logo
Prosecutor reflects on ‘long road' to justice for baby Victoria

Prosecutor reflects on ‘long road' to justice for baby Victoria

Glasgow Times3 days ago
On Monday, Victoria's parents, Constance Marten and Mark Gordon, were convicted of her manslaughter following two lengthy trials spanning two years.
Samantha Yelland, senior Crown prosecutor for CPS London, told the PA news agency: 'I feel that justice has been done.
'It's been a long road, it's been a lot of work, but, you know, no work is too much when anyone's died, but particularly a young child who wasn't able to stick up for herself or fight for herself.'
Crown Prosecution Service senior prosecutor Samantha Yelland (Emily Pennink/PA)
Last year, a jury failed to reach verdicts on whether the defendants were responsible to Victoria's death but did convict them of concealing her birth, child cruelty and perverting the course of justice by hiding her body in a shed.
Ms Yelland sought a retrial on charges of manslaughter and causing or allowing Victoria's death in the public interest, even though it meant a second six-month trial.
Explaining the decision, she said: 'A baby died in circumstances which she absolutely didn't need to and could have been avoided.
'That is why it's serious and it needs to be prosecuted. Obviously none of us expected it to take this long.'
Dealing with a case involving the death of a baby is 'always upsetting' even for an experienced team, she said.
Phd students during tests replicating conditions in which Victoria died in a tent (Met Police/PA)
Ms Yelland said: 'I consider it a privilege to prosecute baby cases. It is very upsetting, it could be harrowing, but usually the people charged with their killing is someone who is supposed to look after them.
'Some of the evidence in is not very nice, but we're just looking at the whole picture and wanting to get justice for the person who has died.'
Images of Victoria's body found rotting amid rubbish in a Lidl bag in a shed near Brighton have stuck in her mind throughout the case.
She said: 'I've seen what baby Victoria looks like inside of that bag. I've seen the post-mortem photos.
'We didn't subject the jury to that because that is not a nice thing to see. But the baby is in that bag, which we know she was carried around in when she died, but also when she was alive. It is probably what stays with me the most. And what was on top, the rubbish, the Coke can and the sandwich wrapper.
'And the two police officers finding it. You can see how moved they are when they realise that they found it. Obviously, that had been a manhunt been going on for a couple of days by that stage.'
A pink sheet and Victoria's teddy bear motif babygro were found inside a Lidl bag with her body (Met Police/PA)
On the defendants' actions after four other children were taken into care, Ms Yelland said: 'We never said that they didn't love their children, but when it comes to decision making, it's the prosecution view that they think of themselves above the children.
'And that's why they got themselves into the predicament they did. And that's why Victoria died, and that's why they continued to keep her there in that bag for however long it was after she died and not go to the police and not explain the situation.
'And that's why I charged perverting the course of justice rather than preventing the lawful for burial, which is another offence I could have considered.
'For me, it was more than that because they kept it for such a long time that the state that she was in was such that we couldn't be sure if there had been an injury – not that we're saying there was for a minute – but we wouldn't have been able to tell because at the amount of time that she'd been in there.
'I do accept that there were experts that said that everyone grieves differently and everyone deals with things differently, but I think the whole theme of this case is that they think about themselves more than they think about their children and other people.'
Ms Yelland said the case had presented multiple challenges for the prosecution before baby Victoria was found dead on March 1 2023.
Tests on the tent supported the prosecution case Victoria died from cold (Met Police/PA)
Discussions had already started about charging Gordon and Marten even in the absence of a body.
The CPS pressed ahead with charges despite a post-mortem examination failing to ascertain exactly how Victoria died.
With no pathological cause of death, the jury was asked to look at other evidence that Victoria died from hypothermia or smothering, as the defendants claimed.
Ms Yelland said: 'We decided that although there were two distinct ways in which she may have died, our main case is that she died of hypothermia.
'The defendants raised that she was smothered and in response to that, we say, while we don't accept that, even if that were to be the case, the circumstances in which she was smothered are such it still amounts to grossly negligence manslaughter.
CCTV footage of Constance Marten holding baby Victoria under her coat in East Ham, London (Met Police/PA)
'It's our case that hypothermia would have been heavily involved in any smothering anyway, because she's been subjected to very cold conditions with the items that she was wearing and would not have been as healthy.'
In a change from the original trial, an expert replicated cold and damp conditions in the tent where Victoria died and examined her inadequate clothes pointing to hypothermia being the likely cause.
Other challenges involved piecing together and assessing sightings of the defendants from across England in the seven weeks they were on the run with baby Victoria.
Mr Yelland said that the prosecution was able to narrow the timeline in the second trial although the prosecution still asserted Victoria survived for longer than the defendants had said.
Towards the end of the retrial, Gordon, who by then was representing himself, provided the prosecution with the chance to lift the lid on his 1989 rape conviction in the United States after he gave a misleading impression of his childhood.
When he refuted the convictions, the prosecution moved swiftly to produce an embossed certificate from a Florida court to prove it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Victorian regulator weighs unprecedented intervention in AFL's fight with bookmakers over gambling revenue
Victorian regulator weighs unprecedented intervention in AFL's fight with bookmakers over gambling revenue

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Victorian regulator weighs unprecedented intervention in AFL's fight with bookmakers over gambling revenue

