McLaren F1 Condemns 'Harsh' FIA Penalty That Derailed Oscar Piastri's Victory
McLaren team principal Andrea Stella was happy about Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri's 1-2 finish at the British Grand Prix at Silverstone. However, he described Piastri's 10-second penalty as being "harsh." The Australian driver lost his lead to Norris after serving the penalty while pitting.
The British Grand Prix saw several twists and turns due to a damp track race start and a mid-race rain spell. But given the dominant performance of the McLaren MCL39, Piastri snatched the lead from Verstappen on the initial laps. However, the race momentum was affected on several instances due to yellow flags.
Just as a safety car was ending, Piastri hit the brakes hard, prompting Verstappen to go past him. Just as the Red Bull driver made it back to his spot behind, Piastri accelerated instantly.
Verstappen reacted immediately, only to spin out in the next corner. The costly error dropped him from P2 to P10. However, Piastri's brake test came under the stewards' scanner, who then handed him a ten-second penalty for a safety car infringement. Stella was happy about Norris' home win but frustrated by Piastri's penalty. Speaking to Sky Sports F1 after the race, he said:
McLaren Team Principal Andrea Stella speaks to the media in the paddock during qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Austria at Red Bull Ring on June 28, 2025 in Spielberg, Austria.
McLaren Team Principal Andrea Stella speaks to the media in the paddock during qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Austria at Red Bull Ring on June 28, 2025 in Spielberg, Austria."Well, we certainly gave our input to the race direction, especially related to the fact that we thought that the safety car was called in relatively late. This didn't give much space for the driver — the leading driver — to take control of the group and go with the restarting procedure.
"So we think overall the penalty has been harsh, but we will review the data like usual. We will see if there's any learning from that. At the moment there's not much we can do. We just have to take it on the chin.
"A tough one for Oscar because he drove very well today. He drove very well, but it's just midseason — many more opportunities. I think this will give Oscar even more motivation."
Addressing the way both McLarens performed and congratulating the team and Norris on a dominant race finish, Stella said:
"First of all, I would like to extend the congratulations to the entire team. To the people that today operated really very, very well under the direction of Randi, the race engineers, and together with the drivers — all good calls in difficult circumstances.
"Both drivers drove very well, pretty much with no issues at all. Oscar was very aggressive at the start. He gained the lead quite deservedly, and then the penalty unfortunately meant that he couldn't capitalise on a victory.
"This went to Lando. I'm sure for Lando this is a very, very, very special day — winning the home Grand Prix. P1, P2 for McLaren. So overall a very strong day. We're very happy, something to celebrate."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major EV warning as true battery range for big brands like Tesla and BYD exposed: 'Aussies deserve to know'
Australians considering buying an electric vehicle (EV) have been warned about the real-world battery range on some of the most popular models. Range anxiety has been a thorn in the side of the electric vehicle market for years as Aussie drivers fear they'll run out of juice on a long journey. Major strides have been made to push the maximum battery range for many EV manufacturers; however, these limits have been put to the test on our roads. The Australian Automobile Association grabbed popular models from Tesla, BYD, and Kia to see if they could go as far as they claimed. RELATED Electric vehicle warning as BYD records biggest month of sales in Australia Little-known Centrelink perk offers Australian students free flights ATO warning over $485 billion deadline for thousands just weeks away The AAA's investigation was part of a $14 million Real-World Testing Program to see how cars (including petrol and hybrid models) really performed in the wild. The Program recently discovered 25 out of 30 petrol and hybrid vehicles tested consumed more fuel than their lab results, and more than three-quarters failed to meet expectations. The next round of testing saw EVs taken on urban and rural roads, as well as on a motorway, and they had to contend with real-time traffic. They were also driven inside a lab to see how far the battery would last under perfect circumstances. Carmakers happily boast their vehicles can go certain distances on a single tank or full battery, with the latter used as a huge competitive edge in the EV world. Five electric cars were tested in AAA's program: BYD Atto 3 Tesla Model 3 Tesla Model Y Kia EV6 Smart #3How long did popular EV car batteries last? For the two Teslas, the Model 3 was able to go 513km in the lab, but only 441km on real roads, a 14 per cent difference. The Model Y had an 8 per cent difference, with the car driving 533km in the lab and only 490km outside. The BYD Atto 3 had the biggest inconsistency of 23 per cent, with the lab results showing a battery range of 480km, but a real-world result of just 369km. Kia's EV6 notched 528km in the lab and 484km on real roads, and the Smart #3 had the lowest variation of just 5 per cent, with 455km in the lab and 432km real-world battery range. "Australians deserve to know how vehicles perform on roads," the AAA said. "This testing provides accurate and relevant information to enable more informed decisions for consumers, businesses and fleets buying new light vehicles." Australian Electric Vehicle Association national