People on New State Pension could be due up to £971 each month from next April
The annual uprating will be announced at the Autumn Budget but pensioners can start calculating the Triple Lock uplift now.
Income tax rises for Scots in April - how the changes affect you
Nearly 13 million State Pensioners across Great Britain, including over one million living in Scotland, should start to keep an eye on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate as it forms part of the Triple Lock measure which determines the annual uprating for the contributory benefit.
The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show UK inflation increased to 3.5 per cent in April, up from 2.6 per cent in March. Annual growth in employees' average wages for regular earnings (excluding bonuses) was 5.6 per cent and total earnings (including bonuses) was 5.5 per cent.
Under the Triple Lock measure, State Pensions increase each year in-line with whichever is the highest of average annual earnings growth from May to July, CPI in the year to September or 2.5 per cent.
The New and Basic State Pension increased by 4.7 per cent in April, which means someone on the full New State Pension currently receives £230.25 per week, or £921 every four-week pay period.
Those on the full Basic State Pension receive £176.45 each week, or £705.80 every four-week pay period.
State Pension uprating predictions for 2026/27
The Triple Lock is currently on track to be determined by the earnings growth element which is currently at 5.5 per cent. However, this figure may go up or down and isn't the final metric that will determine the level of uprating.
The next CPI figure will be published by the ONS on June 18.
That being said, a 5.5 per cent increase on the current State Pension would see people receive the following amounts.
Full New State Pension
Weekly: £242.90 (up from £230.25)
Four-weekly pay period: £971.60 (up from £921)
Annual amount: £12,630.80 (up from 11,973)
Full Basic State Pension
Weekly: £186.25 (up from £176.45)
Four-weekly pay period: £744.60 (up from £705.80)
Annual amount: £9,679.80 (up from £9,175.40)
The annual uprating won't be confirmed until the Autumn Budget, but pensioners - and those due to retire next year - can start to plan their finances by following the Triple Lock measurements. The September CPI figure will be published in mid-October, but the wages growth figure is usually published in August.
State Pension and tax
The Labour Government confirmed earlier this year that the Personal Allowance will remain frozen at £12,570 until April 2028.
If the New and Basic State Pension increased by the lower measure of the Triple Lock (2.5%), it would see the full New State Pension exceed the income tax threshold by nearly £79 in the 2027/28 financial year (£12,578.80).
While the amount of State Pension to be taxed may seem relatively small - tax is only paid on the amount over the Personal Allowance - older people with other income streams could find themselves having to part with more cash to pay a tax bill - if it's not automatically deducted from private or workplace pensions through PAYE.
And remember, that figure is based on the lower measure of the Triple Lock. Using the current projections, more pensioners could be dragged into the retirement tax net sooner, especially if they have additional income through a private or workplace pension.
What is taxed
Guidance on GOV.UK states: 'You pay tax if your total annual income adds up to more than your Personal Allowance. Find out about your Personal Allowance and Income Tax rates.
Your total income could include:
the State Pension you get - Basic or New State Pension
Additional State Pension
a private pension (workplace or personal) - you can take some of this tax-free
earnings from employment or self-employment
any taxable benefits you get
any other income, such as money from investments, property or savings
Check if you have to pay tax on your pension
Before you can check, you will need to know:
if you have a State Pension or a private pension
how much State Pension and private pension income you will get this tax year (April 6 to April 5)
the amount of any other taxable income you'll get this tax year (for example, from employment or state benefits)
You cannot use this tool if you get:
any foreign income
Marriage Allowance
Blind Person's Allowance
Use this online tool at GOV.UK to check if you have to pay tax on your pension.