The Victorian gambling regulator is considering whether to make an unprecedented intervention in a dispute between the AFL and bookmakers, which could set a limit on the league's revenue from wagering. Earlier this year, the AFL proposed a significant increase to the amount of money it receives from each bet placed on its game. The league also proposed a minimum $20,000 annual fee for all bookmakers, including small operators who focus on racing. Leaked documents seen by Guardian Australia revealed the cash grab was justified as a way to address what AFL executives termed an 'unprecedented' increase in 'integrity risks' posed by the wagering industry, which has exploded in popularity in recent years. The documents outlined concerns the AFL's integrity system was seriously deficient and struggled to identify whether players, coaches and staff were using inside information to manipulate betting markets, in breach of their contracts. Bookmakers opposed to the increase were told they needed accept it before the season began, or be banned from taking bets on the sport. By law, all bookmakers must have an agreement with a sport's governing body. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email When the increase was first proposed, several gambling companies described it as 'unsustainable' and said it could cripple smaller operators willing to pay their 'fair share' to support integrity measures. Some bookmakers have told Guardian Australia they increased financial inducements – such as bonus bets or bet-matching – to encourage people to spend more money, despite knowing this could increase harm. In June 2023, a parliamentary inquiry into online gambling called for financial inducementsto be banned. The Victorian Gambling and Casino Control Commission (VGCCC) has confirmed it is assessing an application to intervene in the dispute and make a determination about the AFL's conduct and the reasonableness of its fees. The application was made by an unnamed bookmaker. Before making a decision to intervene, the regulator must assess whether both parties have engaged in genuine negotiations. It must also assess whether a resolution is possible without the regulator's involvement. It has been assessing the application for more than two months. The regulator has the power to ask for information from the AFL, recover costs for any investigation, and make compulsory determinations to settle the dispute. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Previous applications received by the VGCCC did not meet the criteria for a determination as outlined in legislation,' a spokesperson for the regulator said. Two sources at established bookmakers who were not authorised to comment publicly said a determination could set a limit on how much money the AFL could make from gambling. They said a determination could also impact future negotiations. Lachlan Gepp, an expert gambling and sports rights lawyer at Addisons, which has represented bookmakers, said product fees had become 'uncommercial and unreasonable' in recent years. The fees were introduced in the early 2000s. 'It should be remembered that the laws requiring betting integrity agreements were introduced in Victorian and New South Wales betting legislation to coincide with the blow-up of corporate online bookmaking and to provide funds to the AFL to administer an integrity concern that otherwise did not exist,' Gepp said. 'Make no mistake: in 2025, product fees have been morphed into a tax strategy designed to play catchup to the NRL and positioned by AFL spin doctors to solve an invisible growth in betting integrity issues.' The AFL has argued the integrity challenges are real and serious. Its correspondence outlining the increase to bookmakers did not mention commercial objectives. 'If the VGCCC determines that the product fee rate sought by the AFL is unreasonable or an overreach in terms of what the law is designed to do, then that outcome has been a long time coming for the online wagering industry,' Gepp said. The AFL declined to comment. One relatively small bookmaker, who declined to be named because of the commercial sensitivity of the issue, and so that they could speak freely, said they had increased inducements in response to the AFL's proposal. 'We will need to introduce additional incentives, not because we want to, but because the market demands it. Without them, we may not be able to keep the business running,' the bookmaker said. In Australia, Gambling Help Online is available on 1800 858 858. The National Debt Helpline is at 1800 007 007

‘Titanic' flood disrupts Old Bailey courtrooms
‘Titanic' flood disrupts Old Bailey courtrooms

South Wales Argus

time2 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

‘Titanic' flood disrupts Old Bailey courtrooms

Six courtrooms were affected by the floods on Thursday, causing ongoing trials to be disrupted and moved to other areas of the historic building. One witness said: 'It was like the Titanic – you could hear the water lapping in the corridor.' FW Pomeroy's Statue of Justice stands atop the Central Criminal Court building (Jonathan Brady/PA) Judges at the Grade II listed Central Criminal Court, in London, hear some of the most serious and complex cases in England and Wales, including murder and terrorism trials. With foundations dating back to the Roman era, the building is constructed atop the underground River Fleet, a tributary of the Thames. The Old Bailey, which houses 18 courtrooms, has been affected by floods in the past, as well as plumbing issues dubbed 'the Great Stink'. Last February, around 1,500 people were evacuated from the Old Bailey and surrounding offices after a fire broke out in an electrical substation at the rear of the building. Multiple explosions were heard and courtrooms were plunged into darkness before fire alarms sounded.

‘Titanic' flood disrupts Old Bailey courtrooms
‘Titanic' flood disrupts Old Bailey courtrooms

Glasgow Times

time2 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

‘Titanic' flood disrupts Old Bailey courtrooms

Six courtrooms were affected by the floods on Thursday, causing ongoing trials to be disrupted and moved to other areas of the historic building. One witness said: 'It was like the Titanic – you could hear the water lapping in the corridor.' FW Pomeroy's Statue of Justice stands atop the Central Criminal Court building (Jonathan Brady/PA) Judges at the Grade II listed Central Criminal Court, in London, hear some of the most serious and complex cases in England and Wales, including murder and terrorism trials. With foundations dating back to the Roman era, the building is constructed atop the underground River Fleet, a tributary of the Thames. The Old Bailey, which houses 18 courtrooms, has been affected by floods in the past, as well as plumbing issues dubbed 'the Great Stink'. Last February, around 1,500 people were evacuated from the Old Bailey and surrounding offices after a fire broke out in an electrical substation at the rear of the building. Multiple explosions were heard and courtrooms were plunged into darkness before fire alarms sounded.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store