Morehouse College names new president
The Morehouse College Board of Trustees has named renowned public health leader and biostatistician Dr. F. DuBois Bowman, a 1992 graduate of Morehouse, as the College's 13th president following a national search. Dr. Bowman will assume the role on July 15, 2025, succeeding President David A. Thomas, who concludes his tenure in June.
Dr. Bowman currently serves as dean of the University of Michigan School of Public Health and holds the Roderick J. Little Collegiate Professorship of Biostatistics. A nationally respected scholar, innovator, and academic leader, Bowman is a member of the National Academy of Medicine, a fellow of the American Statistical Association, and a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
'Dr. Bowman's record of visionary leadership, his deep commitment to academic excellence, and his lifelong dedication to Morehouse make him the ideal choice to lead the College into its next era,' said Willie Woods '85, chairman of the Morehouse College Board of Trustees. 'He brings an extraordinary blend of intellectual rigor, strategic thinking, and values-driven leadership.'
A leading expert in the statistical analysis of complex data sets, Dr. Bowman's research has transformed understanding of neurological and mental health disorders such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, depression, and schizophrenia. His work has shaped more personalized therapeutic approaches and has explored how environmental factors affect brain function in youth.
At the University of Michigan, Dr. Bowman leads a top-ranked school of public health with more than 1,300 students and an annual sponsored research portfolio exceeding $100 million. He has launched interdisciplinary initiatives to address public health challenges, such as firearm injury prevention, health equity, and infectious disease control. His leadership has fostered a culture of inclusion, innovation, and service across the school.
A proud Morehouse alumnus, member of Phi Beta Kappa, and Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Inc., Dr. Bowman has remained closely connected to his alma mater as a two-time Morehouse parent and a dedicated mentor, facilitating a University of Michigan pipeline program for students from Morehouse and Spelman colleges. In 2019, he was awarded the College's highest award for alumni – the Bennie Trailblazer Award –named after the sixth president of the College, Dr. Benjamin Elijah Mays.
'Returning to Morehouse as its 13th president is the honor of a lifetime,' said Dr. Bowman. 'This institution shaped who I am-instilling a commitment to excellence, justice, and impact. I am excited to partner with faculty, staff, students, alumni, and supporters to build on our legacy and write the next chapter of Morehouse's transformative story.'
His appointment follows a historic milestone for the College, which was recently named both a Research College & University (RCU) and Opportunity College & University (OCU) in the 2025 Carnegie Classifications. The dual designation reflects Morehouse's growing investment in research and its enduring mission to provide students from underrepresented communities with access to life-changing education and competitive post-graduate outcomes.
Prior to his deanship at Michigan, Dr. Bowman held academic and leadership positions at Columbia University and Emory University. He earned a Master of Science in Biostatistics from the University of Michigan and a Ph.D. in Biostatistics from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Dr. Bowman is married to Cynthia Bowman who holds degrees from Spelman College, Georgia Tech, and Northwestern. They have four children, including a son who graduated from Morehouse in 2024 and a younger son who is currently enrolled at the College.
The post Morehouse College names new president appeared first on HBCU Gameday.
