Kashmiri man dies in Delhi hospital: Family alleges police torture, cops deny
Speaking to The Indian Express, his 24-year-old brother Faizan alleged: 'On May 28, Zubair texted us, saying he had been beaten up by the police. The police said that he banged his head on the wall. Then why is there no injury?'
Police, however, maintained that Zubair was found injured in Southeast Delhi's Lajpat Nagar on May 29. They said he was taken to Safdarjung Hospital in a PCR van and died on June 2. Police also said Zubair was suffering from migraine-related issues and that the injuries he sustained were self-inflicted.
DCP (Southeast) Hemant Tiwari said the allegations of police beating up the deceased are false. 'On May 28, around 2 pm, the deceased got a call from his family. He then had a chat with his siblings, where he claimed that he was beaten by the police. On May 29, he checked out of the hotel at 11 am, and, around 6 pm, police got a PCR call from the Lajpat Nagar 2 area. CCTV footage of the time between May 28, when he claimed to be beaten, and May 29, when we got the PCR call, shows that he was roaming around in the Lajpat Nagar area and looked physically healthy,' he said.
He added, 'The deceased was never taken to the police station. He was taken to the hospital from the spot after a PCR call… in front of 50-60 people.'
Zubair was the only earning person in his four-member family, comprising his brother, sister, and mother.
Speaking to the media last week, PDP's Iltija Mufti said, '… What was his fault? That he is Kashmiri? Is being Kashmiri a crime?… And where is the NC government? They are absolutely silent on this. They are not able to protect the youth of Kashmir. They should come and meet the family. Their MLAs haven't been elected to inaugurate showrooms and collect ribbons.'
'I request that the government give the family long-term relief. Not just cash relief, give them government jobs,' she added.
Farooq also visited the family last Friday and offered condolence prayers with them. The X handle of the Office of Mirwaiz-e-Kashmir said, '… Mirwaiz assured the family that he stands with them and the people in their pursuit of justice for Zubair.'
Congress's Pawan Khera also raised questions. In a post on X, he wrote: 'In the capital city, a young Kashmiri dies under mysterious circumstances and not a word of it gets discussed in mainstream media? If you don't question the authorities, obviously the authorities won't give you answers. @DelhiPolice needs to respond to questions surrounding the death of Zubair Ahmad Bhat.'
According to Zubair's sister, Iqra, he left for Delhi last Tuesday. 'He worked with Kashmir Arts — he was a salesman. He would work in Bangladesh during the winters and in Kashmir during the summers. When he reached Delhi, he called and told us that he had booked a hotel in Lajpat Nagar.'
His family said Zubair was supposed to pick up his fiancée, a Bangladeshi national, from the airport. They were to be married in August.
But when Faizan called his brother on the evening of May 29, he said a policeman answered and said Zubair was sick. 'He said he has been admitted to Safdarjung Hospital. Our family friend from Bangladesh, whom Zubair was supposed to pick up from the airport, rushed to the hospital,' he said.
On May 30, Faizan and his family reached the hospital from Srinagar. On Monday, Zubair succumbed to his injuries.
The family took the body to Ali Kadal in Srinagar for the last rites.
The post-mortem report from Safdarjung Hospital, seen by The Indian Express, lists the cause of death as septicaemia and related complications.
It says the patients had a history of high fever, HCV (Hepatitis C virus) with AFI (Acute Febrile Illness) and AMS (Altered Mental Status). Upon arrival at the hospital, the report states, he was diagnosed with septic encephalitis with pneumonitis with sepsis with MODS (multiple organ dysfunction syndrome).
Police said further investigation is underway.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
8 hours ago
- The Print
Protests erupt in Chennai over SC order on removal of street dogs in Delhi-NCR
Police said the demonstrations in Delhi were organised despite prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), formerly Section 144 of the CrPC, which is currently in force as part of security measures ahead of Independence Day. According to officials, the protests turned unruly when police attempted to disperse the demonstrators, leading to clashes at some sites. The protests in Chennai came days after similar demonstrations in the national capital. On Friday, Delhi Police registered four FIRs in connection with protests held by dog lovers without prior permission on August 11 and 12 in the New Delhi district. Chennai: Animal lovers and rights activists staged a protest in Chennai on Sunday against the Supreme Court's order directing that all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR be moved to shelters within eight weeks. 'Those who refused to leave the protest sites despite repeated requests were detained. Legal action will be taken against all those found violating the law,' the Delhi Police said. One viral clip from the protests shows the Station House Officer of Tughlaq Road police station being manhandled by protesters, while another video shows a confrontation between a woman sub-inspector and a female demonstrator inside a bus. The protests followed the Supreme Court's August 11 order directing authorities to ensure that all localities in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram and Faridabad are free of stray dogs. The court had ruled that captured animals should not be released back onto the streets. On Thursday, a three-judge bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria reserved its order on petitions seeking a stay on the directive. The bench said it would pass an interim order after hearing arguments from all sides. At the outset, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Delhi government, said there was a 'loud vocal minority' opposing the order, while a 'silent suffering majority' supported action. 'In a democracy, there is a vocal majority and one who silently suffers. We had seen videos of people eating chicken, eggs, etc., and then claiming to be animal lovers. It was an issue to be resolved. Children were dying… Sterilisation did not stop rabies; even if you immunised them, that did not stop mutilation of children,' Mehta submitted. Citing World Health Organisation data, the Solicitor General said 37 lakh dog bites were reported in 2024, with 305 rabies deaths, most among children under 15 years of age. 'Dogs do not have to be killed… they have to be separated. Parents cannot send children out to play. Nobody is an animal hater,' he added. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing an NGO, questioned whether municipal authorities had created enough shelter homes for the dogs. 