Hong Kong's still ‘over' but Stephen Roach says city a surprise trade war winner
American economist Stephen Roach has said that Hong Kong has benefited from the US-China trade war despite last year having declared the city to be 'over', even as he claimed that other aspects of the financial hub had worsened.
The former Morgan Stanley Asia chairman
sparked debate last year after he penned an opinion piece which argued, in part, that Hong Kong would be caught in the 'crossfire' of the worsening US-China rivalry.
'The word caught is the word that, if I had to write the piece again, I would probably change, because I think, ironically, Hong Kong has benefited from the crossfire between the US and China,' he told the Post in a recent interview.
Despite worsening ties between the two superpowers since US President Donald Trump began levying his so-called reciprocal tariffs on China and the rest of the world, Hong Kong's stock market has seen solid gains.
The benchmark Hang Seng Index is up by around 50 per cent since Roach made his original claim, while Hong Kong has rocketed to the top of the global fundraising table following a string of high-profile initial public offerings last month, including from mainland Chinese battery maker Contemporary Amperex Technology.
Roach, who is now a faculty member at Yale University, said the 'sell America' trade had become a 'global mantra' and Hong Kong was a beneficiary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
39 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Crypto confiscated in Beijing to be liquidated in Hong Kong through licensed exchanges
Beijing's police authority has unveiled a plan for liquidating cryptocurrencies confiscated in criminal cases by selling them through licensed exchanges in Hong Kong, a move that could aid the southern city's efforts to become a virtual asset hub. The municipal Public Security Bureau in Beijing said on Thursday that it has partnered with the China Beijing Equity Exchange (CBEX) to offload seized cryptoassets through regulated platforms in Hong Kong. Under the 'Framework Agreement on Handling Seized Virtual Currencies', CBEX will be responsible for appointing third-party agencies to sell the assets through the exchanges. Proceeds will be converted into yuan and deposited in designated accounts, according to a statement posted on the bureau's official WeChat account. This marks the first time that a mainland agency has detailed a process for disposing of confiscated cryptoassets, while working within Hong Kong's virtual asset regime to offload them. Mainland China enforces a strict ban on crypto trading, complicating efforts to handle such assets seized by law enforcement. From 2019 to June 2024, Chinese authorities publicly documented 2,206 criminal cases involving digital currencies, according to Wolters Kluwer's database. In a September report, the People's Court Daily, a newspaper under the Supreme People's Court, estimated that the value of cryptocurrencies awaiting disposal by Chinese authorities by the end of 2022 exceeded several billion US dollars. In 2023, the value of crypto involved in criminal cases surged to 430.7 billion yuan (US$60 billion), a 12-fold increase from the previous year.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Africa warns Trump travel ban could dampen relations
US President Donald Trump's travel ban on seven African nations could dampen economic and diplomatic ties, a continental bloc warned. Trump on Thursday signed a proclamation that restricts travel by foreign nationals from 12 countries, including Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia and Sudan, citing the need to counter the threat of terrorist attacks and safeguard the public. The African Union 'remains concerned about the potential negative impact of such measures on people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and the broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades', its executive branch said in a statement posted on social-media platform X. The bloc requested the US to 'consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned'. Reaction to the travel ban has been limited, and none of the governments affected had publicly signalled their intention to retaliate against US commercial interests or personnel, said Bilal Bassiouni, head of risk forecasting at advisory firm Pangea-Risk. 'Precedents from prior travel bans suggest a preference in these jurisdictions for bilateral diplomatic engagement rather than reciprocal restrictions,' he said.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Caught in a bad bromance: Trump and Musk go for the throat as shocking feud escalates
Hours after US President Donald Trump spoke with his Chinese counterpart on Thursday night and shared optimistic remarks about the call on social media, a public feud escalated between him and his biggest political donor. Advertisement Elon Musk, once Trump's most high-profile donor and self-proclaimed 'first buddy', lambasted the 'big beautiful bill' earlier this week – one of Trump's key domestic policy initiatives that was recently passed by the House – lighting the fuse on a public fight that quickly spiralled into a fiery exchange of accusations. In this explainer, the Post takes a closer look at Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act – examining a specific clause that fuelled the fallout, how the two sides turned on each other, and the economic ripples that have followed. How did the feud start? Musk called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act a 'disgusting abomination' in a social media post on his own website, X, saying it was a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill'. 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt,' added Musk, who was at the helm of the US' cost-saving-focused Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) until last week. This was the second time Musk publicly lashed out at the bill. In late May, before officially leaving the Doge, he said he was 'disappointed' by the bill and believed the legislation 'increases the budget deficit' and 'undermines the work that the Doge team is doing'. Advertisement In response, Trump suggested that Musk was upset about the removal of mandates for electric vehicles (EVs), which could affect his Tesla business, while the president was speaking to reporters during a news conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday.
