logo
Riefenstahl review: Unrepentant propagandist will make you want to yell at the screen, but this fine film gets her in the end

Riefenstahl review: Unrepentant propagandist will make you want to yell at the screen, but this fine film gets her in the end

Irish Times08-05-2025

Riefenstahl
    
Director
:
Andres Veiel
Cert
:
None
Starring
:
Leni Riefenstahl, Adolf Hitler, Albert Speer
Running Time
:
1 hr 55 mins
One can easily understand how a documentary about Leni Riefenstahl, the notorious cinematic propagandist for Nazi Germany, might prove unsettling, but it is surprising how relentlessly infuriating Andres Veiel's fine film proves.
This counts as a sort of backhanded compliment. The film-maker flits over many corners of a long life. His main focus is, however, on Riefenstahl's tireless efforts to distance herself from the appalling crimes and crackpot philosophies of the regime.
Her argument seems to be that, like barristers explaining how the 'taxi rank' principle places them unstoppably in the employ of rapists, she was just a film director for hire. At one point she half-claims that if 'Roosevelt or Stalin' had given the order, then she would have complied. Only following orders? They heard that quite a bit during the Nuremberg trials.
The wonder is that, if Riefenstahl wasn't going to repent (and there is not an ounce of that here), she kept submitting herself to hostile interviews. Close to the end we see footage of a French programme that presents an empty chair after she refused to appear unless footage of the death camps was cut. To that point she seemed happy to trot out the same unconvincing evasions to any sceptical interlocutor.
READ MORE
After an hour and a half of this, the temptation to yell at the screen proves close to irresistible.
[
Leni Riefenstahl, Hitler's favourite film-maker: 'After the first page of Mein Kampf she became an enthusiastic Nazi'
]
Veiel structures his film with grace and guile. We cut back and forth from a roughly chronological trawl through the early career to postwar footage of her standing firm against irrefutable evidence. She began as an actor and dancer before moving into film-making, ultimately directing herself in the lyrical The Blue Light.
The most problematic sort of immortality came with two propaganda features for the Nazis: Triumph of the Will (about the Nuremberg Rallies) and Olympia (about the 1936 Olympics). The film doesn't really engage with the debate about whether the films' innovations – see also those of DW Griffith's foully racist Birth of a Nation – can be considered in lofty isolation, but intercutting shots of Olympia with quotes from Mein Kampf helps to confirm that the moral poison is baked in.
For all the irritation along the way, Veiel does deliver a satisfactory conclusion. That is to say, he gets her in the end.
In cinemas from Friday, May 9th

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ed Sheeran has as much right to call himself Irish as The Pogues or The Smiths
Ed Sheeran has as much right to call himself Irish as The Pogues or The Smiths

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Ed Sheeran has as much right to call himself Irish as The Pogues or The Smiths

Ed Sheeran rarely says or does anything controversial – but the internet has required an urgent dose of smelling salts after the singer said that he identified as 'culturally Irish' . Sheeran made the remarks in an interview with Louis Theroux, saying, ' My dad's family is ... he's got seven brothers and sisters. We'd spend all of our holidays in Ireland'. He said : 'My first musical experiences were in Ireland, I grew up with trad music in the house. So I identify culturally as Irish, but I was obviously born and raised in Britain.' His comments have generated considerable commentary on both sides of the Irish Sea – though why this should be so is a mystery. With early songs such as The A-Team and later hits like Castle on the Hill, Sheeran was following unashamedly in a bare-boned, dewy-eyed tradition of confessional acoustic songwriting – which, if not invented in Ireland, is certainly part of the country's bloodstream culturally speaking. That isn't to suggest early 2000s artists such as Paddy Casey, David Kitt or Damien Rice should be given credit/blame for Sheeran – but it is surely telling that he was coming of age musically while they were at the zenith of their powers. The influence of Rice, in particular, is something Sheeran has talked about on many occasions – recalling how seeing the Kildare singer perform in Whelan's when Sheeran was aged 14 had a formative influence. As he told Hot Press in 2022, 'I was brought up on Van Morrison's Irish Heartbeat album. Then there was Planxty, Christy Moore, Dónal Lunny, and my cousin got me into Bell X1, The Frames, Damien Rice, Mundy and Damien Dempsey. I'm really inspired by Irish music.' READ MORE The shock is that this should be considered surprising. What could be more Irish than a singer with a guitar emoting from the bottom of their boots? Tellingly, Sheeran's biggest hit, Shape of You, was co-written with another Irish musician, Snow Patrol's Derry-born guitarist Johnny McDaid. When it comes to his Irish identity, the obvious black mark against Sheeran is Galway Girl – not so much a song as a harbinger of the music apocalypse, with fiddles that sound like a caterwaul from Celtic purgatory. But while it is deeply cliched, is it really so different from anything put out by The Pogues or Dropkick Murphy's, 'Irish' bands whose music feels like the equivalent of a trolley dash through a Carrolls Gift Shop? Fair enough, Sheeran is a long way from The Smiths, perhaps the most 'Irish' British band of all time, their music suffused in mordant wit, sexual repression and poetic fatalism – aka the holy trinity of Irish cultural hallmarks. But as a heartfelt singer-songwriter, he is absolutely entitled to feel Irish. As he himself has stated, he is following in the footsteps of Damien Rice and Mundy. The difference is that he has spun from these raw materials chart-topping gold. Good on him – and at least he isn't as annoying as Bono.

