logo
Canada's EV Market Was Already in Trouble-Tariffs Made It Worse, Workers Say

Canada's EV Market Was Already in Trouble-Tariffs Made It Worse, Workers Say

Canada News.Net27-06-2025
Bob Pulham recalls the optimism in the air when General Motors began producing electric vans in Ingersoll, Ontario, in late 2022.
As the first BrightDrop commercial van rolled off the line at the CAMI Assembly plant, GM executives, union leaders and former prime minister Justin Trudeau touted it as a major milestone for electric vehicle production in Canada, The Canadian Press reports.
Pulham, a Unifor representative at the plant, remembers talk of increasing shifts and hiring more people to produce 50,000 such delivery vans annually by 2025.
But the sales never picked up, the plant kept slowing down the production line amid sluggish demand and the optimism slowly faded.
This April, GM announced it would idle the plant for several months and resume production in October with just one shift. Union members say about half of 1,200 workers at the plant will be gone as a result.
"I feel bad for all 600 that are being laid off. It's a horrible position to be put in," Pulham said in an interview. "It's a crazy amount of uncertainty and I think that hurts people."
The announcement came shortly after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on Canadian-made vehicles, but a GM Canada spokesperson said the halt was directly related to lower-than-expected demand for the BrightDrop vans.
Pulham, who began working at the CAMI plant more than three decades ago, said his wife has also been laid off and is now pondering whether to go back to school or search for a new job.
Several other companies, including Honda, Stellantis, Umicore, and Ford have also delayed or scrapped their EV projects amid the slow sales growth and the ongoing trade war.
GM Canada said reducing production in Ingersoll was necessary to adjust to market demand and balance inventory.
But workers at the CAMI plant say Trump's tariffs made things even worse. They've experienced the industry's ups and downs over the decades, but say this challenge is especially difficult at a time of great economic uncertainty.
"There's a push to build (vehicles) in the U.S., and that has caused a lot of issues over here," Pulham said. "So, it's not a good situation."
View our latest digests
Mike Van Boekel, the Unifor Local 88 CAMI plant chairperson, said even though workers knew layoffs were on the horizon, the news was still shocking for many.
"It was terrible," he said. "I thought we were going to lose a shift. I was worried in the back of my mind ... and now it has come true."
GM's ambitious plan to be at the "forefront of a big wave" of electric delivery van production didn't materialize because the timing was not right, Boekel said.
He felt the company was gaining some momentum before the imposition of 25% tariffs on Canadian-made vehicles. GM had just received an order of a thousand delivery vans from the U.S. grocery chain giant Kroger, he said.
"So, it looked like we were just getting to go and all of a sudden, the tariffs came on," he said, adding that CAMI workers will still produce Kroger's vans when they return to the factory this fall.
Workers aren't the only ones feeling the pain.
The ripple effects of layoffs are a source of concern for Ingersoll Mayor Brian Petrie. The CAMI plant, which spans two million square feet, is the largest employer in the southwestern Ontario town of about 14,000 people.
Petrie said Ingersoll expects to receive $1.8 million in municipal taxes from the company this year, which is around 10% of the total levies the town is expected to collect.
"It is devastating because we're not talking about new employees here, either, these are long serving employees and ... they've had a tough road going up to that point," Petrie said in a recent interview at his office.
The federal government under Trudeau set a target of 100% zero-emission sales of light duty vehicles by 2035. Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin indicated mid June that the mandate won't be changing.
But that goal seems hard to achieve, Petrie said.
"It's honest to say that I think everybody may have misunderstood the scale of the problem that we're facing to do the EV switch," he said. "I think all of them will admit that it's been a bigger problem than they once thought."
Still, he thinks the more than $50 billion in investments that Canada has pledged since 2020 to incentivize the EV supply chain will pay off in the long term.
Some provinces, including Manitoba and Quebec, are offering rebates for electric vehicle purchases. B.C.'s rebate program, which was the longest running in the country, was paused last month. Ontario scrapped its rebate program after Premier Doug Ford's Progressive Conservatives won the election in 2018.
