Councillors have ‘little sympathy' for those who complain about 20mph speed limit
Midlothian Council's SNP administration cabinet was asked to consider nine objections to plans to introduce the reduced speed on urban streets.
And they had little sympathy for those who complained it would make their journeys longer.
Councillor Connor McManus said he had looked over the speed limit plans, which were originally approved by elected members two years ago, and could not see an issue with it.
He said: 'There was an expression in the comments that it would take longer to get places. I noted people saying that travelling through Penicuik would take a substantially more amount of time.
'I have run the numbers and I am no mathematician but to get from Mauricewood to Lidl, which is the longest stretch in Penicuik which is in my ward, was three minutes without any traffic light stops. It is now going to be four minutes.
'I am pretty sure a minute will not kill anyone.'
Council leader Kelly Parry agreed with his comments adding: 'It won't kill you to take an extra minute to get there but speeding can and does kill.'
Objectors had claimed reducing the speed in towns could fuel road rage and put children at risk.
One protester said the 'utopian' idea would create the impression roads are safe for children to play on and fail to teach them safety.
However Councillor McManus said roads would not be playgrounds adding 'there is no need to drive fast on urban streets.'
Councillor Ellen Scott also welcomed the reduced speeding saying recent monitoring of vehicles travelling through her local ward area of Gorebridge had produced some 'horrendous' findings.
She said: 'There are roads where children are crossing, so if it takes a few extra minutes so be it.'
Among comments from objectors, who described the project as a waste of money which could be spent upgrading the road surfaces had been claims Midlothian Council's 'Tarminator' pothole machine, which was bought by the local authority two years ago, was now being used by neighbouring Scottish Borders Council.
However council officers took the opportunity to address the allegations, which had been circulating on social media.
Derek Oliver, chief officer Place, told the meeting: 'I can confirm our Pothole Pro is not being used by Scottish Borders Council. They have their own one. There are only three Scottish local authorities who own their own Pothole Pro, Midlothian, Scottish Borders and Highland Councils.'
There was anger after 20mph signs were installed across towns in the county while the public consultation into introducing the new rules was being carried out.
At today's cabinet meeting the report put before councillors asked them to 'consider the objections' made and 'determine whether or not the Order
should be made and implemented, as advertised'.
However Councillor Parry said that the decision to implement the speed reduction had already been taken by elected members two years previously.
She said: 'Just to make it clear to anyone watching council has already passed this policy unanimously, we are simply hear to consider the objections which we have now considered and we can move on.'
By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Glasgow university building taped off due to 'incident'
In an internal email, students were told that the closure was due to 'an incident yesterday regarding a window at the front of the Govan Mbeki Building'. A member of security staff told our reporter that a 'fault' with one of the building's windows meant the entrance would be closed 'for the foreseeable'. Caution tape covered much of the building's front facade. (Image: Josh Pizzuto-Pomaco) Affected individuals will be able to access classrooms inside the building via the adjacent George Moore Building, and have been asked to approach their programme leaders with any questions. The email reads: 'The main and rear entrances to the Govan Mbeki Building have been closed as a precautionary measure. 'Protective coverings will be put in place at other entrance/exit points in the coming days All fire exits will remain open. 'The accessible entrance from the George Moore Building is by the lift lobby linking to the Deeprose Lecture Theatre.' Students were also told not to open any windows inside the building. A sign posted to the front door of the building read: 'Due to essential maintenance, this entrance is closed.' Read more: World's largest archive of street newspapers gifted to Scottish university Students urged to boycott cybersecurity tech over Israel link 'I left school with nothing but college has changed my life' The Govan Mbeki Building was named after South African politician and anti-apartheid activist Govan Mbeki, a close ally of Nelson Mandela who was imprisoned with him at Robben Island. Mandela had suggested the building be renamed after his comrade upon receiving an honorary degree from the university in June 1996 at Buckingham Palace. The building was officially opened by Mbeki's son, President Thabo Mbeki, at a special ceremony in June 2001. A Glasgow Caledonian University spokesperson said: 'On Wednesday afternoon our staff identified an issue with a single window in our Govan Mbeki Building which had become separated from its frame. The window was reinstated and secured shortly thereafter. "As a precaution a full assessment is now being undertaken of all similar windows. Two entrances to the building have been temporarily closed and a range of actions are being undertaken to ensure the health, safety and wellbeing of all the students and staff who use the building. "We will of course be providing further updates to our staff and students in due course.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Robin McAlpine: Why I won't be reading Nicola Sturgeon's book
