logo
A sunscreen for Earth? Assess the risks first

A sunscreen for Earth? Assess the risks first

Mint24-04-2025
More than a dozen private companies around the world are looking to profit from extreme measures to combat global warming—filling the sky with sunlight-blocking particles, brightening clouds or changing the chemistry of the oceans. We live in precarious times when it's not hard to find the technology and money to change the Earth's climate. The problem is that nobody knows how to control the unintended consequences.
Some scientists who've studied and modelled the complexity of Earth's oceans and atmosphere say any 'geo-engineering' scheme big enough to affect the climate could put people at risk of dramatic changes in the weather, crop failures, damage to the ozone layer, international conflict and other irreversible problems.
Environmental lawyer David Bookbinder is more afraid of geo-engineering than he is of climate change. 'The consequences of geo-engineering could happen a lot faster and with much less warning," he said. 'And could provoke a really bad geopolitical crisis."
The world got an early warning about this Wild West situation in 2022 when a small startup called Make Sunsets caused a scandal by launching a small balloon-borne experiment over Mexico to spray sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere. Now, it's joined by richer, more serious players, including an Israel-based company called Stardust, which is researching a plan to dim the skies with a particle of undisclosed chemistry.
In theory, sulphur dioxide or similar chemicals can cool the planet by forming suspended particles of sulphuric acid that act to scatter sunlight. When I wrote about the Make Sunsets incident, the company's founder said he thought it could profit by selling carbon credits under the belief that its actions would offset emissions.
They won't. Such a particle release does nothing but mask the effect of the carbon build-up in the atmosphere. If those releases are abruptly stopped, the temperature could rise suddenly in what's been called 'termination shock."
Bookbinder said that presidents, governors or even private individuals might be authorized to make such decisions. 'Right now, anyone can… There are literally no rules." He warned that if a cooling scheme initiated in one country coincided with floods, droughts or crop failures in another, the affected country might retaliate without direct evidence that the geo-engineering caused the problem.
One justification for geo-engineering comes from the 2015 Paris Agreement, which included an imperative to keep warming below 1.5° Celsius. We've already surpassed that mark. Preventing us from reaching even more dangerous temperatures will require more than just stopping carbon emissions. We might need to find a way to pull carbon out of the atmosphere on a global scale.
That was the stated goal of California businessman Russ George back in 2012 when he released iron into the Pacific Ocean off the coast of British Columbia. The iron, in theory, would fertilize algae, which would absorb carbon. There was never any documented scientific evidence that it helped.
Now, several companies, such as Canadian startup Planetary Technologies and US startup Vesta, are beginning to dump chemicals into the oceans in an attempt to increase the pH level of the water. This should, in theory, trigger more carbon uptake from the atmosphere. Planetary Technologies has found a way to make money by selling carbon credits.
With for-profit organizations already releasing chemicals into the oceans, it's important for scientists with no financial stake in this industry to collect data, said geo-chemist Adam Subhas of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. The American Geophysical Union believes monetary gains should not be prioritized in small-scale research either.
There's a catch, according to Stanford's Jacobson. Small-scale experiments won't detect damage that might ensue if the projects were scaled up enough to actually affect global warming. In his view, we aren't coming close to realizing the world's potential to switch our energy needs to renewable resources. He convincingly argues that it makes no sense to resort to exotic and dangerous solutions when we haven't fully exploited what we know is safe and clean.
Right now, some of these companies have sunk millions of dollars in investor money, giving them incentives to convince the public and politicians that their particular brand of geo-engineering is necessary to save the world. What we need instead is more scientific data and some rules to protect us all from rash decisions and their unintended consequences.
©Bloomberg
The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering science.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These 15 US colleges will actually get you hired: Here's why LinkedIn ranked them above thousands of others
These 15 US colleges will actually get you hired: Here's why LinkedIn ranked them above thousands of others

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

These 15 US colleges will actually get you hired: Here's why LinkedIn ranked them above thousands of others