The federal government also halted in January its Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles program, which offered up to $5,000 off the cost of a new electric vehicle. Dabrusin said Ottawa intends to bring back consumer rebates for EVs, but doesn't yet know what they'll look like.
Zero-emissions vehicles represented only 8.7% of all new vehicle sales in Canada in the first quarter of 2025-a drop from 16.5% in the fourth quarter of 2024, according to data from Statistics Canada.
The sales of EVs and plug-in hybrids had steadily increased from below 1% in 2017 to 14.6% in 2024, but experts say the growth hasn't been nearly as fast as many expected.
Dan Park, CEO of online used car retailer Clutch, said EV adoption has been slower in Canada because people normally drive long distances in colder temperatures, which reduces battery life by 20 to 40% and slows down the charging speed.
"Canada is just a fundamentally harder market to have," he said. "Until technology and battery life is improved to be able to handle colder conditions, I think Canadians will just shy away from it."
Park said EVs make up only 5% of Clutch's inventory, which is tied to consumer demand.
He said consumer rebates and production subsidies "artificially propped up the market," and provincial and federal governments should instead invest in a stronger charging infrastructure to encourage more Canadians to adopt EVs.
A recent survey by consumer insights firm J.D. Power shows that only 28% of nearly 4,000 respondents said they were "very likely" or "somewhat likely" to consider an EV for their next vehicle purchase, down from 29% last year and 34$ in 2023. The survey also found that 75% of new vehicle purchasers aren't confident Canada can reach its 2035 zero-emission vehicle sales goal.
Manufacturers took note of the lacklustre interest.
Honda Canada announced in May that it's postponing a $15-billion EV project in Ontario, citing the "unexpected slowdown" in the market. Stellantis is postponing the production of an EV model of 2026 Dodge Charger Daytona R/T at its Windsor, Ont., plant as it assesses the effects of U.S. tariffs. And Ford Motor Co. said it will assemble F-Series Super Duty pickup trucks at its Oakville, Ont., plant beginning in 2026 instead of planned electric vehicle production at the site.
Despite the setbacks, Environment and Climate Change Canada said it will continue to support investments and innovations in the EV supply chain.
Canada's zero-emissions vehicle sales mandates ensure "Canadians have access to electric vehicles, which offer long-term savings for consumers," department spokesperson Hermine Landry said in a statement.
"Transportation emissions have declined to levels not seen in decades, demonstrating that we can grow our economy while also fighting climate change," Landry said. "It is important to remain focused on the fact that the real threat to the Canadian auto industry right now are the unjustified tariffs from the United States."
Overall, Canadians buy around two million new vehicles annually and the country produces approximately 1.5 million of them, according to Unifor. Autoworkers say the federal government should push for more vehicle production in Canada from manufacturers such as Kia, Hyundai, Mitsubishi and others that don't have any production footprint in the country, to offset the impact of U.S. tariffs.
"It'd be nice, (if) the government stands up for us and you know says to these big companies, 'If you want to sell here, then you need to build here as well,'" said Paul Harvey, who works as a framing team leader at CAMI.
Harvey said that although he and his wife will keep their jobs at the CAMI plant in Ingersoll, they will both have to work the same hours when production resumes on one shift. With four children at home, that means the couple will need a new child-care plan and increased costs will come with it.
Harvey, who has been an autoworker for 20 years, said it would be "kind of silly" to think that the transition to electric vehicles would happen at the flick of a switch. He said he and his wife remain optimistic about the EV market and that's why they purchased a Chevy Blazer EV just a few weeks ago.
"We're committed to moving into the future with the electrified vehicles," he said.
"I do believe it will get there eventually."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 19, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ZYUS Life Sciences Announces Closing of Second Tranche of Unit Offering
ZYUS Life Sciences Announces Closing of Second Tranche of Unit Offering