president Chris Jones blamed the difference in battery range on multiple factors, including high or low temperatures, headwinds, steep terrain, and whether the driver uses air conditioning or heating features during their journey. He said EV makers needed to be more upfront about how far their cars could go so that buyers didn't shy away from them in the future. "It is frustrating that manufacturers are inflating the values when they really ought to be a bit more conservative," Jones said. "I would have thought a 10 per cent difference was reasonable but 20 per cent is pretty bad." Yahoo Finance has approached Tesla, Kia, and BYD for comment. EV subsidies could soon be axed under major overhaul The revelation could serve as a huge blow to the EV industry at a time when subsidies that won over many buyers are on the chopping block. The Productivity Commission is investigating the country's goal of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050 and highlighted the generous handouts given to those who buy an electric car. It has recommended to dump the Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemptions and state-based stamp duty discounts for the EV market. 'Now that the Australian Government has implemented the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), it should phase-out the exemption of electric vehicles from the Fringe Benefits Tax,' the interim report said. The NVES was implemented earlier this year and it gives every car manufacturer a CO2 target that they either have to meet or beat each year. That target is lowered each year until 2029, which will put increased pressure on brands to have zero or low-emissions vehicles in their fleet. 'The EV purchase subsidies and the NVES overlap, as they both promote the purchase of low-emissions vehicles," the Productivity Commission said. 'EV tax discounts subsidise car buyers to opt for EVs, while the NVES is a broader-based policy that aims to increase purchases of low-emissions light vehicles, including both EVs and more fuel-efficient fossil fuel cars.' The suggestion sparked outcry from the EV industry, with Electric Vehicle Council (EVC) CEO Julie Delvecchio saying the incentives proposed to be axed were "finally helping everyday Australians afford an electric car". 'Suggesting we end incentives just as Australia finally catches up to the rest of the developed world with an efficiency standard is short-sighted. We need both - they work together, not in isolation," she while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The England selection decision looming large before the Ashes
On a quiet autumn afternoon at Lord's in October, captain Ben Stokes and head coach Brendon McCullum will meet national selector Luke Wright and ECB director Rob Key to pick England's Ashes squad. Wright used to be the one who would make the phone calls, delivering the good news and the painful blows, but McCullum has since taken on that responsibility, seeing it as his duty to speak personally with each player. Wright will often follow up with a call to those closest to the cut to explain the decision in more detail and discuss a path for their return. Wright will have spent the summer receiving briefings from scouts across county cricket and beyond, while analysts will have drilled down through deep data wells to model whose game will suit the Australian summer. The reality, however, is that McCullum is a man who trusts his gut over spreadsheets and algorithms, and his squad is mostly set. There is little chance to alter minds now, with no more Tests between Monday's dramatic finale at The Oval and the first ball in Perth in November. England already have their top seven set in stone, despite the struggles of Ollie Pope and Zak Crawley. The seam attack starts to pick itself if fitness allows, with Mark Wood and Jofra Archer requiring cryogenic preservation over the autumn in time to thaw in the Australian sun. What did England learn from this compelling series with India? Plenty, but the Ashes is a different game. England will face a very different bowling attack in contrasting conditions, on surfaces that offer bounce with the Kookaburra ball in hand. Playing India at Headingley on the solstice and Australia at the MCG on Boxing Day are both, technically, incidents of elite Test cricket, but they are entirely unique endeavours. England, and cricket, will undoubtedly have picked up some new fans over the past few weeks, and it is only right that they are made aware of the humbling circle on which the Test game runs: your team will compete gamely in home conditions, looking genuinely good at this, before travelling to a far-flung part of the world where most of their skills will be irrelevant. England have at least reaffirmed a few things. Crawley averaged about 30 here and will forever average about 30. Ben Duckett will be occasionally magnificent and get out to the straight ball. Pope will get out. England have the best middle order in the world. England's bowling attack isn't quite good enough. Gus Atkinson remains the most likely pace bowler to join Archer and Wood when fit, and he will be required to put in an almighty shift when they're not. Brydon Carse will have a big part to play and Josh Tongue will travel, while Jamie Overton was able to hit 90mph at The Oval – he is a favourite of McCullum, and Key has spoken about pace as an essential tool in Australia. Chris Woakes may not have been in line to travel anyway, but his dislocated shoulder will further damage his chances – Sam Cook has been excellent with the Kookaburra ball in county cricket and may go in Woakes's place as the subtle seamer. The more significant shoulder injury is to Ben Stokes, who must be fit to bat and bowl for five Tests if England are to pull off a first series win over Australia since 2015. Some questions remain