logo
Cruel puppy ear cropping gang who mutilated designer dogs for £450 to make them look 'mean and aggressive' are jailed

Cruel puppy ear cropping gang who mutilated designer dogs for £450 to make them look 'mean and aggressive' are jailed

Daily Mail​a day ago
A cruel puppy ear cropping gang mutilated designer dogs for £450 so they would look 'mean and aggressive'.
One member of the racket boasted about being an 'icon of the dog world', while another named the businesses 'High Grade Bullz' and 'Balaclava Bullies'.
Alexander Johnson, Holly Dunn, and Amanda Whitehouse this week were sentenced at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court after pleading guilty to animal cruelty offences for their part in the criminal enterprise.
Aaron Lee Wareham, who boasted about selling the mutilated puppies and was described by other members as the ringleader, died before he could enter a plea.
Johnson, 35, of Elmsmere Road, Abbey Hulton, in Stoke-on-Trent, was jailed for 12 months.
Dunn, 29, of Dentdale Close, Longton, and Whitehouse, 56, of Barry Avenue, Bucknall, were handed suspended sentences of 23 weeks and nine weeks respectively.
During sentencing, Judge Robert Smith called it a 'vile trade' and a 'wholly sickening and inhuman practice'.
The prosecution was brought by the RSPCA, and came following an investigation sparked by an undercover report by BBC Panorama.
This exposed incidents of dogs having their ears cropped after the practice was made illegal in the UK in 2006.
Hazel Stevens, prosecuting on behalf of the RSPCA, said: 'This act has been illegal for nearly 20 years and there is no breed of dog that's permissible to crop.
'This cropping is done because it's thought to make the animal look more fearsome, to increase the financial value and for kudos for breeders who do this.
'These are status dogs meant to look mean and aggressive, it's like tattooing a baby for the sake of aesthetics.
'The pregnant dogs were moved to different addresses to give birth. Johnson sees himself as an icon in the dog world and doesn't see the problem with cropped ears. He enjoys fame in the media.'
Johnson, who described himself as an 'icon of the dog world', pleaded guilty to causing a prohibited procedure to be carried out on a protected animal and breaching a lifetime disqualification order by keeping a dog
David Farley, mitigating for Johnson, said that Mr Wareham had recruited him to crop puppies' ears while he was on licence from prison for the same offence.
Johnson has no veterinary qualifications or training, and did not know the long-lasting health impact for dogs that have their ears cropped.
Mr Farley said: 'He did provide anaesthetic and pain relief. Mr Johnson never intended to cause cruelty to any animals.
'This was an unnatural procedure and something he regrets doing, but he managed to carry out the procedure without infection or harming the dog's general wellbeing.
'Other than the condition on the photos we've seen, he seems to have done it with some skill despite the lack of training.'
Mental health worker Dunn was asked if she wanted her Bully puppy to have cropped ears, responding 'no, it's fine', showing a lack of care for the puppy after declining the procedure.
The court heard Dunn lied to authorities, telling them that her dog had been imported into the UK with cropped ears and she had been unaware of the procedure happening.
It is currently not illegal to import a dog with cropped ears into Britain.
Fake documents were created in Romanian and Serbian in an attempt to show that the dogs had been imported, and that the ear cropping had been necessary due to being in fights outside the UK. Forged passports were also created for the dogs.
Dunn pleaded guilty to one charge of causing a prohibited procedure to be carried out on a protected animal and one charge of causing unnecessary suffering to a protected animal.
She was handed 23 weeks imprisonment suspended for 12 months, 100 hours of unpaid work and a lifetime ban for owning and keeping animals. She must also pay £1,000 costs.
Anis Ali, mitigating for Dunn, said: 'Whatever the scale for the commercial enterprise, it remains her role was extremely limited and was born out of misguided loyalty to individuals associated with those cruelly instrumented shears. She was convicted by her own confession.'
Whitehouse pleaded guilty to causing unnecessary suffering to a protected animal. She was given a nine-week prison sentence suspended for 12 months, 60 hours of unpaid work, and a 10-year disqualification for owning or keeping animals. She must also pay £500 towards costs.
She was the only one of the trio to plead guilty at the first opportunity, and showed genuine remorse.
Whitehouse is the aunt of another defendant, Thomas Taffe, and she was promised that she could keep pregnant bully bitch Lila if she acted as a fosterer for the cropped-ear pups.
Sentencing the trio, Judge Smith said: 'A criminal enterprise was being done. Ms Dunn and Ms Whitehouse, you played a part in that and you Mr Johnson, were the ear cropper - a significant role.
'Mr Johnson, you say you're an icon in the dog world, and you told a pack of lies to the police interviewer, saying you'd never done it before when in fact you had been imprisoned for the same offence.
'You had complete and utter disregard for the puppy named Rain, whose ears are scarred for life after your mutilation.'
Judge Smith added: 'This is a vile trade and in my view, anyone involved should go to prison. These offences are absolutely abhorrent to any right thinking individual, and I would be failing my public duty if I didn't send to prison the very people who take part in this awful and cruel procedure.'
Charlotte Bailey, 29, of Causeley Gardens, Bucknall, and Thomas Taffe, 29, also of Causeley Gardens, Bucknall, both pleaded guilty to multiple animal cruelty offences and will be sentenced on September 4.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jury discharged in trial of former Nine O'Clock Service priest Christopher Brain
Jury discharged in trial of former Nine O'Clock Service priest Christopher Brain