Not because I couldn't be fair-minded but because I wasn't sure everyone would think me fair-minded on the topic. But really, that wasn't my main reason for saying no. Much more to the point, I simply do not like political autobiographies and think it is an actively unhelpful genre. I do not read them and I'm not about to start. So, they asked me to explain why. The 'rapid memoir' is now a fundamental part of politics. A successful leader will get a book deal shortly after leaving office. Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss – they've all had a shot (Alex Salmond and Theresa May did something slightly different). Nicola Sturgeon at the launch of her memoir, Frankly (Image: PA) As someone who towered over Scottish politics for nearly a decade, there is no question Sturgeon has earned her book. But honestly, I wish none of them had bothered. I can't think of a single useful thing we learned from any of them. There is a simple reason for this. All long-form writing involves an author 'selling you' a story. They want you to believe in their thesis (non-fiction, biography), to buy into their plot (fiction) or to find their lives interesting (autobiography). In every case, the story serves the reader. Only in the political autobiography does the story exist to serve the author. A retired footballer doesn't relive all his key games trying to persuade you the referee robbed him or it was an unfortunate gust of wind and actually he was a better footballer than you thought he was. That's what political autobiographies do. READ MORE: BBC Scotland slammed over 'farcical' Debate Night impartiality ruling There are other problems. Politics is basically self-chronicling as you go along. Politicians tell you what they want you to think in real time. By the time Blair was writing his autobiography, we'd heard his justifications for the Iraq War so many times you wondered why he bothered writing them down again. A biography reveals things the subject doesn't want revealed so those can be useful. If you kept diaries, then they can be worth publishing as a contemporary record. Further down the line, the memoir, which is really a historical reflection, can be interesting and enlightening – if the politician is far enough past the events to no longer be trying to spin them. That's the fundamental problem for me. I was a spin doctor when they were still called spin doctors (pager and everything). I've seen so much narrative manipulation and distraction in my time that I am largely immune. I mean, I've been responsible for some of it and I didn't believe that either. Rapid political autobiographies are, without fail, manipulative and a distraction. They are always obsessed with litigating the legacy of the politician concerned. So, if you have a passionate interest in the minutiae of what happened 10 years ago then knock yourself out. I'm much more concerned with today. Across the Western world, there is a crisis in democracy and the public is losing faith in the system. From Gaza to poverty to climate change to AI, democracy seems incapable of stepping up to the challenges of our era. Abusive oligarchy is replacing the social contract. In Scotland, we're stuck in a constitutional impasse. Worse, there doesn't seem to be a single political party in Scotland capable of generating a convincing (never mind inspiring) new generation of leaders. At the moment, the future doesn't look great. All of this is happening right now and so, for me, looking in the rear-view mirror is an indulgence. Let me therefore offer you the two big pieces of advice I give anyone who cares about politics and cares about the future. READ MORE: Kate Forbes not barred from Summerhall, venue confirms First, ignore what they say and focus on the facts. All that matters is what is done, why it is done, how it is done and what happens as a result. Adjectives don't change facts. Second, just like with a magic trick, ignore the manipulation and distraction. Politics is often a game of distraction, but inside that distraction is the thing that counts, the purpose, the important thing. Stay focused on that and never look where the politician is guiding you to look. With Sturgeon, the facts you choose to look at will define your opinion. If it is electoral success, she was pretty impressive; if it is what was done with the power that resulted, she really wasn't. I am a 'power for a purpose' kind of person and for that reason I have long viewed the Sturgeon era as a criminally wasted opportunity. You may feel differently. Either way, anecdotes about tattoos and panic attacks change nothing at all.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Highland community councillors are angry, united and very vocal
