Bay Area tech companies Roblox and Discord face lawsuit for allegedly facilitating child abuse
A pair of apps based in the Bay Area that are commonly used for gaming and messaging -- Roblox and Discord -- are being sued for allegedly facilitating the sexual exploitation of children online.
San Mateo-based Roblox is a popular gaming platform and app marketed to young people that allows users to create their own games, while San Francisco-based Discord is a messaging app commonly primarily used by members of the gaming community. Roblox is valued at $27 billion, and Discord is valued at over $15 billion, the complaint said.
In the lawsuit filed in State Superior Court in San Mateo County on February 12, the 13-year-old male plaintiff from Spokane, Washington, claimed he was targeted by a child predator on the platforms.
Roblox exploded in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the suit, by September 2020, the platform had roughly 30 million daily, with more than half of them under the age of 13. The company's annual report from 2023 said Roblox had an average of 68.5 million daily active users, with 21% under 9 years of age, 21% from 9-12 years of age and 16% from 13-16 years of age.
The lawsuit alleges that lax safety standards and systematic failures on both Roblox and Discord allow sexual predators and pedophiles to prey on children, grooming them for abuse.
The lawsuit alleges the man who allegedly targeted the plaintiff "was already facing criminal charges for sexually exploiting another child and [authorities] now believe that he exploited at least 26 other children."
The suit alleges that the plaintiff was an avid user of Roblox and Discord and that his "father allowed Plaintiff to use these apps only because he trusted Defendants' representations that their apps were safe for children to use."
Roblox released the following statement when asked for a response to the litigation:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Annual Humblebrag Is Actually Putting Your Kid's Security At Risk
What started as a creative workaround during the lockdown days of COVID-19 has become a feel-good fixture of graduation season: lawn signs adorned with a child's name, photo, school and graduating class. You may have seen them around your own neighborhood from kindergarten 'moving up' moments to high school and college milestones. But as these signs grow in popularity, some security experts and privacy advocates are raising a red flag. Kaylen Schroeder, a mom to a 5-year-old, said she put up a sign for her son's pre-kindergarten graduation ceremony at her mom's house instead of their own. 'He doesn't actually live there and there was no photo or name,' said Schroeder. 'We just did not feel safe putting one in our yard because we are not as familiar with our neighbors as I am at my mom's house.' Instead she opted to celebrate her son at her home by throwing a party and focusing on starting new traditions around these major milestones. 'I did self-defense instructor classes at the University of Florida police department,' said Schroeder. 'One of the topics we went over was car decals. The things that say honor students or the sport they may play gets targeted a lot. We treated those yard signs the same way.' These personal displays, while festive and proud, may unintentionally expose kids to privacy and safety risks — from identity theft to location tracking. Here's what parents should consider before planting one in the yard. Graduation yard signs have become a beloved way for families to celebrate their children's milestones, but these signs can often include: a photo, age, school, and even the college the student is planning to attend. These are all pieces of information that can be useful to scammers, identity thieves, or even strangers with bad intentions. 'Everyone has to consider the risks in their own local environment,' Dr. Neha Pathak, WebMD Chief Physician Editor, health and lifestyle medicine. 'Along with names and grades on yard signs, people should be equally thoughtful about what they post on social media about their children. Particularly at the beginning and end of the school year.' She adds that there are a few other safety concerns that include: By placing a sign in your front yard, you're essentially broadcasting that your child lives at a specific address. That can open up risks ranging from doxxing to unwanted attention, especially if the sign includes a photo of the child or a school name that pinpoints their daily routine. Photos of these signs often get posted online by proud parents. Once shared on social media — especially without privacy settings — they can be scraped or misused, adding to a child's digital footprint without their consent. For families with more than one child, yard signs over the years can unintentionally reveal family patterns — like ages, school tracks, or even when a house might be empty during college drop-offs or vacation. 