logo
NIH reportedly loses two top leaders in two days

NIH reportedly loses two top leaders in two days

Yahoo13-02-2025
(The Hill) — Two key staff members at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) are reportedly leaving the agency amid ongoing efforts by the Trump administration and Department of Government Efficiency head Elon Musk to drastically cut the size of the federal workforce.
NIH Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak told staffers in an email Tuesday that he was retiring effective immediately, according to CBS News. Along with being principal deputy director, Tabak also served as the agency's deputy ethics counselor, having held both roles since 2010.
Tabak temporarily served as acting head of NIH between December 2021 and November 2023, after the institute's former director Francis Collins stepped down.
As CBS reported, Tabak had not been expected to retire until the fall but told a colleague that he felt it was necessary to retire at this time.
Senate confirms RFK Jr. as Health secretary; McConnell lone GOP dissenter
Just a day after Tabak's abrupt retirement, it was reported that Michael Lauer, deputy director of the National Institutes of Health's extramural research, will be leaving the agency at the end of the week.
According to STAT, acting NIH director Matthew Memoli informed staff in an email of Lauer's departure, thanking him for his 'exemplary service to NIH and the American people.'
The Hill has reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services and the White House for comment.
These departures are occurring as the NIH is currently undergoing significant upheaval. Last week the agency issued an order slashing federal funding for research projects, alarming lawmakers, universities and institutions across the country. The order has been stayed, though biomedical researchers remain wary for the future.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

With Deep N.I.H. Cuts, Research Into Health Disparities Falters
With Deep N.I.H. Cuts, Research Into Health Disparities Falters

New York Times

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Times

With Deep N.I.H. Cuts, Research Into Health Disparities Falters

The federal government has for decades invested vigorously in research aimed at narrowing the health gaps between racial and socioeconomic groups, pouring billions of dollars into understanding why minority and low-income Americans have shorter lives and suffer higher rates of illnesses like cancer and heart disease. Spending on so-called health disparities rose even during the Trump administration's first term. But in its second, much of the funding has come to a sudden halt. Following a series of executive orders prohibiting diversity, equity and inclusion policies at every level of the federal government, the National Institutes of Health this year began terminating initiatives that officials said smacked of identity politics and offered dubious benefits. 'Spending billions on divisive, politically driven D.E.I. initiatives that don't deliver results is not just bad health policy — it's bad government,' said a spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services. The N.I.H will invest in projects that support 'all vulnerable populations,' and expand participation 'based on clinical need — not identity,' she added. She declined to be identified. In letters from the N.I.H., scientists were told that their projects were canceled because they 'harm the health of Americans,' 'provide a low return on investment,' or 'do not enhance health, lengthen life, or reduce illness.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Schools brace for MAHA changes to lunches
Schools brace for MAHA changes to lunches

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Schools brace for MAHA changes to lunches

The Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement is taking aim at school lunches in a move advocates say is unrealistic without devoting more federal resources to K-12 students. While some schools can only afford to buy frozen meals that are heated up and served, the Trump administration is looking for freshly cooked meals that will take more employees and ingredients to put together. The MAHA Commission was required to send over recommendations to the White House by Tuesday to combat childhood chronic diseases, a document experts and advocates are eagerly awaiting. But three people familiar with the matter told CNN the report will not be released immediately to the public, keeping schools on their toes as it is expected to impact their food. 'We're guessing at this point what we think that the report is going to say around school nutrition, but we have a few hints. RFK Jr. has said that school lunch programs have deteriorated. He's mentioned how many ultraprocessed foods are in school meals. He's suggested that school meals are poisoning children. … I think we're all pretty much anticipating something around that,' said Meghan Maroney, campaign manager for federal child nutrition programs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has railed against school lunches before, saying the ultraprocessed food and food dyes are hurting student health. He has moved to ban artificial food dyes from the nation's supply chain and has pushed fast food chains to cook their food in beef tallow over seed oils. 'We need to stop poisoning our kids and make sure that Americans are once again the healthiest kids on the planet,' Kennedy said in April. He has celebrated states such as Utah, West Virginia and Arizona, where certain dyes and processed food were banned from school lunches. But other moves by the Trump administration, advocates argue, have been counterintuitive to helping schools produce fresh meals. The U.S. Agriculture Department (USDA) in the spring ended two programs, totaling $1 billion, that helped schools buy food from local farmers and producers. USDA is in charge of the nutrition standards for the National School Lunch Program. 'They are being asked to create healthy and appealing meals on very slim budgets, and there have been things that have been happening recently that have taken away even more of their resources,' said Alexis Bylander, director of child nutrition programs and policy at the Food Research & Action Center. 'I think what this really comes down to is, are the recommendations going to provide enough resources so that schools really can enhance the quality and appeal of the meals that they are serving?' she added. In Oklahoma, Ryan Walters, the state superintendent of public instruction, has already been working on implementing the MAHA agenda in school food, saying schools can no longer serve food that is ultraprocessed or grown with pesticides and processed snacks in vending machines. The districts are expected to overhaul the foods without additional room in the budget. 'What we're seeing with the MAHA movement as it's applied in our state is lots of talk about restriction and what people can have and what choices they can make, but not a lot of talk about making sure people have access to the healthy things they need or the resources they need to not be food insecure … because, ultimately, if you don't have access to enough food, nutritious or not, your health outcomes are worse than if you do,' said Chris Bernard, CEO and president of Hunger Free Oklahoma. Along with changes to food costs, schools would have to pay for more employees to make the food and, in some cases, would need to acquire equipment to be able to handle making fresh food for hundreds of students every day. The Hill has reached out to HHS for comment. Some are hoping for a definitive set of markers to build upon for what types of food should be served and what the cost will be. 'When we establish that baseline, then we can move from it, then we actually have something that we can achieve goals and we can achieve targets with,' said Gregory Bundschoks, founder for the Foundation of Healthy Schools. He added that there needs to be 'consistency' for businesses trying to make a profit while also remaining within the new mandates. Advocates note school food is the healthiest many students eat and, for some, it might be the only full meal they get in a day. While schools have partnered with some nonprofits to help bring fresher meals to their students, not every district is able to afford it. According to USDA, in 2023, 1 in 5 children were unsure where their next meal would come from. Black, Latino and single-family households were more likely to be food insecure. 'I do think school meals are one of the last remaining universal public school services that are reaching every child, nearly in America … so making school the ideal environment to shape their wellness behavior, and a lot of that starts with food,' said Alexina Cather, director of policy and special projects for Wellness in the Schools. 'As we see increasing rates of food insecurity, food again at school becomes one of the places that kids can be guaranteed a nutritious meal if we put that energy and effort into making sure that's a nutritious meal,' she added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