Cision Canada

time3 hours ago

  • Cision Canada

ZYUS Life Sciences Announces Closing of Second Tranche of Unit Offering

SASKATOON, SK, Aug. 15, 2025 /CNW/ - ZYUS Life Sciences Corporation (the " Company") (TSXV: ZYUS), a Canadian-based life sciences company focused on the development and commercialization of novel cannabinoid-based pharmaceutical drug candidates for pain management, is pleased to announce that, further to its press release dated July 29, 2025, it has closed the second tranche (the " Second Tranche") of its non-brokered private placement (the " Offering") of units of the Company (each a " Unit") for up to CAD $1,000,000. Under the Second Tranche of the Offering, a further 140,845 Units were issued for aggregate gross proceeds of CAD $100,000. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the Second Tranche and first tranche of the Offering (which closed on July 29, 2025) (the " First Tranche") is approximately $0.42 million. The Company has issued a total of 591,126 Units each priced at $0.71 per Unit in the First Tranche and the Second Tranche. Each Unit consists of one common share of the Company (a " Common Share") and one Common Share purchase warrant (each Common Share purchase warrant, a " Warrant"), whereby each Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one Common Share at a price of $0.95 for a period of twenty-four months from the date of issuance, unless the term of the Warrant is accelerated pursuant to its terms (the " Acceleration Provision"). In accordance with the Acceleration Provision, if the volume-weighted average trading price of the Common Shares is greater than $3.00 for a period of 5 consecutive trading days on the TSX Venture Exchange (the " TSXV"), the Company will have the right to accelerate the expiry date of the Warrants. Proceeds of the Offering will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes. No finder's fees were paid in connection with the Offering. The Units were offered by way of private placement pursuant to exemptions from prospectus requirements under applicable securities laws. All securities issued under the First Tranche are subject to a hold period expiring November 30, 2025, and all securities issued under the Second Tranche of the Offering are subject to a hold period expiring December 16, 2025, in accordance with applicable securities laws and the policies of the TSXV. The Offering has received conditional approval from the TSXV and remains subject to final acceptance of the TSXV. The securities described herein have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the " U.S. Securities Act"), or any state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for account or benefit of, U.S. persons except in compliance with the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or pursuant to available exemptions therefrom. This release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy of any securities in the United States. About ZYUS Life Sciences Corporation ZYUS (TSXV: ZYUS) is a life sciences company focused on the development and commercialization of novel cannabinoid-based pharmaceutical drug candidates for pain management. Through rigorous scientific exploration and clinical research, ZYUS aims to secure intellectual property protection, safeguarding its innovative therapies and bolstering shareholder value. ZYUS' unwavering commitment extends to obtaining regulatory approval of non-opioid-based pharmaceutical solutions, in pursuit of transformational impact on patients' lives. For additional information, visit or follow us on X @ZYUSCorp. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This news release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws relating to the Company's business, the Company's ability to advance clinical research activities, obtain regulatory approval of cannabinoid-based pharmaceutical drug candidates and introduce products that act as alternatives to current pain management therapies such as opioids, receipt of TSXV final acceptance, closing of any additional tranche of the Offering and use of proceeds from the Offering. Any such forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as "expects", "anticipates", "intends", "contemplates", "believes", "projects", "plans", "will" and similar expressions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Statements about, among other things, the Company's business, the Company's ability to advance clinical research activities, obtain regulatory approval of cannabinoid-based pharmaceutical drug candidates and introduce products that act as alternatives to current pain management therapies such as opioids, obtain TSXV final acceptance, closing of any additional tranche of the Offering and use of proceeds from the Offering are all forward-looking information. These statements should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those implied by such statements. Although such statements are based on management's reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve these results. The Company assumes no responsibility to update or revise forward-looking information to reflect new events or circumstances or actual results unless required by applicable law. Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release.

Feasibility without First Nations isn't feasible
Feasibility without First Nations isn't feasible

Winnipeg Free Press

time3 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Feasibility without First Nations isn't feasible

