Government risks catastrophic fallout by stripping protections from millions of acres: 'Many ... forests are considered to be at high wildfire risk'
Over 112 million acres of once-protected forests are opening for business, mostly in Western states. An emergency order issued this month will allow logging companies to operate on nearly 60% of National Forest System lands, as USA Today reported.
The Secretary of Agriculture's memorandum, which followed up on previous executive orders, rolls back federal environmental protections, claiming that it will help manage wildfires, increase timber supply, and create jobs.
Geopolitical uncertainties may have at least partly motivated the move, as USA Today said tariffs on Canada, the top exporter of timber to the United States, could impact the lumber supply. In 2021, Canada sent $28 billion worth of lumber to the U.S., per The New York Times. With deteriorating relations caused by tariffs and annexation threats, the administration appears to be turning to domestic sources for lumber.
While this is a win for the logging industry, which made Donald Trump the biggest recipient of political donations in the 2024 election cycle, per the research group OpenSecrets, scientists and environmental groups have reacted to the order with dismay.
The Sierra Club decried the perceived motivations behind the order, calling it "a giveaway to logging" and stating, "Again and again, the Trump administration has shown it's more interested in boosting the bottom lines of corporate polluters than protecting our national forests and public lands."
The benefits of forest lands to people and the planet go beyond the value of their lumber. As the U.S. Forest Service itself has noted, healthy forests help supply clean air and water as well as recreational opportunities that are invaluable to communities.
Trees also store heat-trapping carbon pollution, but the effects are most apparent in mature trees around 70-125 years old, according to Yale Environment 360. Unfortunately, those older, larger trees are exactly the type that are most valuable to logging companies. Planting new trees is helpful, but keeping mature forests intact is a much better move.
Opening up the nation's forests to logging to reduce forest fires is a debated strategy, as USA Today pointed out. The John Muir Project has argued that wildfire suppression and logging has actually been part of the problem. "Land managers have requested, and received, increasingly more money for forest 'thinning' operations under the guise of 'fuel reduction,'" the organization noted, adding that "the discredited policies of the past, including fire suppression and removal of mature, fire-resistant trees, has continued — even increased in many cases."
As USA Today also noted: "Many U.S. forests are considered to be at high wildfire risk, due to climate change and almost a century of wildfire suppression policies that have resulted in overgrown, fire-prone land. Neither are mentioned in the memorandum."
Additionally, removing protections in national forests places endangered species at risk of habitat loss.
Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty?
Definitely
Only in some areas
No way
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
The first laws to protect land as national forests began with Benjamin Harrison, a Republican president, in 1891. These were expanded by Teddy Roosevelt, another politician who started as a Republican, with the creation of the Forest Service in 1905. Yet another Republican, Richard Nixon, signed the Endangered Species Act of 1973 into law.
Experts hope existing laws such as these will provide the framework for legal challenges against the changes to forest protections. "The federal government still has to comply with federal law even if the president doesn't want to," Washington state Commissioner of Public Lands David Upthegrove told Fox 13 Seattle.
Polling indicates the majority of Americans want to protect public land. Local and individual acts can make a big impact on conservation efforts. Contacting your local representative is easy with the right tools for using your voice, too.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
8 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Bitcoin rebounds above $104,700 after initial dip on Trump-Musk fallout
Bitcoin (BTC) staged a smart recovery on Friday, climbing back above the $104,700 mark after an early dip sparked by jitters in the market following the reported fallout between former US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk. As per latest data, Bitcoin was trading at $104,731.41, up 2.18% over the past 24 hours. The cryptocurrency saw a volatile session, hitting an intraday low of $102,405.29 before bouncing back sharply to test a high of $105,333.00. The market had initially reacted negatively to reports of strained relations between Trump and Musk, which had raised concerns about potential policy shifts or regulatory overhang on digital assets in the US. The development triggered a broad risk-off sentiment across major cryptocurrencies during early trade. However, BTC's resilience was on display as buyers stepped in at lower levels, fueling a strong rebound. The 24-hour trading volume stood robust at 14,435.76 BTC, with $1.5 billion USDT turnover, indicating healthy participation on the bounce. Crypto market analysts noted that despite short-term headlines, underlying bullish momentum in BTC remains intact amid improving institutional interest and optimism around the next leg of mainstream adoption. Traders will be watching closely for further developments on the Trump-Musk front, along with upcoming macroeconomic cues, which could influence BTC's near-term trajectory. Note: $BTC price at the time of writing this article. News desk at
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Palantir and TeleTracking Team Up to Enhance Healthcare Operations Using AI-Driven Insights
TeleTracking Technologies, a leading provider of healthcare operations platforms, has teamed up with Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:PLTR), known for its expertise in artificial intelligence systems. The two companies have formed a strategic partnership with the goal of transforming how hospitals and health systems make operational decisions, ultimately creating long-term value for healthcare providers around the world. The collaboration will integrate TeleTracking's Operations IQ platform with Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:PLTR)'s AI-driven tools, including Foundry and AIP. This combined solution is expected to equip hospitals with near real-time, actionable insights to improve staffing efficiency, speed up decision-making, and ensure that patient needs remain the top priority. As healthcare systems continue to face increasing demands to enhance capacity and coordination without expanding their physical footprint, this partnership represents a significant step forward. By bringing together TeleTracking's operational strengths and Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:PLTR)'s cutting-edge technology, the two aim to usher in a new era of intelligent, scalable, and efficient healthcare delivery. Alex Karp, CEO at Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:PLTR) made the following comment: 'This partnership with TeleTracking represents the AI revolution in healthcare we are in the midst of—where we continue to move closer to a world where all hospitals and health systems are embracing, implementing and operating with an AI-powered approach, helping to streamline operations allowing for increased focus on providing the best level of care.' Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:PLTR) is an American publicly traded company that focuses on developing software platforms designed for analyzing large volumes of data. While we acknowledge the potential of PLTR as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Hamilton Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. States split on whether to aid or resist Trump Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools , churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey , alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision . Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Legislation supporting immigrants takes a variety of forms Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Many new measures reinforce existing policies Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.' ___ Associated Press writers Susan Haigh, Trân Nguyễn, Jesse Bedayn, John O'Connor and Brian Witte contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .