
This money manager used the April downturn to buy defensive stocks
Money manager Kevin Burkett has been using the recent market downturn to pick up a few stocks he thinks will not only weather the current economic storm but also become long-term winners in his clients' portfolios.
'We look for companies that not only generate sustainable returns on capital, but also have competitive advantages that allow them to thrive across market cycles,' says Mr. Burkett, partner and portfolio manager at Victoria-based Burkett Asset Management Ltd., which oversees about $430-million in assets.
His team became more defensive last fall, increasing its fixed-income holdings. In recent weeks, as the tariff war started to roil markets and valuations came down, Mr. Burkett and his team started to increase equities holdings, buying defensive stocks in sectors such as utilities and consumer staples.
The firm's balanced portfolio, which includes an approximately 60-40 split of stocks and bonds, was up 9.3 per cent over the past 12 months. Its three-year annualized return was 8.2 per cent, while its five-year annualized return was 11.4 per cent. The performance is based on total returns, gross of fees as of March 31. (Fees range from 0.40 per cent to 1.25 per cent depending on the size of a client's portfolio.)
The Globe spoke with Mr. Burkett recently about what he's been buying and selling:
Name three stocks you own today and why.
Stella Jones Inc. SJT-T, the Montreal-based manufacturer of pressure-treated wood products such as utility poles and railway ties, is a company we bought in late April at an average price of $67.11 a share.
We like that its customers, such as railways, telecom and electrical companies, are stable businesses largely independent of economic swings. This is a business we've owned before, but sold in the middle of 2023 after a strong run-up. It's an example of a solid company we've decided to buy back, given its recent drop.
Enbridge Inc. ENB-T, the Calgary-based pipeline company, is a stock we bought in late February for $61.24 a share. We tend to trade between Enbridge and Pembina Pipeline Corp. We think Enbridge is best positioned to deliver stable growth through the current business cycle. It operates long-term, fee-based contracts, which lowers cash flow sensitivity to commodity price fluctuations.
When you think about the impact of energy tariffs, it comes mostly at the cost of the shipper, so we don't see exposure in pipelines to tariffs on cross-border energy flows. That's a nice feature, too: Enbridge's footprint across North America offers a competitive advantage.
Bunzl PLC BZLFY, is a British company that sells food packaging, personal protection and safety equipment to customers across industries such as health care, construction, supermarkets, retail and offices.
It has an extensive North American business as well. We originally bought it in late December and again in April. Our average cost is $20.05 a share. It's a stable, conservative business and a great defensive company in a macroeconomic backdrop like we're in now.
Name a stock you sold recently.
Andlauer Healthcare Group Inc. AND-T, a logistics company in the health care industry, is a stock we sold after it recently announced it was being taken over by United Parcel Service Inc. UPS-N for $55 a share.
We bought the stock in February and March for an average price of $43.50 a share. We liked that it had a stable customer base in the health care field. It's also defensive, given the aging population, increased retail drug purchases and strong moat given the strict regulations around pharmaceutical transportation in Canada. It has also been making acquisitions in the U.S.
While we were lucky with the quick stock appreciation after the UPS acquisition, we were also a bit disappointed. We wanted to own it for a longer period of time and hoped it would do better than the UPS acquisition price. We sold our shares on April 24 for $53.42 each. We decided not to wait until the deal closed so we could put the money into another stock.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
Justice department cutting up to 264 jobs as it faces ‘budgetary pressures'
The Canadian flag flies on the Peace Tower of Parliament Hill as pedestrians make their way along Sparks Street Mall in Ottawa on Nov. 9, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick OTTAWA — The federal department of justice is set to lay off up to 264 employees as it navigates what it calls 'significant budgetary pressures.' Ian McLeod, a spokesperson for the department, says in an email that the department is taking 'difficult but necessary' steps to manage available resources, given ongoing budget pressures that 'can no longer be sustained.' He says 264 positions in the department 'may no longer be required' and that the employees in those roles were notified this week. McLeod says the department has implemented 'several measures' aimed at addressing budgetary pressures over the past year, including staffing restrictions. The number of federal public service jobs dropped by almost 10,000 in the last year, marking the first decrease since 2015. As of March 31, 357,965 people were working for the Government of Canada, down from 367,772 in 2024. Between 2024 and 2025, the justice department lost 29 workers, going from 5,637 to 5,608 employees. Hundreds of workers in other federal organizations — like the Canada Revenue Agency, Employment and Social Development Canada and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada — also have been laid off recently. Prime Minister Mark Carney has vowed to cap, not cut, the federal public service. He also has promised to launch a 'comprehensive' review of government spending with the aim of increasing its productivity. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2026. Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press


CTV News
23 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘Unsafe': Popeyes accused of using supplier that stored chicken in residential garages
A lawsuit alleges Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen of purchasing meat unsafe for human consumption, that was stored and packaged in residential garages. A lawsuit filed against Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is accusing the fried chicken chain of buying 'unsafe' meat from an unauthorized seller that was allegedly storing and packaging raw chicken in residential garages in Ontario. The lawsuit was filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on May 26 by ADP, a former raw chicken supplier to Popeyes. The company alleges they lost their contract with Popeyes after bringing forward its concerns about the 'unsafe supply' of products. Popeyes, Restaurant Brands International (RBI)—the Toronto-based company that owns the fast-food chain—and Restaurant Services Canada Inc. (RSCI), the supply chain manager, are all named in the lawsuit. Popeyes, for its part, said in a statement to CTV News that the claims from ADP Direct Poultry Ltd. are unfounded and that it found 'no evidence' to support them following an investigation. The lawsuit also names another company as the unauthorized supplier that allegedly provided, at times, 'rotten or expired' chicken deemed 'unfit for human consumption' to various franchisees across Ontario. The documents continue to say this chicken created a public health risk because it was delivered in vehicles that did not have the proper refrigeration to prevent it from spoiling. The statement of claim alleges that these tainted products were bought by various franchisees—both known to ADP and not, all named in the suit—due to their lower prices. The lawsuit also alleges the franchisees continued to sell the chicken to customers, even after ADP brought forward its concerns that the products did not adhere to food health and safety standards. The allegations have not been tested in court. As laid out in the documents, Popeyes had a system of authorized suppliers and distributors who adhered to the company's specifications and standards, meaning franchisees were required to purchase from within their approved list of vendors. Any restaurant looking to purchase ingredients outside of the company's list of vendors had to write a formal request, after which the supplier in question would have to submit to an inspection to ensure it meets the requirements as well as health and safety standards. ADP claims the chicken sold by the unauthorized company was not inspected by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) or any other inspector. CTV News Toronto contacted the CFIA for comment. The supplier claims RSCI, meanwhile, did not investigate the unsafe supply of chicken as they promised and instead conspired to 'manufacture a rationale for removing ADP' from their authorized vendors list. In turn, the filings further allege franchisees were 'upset about the reporting of the unsafe supply' and worked with the RSCI to lodge 'false or misleading' complaints about the quality of their products. CTV News has reached out to Restaurant Services Inc., parent company to RSCI, for comment but has not yet heard back. 'We believe this former supplier is lashing out after losing our business for a variety of legitimate reasons,' Emily Ciantra, Popeye's director communications, told CTV News Toronto in a statement. 'We have always been committed to rigorous safety standards, including regular inspections by third party auditors who verify our strict standards are being followed.' ADP seeks $35 million in damages from Popeyes, RBI and RSCI, citing breach of contract and breaches of the Competition Act. The documents state that $30 million is to cover ADP's loss of profits after their contract—which was expected to continue until 2027—was prematurely terminated. An additional $5 million is to cover the costs the supplier incurred after boosting its production facilities to meet Popeyes' increased production demand, the documents state. ADP also seeks $1 million in punitive damages. The supplier adds it also lost out on business opportunities, such as providing products to other fast-food chains like Wendy's. Additionally, the raw chicken supplier is seeking at least $10 million in damages from the unauthorized company, who it deems liable for 'unlawfully interfering' with ADP's economic relationship with Popeyes, as well as $500,000 in aggravated damages. ADP also seeks $150,000 from each franchisee and an account detailing the quantity of 'unsafe supply' they bought from the company as well as how much they profited from the unauthorized products. 'The defendants' conduct was malicious, high handed, intended to cause harm to ADP, endangered the public, and warrants aggravated and punitive damages,' the filings state.


CBC
30 minutes ago
- CBC
Quebec government invokes closure to force through sweeping energy bill
The Quebec government has invoked closure to speed up the adoption of a bill that will give Hydro-Québec free rein to increase its electricity production. This parliamentary procedure limits the time devoted to debate on a motion or bill and fast-tracks its adoption. Christine Fréchette, Quebec's economy and energy minister, said adopting Bill 69 before the end of the legislative session would save $6 billion on the government's $30 billion wind power strategy. The bill makes sweeping changes to the operations of Hydro-Québec and how electricity rates are fixed. The government has promised to cap increases in residential electricity rates to three per cent. The bill will also allow a private company to sell its electricity to another and aims to simplify partnerships with Indigenous communities. Opposition parties are highly critical of the bill, deeming it poorly crafted. Quebec's former "super minister" of economy and energy Pierre Fitzgibbon tabled the bill in June 2024 — highlighting the purpose of accelerating the production of green energy. After he stepped down, Fréchette took over, but the bill's legislative process was weeks ago, she tabled 52 amendments to modify the bill.