The full guide to tax when you get a pension can be found on GOV.UK here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Fact check: 2025 spending review claims
This round-up of claims from the 2025 spending review has been compiled by Full Fact, the UK's largest fact checking charity working to find, expose and counter the harms of bad information. On Wednesday Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves delivered the Labour Government's first spending review, outlining its spending plans for the next few years. We've taken a look at some of the key claims. How much is spending increasing by? At the start of her speech Ms Reeves announced that 'total departmental budgets will grow by 2.3% a year in real terms'. That headline figure doesn't tell the full story, however. Firstly, 2.3% is the average annual real-terms growth in total departmental budgets between 2023/24 and 2028/29. That means it includes spending changes that have already been implemented, for both the current (2025/26) and previous (2024/25) financial years. The average annual increase between this year and 2028/29 is 1.5%. Therefore, as the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has said, 'most departments will have larger real-terms budgets at the end of the Parliament than the beginning, but in many cases much of that extra cash will have arrived by April'. Secondly, it's worth noting that the 2.3% figure includes both day-to-day (Resource DEL) and investment (Capital DEL) spending. Capital spending (which funds things like infrastructure projects) is increasing by 3.6% a year on average in real terms between 2023/24 and 2029/30, and by 1.8% between 2025/26 and 2029/30. Day-to-day departmental budgets meanwhile are seeing a smaller average annual real-terms increase – of 1.7% between 2023/24 and 2028/29 and 1.2% between 2025/26 and 2028/29. Which departments are the winners and losers? Ms Reeves touted substantial spending increases in some areas (for example, the 3% rise in day-to-day NHS spending in England), but unsurprisingly her statement did not focus on areas where spending will decrease. Changes to Government spending are not uniform across all departments, and alongside increases in spending on things like the NHS, defence and the justice system, a number of Government departments will see their budgets decrease in real terms. Departments facing real-terms reductions in overall and day-to-day spending include the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (this factors in reductions in aid spending announced earlier this year to offset increased defence spending), the Home Office (although the Government says the Home Office's budget grows in real terms if a planned reduction in asylum spending is excluded) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Did the Conservatives leave a '£22 billion black hole'? Ms Reeves made a claim we've heard a number of times since it first surfaced in July 2024 – that the previous Conservative government left a '£22 billion black hole in the public finances'. That figure comes from a Treasury audit that forecast a £22 billion overspend in departmental day-to-day spending in 2024/25, but the extent to which it was unexpected or inherited is disputed. The IFS said last year that some of the pressures the Government claimed contributed to this so-called 'black hole' could have been anticipated, but others did 'indeed seem to be greater than could be discerned from the outside'. An Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) review of its March 2024 forecast found an estimated £9.5 billion of additional spending pressures were known to the Treasury at that point in time, but were not known to the OBR as it prepared its forecast. It's true that this review didn't confirm the £22 billion figure, but it also did not necessarily prove that it was incorrect, because Labour's figure included pressures which were identified after the OBR prepared its forecast and so were beyond the scope of the OBR's review. We've written more about how the Government reached the figure of £22 billion in our explainer on this topic. How big is the increase in NHS appointments? Ms Reeves took the opportunity to congratulate Health Secretary Wes Streeting for delivering 'three-and-a-half million extra' hospital appointments in England. The Government has previously celebrated this as a 'massive increase', particularly in light of its manifesto pledge to deliver an extra two million appointments a year. Ms Reeves' claim was broadly accurate – data published last month shows there were 3.6 million additional appointments between July 2024 and February 2025 compared to the previous year. But importantly that increase is actually smaller than the 4.2 million rise that happened in the equivalent period the year before, under the Conservative government – as data obtained by Full Fact under the Freedom of Information Act and published last month revealed. What do announcements on asylum hotels, policing, nurseries and more mean for the Government's pledges? Ms Reeves made a number of announcements that appear to directly impact the delivery of several pre-existing Labour pledges, many of which we're already monitoring in our Government Tracker. (We'll be updating the tracker to reflect these announcements in due course, and reviewing how we rate progress on pledges as necessary). The Chancellor announced an average increase in 'police spending power' of 2.3% a year in real terms over the course of the review period, which she said was the equivalent of an additional £2 billion. However, as police budgets comprise a mix of central Government funding and local council tax receipts, some of this extra spending is expected to be funded by increases in council tax precepts. Ms Reeves said this funding would help the Government achieve its commitment of 'putting 13,000 additional police officers, PCSOs and special constables into neighbourhood policing roles in England and Wales', a pledge we're monitoring here. The spending review also includes funding of 'almost £370 million across the next four years to support the Government's commitment to deliver school-based nurseries across England', which Ms Reeves said would help the Government deliver its pledge to have 'a record number of children being school-ready'. The Chancellor also committed to ending the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this Parliament, with an additional £200 million announced to 'accelerate the transformation of the asylum system'. When we looked last month at progress on the Government's pledge to 'end asylum hotels' we said it appeared off track, as figures showed the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels was higher at the end of March 2025 than it was when Labour came into Government.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Our purpose is clear: to make you and your family better off