These 15 US universities lead in graduate employability, says LinkedIn. (AI Image) LinkedIn has released rankings identifying which American universities deliver the strongest career outcomes for graduates, with Princeton University claiming the top position amongst nearly 4,000 institutions analysed. The professional networking platform examined exclusive alumni data to determine which schools most effectively position students for employment success and rapid career advancement. The comprehensive study evaluated approximately 3,931 postsecondary institutions across the US, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. LinkedIn 's methodology focused on measurable career outcomes including job placement rates, networking opportunities, and leadership advancement speed amongst graduates from the top 50 institutions. Elite institutions dominate employment prospects Princeton University secured first place with undergraduate tuition fees of $65,210 and enrollment of 5,670 students. The New Jersey institution's graduates predominantly enter technology and internet sectors, financial services, and business consulting roles. Duke University followed in second position, charging $66,326 annually for its 6,525 undergraduates, with similar industry concentrations. The University of Pennsylvania claimed third place with $63,204 tuition costs and 10,500 undergraduate students. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Cornell University completed the top five rankings, with MIT focusing heavily on technology, manufacturing, and research services sectors. Limited SEC representation in rankings Only two Southeastern Conference universities achieved inclusion in LinkedIn's analysis. Vanderbilt University earned 13th position with annual tuition of $61,618 and 7,220 undergraduate students, whilst the University of Texas at Austin placed significantly lower at 46th position. Vanderbilt's graduates primarily pursue careers in technology and internet industries, business consulting services, and financial services. The Nashville-based institution represents one of the highest-performing universities in the southeastern region for career advancement metrics. Complete rankings reveal diverse institutional profiles Rank University Location Tuition UG enrollment Top industries 1 Princeton University Princeton, NJ 65210 5,670 Technology & Internet, Financial Services, Business Consulting & Services 2 Duke University Durham, NC 66326 6,525 Technology & Internet, Financial Services, Business Consulting & Services 3 University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 63204 10,500 Technology & Internet, Financial Services, Business Consulting & Services 4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 64310 4,535 Technology & Internet, Manufacturing, Research Services 5 Cornell University Ithaca, NY 48,010 (in-state); 71,266 (out-of-state) 16,130 Technology & Internet, Financial Services, Higher Education 6 Harvard University Cambridge, MA 59320 7,100 Financial Services, Business Consulting & Services, Technology & Internet 7 Babson College Babson Park, MA 58560 2,800+ Financial Services, Technology & Internet, Business Consulting & Services 8 University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 65025 8,925 Business Consulting & Services, Financial Services, Technology & Internet 9 Dartmouth College Hanover, NH 66123 4,450 Financial Services, Technology & Internet, Business Consulting & Services 10 Stanford University Stanford, CA 65127 7,555 Technology & Internet, Research Services, Financial Services 11 Northwestern University Evanston, IL 67158 8,000 Technology & Internet, Business Consulting & Services, Financial Markets 12 University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 21,123 (in-state); 58,014 (out-of-state) 17,900 Technology & Internet, Business Consulting & Services, Financial Services 13 Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 61618 7,220 Technology & Internet, Business Consulting & Services, Financial Services 14 Brown University Providence, RI 71700 7,270 Technology & Internet, Financial Services, Business Consulting & Services 15 Bentley University Waltham, MA 63390 4,350 Accounting, Financial Services, Technology & Internet Harvard University placed sixth with $59,320 tuition costs, whilst Babson College earned seventh position despite smaller enrollment of approximately 2,800 students. The University of Notre Dame, Dartmouth College, and Stanford University completed the top ten rankings. Northwestern University, University of Virginia, Vanderbilt University, Brown University, and Bentley University rounded out the top 15 positions. The University of Virginia offered the most affordable option for in-state students at $21,123 annually, compared to $58,014 for out-of-state applicants. Technology and internet industries dominated graduate employment across most institutions, followed by financial services and business consulting sectors. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Spirulina units open new doors for SC/ST women in Tamil Nadu
Spirulina units open new doors for SC/ST women in Tamil Nadu