Remembering Housewife of the Year, deadbeat husbands and patronising Gay Byrne
Remembering Housewife of the Year, deadbeat husbands and patronising Gay Byrne

Irish Times

time16 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Remembering Housewife of the Year, deadbeat husbands and patronising Gay Byrne

For many of us who lived through the era covered by the recent Housewife of the Year documentary, the viewing was always going to trigger a dull, throat-constricting ache. A film about a 30-year old television show that ran for just 10 years would provoke less predictable responses in younger viewers. Some sat down to sneer but left it deeply unsettled. The cameras panning over the huge audiences in their Sunday best revealed glimpses of a deeply unfamiliar Ireland: shy, minimally made-up faces with uniformly dark hair, neglected teeth, unshowy clothes modestly buttoned up to the neck. This was Ireland in the 1980s, the country Gay Byrne correctly diagnosed back then as 'banjaxed'. I watched the film twice in an effort to distinguish the television show from its dapper host. Byrne was celebrated for the rare quality among chatshow hosts of a genuine curiosity about people. [ At home there's an apron with the slogan 'Calor Housewife of the Year 1985′ Opens in new window ] Introducing the first televised Housewife of the Year in 1982 he welcomed the fully-grown competitors as people who 'sing little songs for us and they write little poems and they do all sorts of quare things ...' READ MORE The women smiled desperately, often rictus-like, conveying the glassy look of rabbits caught in headlights. The questions – intercut with images of the 'simple' meals cooked by competitors – were eerily repetitive. How did you meet your husband? What did your husband do for a living? Did you make your own dress? Give us a twirl. Show us what you cooked. How have you taken to motherhood? You're a mother of 14, is that the end of it now Angela? (And coyly) would you go again Angela? Six children was the least of it. Where there was an evident gap in baby production, he asked what happened. He held hands with the women, doubtless to encourage them, and called himself Uncle Gaybo while leaning into a woman's pregnant stomach. A still from RTÉ's Housewife of the Year All this was expressed in Byrne's cheery light entertainment tone. None of it was said or done unkindly. He knew better than most the oppressive patriarchal depths of that Ireland and its calamitous impact on girls and women. His HOTY years ran alongside some of the nation's most tumultuous events, which in turn generated the agonising first-hand confidences that animated his daily radio show – the divorce referendums, the Eighth Amendment, the contraception battles, the death of Ann Lovett . These must have colonised some part of his brain while he perpetuated the same old patronising stereotypes on HOTY. But the ever-curious Gaybo was entirely absent. Perhaps it wasn't the time to ask the remarkable Lily, who had 13 children by the age of 31, how she was surviving physically or mentally. Or for a quick question about Miriam's life, a nurse who had loved her few carefree single years in London and had plans for Australia until called back to rural Cork to help care for her father. Or to ask Patricia – who said she loved not having to go out to work – how she squared the 'housewife' label with being the breadwinner, working as a 'postman' while rearing hundreds of turkeys 'and still had the housework' to do. Even the Roses of Tralee were asked about their hopes and dreams. The Housewives were never asked if they envisioned themselves as something other than 'housewife' – as the farmers, entrepreneurs, artists, designers, craftswomen some already were – because aspiring to anything beyond wife and mother would amount to betrayal of the script. From the film we learn that Lily, mother of 13, had a husband who 'receded further to the pub' with each new baby while she fed her children from a food charity. That Ellen's husband walked out on her without a word soon after the competition, leaving her destitute but bouncing back to found her own business – 'It was my money. No one was going to smoke it, no one was going to drink it ...' That Miriam, the nurse who had to give up her dream of travel and then her job on marriage, was rewarded with a dearth of pension contributions. Do we need reminding of all this, you might ask? That the national broadcaster and its national treasure were in cahoots with commercial interests to sell this society's idealised vision of a woman back to women on prime time TV? That the birth agony, care and maintenance of eight, 13 or 14 children were made to sound like a breeze. And that fathers were mentioned only in the context of their jobs or illness, copper-fastening the myth that the men could or would always be faithful providers to their women who stayed in the home? Just as de Valera's Article 41.2 continues to imply. But in the eyes of the State and society back then, those treasured mammies were just dependants on their welfare-dependent husbands. So perhaps the true marvel is that these women mustered the courage to enter a competition on prime time TV, dreaming of a break and public acknowledgment of their many labours. And perhaps it was the certain knowledge that Gay's questions would be kind, swift and superficial that encouraged them to step up to what for some – such as the extraordinary Lily – was a life-changing shot of confidence. But for others, the damage caused by the televised myth of the perfect and perfectly happy housewife is incalculable. In an era of backlash, we always need reminding. That dull ache will take a while to abate.

