Two people in hospital after bare-knuckle boxing event in Edinburgh
The arena's bosses thought it fell within the terms of its indoor sports entertainment licence, which allows 'ice hockey, ice skating, roller skating, boxing, and similar' activities.
But Edinburgh council officers disagreed, saying that what they termed both as 'bare-knuckle fighting' and 'bare-knuckle boxing' was not similar to the sports listed in the licence.
READ MORE: Council announces plans for 95 new homes in Highland village
They took the rare step of writing a letter to the city's Licensing Sub-Committee, asking for the term 'and similar' to be removed from the licence.
In a narrow 4-3 vote, councillors sided with officers, with the two Labour and two Conservative councillors voting to modify the licence.
At the event, at least two boxers were sent to hospital – one with a broken jaw – and fighters had a range of injuries, including an arm fracture and a torn ACL.
During Monday's meeting of the committee, licensing manager Catherine Scanlin said: 'Concerns were raised ahead of this event, and this was raised with the organiser.
'The event did go ahead on the fifth of July, however, it's the directorate's view that we want to avoid any ambiguity under what activities should be included in the licence.
'The inclusion of the words, 'and similar', which was used by the applicant to justify the operation of this event, we would ask that the 'and similar' be removed from the [licence].'
And Tom Veitch, Trading Standards manager, said: 'It was advertised as featuring 'blood spattering, bone shattering, blood spills, and carnage' in relation to this event.
'The concerns were such that both the council and the police considered the use of an immediate suspension.
'On this occasion, concerns were resolved, less than 24 hours before the event. There was, however, significant council officers and police officers required for it to go ahead.'
A police sergeant in the meeting said that Police Scotland had no contributions to make to the committee about the event.
Bare-knuckle boxing is legal in the UK, but has no official regulator. The event in July took place under the regulation of the International Sport Karate Association.
Caroline Loudon, a solicitor representing the ice arena, said: 'We're slightly surprised to get the notification to come to committee today.
'It's our position that there is no ambiguity here, and that it's not necessary to vary the terms of the licence at all.
'We don't feel that the application by the Directorate is necessary or proportionate in the circumstances of this case.'
Scott Neil, who is involved in the management of the arena, said that ice hockey alone could not sustain the site by itself year-round, causing it to look for events in the summer months.
He said that he felt that the event was safe, and said the sport's supporters would say it is safer than gloved boxing for a range of reasons, including the limits on the length of fights.
Conservative councillor Cuthbert Neil said: 'I think I'm happy to go with the recommendation of the report.
READ MORE: David Lammy told Foreign Office secondment scheme 'may be illegal'
'But just reflecting, and we've had quite a lengthy discussion about this, I think it has flagged up an issue that others have noticed as well.
'There is an ambiguity. So it does seem to me that that has to be resolved.
Liberal Democrat councillor Pauline Flannery advanced an alternative position, saying: 'I think boxing is similar.
'I don't think there is a difference, but it's what we want to do for the future that I'm hearing underneath. And I think that is a separate conversation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Nigel Farage blasted by Angela Rayner over plans to axe key law - 'failing women'
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner says women would be left at risk of revenge porn under Reform UK's plans to scrap new provisions in Online Safety Act Angela Rayner has warned Nigel Farage risks "failing a generation of young women" over plans to scrap new online safety laws. The Deputy Prime Minister said women would be left at risk of revenge porn - intimate image abuse - without Online Safety Act provisions. She also warned axing the new law would "open the floodgates of abuse". Under new rules online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Labour said it also protects women and makes the sharing of intimate images without consent a 'priority offence' - the most serious class of online crime. It comes after Mr READ MORE: Nigel Farage under pressure to distance himself from 'racist' Ant Middleton rant Ms Rayner is the latest senior Labour figure to clash with the ex-Ukip leader Mr Farage since Reform UK vowed to repeal the law. The right-wing party has said it would use a different means to protect kids online - but failed to explain how they would do this. Ms Rayner said: 'Intimate image abuse is a devastating crime and contributes to a vile misogynistic culture on social media that we know translates into physical spaces too. Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws." She added: "Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online." Earlier this week the Technology Secretary, Peter Kyle, also stood by his assault on the Reform UK leader after a huge row erupted when he said Mr Farage is on the side of predators like Jimmy Savile. He told The Mirror, the Reform UK leader 'should have regrets about the position he is taking and the hole he's digging himself into". He continued: 'Nigel Farage wants to overturn that legislation without saying one single word in practical terms how he will keep children safe so he should be deeply regretting the fact that he is causing anxiety to parents and just with his words, risking putting children in deep, deep harm's way." Reform's Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham responded, claiming: "Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety - she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship."
Powys County Times
3 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row
Nigel Farage and Reform UK risk 'failing a generation of young women' if they scrap online safety laws aimed at preventing revenge porn, Angela Rayner has said. The Deputy Prime Minister demanded Mr Farage explain how his party would keep young women safe when they use the internet, after Reform vowed to repeal the Online Safety Act. Her warning is the latest intervention in a row between senior Labour figures and Mr Farage's party over the Act. Under new rules introduced through the legislation at the end of July, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Reform has vowed to repeal the law and replace it with a different means of protecting children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Among their criticisms of the Act, Mr Farage and his colleagues have cited freedom of speech concerns and claimed the Act is an example of overreach by the Government. This prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the Act – like Mr Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the Act. Now, the Deputy Prime Minister has questioned how Mr Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse, also known as 'revenge porn', without the Online Safety Act's protections. Ms Rayner claimed: 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also said. Ministers have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free speech. In a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Mr Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the Government have outlined one. He also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and location. When Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. 'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. 'Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'
North Wales Chronicle
11 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row
The Deputy Prime Minister demanded Mr Farage explain how his party would keep young women safe when they use the internet, after Reform vowed to repeal the Online Safety Act. Her warning is the latest intervention in a row between senior Labour figures and Mr Farage's party over the Act. Under new rules introduced through the legislation at the end of July, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Reform has vowed to repeal the law and replace it with a different means of protecting children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Among their criticisms of the Act, Mr Farage and his colleagues have cited freedom of speech concerns and claimed the Act is an example of overreach by the Government. This prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the Act – like Mr Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the Act. Now, the Deputy Prime Minister has questioned how Mr Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse, also known as 'revenge porn', without the Online Safety Act's protections. Ms Rayner claimed: 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also said. Ministers have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free speech. In a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Mr Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the Government have outlined one. He also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and location. When Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. 'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. 'Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'
