&w=3840&q=100)
Cambodia seeks ceasefire with Thailand after clashes: All that happened
Apexa Rai New Delhi
Amid escalating violence along the Cambodia-Thailand border, Cambodia's envoy to the United Nations urged for an unconditional halt to hostilities, with Thailand signalling readiness for dialogue, possibly mediated by Malaysia.
Both nations exchanged artillery fire for a second consecutive day on July 25. The intensifying clashes have left at least 32 people dead, prompting calls for an immediate ceasefire.
Ceasefire efforts gain momentum amid fading hostilities
Cambodia's Permanent Representative to the UN, Chhea Keo, on Friday called for an immediate end to the fighting and stressed the need for a peaceful solution. He accused Thailand of initially accepting a Malaysian-brokered ceasefire proposal before backtracking. Speaking after a closed-door UN Security Council meeting, Chhea Keo said, 'We are seeking an unconditional ceasefire and a diplomatic resolution to this conflict.'
Thailand's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Nikorndej Balankura, acknowledged that the fighting had begun to subside by Friday afternoon. He confirmed Bangkok's openness to negotiations, bilaterally or through Malaysia, but noted that no formal ceasefire proposal had yet been received.
Push for diplomatic resolution
At the United Nations, Cambodia defended itself against accusations of aggression, with Chhea Keo questioning how a smaller nation with no air force could initiate an attack on a country with triple its military strength. He reiterated Cambodia's stance for peaceful dialogue and restraint.
Malaysia, holding the rotating chair of Asean, has offered to mediate talks. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim stated that both sides had agreed in principle to withdraw troops and enact a ceasefire, though implementation would take time. He said he had spoken with Cambodian leader Hun Manet and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai, encouraging both to prioritise diplomacy.
On the ground: Fighting continues
Despite diplomatic ventures, fighting continued across three border areas. Thai officials reported heavy shelling by Cambodian forces using field artillery and BM-21 rocket systems. Thai troops responded with what they termed 'appropriate supporting fire.'
Violence was reportedly triggered by a land mine blast that injured five Thai soldiers on July 23. This incident was followed by escalating clashes in six disputed areas near ancient temple sites. Both nations accused each other of starting the conflict, with Thailand further claiming Cambodian strikes damaged civilian infrastructure, including a hospital and a petrol station.
Rising casualties
The death toll has climbed steadily since the clashes began. Cambodian authorities confirmed 13 fatalities, including five soldiers and eight civilians, while Thailand has reported at least 19 deaths—comprising six soldiers and 13 civilians, including children. Dozens more have been injured on both sides.
Long-standing dispute reignites
The border conflict, rooted in a long-standing territorial dispute over a stretch of the 800-kilometre frontier, marks one of the most significant escalations in recent years. Though both countries are members of Asean and popular destinations for global tourists, the latest violence threatens regional stability and bilateral ties.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
New Myanmar junta law: Jail for those who criticise election plan
Myanmar's junta has enacted a harsh new election law criminalising dissent and protest against its planned vote, with penalties including prison and even the death sentence amid widespread opposition and a civil war. read more Myanmar's junta said Wednesday it has enacted a new law dictating prison sentences for critics or protesters of their planned election, which is being boycotted by opposition groups. The junta seized power in a 2021 coup, sparking a many-sided civil war, and has touted elections at the end of this year as a path to peace. Opposition groups – including democratic lawmakers ousted by the military takeover – and international monitors have called the poll a ploy to legitimise the junta's rule. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD State newspaper The Global New Light of Myanmar said the 'Law on the Protection of Multiparty Democratic Elections from Obstruction, Disruption and Destruction' was enacted on Tuesday. Its 14-page text forbids 'any speech, organising, inciting, protesting or distributing leaflets in order to destroy a part of the electoral process'. Individuals convicted face between three and seven years behind bars, while offences committed in groups can result in sentences between five and 10 years. The legislation also outlaws damaging ballot papers and polling stations, as well as the intimidation or harm of voters, candidates and election workers, with a maximum punishment of 20 years in prison. If anyone is killed during an attempt to disrupt the election 'everyone involved in the crime faces the death penalty', the law says. Swathes of Myanmar are beyond the control of the junta and some government census workers deployed last year to gather data ahead of the poll faced resistance and security threats. Data could not be collected from an estimated 19 million of the country's 51 million people, provisional results said, in part because of 'significant security constraints'. Analysts have predicted the myriad of anti-coup guerrillas and ethnic armed groups the junta is battling may stage offensives in the run-up to the vote as a sign of their opposition. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A UN expert called on the international community last month to reject the election plan as 'a fraud'. Tom Andrews, the UN special rapporteur on the rights situation in Myanmar, said the junta is 'trying to create this mirage of an election exercise that will create a legitimate civilian government'.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Drawing A Line In The Sand: Can UN Conference's Two-State Solution End Israel-Palestine Conflict?