'It's important to have a conversation with your children about how much of their information may be out in the world so they should be particularly mindful of strangers that might know their name or what school they go to,' said Pathak. If you're concerned about privacy but still want to celebrate your child's graduation in a meaningful way, here are some safer alternatives to traditional yard signs: Create a festive display on your front door, porch, or windows—balloons, streamers, or a sign which avoids sharing personal info while still showing your pride. If you do want a yard sign, consider using just your child's first name or nickname, and skip the school name, photo, or future plans. 'For example, a sign that says, 'congratulations graduate!' can still be celebratory without sharing details about the grade, age, gender, name of your child,' said Pathak. Parades also became popular during the COVID-19 lockdowns, so opt to decorate your car and drive by friends' homes or attend a school-organized graduation parade. These celebrations are fun, mobile, and less likely to leave long-term digital traces. T-shirts, banners, or reusable yard flags with more general messages can be a safer way to show your excitement without giving away your child's identity. 'I have yard signs up in my own yard with school names, but I do not post my children's names in yard signs or on social media,' said Pathak. Invite family or close friends for a graduation brunch, backyard party, or virtual toast. Celebrating in a more personal setting can be just as meaningful — and much more secure. These alternatives let you cheer on your graduate without putting their personal information on public display. 'Community is an important thing and we often want to share these milestones in our communities,' Pathak said. 'Every parent has to make their own risk assessment. But beyond whether or not to put up a yard sign, I think it's an important launching pad to have a conversation with your children about how much information about them might be out in the world: A stranger is still a stranger, even if they seem to know your name and where you go to school.' Can You Even Stop Your Partner From Putting Your Kid In The Public Eye? Divorce Lawyers Have Thoughts The 6 Biggest Mistakes You're Making On Public Wi-Fi, According To Cybersecurity Experts The 3 Steps To Take When Dealing With Other People's Annoying Kids, According To A School Psychologist
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Feds bust South Florida ring that collected $34 million in US loans during pandemic
At the peak of the pandemic, a ring of South Floridians jumped on the federal relief bandwagon and applied for more than $34 million in loans from the Small Business Administration to help them survive the public health crisis. Now, six ring members have been indicted on conspiracy, wire fraud and money laundering charges after the SBA guaranteed more than 90 of their bank-approved business loans between 2020 and 2021, federal prosecutors said Thursday. A grand jury indictment has charged the six defendants — Elaine A. Escoe, 40; Alfred L. Davis, 51; Gino J. Jourdan, 37; Cher L. Davis, 53; Latoya T. Clark, 39; and James G. McGhow, 69, — with scheming to obtain federal COVID-19 relief funds for their companies in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties. The indictment says their loan applications contained falsified employee numbers, payroll expenses and business revenues, along with fabricated tax documents and bank statements. As a result, the SBA authorized disbursements of about $29 million in Paycheck Protection Program loans and millions in other federal relief funds that the defendants allegedly spent on themselves, according to prosecutor Jonathan Bailyn. If convicted, the defendants face several years in prison. Since the pandemic, federal prosecutors have brought fraud charges against more than 3,200 defendants nationwide — including over 250 in South Florida, the worst-hit region — for stealing over $1.7 billion from the approved pandemic loan programs, according to the Justice Department. Congress approved the emergency programs, with about $800 billion in loans, to help struggling businesses meet payroll and other expenses. Among the loan-fraud suspects that popped up on South Florida's radar was Andre Lorquet, whose case led federal investigators to the probe of the six recently charged ring members. Before the pandemic, Lorquet opened a business, Miami ENT, and after COVID-19 swept the nation in March 2020, he used the company to amass a small fortune by obtaining PPP and other federal loans totaling $4.4 million. He spent more than $600,000 on two Teslas, a Lamborghini Urus and a Porsche Panamera GTS, according to Homeland Security Investigations. At his sentencing last year, Bailyn, the prosecutor, described Lorquet as a greedy criminal who fleeced his country at one of its weakest moments in history. Lorquet was sentenced to six years. 'We were in the middle of a pandemic and a national crisis,' Bailyn said. 'There were many people who saw this as an opportunity for charity; this defendant saw it as an opportunity for exploitation and opportunism.'