Opinion Earlier this month, the governments of Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan signed an agreement to explore the 'feasibility of a new west-east pipeline to bring western oil and gas to southern Ontario refineries and ports.' In a news release, Alberta premier Danielle Smith said: 'By advancing a Canadian energy corridor from Alberta to Ontario, we are securing long-term energy access for families and businesses, creating thousands of jobs, and opening new doors for trade and investment, while strengthening our position as a global energy leader.' There's only one problem, and it's a big one: Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew didn't sign it. So much for feasibility. Since the federal government's passing of the One Canadian Economy Act (Bill C-5), which promises to expedite approvals for projects deemed 'in the national interest,' provinces have been rushing to position themselves with Prime Minister Mark Carney's cabinet in the hopes their regional initiatives and economic dreams will come true. Ontario has even passed its own version of the federal bill, in what is surely a move to speed up approval for the Ring of Fire critical mineral project despite Indigenous opposition. The challenge for all of this — if you can call it a challenge — has been Canada's legal requirement under Section 35 of the Constitution to attain 'free, prior, and informed consent' when it comes to including and respecting Indigenous and treaty rights. Simply put, few provinces have partnership agreements with First Nations to build economic projects and, for those that do, these were made after lengthy and costly court battles, negotiations, and conflict. The federal bill, Ontario's bill and the 'feasibility' agreement between Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario has no First Nations, Métis or Inuit approval. In other words, they are not worth much and are simply a cause for conflict. To be honest, development occurred much quicker when Canada was genocidal. Until the past five decades, Canada never had a legal duty to consult Indigenous peoples on the land, water, the economy, or frankly anything really — so, it didn't. Since the country's founding in 1867 (and arguably before that), Canadian legislators took Indigenous and treaty land, moved people whenever and wherever, and made unilateral decisions on Indigenous lives and families all the time. When law got in the way, other laws were passed under the justification that Canada's national interests were paramount. This meant that swaths of Indian reserve lands were taken whenever a company, corporation, or the military wanted. Or, that masses of Indigenous leaders were imprisoned, Indigenous women were stripped of rights, and children were taken. All this happened blatantly. A few kilometres from where Winnipeggers sit was the St. Peter's Indian Band, whose lands in and around Selkirk were taken illegally in 1907 while the community was removed to what is now Peguis Indian Reserve. The tide started to change in the 1970s, when Canada's Supreme Court recognized that Indigenous title (and therefore law, government, and rights) existed and Canada had to start to act justly, humanely, and with consideration of their humanity. Things were supposed to be different — but old Canadian habits die hard. From the One Canadian Economy Act to the actions of provincial premiers, Canadian leaders continue to act as if Indigenous peoples are an afterthought, using age-old arguments that Canada's 'national interests' are paramount. That is, until Kinew — who has not shied away from interest in lucrative land and resource projects — refused to join his provincial counterparts. 'In other parts of the country with other levels of government, there's the commitment to maybe push things through with legislation first,' Kinew told media, explaining his decision. 'That puts other partners on the back foot.' Don't be confused. When Kinew says 'other partners,' he means First Nations, Inuit, and Métis rights holders. What the premier is doing isn't because he's First Nations, it's because he's trying to follow Canadian law. History has proven it's a tremendous waste of time, money, and energy to exclude Indigenous rights holders from conversations surrounding land, resources, and, frankly, the country. The first and most important 'project in the national interest' is to include Indigenous governments at the outset of every single decision this country makes. Anything else is illegal. An unprecedented step however requires an unprecedented idea. For Kinew, it's a Crown corporation (on par with entities such Manitoba Hydro and Manitoba Public Insurance) that can assemble Indigenous leadership to review and give approval of economic land and resource projects alongside provincial regulators. This 'Crown Indigenous corporation' would require buy-in and unity from Indigenous leadership — and seems to have almost immediately gained it. This week, the Southern Chiefs' Organization and the Manitoba Métis Federation came to an agreement to collectively 'advance economic reconciliation, protect Indigenous rights, and collaborate on major infrastructure and development projects across Manitoba.' That's no coincidence. That's First Nations and Métis holders on the front foot and reserving their spot at the table. Niigaan SinclairColumnist Niigaan Sinclair is Anishinaabe and is a columnist at the Winnipeg Free Press. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Manitoba businesses brace for Air Canada strike
Manitoba businesses brace for Air Canada strike

Winnipeg Free Press

time4 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Manitoba businesses brace for Air Canada strike