Copyright HBCU Gameday 2012-2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
3 days ago
- NBC News
Needle-phobic? FluMist nasal spray vaccine available for use at home
More children died from the flu this past season than any year outside of the swine flu pandemic in 2009. Most of them were unvaccinated. That's why some doctors are hoping that the first nasal flu vaccine available for use at home can improve vaccination rates among people, especially children, who are afraid of needles. AstraZeneca's FluMist Home, which was approved last fall, is now available with a prescription for children ages 2 and over, and adults up to age 49. A 2019 review from researchers at the University of Michigan found the majority of children and up to 30% of young adults are afraid of needles. Dr. Zachary Hoy, board-certified pediatric infectious disease specialist at Pediatrix Medical Group in Nashville, Tennessee, said many children are scared because they aren't old enough to understand what vaccines are and why they are important. 'Most of the time, the anxiety and worry before the shot is scarier than the actual shot,' Hoy said. How does FluMist Home work? The vaccine was first approved in 2003 to be given in a doctor's office. However, after the 2009 swine flu pandemic introduced the new H1N1 strain, several studies found the nasal spray was less effective than other flu vaccines. This prompted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to recommend against using the nasal spray in 2016. At the time, the CDC said the nasal spray accounted for one-third of all flu vaccines given to children. In response, FluMist's manufacturers reformulated it to more closely match circulating strains, including H1N1, and the nasal spray returned in 2018. Like injectable flu vaccines, FluMist is updated each season based on recommendations from global health officials. 'FluMist's efficacy is comparable to injectable flu vaccines and is a safe and effective needle-free option for flu protection,' AstraZeneca spokesperson Andrew Leone said. Experts say it's too early to tell how bad the upcoming flu season will be. Typically, flu vaccines are 40% and 60% effective in preventing severe illness, and FluMist Home should be equally protective. The doses for the 2026-2027 season contain three virus strains: an A/H1N1 strain, an A/H3N2 strain and a B strain from the B/Victoria lineage, according to the drugmaker. The FluMist Home vaccine contains a weakened form of a live virus to stimulate the immune system. Pregnant women or people with compromised immune systems are advised to talk with their doctor before using it. Does insurance cover it? FluMist Home is available only online. People ordering the nasal spray will need to complete a medical screening questionnaire at that is reviewed by a health care professional, according to the drugmaker. FluMist Home's online pharmacy will then collect the insurance information and bill the health plan directly. A temperature monitor on the packaging will verify that the vaccine has been maintained at the appropriate temperature during shipping and delivery. Green means it's safe to use. Red means it's not. Christina Aungst, senior pharmacy editor at GoodRx, estimates people with insurance will likely only have to pay an $8.99 shipping fee for the nasal spray. 'Currently, if you don't have insurance, FluMist is only available in a health care setting,' AstraZeneca's Leone said. 'We hope to provide a cash pay option for FluMist Home in future seasons.' When FluMist is given in a health care office or clinic, most insurance plans — including Medicare and Medicaid — will cover it. Dr. Scott Roberts, associate medical director of infection prevention at Yale School of Medicine, worries people may not administer the nasal spray vaccine properly without a doctor's supervision. 'What if they have a runny nose? How far back do they need to spray in the nose? What if they store it incorrectly in their house?' Roberts asked. Dr. Kristina Bryant, pediatric infectious diseases physician at Norton Children's in Louisville, Kentucky, and a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases, said the bottom line is that all the available flu vaccines offer comparable protection. 'The most important thing to know is that vaccines only work if they are actually administered,' Bryant said. 'Hopefully, the availability of a vaccine that can be administered in the home will make it easier for some people to be protected against flu.'


CBS News
4 days ago
- CBS News
Michigan Medicine mails postcards without envelopes, potentially exposing data of 1,000+ patients
Michigan Medicine says the health information of 1,015 patients was potentially exposed when it mailed out postcards without envelopes. According to Michigan Medicine, a research study postcard was sent to prospective participants on June 27, 2025. Those postcards were mailed without envelopes and contained a "limited amount" of protected health information that might have been exposed by anyone who handled the postcards. An investigation by the health system found that the University of Michigan's Institutional Review Board, which is responsible for the oversight of human subject research, mistakenly approved the use of the postcards. Michigan's Institutional Review Board is taking steps to ensure that a similar incident does not happen again, Michigan Medicine said in a statement. "We take patient privacy very seriously, and we regret this incident. Whenever situations like this occur, we immediately take steps to investigate," said Jeanne Strickland, Michigan Medicine Chief Compliance Officer, in a statement. "We will analyze this incident and review our safeguards and make changes if needed to protect those we care for." Michigan Medicine says it mailed notices to patients affected by the incident on Aug. 14. Those who are concerned about the breach and who did not receive a notice letter can call the Michigan Medicine Assistance Line at 1-833-353-4105, Monday through Friday, from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Although Michigan Medicine believes the risk of medical or identity theft is low with this incident, it encourages impacted patients to monitor their health insurance statements for any evidence of fraudulent transactions.