unanswered, like what to do with Jacob Bethell's uncorked talent. His summer carrying drinks was not particularly instructive or beneficial for his development. Will he spend the winter being dragged around Australia as England's back-up batter? There will at least be some Lions games alongside the Tests in which to build red-ball experience. And then there is the question of spin. Will England need a front-line spinner in every Test? Yes, certainly, insisted Ricky Ponting this week, even in Perth where pace prevails. Ponting endorsed Shoaib Bashir, whose height and bounce he likened to Nathan Lyon's and whose off-breaks could find some turn in Mitchell Starc's foot marks. Bashir had his moments against India, winning the Lord's Test with the final wicket of Mohammed Siraj before a broken finger ended his series. But if he is picked for an Australian pitch that later fails to degrade into a turning track, there is little upside in a 21-year-old whose batting and fielding are akin to those of a garden cricketer. Liam Dawson didn't seize his chance at Old Trafford and that may ultimately count against him, and against the notion that the County Championship is the place to find Test players. Jack Leach is bowling well for Somerset and carries rich Ashes hinterland, while Tom Hartley has impressed for Lancashire this summer. But once you've been dropped from McCullum's Test side, it is notoriously difficult to earn a recall on county form. Rehan Ahmed is the wildcard, a genuine all-rounder who could even replace Pope at No 3 should England need a reshuffle during the series. Ahmed is still raw and his leg-spin is not a typically English weapon, but he would complement Joe Root's off-breaks when Stokes needs variety in attack. Yet it is Bashir who still holds the spinner's place right now. He is the pet project that Key and McCullum started back in 2023, at a Lions training camp in the UAE when they were wowed by his smooth style and high release, and chose to catapult him into the Test team. When they sit down with Stokes and Wright in October, there will be many names to discuss and scenarios to consider. But if there's one thing we know about Bazball, rarely does it lose faith in its chosen ones. Ashes 2025-26 Test matches First Test, Optus Stadium in Perth: 21-25 November Second Test, Gabba in Brisbane: 4-8 December Third Test, Adelaide Oval in Adelaide: 17-21 December (day-night Test) Fourth Test, MCG in Melbourne: 26-30 December Fifth Test, SCG in Sydney: 4-8 January
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Red Bull Confirms Yuki Tsunoda's Future Will be Decided After Summer Break
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Red Bull Racing senior advisor Helmut Marko has confirmed that Yuki Tsunoda's performance will be evaluated after the summer break, which will decide his future with the team. Tsunoda's current Red Bull contract expires after the current season. The Japanese driver was promoted from Racing Bulls to Red Bull after the Chinese Grand Prix, replacing Liam Lawson, who was demoted to take his seat in the junior F1 team. Despite the positive move for Tsunoda, he has struggled to adapt to the RB21 F1 car, much like Lawson and his predecessor, Sergio Perez. Red Bull's challenger is reportedly suited to Max Verstappen, and thus, his teammates have found it difficult to get used to an otherwise sensitive car. Despite securing just 7 points in the 12 rounds since his promotion, the positive point for Tsunoda is that he is getting closer to Verstappen's pace. The previous Hungarian Grand Prix weekend saw him get knocked out in Q1 in qualifying, but his pace was three-tenths off of Verstappen's, who qualified in P8. Tsunoda ended up starting from the pit lane due to an engine penalty, as Red Bull fitted a fifth power unit in his RB21 exceeding the prescribed limit of 4 power units. Marko explained that the decision to swap power units in Hungary was a strategic one. He said: Yuki Tsunoda of Japan and Oracle Red Bull Racing on the drivers parade prior to the F1 Grand Prix of Hungary at Hungaroring on August 03, 2025 in Budapest, Hungary. Yuki Tsunoda of Japan and Oracle Red Bull Racing on the drivers parade prior to the F1 Grand Prix of Hungary at Hungaroring on August 03, 2025 in Budapest, Hungary."Because he would have to change at maybe Monza or Zandvoort. And I think because of his starting position, it was strategically better to do it here." The 82-year-old advisor confirmed an improvement in Tsunoda's pace in qualifying as he closes the gap to his four-time world champion teammate. He added: "He was as near as never before, one-tenth he was behind. But unfortunately, he was dropped out in Q1. He's moving up." However, Tsunoda's future with Red Bull is still unclear for the 2026 season. Marko confirmed that the team is looking at all aspects for a future decision. He said: "Our driver evaluation traditionally takes place after the summer break. At the moment, everything is open. We're looking at performances – both positive and negative." Tsunoda opened up about the challenges he faces with the car, but remains confident about overcoming them. He said: "I didn't see yet so far the driver who probably got used to it in that car straight away. So that's probably the fact. But at the same time, I feel I'm in the right direction, at least on the short runs. "Also in terms of the whole package, I know there's something to come as well into this year compared to Max. So once I get the full package, I still have good confidence that I can be in a level that they want. That's what I'm working hard on. "In terms of the long run is exactly the place that I'm still probably struggling at, but I'll find a way. I saw a couple of driving styles that I can try that I never tried in my career in Formula 1. It's just the learning stuff."