This Labour Government was on a promise of change: to deliver a decade of national renewal. To build a stronger, more resilient country that could navigate an ever-changing world. On Wednesday, we took the next step in delivering on that promise by investing in Britain's renewal – and investing in the priorities of the British people. First, on security. We are keeping our country safe with an £11 billion real-terms increase in defence spending, making sure our Armed Forces have the equipment they need. And we are boosting funding for our security and intelligence agencies, so they have the tools to respond to new threats. Strong national security depends on strong border security. We are cracking down on criminal gangs and illegal immigration, with new investment in Border Security Command, worth up to £280 million more each year. We are ending the costly use of hotels for asylum seekers, saving taxpayers' money and restoring order to our immigration system. The Conservatives lost control of our borders, Labour is taking back control. Second, we are investing in the nation's health. A strong economy needs a strong NHS. The NHS we inherited from the Conservatives was broken. Patients waiting too long for treatment. Families getting caught up in the 8am scramble to get a GP appointment. And services stuck in the analogue era. We promised to change that and we are changing it. That is why I have announced record investment in the NHS, with £29 billion more a year to improve patient care. But let me be clear: this investment comes on the condition of reform. It's not enough to spend money on a broken system. It is about investing to reform services so they are fit for the modern century. And finally we are investing in the economy. We cannot tax and spend our way to prosperity. We need to grow the economy. That is why I announced this week we are giving the green light to Sizewell C, a multi-billion nuclear station that will create and support tens of thousands of jobs. We are investing to fix our roads, rail and national infrastructure, so people can get to and from work and businesses can prosper. And we are creating jobs in the industries of the future – from defence and nuclear to technology and life sciences. This investment is with a singular purpose in mind: to make you and your family better off. To turn the page on 14 years of decline. To deliver a Britain where every family can feel safer, healthier and better off. This is what the British people voted for, and this is what this Government is delivering.
Sky News
6 hours ago
- Sky News
Spending review: Reeves is running out of levers to pull if something goes wrong
It was billed as a massive moment in British economic policymaking - a juncture where the Labour government would turn its economic philosophy into a fiscal reality, running its finger down every line of public spending and overhauling the machinery of government for years to come. So, did the spending review live up to its hype? The answer, of course, is no. But then again, if you're expecting dramatic changes and seismic shifts from spending reviews, you should probably go and lie down in a dark room for a period. After all, the big picture for this review has been set in stone for some time. We've known for months about the scale of overall government spending in coming years (in short: slight increases in day-to-day spending; bigger increases in investment). The only remaining question was how that money was going to be apportioned. And the answer to that question threw up few surprises. As was the case in every previous review in recent memory, the biggest winner was health, which continued to grow - not just in absolute terms but also as a share of public spending. The big winner when it came to the investment spending doled out by the Chancellor was, as expected, defence - primarily to fund that 2.5% (or thereabouts) of gross domestic product (GDP) pledge made by the prime minister earlier this year. There was more money for transport, although questions remain over whether more money will be needed for HS2 when it comes back for an accounting "reset" (translation: this is going to cost loads more than we told you) next year. But in short: no enormous surprises. Then again, this was never going to be one of those spending reviews that dramatically changed the nature of the state, like the ones carried out by Gordon Brown as Chancellor at the turn of the millennium. Those Brownite reviews tended to increase day to day spending by around 5% a year. This one only increased day to day spending by less than 2%. But that tells you a lot about the constraints under which the Chancellor is working. In short, today, the national debt is considerably larger than in 2000. So too is the tax burden. So are debt interest costs, not to mention the health costs of an ageing population. Set that all alongside the Chancellor's fiscal rules (which commit her not to borrow too much more save for investment) and you see the problem. She doesn't have much room left to spend. A sudden deterioration in the economy (due to, say, a trade war) and all of a sudden she's missing her rules. Which is why this spending review does nothing to answer the question that continues to hang over her: will she have to raise taxes again to make her sums add up? Indeed, now that she's committed herself to spending certain amounts in the coming years, she's running out of levers to pull if something goes wrong.
