Bring down age of consent from 18 to 16 yrs, SC told
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Supreme Court has been urged by amicus curiae and senior advocate Indira Jaising to read down the statutory age of consent from 18 to 16 years.Jaising, who is assisting the top court in "Nipun Saxena v. Union of India" case, has filled her written submissions challenging the blanket criminalisation of sexual activity involving adolescents aged 16 to 18 under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act ( POCSO ), 2012 and Section 375 of IPC.She has argued the current law criminalises consensual romantic relationships among adolescents and violates their constitutional rights.Jaising said the legal framework wrongly equates consensual relationships between adolescents with abuse, ignoring their autonomy, maturity, and capacity to consent."There is no rational reason or empirical data to justify the increase in the age of consent from 16 to 18 years," Jaising submitted, noting that the age had remained at 16 for over 70 years until it was raised by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.She pointed out the increase came without debate and went against the Justice Verma Committee 's recommendation to retain 16 as the age of consent.The amicus curiae submitted adolescents today attain puberty earlier and are capable of forming romantic and sexual relationships of their choice.Scientific and social data, including findings from the National Family Health Survey, indicate sexual activity among teenagers is not uncommon, she said.Jaising cited a 180 per cent rise in prosecutions under POCSO involving minors aged 16-18 between 2017 and 2021."Most complaints are filed by parents, often against the girl's will, in cases involving inter-caste or inter-faith relationships," she said, cautioning criminalising consensual sex "forces young couples into hiding, marriage or legal trouble, instead of encouraging open dialogue and education".To address this, she urged the court to read into the law a "close-in-age" exception, which would exempt consensual sexual acts between adolescents aged 16 to 18 from prosecution under POCSO and IPC."Criminalising sex between teenagers is arbitrary, unconstitutional, and against the best interests of children," she said.The senior lawyer referred to international norms and Indian jurisprudence to argue that legal capacity is not strictly age-bound.Quoting the UK's Gillick ruling and India's own Puttaswamy privacy judgment, she said "autonomy in decision-making is central to the right to privacy" and must extend to adolescents capable of informed sexual choices.The submission also pointed to trends in various high courts, including Bombay, Madras, and Meghalaya, where judges have expressed disapproval over the automatic prosecution of adolescent boys under POCSO.These courts have stressed not all sexual acts involving minors are coercive, and the law should distinguish between abuse and consensual relationships.Jaising concluded urging the top court to declare consensual sex between adolescents aged between 16 and 18 was not a form of abuse and must be excluded from the purview of POCSO and rape laws.She called for a review of the mandatory reporting obligations under Section 19 of POCSO, which deter adolescents from seeking safe medical care. Sexual autonomy is part of human dignity," she said, "and denying adolescents the ability to make informed choices about their own bodies was a violation of Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
RTI bench dismisses 7,651 appeals, warns against misusing the law
Intro: RTI Act should not be used as a tool of oppression or hold the government to ransom, says an order of the Information Commission RTI bench dismisses 7,651 appeals, warns against misusing the law MUMBAI: Calling them a burden on the government administration and a misuse of the law, the Sambhaji Nagar bench of the Information Commission has dismissed 7,651 appeals filed by 18 Right To Information (RTI) activists over the last 15 months. In a recent order, the commission also called the appeals filed by one applicant in particular a misuse of the RTI Act. In doing so, the order stated, the applicant was holding government offices to ransom, potentially bringing work in these offices to a standstill. In its order passed on July 14 and uploaded on the commission's portal this week, Prakash Indalkar, state information commissioner of the Sambhaji Nagar bench of the commission, dismissed 81 appeals filed by RTI activist Janak Gaikwad. Of the bulk appeals dismissed since April 2024, filed by 18 applicants, 3,660 appeals filed by Keshavraje Nimbalkar were dismissed in June and December 2024; and 1,144 second appeals filed by activist Sharad Dabhade were dismissed in April and September 2024. In a one-off order, Indalkar cited two verdicts by the Supreme Court and Chief Information Commission of India. He pointed to an August 2011 verdict of the apex court, which had stated, 'The act should not … be converted into a tool of oppression and intimidation, and not turn into a scenario where 75% of the government staff is engaged in 75% of their time in collecting RTI information instead of discharging their duty…' the order states. The July 14 order also cited a verdict delivered by then central information commissioner, Shailesh Gandhi, in 2012, where he had said that right to information is a fundamental right of citizens and it should not be used to fulfill the demands of one individual. Gandhi had also said that repeated applications and appeals was a waste of public resources. Indalkar also said that bulk appeals do not serve any public interest but vested individual interests. 'Because of the bulk applications by specific applicants, significant time of government officers and personnel is wasted. This has posed the danger of government staff spending most of their precious time collecting RTI information instead of serving the people,' the order stated. An official from the Information Commission said that a large number of appeals were filed against officers and teachers in aided and government schools, and government departments such as the forest and rural development departments. 'In some cases, the appeals were filed to blackmail government servants,' the official said.