'Now dogs are picked up. But the order says once they are sterilised, do not leave them out in the community,' he argued, seeking a stay on the August 11 order. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi also opposed the directive. He said, 'Dog bites exist, but there have been zero rabies deaths in Delhi this year. Of course, bites are bad, but you cannot create a horror situation like this.' The bench observed that the core problem was the failure of local bodies to implement the Animal Birth Control Rules. Justice Nath remarked, 'Rules and laws are framed by the Parliament, but they are not followed. Local authorities are not doing what they should be doing. On the one hand, humans are suffering, and on the other hand, animal lovers are here.' In its detailed order, the court stressed that the August 11 decision was not taken on a 'momentary impulse' but after two decades of authorities failing to address a matter directly affecting public safety. A separate bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Madadev noted that the issue concerns both human welfare and animal welfare. 'This is not personal,' the bench said. (ANI) This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. Also read: How Delhi is mobilising to save its street dogs — shelters, safe houses, and watch patrols
Hans India
9 hours ago
- Hans India
Man kills wife in Delhi's Seelampur, walks into police station to confess crime
In a shocking incident, a man allegedly killed his wife in Delhi's Seelampur and later walked into the police station to confess to his crime on Sunday. The person turned up at the Seelampur Police Station and informed that he had killed his wife, Delhi Police said. Acting on the information about the confession, a police team rushed to the spot and found the body of a 24-year-old woman. Crime and Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) teams processed the scene and collected evidence. The body of the deceased was sent to GTB Hospital for post-mortem examination. A case under the relevant section of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita has been registered. The accused has been arrested, and further investigation is in progress to ascertain the motive behind the crime, said an official. The national capital had recorded several murder cases in recent months. In August, a man allegedly killed his wife and two daughters. The accused, identified as Pradeep Kumar, was arrested last week. Pradeep killed his wife, Jayshree, and daughters over a dispute. Jayshree's brother claimed that his sister's husband was a drunkard and a gambler, due to which there was a dispute between the couple. In July, a woman and her son were murdered by her husband's employee in Delhi's Lajpat Nagar. The police said that the accused committed the crime hours after he was scolded by his employer's wife, Ruchika Sewani. To avenge the insult, he killed Sewani and her son. In another incident in July, two men stabbed each other in Delhi's Tilak Nagar area. The police said that the accused Sandeep and Arif had an argument, which later took an ugly turn. Both men stabbed each other to death. In a shocking incident in April, a 20-year-old youth was shot dead in the Seelampur area of North East Delhi. According to police sources, Sameer, a resident of the Jogis' colony in Seelampur, was attacked by unknown bike-borne shooters who fled the scene immediately after firing at him.
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Protests in Chennai over Supreme Court order on relocating stray dogs in Delhi
Animal rights activists and dog lovers took to the streets in Chennai to stage a protest on Sunday, days after the Supreme Court ordered the stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to be moved to shelters within eight weeks. Dog lovers and activists attend a protest rally, after India's top court last week ordered authorities to relocate all stray dogs in Delhi.(REUTERS) Protests in Chennai followed similar demonstrations seen in the national capital previously. Protestors were seen holding placards that read 'Save Delhi Dogs' and 'Their Lives Matter', with pictures of stray dogs on. People taking part in the protests were also seen holding some dogs and puppies in their arms. On Saturday evening, people gathered near India Gate against the SC's order. Earlier, on Friday, Delhi Police registered four FIRs in connection with the protest held without prior permission on August 11 and 12 in New Delhi, reported ANI. According to the police, demonstrations were organised despite prohibitory orders imposed under Section 163 of BNS (formerly known as Section 144), which was in force due to the security measures ahead of Independence Day. Also read: Humane solution to street dogs: It's as simple as ABC Police officials also claimed that the protest turned unruly when police tried to disperse the demonstrators. "Those who refused to leave the protest sites despite repeated requests were detained. Legal action will be taken against all those found violating the law," the Delhi Police said. Protests have been ongoing since August 11, when the Supreme Court directed authorities to ensure that all localities in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram and Faridabad are free of stray dogs. The court had ruled that captured animals should not be released back onto the streets. Following this, a three-judge bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria reserved its order on petitions seeking a stay on the directive. The bench said it would pass an interim order after hearing arguments from all sides. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing from the side of the Delhi government, said that there is a 'loud vocal minority' opposing the order, while the 'silent suffering majority' are supporting it. He said that people eat chicken and then claim to be animal lovers. He said that children were dying and sterilisation did not stop rabies, 'even if you immunised them, that did not stop mutilation of children," Mehta added further. Meanwhile, Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the NGO, questioned whether municipal authorities had created enough shelter homes for the dogs. "Now, dogs are picked up. But the order says once they are sterilised, do not leave them out in the community," he argued, seeking a stay on the August 11 order. The bench observed that the core problem was the failure of local bodies to implement the Animal Birth Control Rules. Justice Nath remarked, "Rules and laws are framed by the Parliament, but they are not followed. Local authorities are not doing what they should be doing.' In a detailed order, the court clarifies that the August 11 decision was not taken on a "momentary impulse" but after two decades of authorities failing to address a matter directly affecting public safety.