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Sanctuary cities forced to comply with federal immigration rules due to innovative program
Sanctuary cities' runaround of the law may have finally come to an end, thanks to a creative program called Operation Guardian Angel. Launched by Bill Essayli, the new U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, this commonsense approach to force scofflaw sanctuary cities to cooperate with—and stop obstructing—federal immigration authorities should be copied by U.S. attorneys around the nation to help rid the country of criminal illegal aliens being detained by local authorities. It's a no-brainer. Sanctuary Cities 101 California has been a sanctuary state since 2018, when former Gov. Jerry Brown signed a law turning it into a sanctuary for criminal illegal aliens. But California's move to create a safe haven for criminals started even earlier, at the local level. In 1979, Los Angeles Police Chief Daryl Gates implemented "Special Order 40," which prohibited his police officers both from making contact with anyone for the sole purpose of learning their immigration status and from making arrests for violations of U.S. immigration law. In 1985, San Francisco's then-mayor Dianne Feinstein signed legislation designating the city as a sanctuary for aliens whose asylum claims had been rejected by the federal government. In 1989, San Francisco voters passed an ordinance extending that protection to all illegal aliens, prohibiting the city's police force from aiding federal immigration officers. In 2013, San Franciscans passed the "Due Process for All" ordinance, which limited when local law enforcement officers could give Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) advance notice of an illegal alien's release from a local jail and prohibited cooperation with ICE detainer warrants or requests. In 2016, San Franciscans amended the law again to impose even further restrictions on city employees that, in essence, ban any and all inquiries into the immigration status of any resident and prohibit any cooperation with federal officers. Sanctuary City Crime Hell Holes Is it any surprise that California as a whole and particularly its cities have become a magnet for illegal aliens? It shouldn't be. And is it any surprise when some of those illegal aliens commit additional crimes, including rape and murder? Sadly, no. But lawmakers and elected politicians there think it's better to endanger the safety of their constituents by releasing these criminals back into local communities rather than turning them over to the feds so they can be deported and returned to their native countries. This has consequences. Take Kate Steinle. She was murdered on Pier 14 in San Francisco by José Inez García Zárate, a career criminal with seven felony convictions and who had been deported five times. He had recently been released from local custody back out on the streets after San Francisco dropped drug charges that were pending against him and refused to cooperate with the immigration detainer ICE had filed against him. California's brand of egregious sanctuary legislation explains how it's possible for 250,000 illegal aliens to have a combined total of nearly 1.7 million arrests for three million offenses committed on U.S. soil, as one 2011 study showed. Of course, those numbers have likely expanded exponentially after four years of Biden's open border policies with virtually no vetting. Just this week, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a list of sanctuary jurisdictions across the country, including entire states, counties, and cities. That list includes a total of over 560 sanctuaries that release thousands of deportable criminal aliens every year. Between 2021 and 2024 alone, 22,000 illegal aliens were released from sanctuary city jails without notification to ICE. One of these released illegal aliens was Jose Antonio Ibarra, the Venezuelan man who brutally murdered Laken Riley in February of 2024. The 22-year-old nursing student was jogging on the University of Georgia campus when she was attacked by Ibarra. DNA evidence showed Riley fought back against Ibarra, who was trying to rape her. After a struggle, Ibarra bashed her head in with a rock multiple times. Her cause of death was blunt force trauma and asphyxiation. But it was New York's sanctuary policy that allowed it to happen. Shortly before Laken's murder, Ibarra had been released from New York custody after being arrested on local charges, but ICE was not informed. Tragically, Laken and Kate's stories are not unique. Every day, thousands of Americans are victimized by violent illegal aliens, who are escorted right past ICE and into our communities by the district attorneys of sanctuary cities. Flouting Federal Law Local and state laws that claim sanctuary status directly violate federal law— specifically, 8 U.S.C. §1373, which bans local governments from preventing law enforcement from sharing information about the "citizen or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual." Laken Riley would be alive today had New York's rogue prosecutor Alvin Bragg waited until the DHS issued a detainer for Ibarra and then cooperated with DHS the way the law requires. Kate Steinle's life would have been spared if San Francisco hadn't enacted a policy banning local police officers from notifying DHS when they arrest an illegal alien. A New Way Forward Fortunately, one U.S. attorney is finally fed up with his fellow Californians being slaughtered, assaulted, raped, and otherwise victimized by criminal illegals benefitting from the Golden State's irresponsible policies. Operation Guardian Angel closes the loophole in sanctuary cities' blatantly lawless schemes that allow them to simply ignore administrative ICE detainer warrants. How? Two words: judicial warrants. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli pulled together an all-star federal taskforce comprising agents from five federal law enforcement agencies—including ICE and the FBI—all working out of an office in Los Angeles. When an illegal alien with a prior deportation is inevitably arrested, upon identification and booking into the local jail, the taskforce seeks a federal criminal warrant—signed by a federal judge—for felony re-entry under 8 USC §1326. By using available criminal databases to find illegal aliens who were arrested and jailed the day before, the team quickly learns of each new offender. Then, a federal warrant is served on local officials, who obviously won't buck a federal judge's warrant. That warrant requires local officials to hand over the illegal criminal alien to ICE. As Essayli said in one interview, "They have no choice; they will comply." And it's already working. Operation Guardian Angel started May 10th, and by the 15th, ICE agents had made 13 arrests. Once fully underway, the taskforce expects to make 40-50 arrests weekly, even despite the obstructionist sanctuary policies of the city and the state. There is no reason why every one of the 93 U.S. Attorney's offices shouldn't be copying Essayli's playbook. His simple, effective strategy returns to immigration law enforcement the power that his sanctuary state wrongfully stole. Operation Guardian Angel is a step in the right direction of recovering the Central District of California from the open border crisis, removing criminal illegal aliens, and restoring sanity in a state that has lost its way.