The seven-page 'New York Declaration' outlines a phased plan to end not only the war in Gaza but also the eight-decade conflict between Israel and Palestine A United Nations conference has advocated for a two-state solution between Israelis and Palestinians. France and Saudi Arabia have led this initiative, laying out the parameters for a Palestinian state. UN chief Antonio Guterres has described the two-state solution as the 'only realistic, just, and sustainable solution for peace in the Middle East". The seven-page 'New York Declaration" outlines a phased plan to end not only the war in Gaza but also the eight-decade conflict between Israel and Palestine. The plan aims to culminate in an independent, demilitarised Palestine that peacefully coexists with Israel and integrates into the wider Middle East region. High-level representatives at the UN conference have urged Israel to commit to establishing a Palestinian state. According to the declaration, the co-chairs, France and Saudi Arabia, the European Union, the Arab League, and 15 countries leading the working groups have agreed 'to take collective action to end the war in Gaza". The meeting comes at a time when reports indicate severe starvation and famine plaguing Gaza, exacerbated by Israeli policies and practices—a claim repeatedly denied by Israel. The conference was postponed from June and downgraded from world leaders to ministers. For the first time, the conference has established eight high-level working groups to examine and make proposals on various topics related to a two-state solution. The declaration condemns Israeli attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure in Gaza, highlighting the 'siege and starvation" that have caused a devastating humanitarian crisis. It also reports that Israel's ongoing offensive against Hamas has resulted in over 60,000 Palestinian deaths. The conference plan envisions the Palestinian Authority governing and controlling all Palestinian territory, supported by a transitional administrative committee established after a ceasefire in Gaza. It also advocates for the deployment of 'a temporary international stabilization mission" under UN auspices to protect Palestinian civilians, support the transfer of security to the Palestinian Authority, and provide security guarantees for both Palestine and Israel. Monitoring the ceasefire and future peace agreements will be a priority. Without directly naming Israel, the document criticises 'illegal unilateral actions" that threaten the realisation of an independent Palestinian state. This comes amid reports of Tel Aviv's plans to annexe the West Bank. The New York Declaration also condemns 'the attacks committed by Hamas against civilians" in southern Israel on October 7, 2023—the first condemnation of Hamas by Arab nations. These attacks resulted in the deaths of about 1,200 civilians, mostly Israelis, and the taking of 250 hostages, 50 of whom are still held. A crucial question remains: can a two-state solution be achieved without cooperation from Israel and its ally, the United States? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has opposed the two-state solution and rejected the meeting on nationalistic and security grounds. The United States has also boycotted the meeting, calling it 'unproductive and ill-timed". India has joined 120 nations calling for a two-state solution. These talks follow French President Emmanuel Macron's announcement at the United Nations General Assembly in September that France will formally recognise the state of Palestine. Recently, the UK's Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer extended his support but was quickly criticised by Netanyahu, who accused him of 'appeasing terrorists" after Starmer stated that the UK would recognise Palestine unless Israel took urgent steps to end the war in Gaza. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
North Korean assembly chief claims US, South Korea preparing to 'actualise' nuclear war
Geneva: The head of North Korea's legislative body on Wednesday accused the United States and South Korea of preparing to "actualise" a nuclear war, insisting that its nuclear development is a self-defence measure vital to ensuring its security against such threats. Pak In-chol, Chairman of the Supreme People's Assembly, made such a claim during a United Nations-led gathering of top legislators around the world in Switzerland, blaming the US and other Western countries for causing "instability and chaos" to maintain their "hegemonic position". "The advanced preparations of the United States and the ROK to actualise a nuclear war have entered the gravity stage," Pak said through an interpreter at the sixth World Conference of Speakers of Parliament. "This impels the DPRK to take every necessary measure in response to such a geopolitical crisis. Possessing capabilities to cope proactively with various security threats ... is an issue of vital importance to our state for defending its sovereignty, security threats and territorial integrity," he said, Yonhap news agency reported. The ROK is short for South Korea's official name, the Republic of Korea. The DPRK stands for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the North's official name. Pak said that North Korea will never tolerate the "high-handedness, arbitrariness of the US and its following forces," and will "fully discharge its responsibility" to defend international justice. He also claimed that his country is carrying out various activities under its development road map for the "prosperity and happiness" of its people, including long-term construction plans and other measures to improve education, health care and science. "Our people are achieving miraculous successes in their struggle for overall development," Pak said. South Korea's National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik attended the meeting and delivered a speech calling for communication channels between the two Koreas to be kept open even as inter-Korean relations remain frayed. No encounter between Woo and Pak took place at the meeting.