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

Spirulina units open new doors for SC/ST women in Tamil Nadu

CHENNAI: In a bid to create alternative livelihood opportunities for women from SC/ST communities, the Tamil Nadu State Council for Science and Technology (TNSCST) has launched an initiative to promote Spirulina farming. The programme, implemented at Jamal Mohamed College, Tiruchy, focuses on providing technical skills and entrepreneurial training in Spirulina cultivation and value-added product development. As part of the initiative, permanent Spirulina cultivation and harvesting units have been set up on the college premises. Officials said the process has been standardised, from microscopic identification to harvesting, post-harvest handling, and production of Spirulina-based products, enabling sustainable and commercially scalable production, officials said. The initiative also incorporates Internet of Things (IoT) to monitor parameters such as pH levels, temperature, alkalinity, and humidity, thereby improving yield. 'We have set up harvesting units at a cost of Rs 25 lakh, and the use of IoT ensures quality of the yield. The college not only trains women but also buys back the yield, converts it into products, and markets them,' said S Vincent, member secretary, TNSCST. So far, three training programmes have been conducted, covering 82 rural women from SC/ST communities. These women were trained in all aspects of Spirulina farming, from setting up a unit to processing and marketing the final products. 'For many of these women, this training has marked the beginning of a new economic journey, offering them a sustainable livelihood option and a chance to become self-reliant,' Vincent added.

Growth hunters and margin hawks: The two blocs in India's IT industry
Growth hunters and margin hawks: The two blocs in India's IT industry

