UN Sounds Alarm on Possible Israeli Military Expansion in Gaza
Jenca emphasized that international law clearly defines Gaza as an integral part of the future Palestinian state, highlighting the urgent need for a peaceful resolution to the ongoing conflict. Israel's Military Strategy Under Review
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened senior security officials on Tuesday to finalize a new strategy for the nearly two-year-old war in Gaza, with media reports indicate that he favors a complete military takeover of the Palestinian enclave. This potential escalation raises significant concerns among international observers.
China's deputy UN representative, Geng Shuang, voiced 'great concern' about the reported plans, urging Israel to immediately halt these dangerous actions and called for a ceasefire. Shuang also encouraged influential countries to take concrete steps to facilitate peace.
Ahead of the UN meeting, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar criticized nations that pressured Israel by recognizing a 'virtual' Palestinian state. He argued that such actions have 'assassinated' potential hostage deals and ceasefires, ultimately prolonging the conflict. G7 Nations Move Toward Palestinian Statehood
Three of the G7 countries announced plans to recognize Palestinian statehood, as France and Canada intend to make this declaration in September during the UN General Assembly, while Britain plans to support Palestinian statehood unless Israel takes significant steps to alleviate suffering in Gaza.
US Ambassador to the UN, Dorothy Shea, criticized a recent UN conference that urged global efforts toward a two-state solution, labeling the event an 'unproductive publicity stunt' and claimed it undermined the efforts of mediators working toward peace.
Ilay David, the brother of Israeli hostage Evyatar David, addressed the Security Council, urging members to use their influence to secure the immediate and unconditional release of hostages. He emphasized the importance of ensuring humanitarian aid reaches them.
'Every moment of delay is a step closer to a tragic outcome,' Ilay David stated. He described the distressing video released by Hamas, which showed his brother appearing emaciated. 'He had barely the strength to move or speak, his voice barely recognizable,' David added.
Short link :
Post Views: 13
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
UK shift on Palestine reinforces a historical fact
The UK recently departed from decades of foreign policy, announcing plans to recognize Palestinian statehood unless Israel takes immediate action to address the crisis in Gaza. This announcement, coming alongside France and Canada's similar moves, marks a growing shift in international support for Palestine as the UN General Assembly approaches in September. The UK's announcement, while following France and Canada's lead, is notably different in its conditional nature. The Starmer government made it clear that it would proceed with recognizing Palestine as a state only if Israel agrees to a series of significant actions. These include a ceasefire in Gaza, a commitment not to annex the West Bank, and a pledge to work toward a credible, long-term peace process aimed at achieving a two-state solution. This move has been welcomed by many in the international community, yet it has also faced significant criticism, particularly given the UK's historical role in shaping the very conditions that have led to the conflict. Before British rule, the region now known as Palestine was part of the Ottoman Empire, specifically the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, reorganized in 1872. This area was part of the larger Ottoman province of Syria, but was granted a special administrative status. It was only with the establishment of the British Mandate for Palestine in 1920 that the term 'Palestine' began to take on its modern political meaning. Under British administration, the land was known as Mandate Palestine, with Britain trying to balance its dual commitment to both the Zionist movement and the local Arab population. The 1917 Balfour Declaration, issued by the British foreign secretary at the time, expressed 'support for the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine,' leaving a historical record of British diplomatic recognition of a territory named Palestine. Despite its longstanding presence in the region, Britain has never officially recognized Palestine as a state — until now. This shift is significant, but it comes with a complex legacy. During the First World War, Britain entered into negotiations with Sharif Hussein, the leader of the Arab revolt against the Ottoman Empire. In exchange for Arab support, Britain promised Arab independence, a commitment later known as