Primodos campaigners have said the government is failing women five years on from a review into the scandal
Campaigners who blame hormone pregnancy test for harming their unborn babies have said the government is failing women five years on from a review into the scandal.
Primodos was taken off the market in 1978 – after 1.5million women had taken it. A 2020 independent review, First Do No Harm, found regulators failed and were responsible for 'avoidable harm'.
How the NHS responded to fears over Primodos as well as pelvic mesh – linked to chronic pain – and anti-epilepsy drug sodium valproate were also reviewed.
Five years on, campaigners are still waiting for justice.
Wilma Ord, 77, of Livingston, took Primodos in 1970. Her daughter Kirsteen, 54, is deaf, severely asthmatic and has cerebral palsy. She said: 'Families can't wait any longer for justice, help or support.'
Marie Lyon, of the Association for Children Damaged by Hormone Pregnancy Tests, added: 'The IMMDS review concluded Primodos should have been removed in 1967.
It was removed in 1978, due to failures of the UK regulator to acknowledge hundreds of warnings they had received since 1958 of concerns about severe adverse effects on unborn babies.
'Since the report, 61 of our members have died without receiving justice. How can government bodies be so inhuman as to delay justice in the knowledge many of our families are elderly.'
Campaigner group Sling the Mesh accused governments of 'dragging their feet'.
It said there had been no audit to gauge the harm caused by mesh or compensation and few recommendations had been implemented.
The group's Kath Sansom said: 'The institutional inertia amplifies the suffering – especially the lack of compensation for harm caused to thousands of women who innocently trusted their doctor they were receiving a safe treatment.'
Sharon Hodgson, chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on First Do No Harm – Mesh, Primodos, Valproate said: 'This little progress is hugely disappointing.'
In 2023, Primodos campaigners lost a High Court battle for compensation – leaving the claimants potentially liable for costs. Manufacturer Schering, now part of Bayer, has denied a link.
Expressing sympathy with those who believe they suffered following the use of hormone pregnancy tests and pelvic mesh, the Department of Health and Social Care said: 'The government is considering the Patient Safety Commissioner's recommendations in full.'
Bayer said: 'Bayer maintains that no significant new scientific knowledge has been produced that would call into question the validity of the previous assessment of there being no link between the use of Primodos and the occurrence of such congenital anomalies.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
40 minutes ago
- The National
Wes Streeting office vandalised with windows smashed
A trans rights group – who call themselves Bash Back – has taken credit and shared a series of images to social media site BlueSky this afternoon which show the front of the Health Secretary's office. Spraypainted on one window are the words "child killer" while several other windows appear to also be smashed. The post (below) reads: 'We refuse to sit and watch as trans young people have their healthcare stripped from them. We refuse to allow Streeting to cover up their suicides. We refuse to endure the violence and humiliation. They will have to go through us.' Our statement on the actions at Wes Streeting's office last night. We refuse to sit and watch as trans young people have their healthcare stripped from them. We refuse to allow Streeting to cover up their suicides. We refuse to endure the violence and humiliation. They will have to go through us. [image or embed] — BASH BACK (@ 1 August 2025 at 13:39 A statement was also released which said it was in response to his "continued abuse of trans people in the medical system, and attempts to cover up the suicides of trans young people under his watch as Health Secretary". Streeting, meanwhile, condemned the vandalism and said it was "unfair" to his staff and an "attack on democracy". The NHS announced in March last year that children would no longer be prescribed puberty blockers at gender identity clinics. In May, following the publication of the Cass Review, the Conservative government introduced a ban with emergency legislation, preventing the prescription of the medication from European or private prescribers and restricting NHS provision to within clinical trials. The move was then made indefinite in December under the new Labour Government – with Streeting as Health Secretary. He said in April this year that he is 'genuinely sorry' for the 'fear and anxiety' felt by the transgender community following the ban. But he added: 'I would challenge anyone in my shoes to say, as a politician, that you would overrule clinical advice, especially when it comes to medicines that are challenged on the basis of whether they are safe or not for children. 'I know people disagree with that decision. I know it's caused real fear and anxiety in our community, and that certainly doesn't sit easy with me.' Commenting on the vandalism, Streeting said: "From day one as Ilford North's MP I've had an accessible and visible constituency office to serve my local community. "Repeated criminal damage is unfair to my staff and an attack on democracy.I will not be commenting further while there is a live police investigation." The Met Police have been approached for comment. The full statement from Bash Back reads: "On July 31st, a group of activists representing BASH BACK took action against Wes Streeting's office in Ilford, in response to his continued abuse of trans people in the medical system, and attempts to cover up the suicides of trans young people under his watch as Health Secretary. "In the months since the puberty blockers ban, we have seen huge backpedals in the healthcare rights afforded to trans people and young people especially - in an NHS system that was never kind to us in the first place. "Under Streeting's rule, GPs have been banned from conducting blood tests on trans patients accessing HRT, and trans people have been banned from accessing hospital wards that fit their gender, leading necessarily to poorer quality of care across the board. "Streeting, along with NHS England, the EHRC, and Hilary Cass, have paved the way for state-mandated conversion therapy, which has since led to the Department for Education's proposed introduction of a Section 28 style bill, preventing discussion of transness in the classroom. "It is clear now that Wes Streeting and the Labour government intend to erase trans people from public life, and will go out of their way to do so, no matter how many bodies lay in their path."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Nurses ‘essential' but we ‘won't miss' GPs: readers react to NHS strikes