Mint

time3 hours ago

  • Mint

Growth hunters and margin hawks: The two blocs in India's IT industry

India's $283-billion information technology (IT) industry appears to be fragmenting into two distinct blocs, one prioritizing growth through large deal wins and the other pursuing profitability at a time when artificial intelligence (AI)-led automation and global uncertainty have made clients both demanding and cautious. Two large IT services firms—HCL Technologies Ltd (HCLTech) and Wipro Ltd—and at least two smaller peers—Hexaware Technologies Ltd and Mphasis Ltd—are concentrating on growth at the cost of profitability, underscoring the large deal wins by these companies, analysts said. Last month, HCLTech lowered its full-year operating margin target to 17-18% from its earlier stated 18-19%. Although the management of the country's third-largest IT services firm attributed it to restructuring costs, many analysts believe it reflects the Noida-based company's flexibility in winning more business. 'One potential conclusion that the Street may draw is that HCLTech is trading off margins for revenue growth. This perception is reinforced by the downward revision of its Ebit (earnings before interest and taxes) margin guidance band—from 19-20% in FY2022 to 17-18% for FY2026, marking the second cut in four years," said Kotak Institutional Equities analysts Kawaljeet Saluja, Sathishkumar S., and Vamshi Krishna, in a note dated 14 July. Similarly, Bengaluru-based Wipro, which has secured about $8 billion of large deals under chief executive Srini Palia's one-year stint, has stated that growth remains a priority. "For now, our number one priority would be growth," said Aparna Iyer, chief financial officer of Wipro, during the company's post-earnings call on 17 July. The management attributed this to upfront investments in its deal wins. 'But looking forward, our focus is going to be conversion of some of these mega deal wins that we have had, large deal wins that we have had. And some of these large deal wins will come with upfront investment and lower margins, right? So, there are going to be pressures that are going to get created," said Iyer, during the post-earnings analyst call. HCLTech and Wipro's approach is in contrast to Tata Consultancy Services Ltd (TCS), which continues to emphasise that it remains committed to its aspirational profitability band of 26-28% in the long term. TCS ended with 24.3% operating profit margin last year. On 28 July, TCS also announced that it would be cutting 2% of its workforce, or about 12,200 employees, as part of various 'strategic initiatives' being undertaken by the company. This exercise, the country's largest private employer said, was aimed at its middle and senior management. At any IT outsourcer, employees at middle and senior levels come with fatter paychecks, pressuring the company's profitability. According to a Mint report on 28 July, TCS's layoff decision was an attempt by the Mumbai-based company to mitigate the impact of AI on operating margins. Clients are demanding up to 30% price discounts on deals, as AI is reducing cost. India's fifth-largest IT firm Tech Mahindra also laid out a plan to boost operating margins when it announced its three-year roadmap in April last year. As part of this plan, the company is looking at increasing its operating margins to 15% by FY27. The Pune-based IT outsourcer is also not considering any acquisition and is embarking on cost-saving initiatives, which help reduce expenses by $250 million every year. It ended last year with operating margins of 9.7%. The country's second-largest outsourcer Infosys Ltd is trying to balance both revenue growth and margins, without sacrificing either. Phil Fersht, chief executive of HFS Research, said that larger IT outsourcers are more likely to protect margins because of shareholder pressure than their smaller peers, which are willing to pay the price for growth because new logos and deals have the ability to change their market position. 'The large services firms like TCS, Infosys and Tech Mahindra, are doubling down on protecting margins because that's their contract with investors— consistent profitability over volatility. Many of the midcaps such as Coforge and Persistent, are signalling they'll sacrifice some near-term margin to grab market share and win large deals," said Fersht. TCS, Infosys, HCLTech, Wipro and Tech Mahindra ended last year with revenues of $30.18 billion, $19.28 billion, $13.84 billion, $10.51 billion, and $6.26 billion, respectively. While TCS, Infosys, and HCLTech reported a revenue increase of 3.78%, 3.85%, and 4.3%, respectively, Wipro and Tech Mahindra's revenue declined by 2.7% and 0.2%, respectively. Smaller IT firms such as Mphasis and Hexaware are unambiguously focussed on winning more deals now in order to secure their long-term growth. 'The prioritization for growth by holding margins, that's the kind of the North Star that we're still following," said Nitin Rakesh, chief executive of Mphasis, during the company's post-earnings call with analysts on 25 July. Mphasis, the country's eighth-largest IT firm, reported $1.68 billion in revenue last year, up 4.43%. Its operating margins jumped 20 basis points last year to 15.3%. Hexaware has adopted a similar approach. '... will some of these deals require some sacrifice in margins? If that is what it takes, we will happily do so. We're not quite at that point yet, but if that's what it comes to, we'll happily do so," said Ramakarthikeyan Srikrishna, chief executive officer of Hexaware, during the company's post-earnings conference call on 25 July. The tenth-largest software firm Hexaware Technologies ended last year with $1.43 billion in revenue, up 13.7%. Its margins jumped 100 basis points to 13.6% in this time. The emergence of two blocs in the Indian IT sector comes as companies battle uncertain macroeconomic conditions subduing demand, stiff competition, AI leading to restructuring, and dwindling margins. 'IT service providers are between a rock and a hard place: go after growth and compromise margins, or the other way around," said Thomas Reuner, principal analyst at Pierre Audoin Consultants. 'On the one hand, the market recovery was pushed out yet again. On the other hand, reflecting on the geopolitical headwinds, customer requirements demand tangible outcomes, acceleration of their AI journey, and cost reduction. The answer to those requirements is not a more nuanced account mining to be able to react selectively, but finding new models and answers to respond to all of them," said Reuner. Fersht said AI was responsible for the two fronts in the country's IT industry. 'AI is redrawing the rules, and the future is unsettled. That's why we're seeing a clear split, with some (IT) services firms gunning for growth, chasing large AI-led transformation deals even at the cost of margins, while others are protecting profitability at all costs. This divergence will only widen as clients demand more AI-driven value, and firms are forced to show whether they are builders of future growth or guardians of current margins," said Fersht.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store