There was some uncomfortable shifting in seats from a few, and some got short shrift as they blamed everything but themselves and failed to take accountability or read the room. The reaction from the audience was angry, united and very vocal. READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Highlanders have the right to be angry over explosion of wind farms Most of the blame lies with Holyrood. The climate is changing, but using a woolly connection to net zero (whatever that means for us) is no reason for further energy exploitation. Communities were there to call for a halt to the rubber-stamping of the industrialisation of the Highlands by multinationals for energy export. They were there because they are being sidelined, landscapes commodified, and voices drowned out by corporate ambition dressed up as green progress. They are being steamrollered by rampant speculative development, and silenced by political complicity in corporate colonisation. The environment, wildlife, our wellbeing and health are being sacrificed for a green agenda that has no overarching plan and no independent cost/benefit analysis. Our health is being scoped out of planning applications, with Scottish Government and local authority approval, and the cost to all – environmentally, economically and emotionally – is immeasurable. Our tourism industry is under threat: visitors come for the views, not the volts. READ MORE: MPs and MSPs commit to debates on Highland energy projects pause The community so-called benefit that a few politicians thought should be wrung out of the developers won't touch what has been lost and destroyed, and was forcefully rejected. As for community ownership, it should have been a number one priority more than a decade ago. Do communities want yet more energy developments? Ask them. Ballot them. Do not presume to speak on their behalf based on cherry-picked national polling that fails to reflect their reality. Attempting to silence people, mentally and financially burdening them and allowing huge swathes of their natural environment to be plundered by wealthy multinationals is not democracy – especially when the enabling ministers don't even bother showing up to face the music but happily, and regularly, meet the very multinationals responsible for so much misery. What is happening in our glens and villages smacks of dictatorship. READ MORE: Scottish spot named one of Europe's best for stargazing The scale of the Big Energy construction that we are witnessing today was in no manifesto I read. We have been deliberately kept in the dark as to the true intentions of what was in store for us. That is not just or fair. It is certainly not honest, and we doubt it is even legal. For some it's a life sentence for a crime they didn't commit. We demand a halt. A moratorium against further Big Energy development just like the Scottish Government has in place for nuclear and fracking. They do have the powers. We need an independent cost/benefit analysis. We need a sensible plan – not reckless over-production of energy without guaranteed customers that will increase constraint payments and raise bills. What a ludicrous business model that has turned out to be for the Scottish people. And we need a national inquiry. We need all of that and we need it now before there is nothing left to save. This is not obstruction – this is survival. Lyndsey Ward, Beauly Communities B4 Power Companies EXCELLENT article from Lesley Riddoch (Highlander revolt is not a case of climate change denying and Nimbyism – it's anger, Aug 14). It is appalling that Highland communities are being left – each one on its own – to raise awareness, organise, and fight the destruction of their local environment. If the Scottish Government wants that, it is inexplicable and shameful. If it doesn't, but can't do anything, it should say so, fight back, and give the electorate another good reason to vote for independence. John Galloway via AN excellent letter from Ron Lumiere (Aug 14), which should be compulsory reading for politicians of all parties and those making public statements promoting either side of a 'complex policy question' as a 'binary contest', especially in matters related to 'culture wars'. Life presents few simple choices and the polarising doctrine of the far-right is more likely to spread misunderstandings, diminish mutual respect and 'fuel conflict' than bring enlightened harmony. Politicians in particular should be wary of arrogantly adopting entrenched positions, no matter the heights of their self-perceived personal intellects or otherwise. Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian
