logo
Sir Keir Starmer vows to overcome sceptical public on ‘harnessing power' of AI

Sir Keir Starmer vows to overcome sceptical public on ‘harnessing power' of AI

Yahooa day ago

The UK must persuade a 'sceptical' public that artificial intelligence (AI) can improve millions of lives and transform the way business and Whitehall works, Sir Keir Starmer said.
The Prime Minister said AI would cut through planning red tape to speed up housebuilding and promised £1 billion of funding to increase the UK's compute power.
Sir Keir acknowledged people's concern about the rapid rise of AI technology and the risk to their jobs but stressed the benefits it would have on the delivery of public services, automating bureaucracy and allowing staff such as social workers and nurses to be 'more human'.
In a speech at London Tech Week, Sir Keir said: 'Some people out there are sceptical.
'They do worry about AI taking their job.'
Even businesses were worried about the 'relentless' pace of change, he said as he stressed the need for the Government and the tech sector to work in partnership.
'When it comes to harnessing the power of this technology, I believe that the way we work through this together is critical and that means a partnership,' he said.
The Prime Minister told the audience of business chiefs and tech experts: 'We are leaning into this.
'We are excited about the opportunity that this could have, will have on the lives of millions of people and making their lives better.'
He said the Government was 'committing an extra £1 billion of funding to scale up our compute power by a factor of 20'.
That would mean that 'in this global race, we can be an AI maker and not an AI taker'.
It will also help support the transformation of public services, he said, pointing to the new work on planning.
The Prime Minister announced the launch of Extract, an AI assistant for planning officers and local councils, developed by government with support from Google.
It will help councils convert decades-old, handwritten planning documents and maps into data in minutes, and will power new types of software to slash the 250,000 estimated hours spent by planning officers each year manually checking the paperwork.
Sir Keir said: 'For too long, our outdated planning system has held back our country, slowing down the development of vital infrastructure and making it harder to get the homes we need built.'
One million students will be given access to learning resources to start equipping them for 'the tech careers of the future' as part of the Government's £187 million TechFirst scheme, Downing Street said.
Sir Keir said: 'I think that training young people earlier on in AI and tech means that they will obviously be better skilled as they come into work but also they will be much better at it than us.
'I've got a 16-year-old boy and a 14-year-old girl and they already understand AI and tech in a way which is really difficult to have even conceived of a decade ago.'
Meanwhile, staff at firms across the country will be trained to 'use and interact' with chatbots and large language models as part of a plan backed by Google and Microsoft to train 7.5 million workers in AI skills by 2030.
Jensen Huang, chief executive of tech giant Nvidia said the UK was in a 'goldilocks' zone because of its combination of academic expertise and finance, but had been held back by a lack of infrastructure for AI.
Sharing a platform with the Prime Minister, he said: 'The UK has one of the richest AI communities anywhere on the planet: the deepest thinkers, the best universities, Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial College, amazing start-ups.'
It was behind only the US and China in venture capital investment, he added.
'The ecosystem is really perfect for take-off, it's just missing one thing: it is surprising, this is the largest AI ecosystem in the world without its own infrastructure.'
That was why the Prime Minister's £1 billion pledge on compute power was 'such a big deal', he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Google Shareholder is Suing the Company Over the TikTok Ban
A Google Shareholder is Suing the Company Over the TikTok Ban

WIRED

time40 minutes ago

  • WIRED

A Google Shareholder is Suing the Company Over the TikTok Ban

Jun 10, 2025 1:34 PM Silicon Valley software engineer Tony Tan says his battle against Google and the Trump administration is about upholding the rule of law. The TikTok app page in the Google Play Store. Photograph:The Trump administration is still refusing to enforce a federal ban on TikTok, and Silicon Valley software engineer Tony Tan is fed up. Last month, Tan sued the US Department of Justice for allegedly failing to turn over records about why it has not taken action against Google and Apple, which Tan believes are violating the law by continuing to host TikTok on their respective app stores. Tan is now stepping up his fight against what he sees as a worrying and potentially costly trend away from respecting the American legal system. On Tuesday, he filed a shareholder lawsuit in Delaware state court against Google's parent organization Alphabet. Tan alleges the company wrongfully denied a request he made for internal documents about Google's decision to risk billions of dollars in fines by not complying with the TikTok ban. 'The biggest thing that motivates me here is I've been frustrated by the volume of recent attacks on our legal system,' says Tan, who is in his late 20s and owns a small number of Alphabet shares directly and through investment funds. 'If Google is outright breaking the law, and they don't have to acknowledge it, they very much are above the law, and that doesn't seem right to me.' Google declined to comment on the lawsuit. But in a letter to Tan's attorneys seen by WIRED, a lawyer representing Google questioned whether the tech giant was really violating the TikTok ban, calling the idea an 'unsupported legal conclusion.' Tan's records request 'appears simply to be wondering if Alphabet is complying with applicable laws,' Doru Gavril, a partner at the firm Freshfields, wrote in March. 'Curiosity alone is not a basis for a books and records inspection demand.' TikTok's future in the United States has been under threat for years. President Donald Trump tried banning the app during his first term in 2020, arguing it posed a risk to national security because it was run by ByteDance, a Chinese tech company. After years of congressional debate and a legal battle that made it up to the Supreme Court, a law banning companies such as Apple and Google from helping to distribute TikTok and other Chinese apps in the US went into effect this past January. TikTok then disappeared from app stores for about half a day, until Trump issued an executive order pausing enforcement of the law and giving ByteDance time to reach a deal to reduce its ownership stake in TikTok's US operation. In the months since, Trump has used the popular video platform as a bargaining chip in high-stakes trade negotiations with China. Legal experts and some lawmakers have questioned the legality of Trump's order, which expires next Thursday. But there haven't been any known legal challenges to it, and the president has indicated that he will extend the pause again as discussions with Beijing continue. Tan, who declined to say whether he personally supports the TikTok ban, believes the central issue is enforcement. 'There is a federal law that says the TikTok app should not be on your store, and I can see TikTok is on the app store,' he says of Google. 'Congress passed the law, and the Supreme Court upheld it. It's not debatable.' In his view, Google is openly ignoring the law, and he wants to understand the legal basis for that decision, as well as the extent to which shareholders should be worried about Google's potential liability. 'I felt I should join the someones who are doing something,' Tan says. Books and Records Tan has a history of using records requests and litigation to investigate and combat what he views as injustices. In 2019, he sued a New Hampshire hotel for allegedly violating anti-discrimination laws by barring bookings from adults under 21 years old. Tan says he dropped the case after the hotel amended its policy. This February, Tan filed a public records request with the US Department of Justice seeking copies of letters that Attorney General Pam Bondi reportedly sent to companies such as Google and Apple advising them that they would not be held liable for continuing to distribute TikTok. After the attorney general's office claimed it did not have records matching Tan's request, he took the Department of Justice to court. (The New York Times has filed a similar lawsuit.) In a court filing, the Justice Department denied any wrongdoing. In March, Tan requested minutes and materials from meetings of Alphabet's board of directors related to the TikTok ban, including the same reported letter from the attorney general. Tan made his request under a law in Delaware, where Alphabet is incorporated, that allows shareholders acting in 'good faith' to inspect 'books and records' when investigating suspected mismanagement. Through a series of exchanges between Alphabet's attorneys and his, Tan learned that the company possessed about half a dozen relevant documents, but that it wouldn't turn them over unless ordered to do so by a court. 'The board minutes will show whether or not the board discussed the risks associated with making the TikTok application available through Google Play and, if so, whether and how they assessed the risk of liability,' Tan's lawsuit filed on Tuesday states. 'The board minutes will also show whether the board considered whether making TikTok available through Google Play constituted a positive violation of federal law.' Companies that violate the TikTok ban by continuing to distribute the app can face penalties of up to $5,000 per user. Tan's lawsuit alleges that Google should not be relying on Trump's executive order and Bondi's letter alone to shield them from legal risks, and that the tech giant could be held liable by a future president—or even by Trump, who is known to frequently change his mind. Gavril, the attorney representing Google, contended in one exchange with the attorneys representing Tan that 'a lot of planets would have to align for that hypothetical harm to become reality. Some would argue that a concerned shareholder should wait for there to be an actual harm before progressing to investigate how it came to be.' Alphabet and Apple have yet to specifically mention the TikTok law in shareholder disclosures listing risks to their businesses. Akamai, which provides content hosting services to TikTok, wrote in a February disclosure that the attorney general determined the company could continue serving the app 'without incurring any legal liability,' but added 'there is no assurance that we will not be exposed to liability' in the future. Tan says that many incidents under Trump 2.0 this year have left him concerned about the rule of law, the foundational democratic principle that everyone should be treated the same way by the government. But the TikTok situation was one he felt capable of investigating, and as a shareholder of tech companies such as Alphabet, he felt a duty to try to protect his own bottom line. 'If these companies are openly willing to break the law, will others be pressured into breaking the law because it's politically convenient?' he says. 'Will shareholders be left holding the bag when the legal liability comes due?' Tan says his work in tech has nothing to do with TikTok or Google, but in general, he doesn't want the industry he is part of a trend toward what he considers flagrant lawbreaking. He claims no one—not even friends and family—has encouraged him to pursue his lawsuits over the TikTok ban. His attorneys at Berger McDermott have represented Meta in the past, but the social media company has no hand in his cases, he says. Tan adds he is paying standard rates for his legal representation. 'It's been expensive,' he says, 'and it's going to be more expensive.' Tan explains that he prioritized challenging Google over other companies, including California-incorporated Apple, partly because of the Delaware law allowing him to seek internal records. In recent years, shareholders have filed an increasing number of these kinds of requests, with the hope of using the obtained records as the basis for shareholder resolutions or lawsuits against executives and board members. Most requests are resolved informally, but some end up in court. In March, Delaware enacted a law aimed at limiting the records companies must turn over, which could hamper Tan's request. Lawmakers in the state acknowledged they were under pressure to stop the flight of companies like Tesla to jurisdictions with more business-friendly statutes. Roy Shapira, a professor of law at Reichman University who studies corporate governance in Delaware, says that shareholders trying to hold a company accountable for intentionally violating the law may now find it even more difficult 'to show what directors knew and when they knew it.'

OpenAI Enlists Google Cloud for Computing Capacity in Partnership of AI Rivals, Report Says
OpenAI Enlists Google Cloud for Computing Capacity in Partnership of AI Rivals, Report Says

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

OpenAI Enlists Google Cloud for Computing Capacity in Partnership of AI Rivals, Report Says

OpenAI has finalized a deal with Google to secure more computing capacity to train its AI models, Reuters reported. The deal comes despite competition between the companies' ChatGPT and Gemini large language models. Google selling capacity to OpenAI potentially reduces its own capacity even as overall cloud demand has outpaced the company's supply, Google's CFO said in has reportedly turned to one of its biggest competitors in the AI arms race to support the training of its ChatGPT models. The ChatGPT developer has finalized a deal to utilize Alphabet's (GOOGL) Google cloud services to meet its increasing need for computing capacity, Reuters reported. The agreement would effectively provide OpenAI with more chips for the development of ChatGPT. The agreement comes despite fierce competition between ChatGPT and Google's Gemini large language model. Last month, Google introduced an 'AI Mode' search feature that lets users ask questions in conversation with Gemini, a move that addresses the popularity of LLMs in how people get their information. Google selling capacity to OpenAI potentially reduces its own even as cloud demand has outpaced the company's supply, Alphabet CFO Anat Ashkenazi said in April. OpenAI previously relied exclusively on its partnership with Microsoft (MSFT) for its computing capacity, but the companies in January moved to a mode where Microsoft instead has right of first refusal on new OpenAI compute. Microsoft declined to comment on the Reuters report. OpenAI and Google did not immediately respond to Investopedia requests for comment. Shares of Alphabet gained 2% in recent trading. The stock has fallen about 5% in 2025. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Why J. M. Smucker (SJM) Stock Is Trading Lower Today
Why J. M. Smucker (SJM) Stock Is Trading Lower Today

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why J. M. Smucker (SJM) Stock Is Trading Lower Today

Shares of packaged foods company J.M Smucker (NYSE:SJM) fell 14.3% in the afternoon session after the company reported underwhelming first-quarter 2025 results: its full-year EPS guidance missed, and its revenue fell short of Wall Street's estimates. The weak top line reflected soft demand for dog snacks, sweet baked goods, fruit spreads and lower contract manufacturing sales related to the divested pet food brands. On the other hand, J. M. Smucker beat analysts' gross margin expectations and its EPS and EBITDA outperformed. Full-year 2026 guidance also called for a 3% growth at the midpoint, which is a deceleration from the 7% growth in the previous year. Overall, this was a weaker quarter. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy J. M. Smucker? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. J. M. Smucker's shares are not very volatile and have only had 2 moves greater than 5% over the last year. Moves this big are rare for J. M. Smucker and indicate this news significantly impacted the market's perception of the business. J. M. Smucker is down 15.1% since the beginning of the year, and at $94.58 per share, it is trading 22.7% below its 52-week high of $122.40 from August 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of J. M. Smucker's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $869.74. Today's young investors likely haven't read the timeless lessons in Gorilla Game: Picking Winners In High Technology because it was written more than 20 years ago when Microsoft and Apple were first establishing their supremacy. But if we apply the same principles, then enterprise software stocks leveraging their own generative AI capabilities may well be the Gorillas of the future. So, in that spirit, we are excited to present our Special Free Report on a profitable, fast-growing enterprise software stock that is already riding the automation wave and looking to catch the generative AI next. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store