Reaction to the threat of new strike action by nurses and GPs has sparked passionate debate among Independent readers, with many expressing sympathy for NHS workers but differing on whether walkouts are the right approach. The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) has warned its members feel 'deeply undervalued' and will ballot for industrial action after 91 per cent rejected the government's 3.6 per cent pay offer. GPs have also told minister Stephen Kinnock that the government must act on their demands to 'avoid a future dispute,' escalating tensions across the NHS. These fresh threats follow a five-day walkout by resident doctors over the government's refusal to grant a 29 per cent pay rise. Several commenters said nurses are 'doing the work of doctors' for far less pay, and pointed to years of below-inflation increases, rising living costs, and poor career progression as valid reasons for industrial action. Mental health professionals were singled out as particularly undervalued. Others criticised GPs for high salaries and part-time hours, arguing patient access has worsened even without strikes. Some readers said they 'won't miss' GPs if they walk out, though most agreed that nurses are essential. While a few readers questioned the effectiveness of striking, most called for urgent reform and investment to retain skilled staff and protect patient safety. Here's what you had to say: I won't miss them if they go on strike It's almost impossible to get an appointment with a GP, so I for one won't miss them if they go on strike. I accept I would miss nurses, as they are the medics I see if I ask for a GP appointment. My daughter is a mental health nurse — she has two degrees and is undervalued by the NHS and not valued by others in the medical profession. Pay is dreadful for nurses and even worse for mental health professionals. However, I don't believe striking will solve the problems of pay and conditions. The way to make the point is to vote with their feet and move abroad, into the private sector, or out of the medical profession. Some will say there are too many vacancies already — agreed — but even more will put on permanent pressure, whereas a strike causes only temporary disruption. HOSS Nurses doing the work of doctors Pay the nurses properly, as they now regularly carry out roles once in the purview of doctors. As has been said many times, it's difficult to see your GP face-to-face. Seeing a nurse practitioner is now the norm, and only if necessary are you referred to the GP. So why do GPs expect higher pay when nurses or trained practitioners are doing more? How many GPs work full-time, compared with part-timers? Chuckiethebrave We should all be out behind them I'm 100 per cent behind them. The money that's been taken out of the economy and given to shareholders — and not a word is said. We should all be out behind them. It wasn't long ago that people were banging pots and pans, supporting them — rightly so. The government is hell-bent on driving down wages and pensions. It's about time we stood up to this lot. LesMisrables The NHS is priceless It is very clear that most workers in the NHS feel undervalued and underpaid. For 14 years, a cynical Tory government has undermined their standard of living for ideological reasons — i.e. full privatisation. Our NHS is priceless. The electorate should kick out every government that doesn't fund it properly — because it's our lives at stake. Nomoneyinthebank All workers will strike eventually All workers will strike, eventually, if their salaries are reduced over a fifteen-year period and their standard of living is reduced. It is naïve to think otherwise. Cyclone8 If the NHS fails, get ready to pay I admit that it's difficult to get a doctor's appointment. We're having to wait longer for an ambulance and within A&E, together with there still being quite a hefty backlog on the waiting list — but it is coming down, albeit slowly. Despite the access issues, once you get NHS treatment, it remains exceptional. Since 2010, our doctors and nurses have effectively had a pay freeze, and, with inflation booming in recent years, our energy bills doubling, our groceries virtually doubling, and many nurses resorting to food banks, it's no wonder they're leaving for Australia in droves. I understand the current government were handed a skeletal economy, fractured public services, the highest taxes since WW2 and almost tripled national debt — but like any business, if you don't invest in your workers, they will leave. For those attacking unions, they are simply workers fighting for the equality, fair pay, working conditions and T&Cs that they deserve. Our NHS is a healthcare system to be proud of. It deserves proper investment — and that includes its workers. For the Brits who are against investing in our NHS workers — I hope you're rich enough to afford private healthcare. If the NHS fails, you'll need to start saving now for the hundreds of pounds it'll cost you each month in insurance. Amy Nothing for GPs I fully understand the nurses — they deserve better. My GP has notified me that they can't tell me the results of a scan for four weeks. That is just a telephone call. They deserve nothing, as far as I'm concerned. They can't handle what they have now, let alone more. Martyn Is £150,000 not enough? My local health centre has four full-time GPs. They have an average salary of over £150,000. Is that not enough? And it is still almost impossible to get an appointment. PeterLoud1 Shame on you NHS workers Shame on you NHS workers. Just as Starmer and Streeting were starting to sort out the NHS — I can confirm this, as my doctors' surgery appointments have got much, much better — and I've just had two cataract operations with a minimum wait of one week for the first eye and four weeks for the second. You got a good increase last year, and now you're starting to destroy the NHS. Jol Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day's top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click 'log in' or 'register' in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Former NHS HQ in Sheffield should be demolished due to safety risk
A former NHS headquarters should be demolished because it is at risk of collapse following two fires, a report has latest blaze at Fulwood House, the former head office of Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, resulted in catastrophic damage including "a full collapse of the roof and a severely compromised first floor".The report to the trust recommended full demolition of the building due to it being an "ongoing safety hazard".A meeting was told the house had been empty since 2023 after staff and services were relocated and had remained unoccupied since. The trust's board of directors was told that the buildings on the site were highly accessible, which had created "persistent challenges" in securing it from recent months there had been escalating incidents of anti-social behaviour, including break-ins, vandalism and fire-related activity, it report added: "These concerns have culminated in two significant fire events affecting the derelict buildings in late May and early July 2025, with the second incident severely damaging the original Fulwood House structure." Housing plans The meeting heard how an independent structural survey of the building had found it was "deemed at risk of imminent and progressive collapse."Board members were told the site had been earmarked for housing by a property developer and the trust was now looking at the most cost-effective way to demolish the would include an assessment of any asbestos present in the building, although perimeter air monitoring found no detectable airborne fibres, the report added: "The trust continues to monitor and adapt security arrangements and is actively reviewing alternative measures and providers to ensure effective risk management at the site." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