Manitoba businesses could be dealt another blow if a looming strike by Air Canada flight attendants halts operations at the country's largest airline this weekend. The Canadian Federation of Independent Business said Friday that small businesses are 'deeply concerned' with the prospect of a shutdown at Air Canada, which was set to take effect at 1 a.m. ET on Saturday. 'They're already facing massive economic uncertainty, said Brianna Solberg, CFIB's provincial director for Manitoba, Saskatchewan and the North. 'One third of Canadian small firms depend on the summer season for their revenues. They can't afford to lose even a single day or take a hit to tourism.' Solberg said a strike could result in cancellations for hotels, restaurants and other tourism operators. 'And we've already had a couple of major things impact the tourism sector, one being the global trade uncertainty, and also the wildfires this year, which caused a lot of people to put a pause on making some tourism-related bookings,' she said. SUPPLIED / FREE PRESS FILES 'One third of Canadian small firms depend on the summer season for their revenues. They can't afford to lose even a single day or take a hit to tourism,' said Brianna Solberg, CFIB's provincial director for Manitoba, Saskatchewan and the North. 'One third of Canadian small firms depend on the summer season for their revenues. They can't afford to lose even a single day or take a hit to tourism,' said Brianna Solberg, CFIB's provincial director for Manitoba, Saskatchewan and the North. Earlier this year, the province urged people to avoid travelling to certain destinations in Manitoba to keep hotel rooms available for wildfire evacuees. 'It's been a difficult year for small business in Manitoba,' Solberg said. The looming strike that could see thousands of Air Canada flight attendants walk off the job is frustrating for all involved, said a labour negotiations expert — and that's exactly why strikes can be so effective. In essence, the power of a strike often stems from its ability to affect not just the employer, but also the public and allied stakeholders. Julia Smith, an associate professor of labour relations at the University of Manitoba, has studied flight attendant union activism extensively and said the widespread impact of a strike makes it a powerful bargaining tool. 'Workers want to work, they're frustrated that they're not getting paid, employers are frustrated because they're not making money, and whoever is accessing the service, whether it's a passenger or a customer, they're frustrated because they can't get what they need,' Smith said. Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. A spokesperson for Travel Manitoba said Friday the Crown Corporation is watching developments closely, and with concern. 'Any disruptions to airline traffic negatively impact overall tourism numbers, further compounding a challenging summer season in our province, which has seen many tourism operators struggling because of the impact of wildfires,' the spokesperson said. 'We are hoping the parties are able to come to an equitable agreement as soon as possible.' If an agreement between Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees isn't reached before 1 a.m. ET Saturday, 10,000 flight attendants will strike, grounding all airline flights and affecting roughly 130,000 travellers per day. The strike's effects were already being felt Friday, with Air Canada announcing on X that it had cancelled 34 flights, affecting more than 7,000 passengers. This follows Thursday's disruption, when more than 300 flight attendants failed to report for work, cancelling 19 flights and impacting more than 3,000 passengers. Mark Nasr, Air Canada's chief operations officer, said Thursday that as many as 500 flights could be cancelled by the end of Friday. By midday Friday, 294 flights had been scrapped, affecting 55,726 passengers, and the union had rejected the company's request for binding arbitration. The dispute centres on wage increases and compensation for unpaid work hours. Flight attendants issued a 72-hour strike notice on Wednesday, prompting Air Canada to issue a lockout notice in response. The airline has offered to pay half of a flight attendant's hourly rate for pre-departure duties performed before a plane pushes back from the gate. CHRISTINNE MUSCHI / THE CANADIAN PRESS Mark Nasr, Air Canada's chief operations officer, said Thursday that as many as 500 flights could be cancelled by the end of Friday. Mark Nasr, Air Canada's chief operations officer, said Thursday that as many as 500 flights could be cancelled by the end of Friday. Smith called the lockout 'a bold move' and noted it's generally a sign that negotiations aren't going well. 'There are far more strikes than lockouts, and that's simply because employers don't want to do that, they want to get back to work,' Smith said. 'So it's usually a sign that things are quite hostile and toxic when you're seeing employers walk out.' Meanwhile, the Angus Reid Institute reports that Canadians are largely siding with the flight attendants in the dispute. The independent, self-commissioned poll found three-in-five (59 per cent) believe Air Canada should provide full hourly wages for all aspects of a flight attendant's work, while 41 per cent say keeping airfares low should be the priority. 'Notably, however, more frequent fliers — those who have taken to the skies three times or more in the last year — are evenly split on the matter, with half (51 per cent) siding with flight attendants demands, and the other half more focused on not seeing the increased costs of such compensation passed along to them,' the release said. Scott BilleckReporter Scott Billeck is a general assignment reporter for the Free Press. A Creative Communications graduate from Red River College, Scott has more than a decade's worth of experience covering hockey, football and global pandemics. He joined the Free Press in 2024. Read more about Scott. Every piece of reporting Scott produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store