the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence. Though the specific interpretation of Palestine's status in this agreement has been a point of contention, this is another colonial-era record of official British utilization of the term, Palestine. While Arabs saw it as a promise for the independence of Palestine, Britain later argued that Palestine was excluded from this promise due to its strategic importance and other conflicting commitments, such as the Balfour Declaration. These historical British footnotes regarding Palestine statehood have shaped the Palestinian cause just as they have defined the very recognition of the territory itself. During the British Mandate for Palestine, Britain assumed administrative control with the aim of helping the region transition toward self-governance. One of the notable steps taken by the British was the establishment of the Palestinian passport system, which formally recognized Palestinians as residents of the Mandate, though not as a sovereign nation. These passports, issued under the Passports and Immigration Regulations, granted Palestinians some travel and residency rights, but they did not recognize Palestine as a distinct nation-state. In the first decade of the Mandate alone, about 70,000 of these documents were issued. In the context of Palestine's century-long struggle, the issuance of these documents supports one more time British utilization of the term Palestine. While the UK's announcement to recognize Palestine is a significant diplomatic step, it must be understood within the context of Britain's historical involvement in shaping the region's political landscape. Besides, this recognition carries significant geopolitical and diplomatic implications. Both the UK and Canada have tied their recognition of Palestine to specific actions from Israel or the Palestinian Authority, such as halting the expansion of Israeli settlements and agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza. In doing so, they are responding to the urgent need for change in the region, while at the same time pushing for conditions that reflect their vision of a lasting, sustainable two-state solution. The UK's recognition, in particular, carries considerable diplomatic weight as one of the permanent members of the UN Security Council. If the UK follows through, it will join France, Canada, and several other nations in formally recognizing Palestinian statehood as the world gathers in New York this September. For the Palestinian Authority, this recognition is particularly pertinent as it legitimizes the organization's aspirations for a sovereign state and enhances its standing on the international stage. UK recognition carries considerable diplomatic weight. Zaid M. Belbagi In addition to this diplomatic shift, the UK has committed significant resources to alleviating the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The UK government pledged £60 million ($80 million) in humanitarian aid in July 2025 alone, focusing on healthcare, food, water, shelter, and emergency services. This includes funding for UK-Med field hospitals, which have treated over 500,000 people during the conflict. The UK has coupled its recent diplomatic overture with a continued program of humanitarian assistance. However, this diplomatic announcement raises questions about the future of UK-Israel relations. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted strongly to the announcement, accusing the UK of rewarding 'Hamas' monstrous terrorism,' which signals potential strain in the longstanding bilateral relationship between the two nations, historically tied by economic, political, and diplomatic agreements. By the end of Q1 2025, total trade between the UK and Israel reached £5.8 billion, with Israeli investment in the UK contributing an additional £1 billion in gross value and creating about 16,000 British jobs. With an updated free trade agreement expected following the launch of talks in 2022, the UK's shift in policy could challenge the foundation of this economic partnership. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has made the UK's recognition of Palestine conditional, requiring Israel to take substantive steps to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire, allow UN aid, halt annexations in the West Bank, and commit to a sustainable peace process aimed at reviving the two-state solution. The British government has made it clear that recognition will be upheld if these conditions are not met. However, given the current stance of Netanyahu's government, it seems unlikely that these conditions will be accepted, making the recognition of Palestine increasingly probable in the coming months. As such, the UK's recognition of Palestine before September seems all but certain, confirming what has been a historical fact.
