logo
What are the IMF and World Bank, and what happens if the US leaves?

What are the IMF and World Bank, and what happens if the US leaves?

Reuters27-02-2025

LONDON, Feb 27 (Reuters) - Alarm is rising over Washington's potential withdrawal from global institutions, including the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, with the no-show of U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent at G20 meetings adding to anxiety. So what are the IMF and World Bank and what happens if the United States pulls back from them?
WHAT DO THE IMF AND WORLD BANK DO?
The U.S. and its allies formed the two institutions in the ashes of World War II to encourage global integration and forestall future wars.
The IMF is a lender of last resort to countries in trouble - from Greece during its financial crisis, Argentina amid successive debt defaults and even the United Kingdom after a 1976 economic meltdown.
Lending ranges from emergency cash to tackle balance of payment crises to precautionary lines to prevent a crunch.
It attaches conditions to the loans - dispatched in tranches - to ensure countries enact reforms, usually requiring cuts to wasteful spending, more transparent budgets, rooting out corruption or raising tax revenues. Investors use IMF data on GDP and growth as the trigger to determine whether certain debt instruments that link payments to economic performance give them more - or sometimes less - money.
The World Bank lends at low rates to help countries build everything from railroads to flood barriers, creates frameworks needed for innovative financial tools, such as green bonds, and provides risk insurance.
Both lenders provide expertise on issues from irrigation to central bank transparency.
WHO NEEDS THE IMF?
A swathe of emerging market countries rely heavily on the IMF: Argentina could not pay government workers without it, and others from Senegal to Sri Lanka also currently count on its cash.
Having an IMF programme also assuages investors - both private and bilateral.
"The IMF has been for a long, long time an anchor specifically for debt investors," said Yerlan Syzdykov, head of emerging markets at Europe's biggest asset manager Amundi, adding U.S. expertise, and not just money, gives investors confidence in countries with IMF programmes.
Bilateral investors such as Saudi Arabia also increasingly look to the IMF as an anchor for their loans. Economy Minister Faisal Alibrahim said linking lending to institutions including the IMF ensured "more value, from every dollar, every riyal, that is dedicated to supporting other economies."
WHAT ABOUT THE WORLD BANK?
Investors work closely with the World Bank's private investment arm, the International Finance Corporation, co-investing in public/private partnerships for countries seeking the estimated trillions of dollars needed for cleaner power and infrastructure.
Developed countries funding the institutions, including the United States, have used them to ensure global financial stability and to encourage countries to adhere to fiscally responsible, open economic models.
Both institutions, at the behest of their biggest shareholder, the United States, had backed countries such as Egypt, Pakistan and Jordan, where the U.S. has strategic interests, said Mark Sobel, the U.S. chairman of the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF), a veteran Treasury Department official and former IMF board member.
"If there's economic instability abroad, it can hurt the U.S. economy," Sobel said.
DOES THE DEVELOPING WORLD WANT THEM?
The IMF often earns the ire of protesters for advocating painful unpopular reforms to balance budgets such as cutting fuel subsidies or raising tax revenues.
Some Kenyans denounced the IMF during deadly protests last summer, while the Fund's response to the 1997 Asian financial crisis was roundly panned.
But only a few countries, such as Cuba, North Korea and Taiwan, are not IMF members.
WHAT HAPPENS IF THE UNITED STATES PULLS ITS SUPPORT?
"It would be a disaster," said Kaan Nazli, emerging market debt portfolio manager at Neuberger Berman.
A founder member, the United States holds the largest single share of each institution - just over 16% for the IMF and just under that for the World Bank. This has given U.S. policymakers strong influence over decision-making that global economic leaders have come to rely on.
U.S. withdrawal would also surprise experts and investors, as the institutions give Washington that influence at a relatively low cost. Stepping back, they say, would be a gift to China and others seeking to dislodge it as the global leader.
Other countries could fill the financial gap; China has been keen for a larger role in global groups. It has pushed for a realignment of IMF shareholdings and to strengthen emerging market voices. China's current share is just over 5%.
A U.S. exit "would be a major blow to their functionings, and it would only help China," Sobel said.
At the World Bank, U.S. companies would have less access to contracts and work funded by the group. A change in IMF shareholder structure would upend the power balance, making decisions less predictable and potentially less transparent.
Lost access to expertise from U.S. Treasury officials could undermine trust, and ratings agencies have warned U.S. withdrawal could put multilateral lenders' coveted triple-A credit ratings at risk, limiting their ability to lend.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact check: Labour claims the economy ‘is in a better place'
Fact check: Labour claims the economy ‘is in a better place'

