Your Stories Q&A: Why do I pay a county water tax when I'm not an OCWA customer?
SYRACUSE, N.Y. (WSYR-TV) — You ask, we answer!This question came from a viewer named David, who lives in the Town of Pompey and has well water on his property.
So why the tax? According to Onondaga County and OCWA (Central New York's Water Authority), everyone pays, because everyone benefits.
'The county water tax was instituted in the 1960s in connection with the Onondaga County Water District's buildout of the water supply system from Lake Ontario. The feeling was that even people not directly connected to the water system would benefit from public water being supplied to the area. The tax pays for the debt associated with building out the facilities to deliver water to Onondaga County,' A spokesperson for OCWA said in an email to the Your Stories Team.
A spokesperson with the Onondaga County Executive's office said something similar, but added a few more details:
'The county decided in the 1960s that all property owners are benefitted the presence of public water – it spurred economic development that created jobs, etc. Also, people benefit when there is public water available in schools, libraries and other government buildings. Very important to note that just because someone may not personally have access to public water currently, does not mean that they won't in the future.' Justin Sayles, communications director with the Onondaga County Executive's office said in an email.
According to Onondaga County Legislator, David Knapp, the county water tax is about 7 cents for every $1,000 in assessed value of your property.
Submit a form.
Your Stories Q&A: Why do I pay a county water tax when I'm not an OCWA customer?
Your Stories Q&A: Can businesses refuse to take $100 bills?
Your Stories Q&A: What's the latest on Manlius getting an upscale Taco Bell?
Your Stories Q&A: When will construction begin on broken Hanover Square fountain?
Your Stories Q&A: New plans for The Inn Between Restaurant in Camillus
Your Stories Q&A: New restaurant to open in closed Daniel's Grill in Marcellus
Your Stories Q&A: A new hotel proposed to be built on former Clay Golfers Dome site
Your Stories Q&A: How do school districts decide when to take a snow day?
Your Stories Q&A: Closed Cicero Rite Aid to become Ace Hardware
Your Stories Q&A: Pickleball center to open this week in former DeWitt Sky Zone location
Your Stories Q&A: Former DeWitt Friendly's demolished to make way for popular burger chain
Humana members and Medicare changes: What you need to know about St. Joseph's health coverage after Excellus deal
Your Stories Q&A: Whose job is it to fix the large potholes on what appears to be a forgotten stretch of road?
Your Stories Q&A: Cannabis dispensary moving into old gas station in Chittenango
Your Stories Q&A: Hotel slated to be built behind the closed Outback Steakhouse in Clay
Your Stories Q&A: Are work zone speed limits enforced on weekends and off-hours?
Your Stories Q&A: Popular Cicero restaurant moving to new LeMoyne Manor development
Your Stories Q&A: When will SYR Airport once again allow passengers to reserve parking online?
Your Stories Q&A: Niagara Mohawk building gets new lights just in time for the holidays
Band in Syracuse has $10,000 worth of bass guitars stolen from van, police continue to investigate
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Social Security cost-of-living adjustment may be 2.5% in 2026, new estimate shows
The cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security could be 2.5% in 2026, based on the latest inflation data, new estimates show. That's up from last month's estimate of 2.4%, said Mary Johnson, an independent Social Security and Medicare policy analyst who forecasts 2026 COLA using monthly inflation data. A 2.5% increase would be the same gain beneficiaries received this year, but there's still time for the 2026 estimate to rise because the full impacts of President Donald Trump's tariffs are still unknown. "This estimate may rise with four more months of data still to come in before the 2026 COLA will be announced in October," Johnson said. Even though May inflation remained tame, most economists predict Trump's tariffs will raise inflation, which in turn, boosts the COLA. "Another month goes by with little evidence of tariffs, but the longer-term inflation challenge they pose remains," said Ellen Zentner, chief economic strategist for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. Ken Kim, senior economist at KPMG, sees inflation peaking above 4% annually in the fall. That would be sharply higher than the 2.4% annual increase in the May consumer price index, a measure of average changes in goods and services costs. The average monthly Social Security check in May reached a record high $1,948.17. Based on that, a 2.5% increase would raise the monthly benefit by about $40.70. Roughly 75 million Americans, or about a fifth of the population, receive Social Security benefits. COLA is an annual adjustment to benefits meant to keep beneficiaries' purchasing power from being eroded by inflation. The final COLA for the following year is typically announced in October by the Social Security Administration. COLA is based on the percentage increase in the consumer price index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers from July through September of the last year as compared to the same three months of the current year. CPI-W tracks the overall inflation rate but can differ slightly. In May, annual CPI-W rose 2.2%, compared with the 2.4% rise in overall consumer prices. Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Social Security COLA may be 2.5% in 2026, but tariffs could lift it
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Group protests Congressman Rulli's stance on issues and bill
AUSTINTOWN, Ohio (WKBN) – Protesters gathered at a Valley grocery store Wednesday, demonstrating about Congressman Michael Rulli's votes on some issues and President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. It was one of many protests being held by constituents outside Rulli Brothers grocery stores. This time, the protest is in Austintown. About 40 people have been outside the store since about 3 p.m. They're calling for Congressman Rulli to hold a town hall meeting with constituents while he is in town, and are also concerned with his stance on some issues. Among their concerns are cuts being made in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, especially to Medicare and Medicaid. This protest comes on the same day that Congressman Rulli introduced the Gambler Act in Congress to address the border crisis, which seeks to allocate money from the US Treasury towards ICE operations. The money will specifically come from gambling tax revenue The act would receive a $300 million fund each year from the treasury. Rulli says the act will strengthen immigration enforcement without raising taxes on citizens. Rulli Brothers issued a statement about the protests: For 108 years Rulli Bros has proudly served the Mahoning Valley as a retailer of groceries and Italian specialties. During that history we have contributed to the local community and economy by providing customers with goods at competitive prices, creating countless jobs, procuring goods from local vendors, and generating local tax revenues that directly benefit the community. We greatly appreciate all our customers, vendors, and employees who represent the political diversity of the Valley. All are welcome at Rulli Bros., left, right, and center as we continue to serve the Valley to the best of our ability. Rulli Bros. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