To teenage me, caring about exams felt like conforming. My kids are different
To teenage me, caring about exams felt like conforming. My kids are different

Irish Times

time16 hours ago

  • Irish Times

To teenage me, caring about exams felt like conforming. My kids are different

It's not really exam weather, which is a minuscule mercy for all the young people sitting down at desks in school halls across the country. I don't remember much about the Junior Cert which in my day was called the Inter Cert, but I'm nearly sure it was exam-season sunny back then. In contrast, my daughters set off last week for their first exam under gloomy skies, clutching Leap cards and small plastic bags of pens and stationery. One daughter left her phone at home – 'too distracting' – but rang me from a friend's mobile minutes before the English exam so that I could read her some quotes from the battered flashcards she had left scattered across the kitchen table. She was hoping for a question that allowed exploration of her views on the character of Portia in Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice. 'Her ingenious, immovable and intelligent self enables her to find a way around all obstacles,' my daughter had written on a bright yellow card in blue pen. 'Because she is a woman, her father is still controlling her even from the grave.' [ Broadcaster Andrea Gilligan on the Leaving: 'I think the A-level system in Northern Ireland is far superior' Opens in new window ] 'I have a whole feminist thing about Portia, Mum,' J told me as she went off to get the bus to her first State exam. 'Examiners totally eat that stuff up.' We had marked the auspicious occasion earlier by blasting out the song Drive It Like You Stole It from John Carney's film Sing Street, which is part of the curriculum. 'This is your life, you can go anywhere/You gotta grab the wheel and own it/You gotta put the pedal down/And drive it like you stole it.' My other daughter P danced about in the kitchen, energised by the message, and I thought about this wonderful world we live in where English in the Junior Cert now includes studying Carney as well as Heaney . READ MORE I watched the two of them leave and felt a bit emotional. I wasn't sure why but hearing Heaney's Mid-Term Break read out as part of a last-minute cram over breakfast definitely didn't help. The exams marked another milestone for the girls, I suppose. I rang a friend with daughters also doing the Junior Cert. She was teary too. We talked about how proud we were of them but also about the privilege of even being able to do exams when there are a 1½ million girls and young women being subjected to gender-persecution in Afghanistan, banned from attending secondary school or university, who would give anything to be in their position. We marvelled about how prepared our daughters seem to be, how invested in the challenge. I had been neither prepared nor invested in the lead-up to the Inter. I didn't care. My not caring was the bluntest form of rebellion. Caring about exams, according to teenage me, was too much like conforming. In fairness to her, she was a mixed-up kid. In yet another contrast, my daughters have spent much of the past couple of months in their local Starbucks or the library studying their heads off. Self-motivated, I think you'd call it. All I know is that I can take no credit for their industry. And while Starbucks might seem like an odd study hall, I'm assured the coffee chain is conducive to academic preparation. At various libraries across the city, from Kevin Street to Raheny, they've been congregating in groups with friends, going through their topics in studious solidarity. The wonderful innovation that is transition year will wipe the slate clean The relief that I was not having to nag them to hit the books was immense. I just didn't have it in me to nag. Whatever about the Leaving Cert , the Junior Cert really doesn't matter except as a practice run for that more significant and consequential exam and I was never going to pretend otherwise. Anyway, the wonderful innovation that is transition year will wipe the slate clean and then, in fifth year, all the people who flailed or foundered in the Junior Cert can find fresh motivation. Or not. And in the end, they won't be defined by exams or points or CAO options or by how much history or Shakespeare they could regurgitate as a teenager but by who they are as people. By how they made other people feel. There are no State exams to measure that. However it goes when those exam results envelopes are opened, all over the country, thousands of variously prepared or motivated young people have presented themselves to be examined. No matter what the outcome, they deserve our praise and admiration. These ingenious, immovable and intelligent boys and girls have been putting their best feet forward whatever that 'best' looks like, and we know 'best' is different for everyone depending on their personal circumstances. Some of them have parents who can afford maths grinds and Starbucks coffees, some know what it's like to go to school hungry or to have to study quadratic equations in a noisy hostel for the homeless. Watch them all now, on the final lap of this gruelling exam course. Grabbing the wheel. Driving it like they stole it. Legends, every single one of them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store