Trump weighs marijuana reclassification as Oklahoma eyes recreational legalization
Trump weighs marijuana reclassification as Oklahoma eyes recreational legalization

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump weighs marijuana reclassification as Oklahoma eyes recreational legalization

President Donald Trump said his administration is weighing whether to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug. This move could mark the most significant federal shift in cannabis policy in half a century. "We're looking at reclassification and we'll make a determination over the next few weeks," Trump said at an Aug. 11 news conference. The federal government lists marijuana alongside heroin and LSD as a Schedule I drug — the category reserved for substances deemed highly dangerous, addictive and without medical value. Reclassifying it to Schedule III, as recommended by federal health officials in 2023, would put marijuana in the same legal tier as Tylenol with codeine and anabolic steroids, allowing it to be prescribed by licensed medical providers and dispensed by pharmacies. It would not, however, legalize recreational use under federal law. What a federal shift could mean for Oklahoma Oklahoma legalized medical marijuana in 2018 and more than 2,000 dispensaries now operate statewide. But under current law, adults can only purchase cannabis with a medical patient license. That could change if voters approve State Question 837, which would legalize recreational sales for adults 21 and older. The measure cleared a major procedural hurdle in July and organizers have already started gathering signatures. Organizers have until Nov. 4 to collect at least 172,993 valid signatures to get on the ballot in 2026. If Trump reclassifies marijuana to Schedule III, Oklahoma's medical marijuana market — already among the largest per capita in the nation — could see smoother banking operations, lower compliance risks for dispensaries and broader medical research opportunities. But the move would do nothing to authorize recreational sales in the state; that decision would still rest entirely with Oklahoma voters. The push for SQ 837 Oklahomans for Responsible Cannabis Action (ORCA), the group behind SQ 837, is betting that public sentiment has shifted since voters rejected a similar measure, State Question 820, in 2023 by a 61% margin. This time, ORCA is pursuing a constitutional amendment, making it harder for lawmakers to alter or repeal the law without another statewide vote. The proposal would tax recreational sales at 10% while preserving the medical system and exempting licensed patients from the new tax. The campaign faces new hurdles, including a 2025 state law limiting how many petition signatures can come from a single county. That means ORCA can't rely solely on the city center like Tulsa or Oklahoma City for signatures and will have to fan out into rural areas — such as Harmon County, where just 117 residents will be allowed to sign. "Maybe we'll go and hang out at the co-op for a day or go to the county courthouse," ORCA Director Jed Green said. "Voters of Harmon County — get ready, we'll come out and visit." Open primary supporters have challenged Senate Bill 1027 in the Oklahoma Supreme Court, which has not yet issued a ruling. The bigger picture Trump's comments come after years of fits and starts on federal marijuana policy. President Joe Biden initiated the reclassification review in 2022, and federal health officials recommended the downgrade in 2023. The Drug Enforcement Administration proposed a rule change in 2024, but the process stalled after Trump returned to the White House in January. Terrance Cole, Trump's newly confirmed DEA administrator, has said reviewing marijuana's classification will be one of his first priorities, though he has not signaled whether he supports the change. Trump said the decision is complicated, weighing the benefits of marijuana use for medical reasons against potential societal impacts. "Some people like it, some people hate it," he said. "Some people hate the whole concept of marijuana." If the administration follows through, Oklahoma's cannabis industry could get a boost in legitimacy and access to services — but recreational marijuana will still live or die by the state's ballot box. This article originally appeared on Bartlesville Examiner-Enterprise: Trump considers marijuana shift; Oklahoma advances recreational use Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store