24 million Americans hit by harsh health insurance reality
The Affordable Care Act's (ACA) Marketplace has quietly become one of the federal government's biggest success stories, providing health insurance to more than 24 million Americans in 2025 – a doubling since 2021. But that success now stands on a knife's edge. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Unless Congress acts, enhanced premium tax credits that helped fuel this growth will expire at year-end. The result? Higher premiums, fewer enrollees, and more uninsured Americans, especially among older, near-retirement millions, expanding advanced premium tax credits (APTCs) in 2021 was a game-changer. By lowering out-of-pocket premiums through subsidies tied to income, the ACA became accessible to people who previously found it unaffordable. The Inflation Reduction Act extended these credits, but only temporarily. Related: Social Security income tax cuts may include a huge new deduction for retirees Under current rules, these credits are available to individuals and families earning up to 400% of the Federal Poverty Level (roughly $58,320 for an individual or $120,000 for a family of four in 2025). However, absent Congressional reauthorization, the clock runs out this December. The numbers are stark. A new analysis from the Commonwealth Fund projects that 4 million people will lose coverage outright if the enhanced tax credits vanish. Other proposed changes to marketplaces could further harm enrollment: an additional 4 million people could lose coverage by 2034 if the House-passed budget bill (H.R. 1) is enacted. In Texas, over 1 million could become uninsured, with premiums up by $400+ California, 174,000 could lose coverage, facing $700+ West Virginia, nearly every Marketplace enrollee -- 98% -- would see increases, with 16,000 losing coverage. Older adults not yet eligible for Medicare are particularly vulnerable. Consider these examples from KFF: A 40-year-old individual could see $1,000 more per year for the same coverage.A 60-year-old married couple could be looking at $20,000+ increases, depending on the state. As Jae Oh, CFP, author of Maximize Your Medicare, explains: "Twenty thousand dollars does not matter what your net worth is. That's a heck of a lot of money." Oh emphasizes that individuals must now start budgeting for higher premiums, even if policy outcomes remain uncertain. "Some people just stick with the same plan out of habit," he notes, "but not at every price point. That needs to change." Related: Medicare recipients face a growing problem Among his key recommendations: Re-evaluate plan tiering: "If you're in a gold plan, look at their silver plan. If you're in a silver, look at a bronze plan." Review COBRA carefully: While often seen as too costly, COBRA could become a better value if premium tax credits disappear. It offers continuity of care, retention of deductibles already met, and coverage for dependents, including adult children. "If your cost advantage dissipates, maybe COBRA was best all along." Control income to manage subsidy eligibility: Strategies like Roth conversions, Roth contributions, and deferring income could help lower modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) and retain eligibility for reduced premiums. "Anything to defray or to try to limit your modified adjust gross income next year may be very valuable." Plan around uncertainty: "We do not know at all what 2026 individual health insurance plans under the ACA look like. We will not know that until the very, very late fall this year." On the broader economic context, Oh adds: "That white-collar recession -- anything that looks or sounds or feels like it -- is real. People are on the bench, if you will, looking for employment." And for those relying on the ACA to maintain coverage between jobs: "This is that instance when the headlines will affect every aspect for those types of people… meaning that people who have accessed the APTC can be affected going into next year." Michael Gusmano, professor of health policy at Lehigh University, puts the risk into stark terms: "The Commonwealth Fund's analysis is depressing, but accurate and important. The temporary increase in subsidies that were adopted after the 2020 election had no chance of surviving if President Trump won re-election-and may have been difficult to extend even with Biden or Harris in the White House. Getting an extension of these subsidies through Congress would have been a challenge regardless of who is president." More personal finance: Social Security student loan garnishment sparks alarmThe most tax-friendly states for your retirement incomeSALT income tax deduction takes critical step forward He continues: "Beyond the expiration of the subsidies and loss of insurance through the ACA -- and the millions who lost insurance coverage during Medicaid's 'great unwinding' following the end of the public health emergency -- the budget bill that was adopted by the U.S. House and is currently being debated in the U.S. Senate would increase the number of uninsured by several million more. Together, these policy changes would substantially erode health insurance coverage in the U.S. and move us in the direction of the situation in the U.S. before the full implementation of the ACA in 2014." The likely fallout? "This will increase premature death, deteriorate public health, increase avoidable hospitalizations, and place enormous strain on the health care safety-net-including many rural hospitals that are already on the brink of disaster." Anne Montgomery, a health systems researcher focused on older adults, underscores the policy's real-world harm: "Not surprising to see the largest states would get hammered by these provisions. They are very harmful to individuals who won't find it possible to buy private health insurance and who might, but for the massive Medicaid reductions in funding, wind up in Medicaid." "Millions will be stranded," she said. "Dual eligibles will struggle to access Medicare if they fall through the cracks and don't get Medicaid supplemental coverage help." "Then there is the fact that the health care system doesn't operate for free -- there are operations, services and wages to be paid," Montgomery noted." And there is no magic way that states have to replace the lost revenue, so many providers will stagger and increasingly fail." Related: Medicare Advantage plans come under fire from DOGE The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