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Jury discharged in trial of former Nine O'Clock Service priest Christopher Brain

A jury has been discharged in the trial of a former priest who was the leader of the Nine O'Clock Service evangelical movement. Christopher Brain, 68, from Wilmslow, Cheshire, was charged with one count of rape and 36 counts of indecent assault between 1981 and 1995 against 13 women. He pleaded not guilty to all charges. He was the leader of the Nine O'Clock Service (NOS), part of the Church of England, in Sheffield between 1986 and 1995. The 11-strong jury, sitting at Inner London Crown Court, was discharged by Judge Freya Newbery on Thursday after failing to reach a verdict on five counts, having started deliberations on August 12. The judge told the jurors: 'I am going to discharge you now on those counts. For you it all comes to an end now. 'I am really grateful for such a lot of time that you have given.' Ms Newbury gave the jurors the option of exemption from jury service if summoned within the next 10 years. A further hearing to determine whether prosecutors believe there are grounds for a retrial for the charges was set for September 4. On Wednesday, jurors at Inner London Crown Court found him guilty of 17 counts of indecent assault against nine women. However, he was acquitted of another 15 charges of indecent assault against two women. The jury is still deliberating the rape charge and four further counts of indecent assault. The seven-week trial heard how Brain, 68, was praised by the Archbishop of Canterbury after his 'club culture' inspired services at St Thomas' Church in Crookes, Sheffield, and later Ponds Forge leisure centre, drew hundreds of young congregants. He was fast-tracked for Holy Orders as the movement took off, but it collapsed in controversy in 1995 after women alleged their charismatic leader had been sexually assaulting them, in some cases claiming he was helping to heal their sexual repression.

Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'
Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'

An anti-Putin activist has been found dead in London after his asylum bid was rejected. After more than a year's wait for an appeal hearing, Alexander Frolov, 26, was found dead in Acton, west London, on July 28. His friends believe that he took his own life because of the mental pressure of being sent back to Russia. Originally arriving in the UK under a temporary visa as an agricultural worker in 2021, Alexander submitted his asylum application in December 2022. When Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, his friend Galina Shakirova said he was unable to return home as he 'refused to take part in killing people'. According to The i Paper, his asylum application was rejected in April 2024. Alexander had appealed the decision and was waiting for his hearing to be rescheduled when he died. Metropolitan Police are not believed to be investigating any suspicious circumstances into his death and an inquest will be held next week. He was described by the Russian Democratic Society as a 'dedicated opponent of Putin's regime'. They added he was a 'volunteer who gave his time to help others, and a constant presence at anti-war protests'. 'Alexander believed in the possibility of a free and democratic Russia and hoped to one day return to it,' the group said. His friend Galina, who met Alexander when they worked together as stewards at anti-war rally, called him 'kind, generous, quietly dependable'. She said: 'Imagine being an opposition activist who knows that returning home almost certainly means prison. You've spoken out publicly. You've worked with organisations labelled in Russia as 'undesirable' or 'extremist'. 'Then you ask for protection – hoping for safety, for a chance to survive. And instead, you're refused.' The Home Office said: 'It is our long-standing policy not to comment on individual cases.'

Vandals scratch memorial to children who died in Bath Blitz
Vandals scratch memorial to children who died in Bath Blitz

BBC News

time30 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Vandals scratch memorial to children who died in Bath Blitz

Vandals have scratched offensive language on a memorial plaque bearing the names of dozens of children killed in the Blitz, police have World War Two memorial, which marks deaths during the Blitz of Bath in 1942, is also missing a metal to the plaque, in a memorial garden on Shaftesbury Road in Bath, was discovered on and Somerset Police are investigating. The force said there was no evidence of political motivation and it was treating the case as an act of "mindless vandalism". "Police are aware that a small number of people have repeatedly engaged in anti-social behaviour in the area and are committed to working with the community to tackle this problem," the force was hit three times in April 1942 by the Luftwaffe, not for its military importance but for its historic approach was revenge for Britain's bombing of the old town of Lubeck, a German attacks on Bath were part of the "Baedeker raids" – in which English cities were chosen as targets if they were highly rated on the German Baedeker tourist guide. More than 400 people were killed in Bath in total.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store