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Law on anvil for blue economy, government tells Lok Sabha
The Centre is taking a systematic approach towards a legislative framework for implementation of the Blue Economy policy, the ministry of earth sciences informed the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. Law on anvil for blue economy, government tells Lok Sabha The draft national policy on blue economy, covering seven thematic areas including ocean governance and marine spatial planning, was placed in the public domain in February 2021 and revised in July 2022 after inter-ministerial and stakeholder consultations, the response said adding that the policy is aiming to harness ocean resources sustainably for economic growth while protecting marine ecosystems ensuring national security and it also provides the foundational basis for future legislation, the ministry said in response to a query, raised by MP Brijmohan Agrawal, on the major legislative steps taken by the government for Blue Economy. The deep ocean mission is a subset of the broader blue economy concept which is focused on technological development for exploring deep ocean resources, promoting climate change advisory services, conservation of deep-sea biodiversity, research on ocean biology, and harnessing energy and freshwater from the ocean. 'The current focus is on strengthening the existing environmental legal framework through targeted reforms, including amendments to existing laws and empowering the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change's umbrella legislation the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. These reforms aim to introduce specific rules to address critical challenges such as e-waste (management), plastics waste management, batteries waste management, and end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) scrapping,' said Jitendra Singh, minister of state for earth sciences. He was responding to questions by BJP MP, Brijmohan Agrawal on the 1. major legislative steps taken by the Government for the Blue Economy district from policy-based approaches such as the Deep Ocean Mission along with the draft legislation; 2. inter-ministerial consultations or projected timelines for a Blue Economy Law; 3. existing mechanism which ensures sector-specific, legally binding environmental among others. The various sectors in the blue economy are governed by different laws which include: 1. Coastal and Marine Ecosystems governed by Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification, 2019 and Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, 2. Fisheries and Aquaculture governed by Marine Fishing Regulation Acts (State-specific); National Policy on Marine Fisheries, 2017; 3. Shipping and Ports & Security under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958; Major Port Authorities Act, 2021; International Maritime Conventions (e.g., MARPOL) (via Merchant Shipping Act); Maritime Zones Act, 1976; Recycling of Ships Act, 2019 and Island Vessels Act, 2021, 3. Oil, Gas & Deep-Sea Mining under Oilfields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 and Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002, 4. Tourism and Recreation under Environment (Protection) Act & CRZ Rules and Biological Diversity Act, 2002 and 5. Marine Biotechnology & Bioprospecting under Biological Diversity Act, 2002. The regulatory gaps and overlaps are being addressed through the PARIVESH portal of Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change which acts as a single window for environmental, forest, wildlife, and coastal regulation zone clearances and the National Sagarmala Apex Committee and PM Gatishakti portal also aid in integrated planning, Singh said. Further, there are dedicated laws and guidelines for investment, accountability, and liability including 100% FDI is permitted via the automatic route in sectors like sea-ports and aquaculture. Offshore mineral block auctions are open to foreign bidders with specified conditions. The Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, adopts international liability conventions and mandates compulsory insurance for pollution damage. Offshore safety is governed by the Oil Mines Regulations, 2017, and a draft Offshore Safety Directive. The 'Harit Sagar' Green Port Guidelines (2023) mandate ESG reporting for terminal operators. The Deep Ocean Mission requires Environmental and Social Due Diligence for its projects. Maritime Zones Act, 1976 along with updated rules like the Offshore Wind Energy Lease Rules, 2023, provides the legal framework for leasing and regulating offshore energy and mineral projects, the response said.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Delhi government considers relocating dangerous stray dogs to shelter homes
New Delhi: Delhi govt is exploring the possibility of relocating dangerous street dogs to shelters, a move that would require a change in existing laws. At present, the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, mandate that stray dogs be sterilised, vaccinated and returned to their original location, thus prohibiting their relocation. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The ABC Rules were framed under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, and the Supreme Court has reinforced the principle that street canines should not be relocated. Sources said that a high-level meeting held at Delhi Secretariat, where chief minister Rekha Gupta and ministers Kapil Mishra and Ashish Sood were present, discussed how the number of dog bite cases was rising in the city. There was a suggestion that the state govt should seek the central govt's help for changes in the ABC Rules and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, so that canines deemed behaviourally dangerous can be sent to shelters and monitored under expert supervision. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi is to build these shelters. Govt sources informed that govt is examining legal options too to empower local bodies to relocate the dogs that habitually bit people in shelter homes where they would be examined by health experts. "After they show improvement under the provision of experts, they could be sent back to their original locations," one source said. Sources added that Gupta directed officials to treat the matter not merely as an administrative task but as a social responsibility. She also suggested that there was a need for a comprehensive and humane approach to address the crisis. "CM wanted animal lovers, experts and social organisations to be consulted and their suggestions incorporated in the policymaking," the source said. Officials said that Delhi govt was also in the process of creating a platform to bring together the residents as well as those who cared for these animals in an effort to create a long-term solution in which neither people nor animals were discomforted. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This year, 49 cases of rabies have been reported in the capital so far, while over 65,000 street dogs have been sterilised and vaccinated over a six-month period, according to official MCD data. The rabies cases were recorded at the Maharishi Valmiki Infectious Diseases Hospital between Jan and July this year. In the first six months of the year, 35,198 animal bite incidents were reported across the capital. MCD's standing committee also formed a subcommittee earlier this month to focus exclusively on street dog management. The panel held its first meeting on Thursday, during which it decided to re-engage the NGOs currently involved in the sterilisation programme and enlist more organisations capable of carrying out the same task. An intensive month-long sterilisation drive is also being planned, according to officials. These latest measures come amid growing public fear over frequent dog bite incidents in various localities in the city. Currently, 20 dog sterilisation centres, managed by NGOs, are operating. These centres carry out surgical sterilisation and administer anti-rabies vaccinations before releasing the dogs back in their original locations.