Times

time3 hours ago

  • Times

Fact check: Labour claims the economy ‘is in a better place'

Labour has justified its U-turn on winter fuel payments by claiming the economy 'is in a better place' and the public finances are on a 'stronger footing', according to James Murray, a Treasury minister. Is he correct? The main statistic backing the government's claim that the economy has turned a corner is the most recent set of official growth figures. Gross domestic product — a broad measure of the size of the economy — expanded by 0.7 per cent in the first three months of the year, exceeding forecasts of about 0.4 per cent and the fastest acceleration in 12 months. It also meant the UK was the fastest-growing economy in the G7 at the start of 2025. Although the growth momentum is expected to peter out over the course of the year, the strong first quarter has led City forecasters and the International Monetary Fund to modestly upgrade their annual growth forecast from 1 per cent to about 1.1-1.2 per cent. The economy expanded by 1.1 per cent last year, so growth is likely to at least match, rather than far outstrip last year's performance. Labour will also take comfort in an improvement in the UK's GDP per capita figures, which is a more accurate measure of living standards. Growth divided by the population rose by 0.5 per cent in the first quarter, after contracting for two consecutive quarters prior. One of the most important economic indicators for living standards and the sustainability of the public finances is productivity growth. This is a broad measure that combines the efficiency of worker output and investment across the economy. The UK's dismal productivity performance since the global financial crisis hasn't turned around since Labour won the election. Productivity was 0.2 per cent lower in the first quarter of the year compared with the same period in 2024. Productivity in the private sector also contracted by a surprising 0.7 per cent last year, pushing it to below pre-pandemic levels and nearly 2 per cent lower than before the financial crisis in 2008. In the public sector, productivity has contracted for the past two years. Along with productivity growth, lifting business investment will be decisive in defining the government's economic record in this parliament. Private sector investment enjoyed a strong start to the year, expanding by 5.9 per cent in the first quarter compared with the end of 2024, and is 8.1 per cent stronger compared with a year ago. However, the figures are likely to have been distorted by a sharp rise in manufacturing investment, as companies rushed to stockpile materials before President Trump's tariffs announcement on April 2. Public and private sector investment is vital to raise innovation, create jobs and ultimately boost productivity. The UK's total rate of investment has been the worst in the G7 for 24 out of the past 30 years, according to the Institute for Public Policy Research. After more than a year of steadily falling inflation, the pace of price rises has started accelerating again this spring. Annual consumer price inflation rose to 3.4 per cent in April, dragged higher by energy and utility costs. The Bank of England does not expect inflation to fall back to its 2 per cent target until the end of next year. Figures released on Tuesday showed that the labour market is in the grip of a pronounced slowdown. Unemployment has hit a four-year high of 4.6 per cent, and the number of payrolled employees contracted by 55,000 in the three months to April. A first estimate for May showed a 109,000 decline in jobs, which if confirmed would be the worst month since the height of the pandemic in April 2022. Labour has been handed some mixed news on the state of the public finances. The Office for National Statistics lowered its borrowing estimate for the last fiscal year by £3.7 billion to £148.3 billion ending in March 2025, but this figure still overshot the £137.3 billion forecast made by the government's independent fiscal watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility. Monthly borrowing data has also consistently come in above forecasts as the government's coffers have suffered from lower-than-expected tax revenues. On the expenditure side, spending on public sector pay deals and welfare has been growing too fast for comfort for the chancellor. Financial market conditions have also turned against the government this year. Investors have driven up the UK's borrowing costs, as reflected by yields on sovereign debt. Since Rachel Reeves's spring statement in late March, higher gilt yields have blown a £5 billion hole in the chancellor's £9.9 billion buffer to meet her main fiscal rule. Labour's difficulty in balancing the books over the course of the parliament has stoked speculation that Reeves will be forced into more tax rises or spending cuts at her autumn budget.

