensland Teachers' Union sent a letter to members on Thursday, seen by the ABC, confirming they had given the government until the end of the month to come up with a better deal or risk further strike action. QTU vice president Leah Olsen said more work stoppages would be a "last resort" option for the union, adding the union's members did "not take industrial action lightly". "Further strike action during school hours can be avoided if the government delivers a package members see value in," Ms Olsen said. As for the police, while there is an in-principle deal in place, union members still have to vote on whether to approve it next month. "My guess is they will vote it down," Dr French said. Both Education Minister John-Paul Langbroek and Health Minister Tim Nicholls have expressed their commitment to getting deals over the line through the conciliation process. Mr Langbroek said the government met with QTU negotiators 18 times over five months before the conciliation process began. The QNMU said they had met with the government for a total of more than 150 hours before they took industrial action last month. Dr Petter said with an election just gone there was little political risk for the government to come off as "tough but fair" in this round of negotiations. However, if three-year deals were signed all round, the next time they would be negotiating would be in the lead up to the 2028 election.

Selling out or selling up? The battle for Santos takes a twist
Selling out or selling up? The battle for Santos takes a twist

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

Selling out or selling up? The battle for Santos takes a twist

The gloves are off. The battle for control of oil and gas giant Santos moved up a gear this week after Ryan Stokes, chairman of Beach Energy and son of billionaire Kerry, took a swipe at the Abu Dhabi government's tilt for a large slice of Australia's energy market. A clearly incensed Stokes delivered a blunt assessment of the Middle Eastern gas giant's $36 billion takeover, suggesting it could end up denying Australians access to their own energy source. "A question we'd have is: 'Is that right in the national interest, given the importance of domestic gas?'" he asked. He didn't have to wait long for a response. The Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) quickly slapped him down, dismissing the criticisms as "clearly opportunistic and [reflecting] a commercial interest in the outcome". With $36 billion on the table — the biggest all-cash takeover offer in Australian history — ADNOC too has a significant commercial interest in the outcome. There's been surprisingly little, if any, debate around the merits of the takeover or the identity of the purchaser. Had the Australian government announced plans to purchase Santos, there undoubtedly would have been furious debate over the nationalisation of a vitally important commercial operation. Instead, a foreign government with potentially shifting global allegiances and a track record of dubious activities across Africa and Asia has stumped up a stupendous amount of cash for the same crucial energy infrastructure with nary a hint of community or political questioning. He's best known in the west as the money man behind the fabulously successful Manchester City Football Club. Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the younger brother of the United Arab Emirates's all powerful ruler, is one of the richest men in the Middle East and the UAE's deputy prime minister and vice president. Rarely seen in public, he never attends Manchester City games and has managed to maintain a low profile despite controlling key institutions like the Emirati central bank, the Abu Dhabi criminal authority and the nation's rapidly growing $330 billion sovereign wealth fund. He also chairs the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, the entity leading the Santos takeover. But his influence extends well beyond the UAE's borders. An in-depth investigation by the New York Times, published just last month, outlines a web of shadowy connections, linking Sheikh Mansour to several long-running conflicts in Africa. Until recently, he's somehow escaped scrutiny. But last year the British government intervened to prevent the sheikh buying The Telegraph over concerns it could diminish press freedom. His name was also raised in trials in the United States and Malaysia amid accusations Sheikh Mansour profited from 1MDB scandal, one of the world's biggest financial frauds. More recently, Manchester City has been accused of breaching funding rules on 130 occasions to purchase star players that have transformed the club from mediocre also-rans to top of the Premier League, accusations denied by the club. But it is the revelations of Sheikh Mansour's associations with regional warlords, outlined in the New York Times, that are concerning. For years, he has been aligned with Lt General Mohamed Hamdan, the powerful Sudanese commander who seized power in a coup and who, two years before the latest conflict erupted in the war-torn North African enclave, he had hosted at an Emirati arms fair. Just weeks before the conflict erupted into outright civil war in 2023, the NYT reported Hamdan was a guest at Sheikh Mansour's Persian Gulf palace. US Democrats have called for a ban on weapons exports to the Emirates. The UAE, meanwhile, has vehemently denied any involvement in arming Hamdan's forces, which have been accused of massacres, mass rape and genocide in the ongoing war. It is a conflict that has resulted in the death of 150,000 and displaced more than 12 million people, making it the world's biggest humanitarian crisis. For a country swimming in surplus energy, it seems almost inconceivable that Australia's most populated areas have faced gas shortages and soaring electricity prices for much of the past decade. The blame can be sheeted home to a series of bungled decisions that allowed gas to be exported from the east coast by three giant consortia without ensuring adequate domestic supplies. Domestic gas prices, which previously had traded around $3 a gigajoule, trebled and then quadrupled to match global prices and beyond. Much of the blame could be sheeted home to Santos. At the last minute, it doubled the size of its liquifying export plant on Curtis Island just off the Queensland coast near Gladstone without fully shoring up its gas reserves. Finding itself short of feed to meet its export contracts, it then proceeded to drain the domestic market. The ongoing shortfalls drove energy intensive manufacturers to the wall and were a major contributing factor to the inflation outbreak for the past three years that only now is under control. It is into this charged environment that ADNOC has parachuted. Santos, for decades a chronic investment underperformer, has been offered a price that far exceeds the company's value. According to one financier who requested anonymity, the UAE based group has suddenly decided it needs to be a global entity and is executing that strategy regardless of price. "There are only a handful of assets globally that are available if you wanted to scale up. There's a few in America and then there is Woodside and Santos. "So ADNOC is willing to deal on non-commercial terms." But there are concerns about the Middle Eastern energy giant's ambitions. Some believe that, despite its statements and assurances, it isn't the slightest bit interested in Australia's domestic gas market, Instead, the thinking is that the firm has its sights set on the Barossa gas field in the waters north of Darwin along with Santos's Papua New Guinea operations and its prospective play in Alaska. Ryan Stokes and his father Kerry have a direct interest in the outcome of this mega-deal. Their Beach Energy has a joint venture with Santos in one of the world's largest carbon capture and storage projects, in the Cooper Basin, a major gas field smack in the middle of Australia, that has supplied the east coast for decades. While Stokes has since gone to ground, insiders believe the pair were miffed at not being informed of the deal, given their commercial link, and may now be looking to expand Beach's domestic gas operations by purchasing Santos assets. ADNOC isn't alone on the transaction. There's another Abu Dhabi government entity along with US private equity group Carlyle. Exactly what role Carlyle will play has yet to be spelt out. It may be in the consortium to pick up the Australian domestic gas interests if the deal goes ahead. Or it could there to play a role in smoothing the way in the US, given the Alaska gas fields. First, however, the deal needs Jim Chalmers' tick of approval. ADNOC is still going over the Santos books and has yet to confirm a formal takeover offer. So the Foreign Investment Review Board has yet to receive an application. But ADNOC may face a tougher time than it anticipated. Foreign ownership has become a politically charged issue, highlighted by the federal government's determination to return the Port of Darwin to local ownership from Chinese control. Energy, and particularly gas, is in another realm altogether, given it is supposed to be the transition fuel to a renewables future. Then there's the history. Three prime ministers, Turnbull, Morrison and Albanese, were forced to personally intervene in the market. Such is the distrust of the gas exporters, the competition regulator has been charged with the task of keeping the east coast market under permanent review. Its most recent report forecasts ongoing and growing domestic shortages out to 2036. Not surprisingly, investors aren't all that confident the deal will proceed. The Santos share price hasn't risen above $8 since the bid was announced. That's an 11 per cent discount to the $8.89 offer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store