Leaders
9 hours ago
- Leaders
Italian Politician's Condemnation Goes Viral: ‘This is Hell on Earth'
Italian politician Alessandro Di Battista's blistering condemnation of Gaza's humanitarian crisis has gone viral, amplifying global outrage over Israel's blockade and its catastrophic impact on Palestinian children. The former Five Star Movement firebrand delivered the remarks during an appearance on Italian television, framing Gaza as a man-made 'hell' where starvation and drone strikes systematically target civilians. Di Battista's voice cracked with fury as he described Gaza: Di Battista's voice cracked with fury as he described Gaza: 'Today there is no war between armies. Here there is an enormous population that literally dies of hunger.' The Heart-Wrenching Truth The former Member of Parliament's speech struck a chord as he described the heartbreaking situation faced by children in conflict zones. 'Every day hungry children die,' he lamented, illustrating the dire circumstances that many families endure. He vividly depicted the scene: 'Bombs hit them, and drones follow the children in search of a little flour.' This imagery resonated deeply with viewers, prompting widespread discussion and outrage on social media platforms. The politician's words took a haunting turn as he contemplated the concept of hell. 'I don't know if hell exists, Floris,' he said, addressing the show's host. 'If I had to imagine hell, I would think of 2 million people who are dying of hunger and thirst.' His statement underscored the severity of the crisis, particularly for children. '1 million children, with bombs hitting them,' he continued, painting a vivid picture of despair. A Call to Action Di Battista's speech did not shy away from the uncomfortable truths surrounding the situation. He pointed out the stark contrast between abundance and deprivation: 'With trucks full of food, a few hundred meters from where hungry children die.' His frustration was palpable as he criticized the actions of those in power: 'Israeli soldiers don't let them in.' This poignant observation highlighted the barriers that prevent aid from reaching those in desperate need. In closing, Di Battista delivered a powerful statement that resonated with many viewers. ' This is reality. The rest is bullshit,' he declared, dismissing distractions and emphasizing the urgency of addressing the humanitarian crisis. His passionate plea for compassion and action sparked a wave of support and solidarity across social media, urging people to confront the harsh realities faced by millions. As the video continues to circulate, it serves as a reminder of the importance of empathy and the need for collective action in the face of suffering. Di Battista's fiery talk not only captured attention but also ignited a conversation about humanity's responsibility to those in need. Short link : Post Views: 7
Leaders
9 hours ago
- Leaders
Israeli Professor Declares: 'Israel Has No Right to Exist'
A searing interview with Professor Haim Bresheeth-Zabner, an Israeli filmmaker, photographer, and former scholar at University of East London, has ignited global debate after going viral online. The professor delivered stark condemnations of Israel's foundational principles and Zionist ideology, using powerful, unambiguous language directly challenging the state's legitimacy and identity. Israel's Right to Exist Questioned When asked whether Israel has the right to defend itself, Bresheeth-Zabner did not hold back. 'Israel has no right to be there. Israel has no right to exist because its right to existence is based on denying the right of the Palestinians for self-determination,' he stated emphatically. He continued, 'No one has self-determination if they deny it to others.' Bresheeth-Zabner labeled the actions of the Israeli state as genocidal, urging, 'They should go away from Palestine if they don't want to live in peace with the Palestinians.' The conversation shifted to the religious justification some Israelis use for their claims to the land. Bresheeth-Zabner challenged this notion directly. 'If somebody came to your home and said 2,000 years ago a friend of mine promised me this place and now I want it back, I mean, this is nonsense,' he argued. He described those who support Israel's claim to the land as 'self-colonialists' who took Palestine by force. Defining Jewish Identity The interview also touched on the internal divisions within the Jewish community regarding Zionism. Bresheeth-Zabner responded to claims from some Zionists that Jews who support Palestine are not true Jews. 'I think Zionists are not Jews. They behave in a way that Jews never behaved for 2,000 years,' he asserted. He characterized Zionists as 'racist' and 'anti-Semitic,' stating, 'They commit genocide. This is not Jewish. There's nothing Jewish about what they're doing.' Bresheeth-Zabner expressed his disdain for the actions of the Israeli state, saying, 'They should be ashamed. And if they think we're not Jewish, they mean we're not like them. We're not killing people.' He concluded with a powerful statement: 'We will not join them. We will not support them. We will shame them until they will disappear. They are a shame on Judaism. They are a stain on Judaism.' Professor Haim Bresheeth-Zabner's interview raises critical questions about identity, morality, and the ongoing conflict in the region. His provocative statements challenge both the narrative of Zionism and the broader implications of Israeli policies towards Palestinians. As discussions continue, his words resonate with those advocating for peace and justice in the region. Short link :