World Bank sharply downgrades forecast for global economic growth to 2.3%
World Bank sharply downgrades forecast for global economic growth to 2.3%

South Wales Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

World Bank sharply downgrades forecast for global economic growth to 2.3%

Citing 'a substantial rise in trade barriers' but without mentioning Mr Trump by name, the 189-country lender predicted that the US economy – the world's largest – would grow half as fast (1.4%) this year as it did in 2024 (2.8%). That marks a downgrade from the 2.3% US growth it had forecast back for 2025 back in January. The bank also lopped 0.4 percentage points off its forecast for global growth this year. It now expects the world economy to expand just 2.3% in 2025, down from 2.8% in 2024. In a forward to the latest version of the twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill wrote that the global economy has missed its chance for the 'soft landing' – slowing enough to tame inflation without generating serious pain – it appeared headed for just six months ago. 'The world economy today is once more running into turbulence,' Mr Gill wrote. 'Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep.'

World Bank makes ominous forecast amid Trump's trade wars
World Bank makes ominous forecast amid Trump's trade wars

Daily Mail​

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

World Bank makes ominous forecast amid Trump's trade wars

The World Bank has slashed its forecasts for the US economy in the wake of President Donald Trump's tariffs. The bank cut its forecast for US growth in 2025 from its January prediction of 2.3 percent down to 1.4 percent. Economists said 'a substantial rise in trade barriers' — referring to Trump's aggressive trade policies — were to blame for the downgrade. The new predictions suggest the US will grow half as fast as it did last year when it hit 2.8 percent. The consequences will hit everyday Americans hard. A sluggish economy typically leads to slower job growth or layoffs, like those already underway at Walmart, General Mills, and Microsoft. Stocks could also fall, hitting regular Americans' 401(K)s and investments. The World Bank, which provides grants and low-rate loans to poor economies, also pared back its expectations for global growth, dropping it 2025 forecast from 2.7 percent to 2.3 percent. World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill said the global economy has now missed its chance for a 'soft landing,' the best possible outcome of lowering inflation without causing a recession. 'The world economy today is once more running into turbulence,' Gill wrote in the Global Economic Prospects report. 'Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep,' he warned. Trump announced a slew of tariffs on its trading partners in April before rolling most back to a 10 percent while trade negotiations take place. Some key tariffs remain higher, such as imported car parts which are levied at 10 percent, and goods from China at 30 percent. The polices have caused many countries to impose reciprocal tariffs on US goods. The result is higher prices for ordinary Americans as retailers pass on the increased costs to consumers. American consumers are already feeling the bite with the cost of cars rising and major grocery chain's such as Walmart raising their prices. Last week the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development also warned that the US and global economies are headed for a downturn because of Trump's trade policies. The Paris-based organization slashed its growth forecast for the year down to 2.9 percent compared to 3.3 percent last year. The group, which is comprised of 38 wealthy nations, said protectionism is also driving up inflation. The stock market could struggle as growth slows in the US The OECD said inflation will tick up in the US this year, likely preventing the Fed from cutting rates until 2026. If consumer-price expectations become de-anchored the Fed could even be forced to raise rates again, the report warned. 'Weakened economic prospects will be felt around the world, with almost no exception,' OECD chief economist Alvaro Pereira said in the report. 'Lower growth and less trade will hit incomes and slow job growth.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store