Medscape
4 days ago
- Medscape
Out-of-Pocket Prep Costs Reduce Screening Colonoscopy Uptake
Out-of-pocket costs for bowel preparation are deterring people, especially vulnerable and underserved groups, from colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, a large insurance-claims analysis in Gastroenterology reported. Moreover, this cost-sharing contravenes the preventive-care provisions for bowel preparation mandated by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Led by Gastroenterologist Eric D. Shah, MD, MBA, a clinical associate professor at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, the study found a significant proportion of prescribed bowel preparation claims — 53% for commercial plans and 83% for Medicare — still involve patient cost-sharing, indicating noncompliance with ACA guidelines. Although expense-sharing was less prevalent among Medicaid claims (just 27%), it was not eliminated, suggesting room for improvement in coverage enforcement across the board. 'Colon cancer is unique in that it can be prevented with colonoscopy, but where are the patients? Bowel prep is a major reason that patients defer screening,' Shah told Medscape Medical News. He said his group was quite surprised that the majority in the study cohort were paying something out of pocket when these costs should have been covered. 'Primary care doctors may not think to ask about bowel prep costs when they order screening colonoscopies.' The findings emerged from an analysis of 2,593,079 prescription drug claims: 52.9% from commercial plans, 35% from Medicare Part D plans, and 8.3% from Medicaid plans. 'These patient costs of $30 or $50 are a real not a theoretical deterrent,' said Whitney Jones, MD, a gastroenterologist, adjunct clinical professor at the University of Louisville in Louisville, Kentucky, and founder of the nonprofit colon cancer prevention project. Jones was not involved in the analysis. 'Some insurers require prior patient authorization for the low-dose preps, but gastroenterologists are doing so many colonoscopies they don't always have time to get a PA [prior authorization] on everyone.' With the increasing use of blood and stool-based CRC testing, he added, 'when you get a positive result, it's really important to have the procedure quickly.' And appropriate bowel preparation is a small, cost-effective portion of the total costs of colonoscopy, a procedure that ultimately saves insurers significant money in treatment costs. The authors noted that while CRC is the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US, screening rates remain low, with only 59% of adults aged 45 years or older up to date with screening. Screening rates are particularly low among racial and ethnic minority groups as compared with White individuals, a disparity that highlights the need to address existing barriers and enhance screening efforts. In the current study, shared costs by bowel preparation volume also varied. Low-volume formulations had consistently higher out-of-pocket costs: a median of $60 for low-volume vs $10 for high-volume in commercial plans. In Medicare, 75% of high-volume claims had shared costs compared with 90% for their low-volume counterparts. The cost-sharing difference was slightly narrower with Medicaid: 27% of high-volume claims vs 30% of low-volume claims. This is concerning, as low-volume options, which are preferred by patients for their better tolerability, can enhance uptake and adherence and improve colonoscopy outcomes. Shah advises physicians to consider prescribing low-volume preparations. 'Let patients know about the potential out-of-pocket cost and about copay cards and assistance programs and use high-volume preps as an alternative rather than a go-to,' he said. As to costs across insurance types, among commercial plans, the median nonzero out-of-pocket cost was $10 for high-volume and $60 for low-volume product claims. For Medicare, the median nonzero out-of-pocket cost was $8 for high-volume and $55.99 for low-volume products. Under the ACA, CRC screening is classified as a recommended preventive service, requiring health plans to cover it without cost-sharing. Although the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services previously tried to enforce this mandate in 2015 and 2016, stating that colonoscopy preparation medications should be covered at no cost, many health plans are still not compliant. At the nonfederal level, Jones noted, Kentucky, which has a significant high-risk population, recently became the first state to pass legislation requiring health benefit plans to cover all guideline-recommended CRC exams and lab tests. For its part, the American Gastroenterological Association has also called on payers to eliminate all cost-sharing barriers across the CRC screening continuum. Of note, the study authors said, the higher compliance with the ACA mandate in commercial and Medicaid plans than in Medicare highlights disparities that may disproportionately affect vulnerable older adults. While nearly half of commercial patients and nearly three quarters of Medicaid patients incurred zero out-of-pocket costs, fewer than 17% of Medicare beneficiaries, or 1 in 6, did so. Although these costs may be low relative to the colonoscopy, they nevertheless can deter uptake of preventive screenings, potentially leading to higher CRC incidence and mortality. 'While some patients may be willing to pay modest out-of-pocket costs, any required payment, however small, can serve as a barrier to preventative care, particularly in underserved populations,' they wrote. 'These financial barriers will continue to contribute to widening disparities and hinder progress toward equitable screening outcomes.' In the meantime, said Shah, 'Physicians should advocate now to their representatives in Congress that bowel prep costs should already be covered as part of the ACA.' This study was funded by Sebela Pharmaceuticals, maker of SUFLAVE preparation.