Ticketmaster settles $6M class-action lawsuit over pricing practices
Ticketmaster, the online ticketing giant, has reached a settlement in a class-action lawsuit, agreeing to compensate approximately one million Canadians who purchased tickets in 2018.
The $6 million settlement, finalized on January 15, 2025, at Regina's Court of King's Bench, stems from allegations of deceptive pricing practices, specifically "drip pricing," which involved adding unexpected fees to ticket prices.
The lawsuit was initiated by Crystal Watch, who accused Ticketmaster of violating The Consumer Protection and Business Practices Act. While Ticketmaster did not admit to any wrongdoing, it opted to settle the matter out of court.
Justice Graeme Mitchell, who presided over the case, emphasized the significance of the settlement, stating, "This case has proved to be a legitimate consumer protection lawsuit, which could only have been effectively prosecuted as a class action."
Customers who purchased tickets for Canadian events between January 1 and June 30, 2018, may receive up to $45 in credits for future ticket purchases on their Ticketmaster accounts.
However, this compensation is only available to those who meet the criteria, and Quebec residents as well as current Ticketmaster employees are excluded. The credit is transferable but can only be redeemed once.
Lawyer Tony Merchant, representing the plaintiffs, estimated that up to 100,000 people in Saskatchewan and about one million across Canada could qualify for the credit.
With $4.3 million allocated to customer credits after legal fees of $1.725 million are deducted, the settlement reflects the broad impact of Ticketmaster's pricing practices during that period.
Consumers will soon receive emails with instructions on claiming their credits. If eligible customers do not receive a notification, they are encouraged to contact the law firm for assistance.
This case serves as an important reminder of the need for transparency in ticket pricing, particularly in the event and concert sectors where service fees often complicate the process.
Though the settlement may seem small compared to larger corporate disputes, it represents a significant step forward in holding businesses accountable for unfair practices.
It underscores the power of class-action lawsuits in ensuring fair treatment for consumers and reinforcing the need for honest business practices, especially in industries like ticket sales that impact millions of people.
Overall, the settlement reflects the growing determination of consumers to protect their rights and push for greater transparency in the marketplace. It also demonstrates the essential role of the legal system in ensuring companies adhere to ethical practices, thereby restoring consumer trust.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US ramps up attack on ICC over Israel
The International Criminal Court building is seen in The Hague, Netherlands. Photo: Reuters/ File The United States on Wednesday defiantly expanded efforts to hobble the International Criminal Court over its prosecution of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, sanctioning a judge from ally France. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also targeted a Canadian judge in a separate case in his latest volley of sanctions against the tribunal in The Hague, which is backed by virtually all other Western democracies as a court of last resort. "The Court is a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare against the United States and our close ally Israel," Rubio said in a statement, using a term popular with President Donald Trump's supporters. He attacked the court for investigating US and Israeli citizens "without the consent of either nation." Among the four people newly slapped with sanctions was Judge Nicolas Guillou of France, who is presiding over a case in which an arrest warrant was issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. France -- whose president, Emmanuel Macron, was in Washington two days earlier — expressed "dismay" over the action. The sanctions are "in contradiction to the principle of an independent judiciary," a foreign ministry spokesman said in Paris. The ICC in its own statement denounced the "flagrant attack against the independence of an impartial judicial institution." The court's prosecution alleges Netanyahu is responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Israel's offensive in Gaza including by intentionally targeting civilians and using starvation as a method of war. Netanyahu saluted Rubio for his "decisive act against a smear campaign of lies against the State of Israel" and the Israeli army. Israel launched the massive offensive in response to an unprecedented attack by Hamas against Israel in which mostly civilians were killed.
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
US targets more ICC judges including over Israel
WASHINGTON: The United States on Wednesday imposed sanctions on four more International Criminal Court judges or prosecutors, including from allies France and Canada, in a new effort to hobble the tribunal particularly over actions against Israel. 'The Court is a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare against the United States and our close ally Israel,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement, using a term popular with President Donald Trump's supporters. Rubio said that the four people targeted from the tribunal based in The Hague had sought to investigate or prosecute nationals from the United States or Israel 'without the consent of either nation.' The four include Judge Nicolas Guillou of France, who is presiding over a case in which an arrest warrant was issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel urges ICC to drop arrest warrants against PM The case was brought forward by the State of Palestine, which is not recognized by Washington but, unlike Israel or the United States, has acceded to the statute that set up the tribunal in The Hague. Guillou, a veteran jurist, had worked for several years in the United States assisting the Justice Department with judicial cooperation during Barack Obama's presidency. Also targeted in the latest US sanctions was a Canadian judge, Kimberly Prost, who was involved in a case that authorized an investigation into alleged crimes committed during the war in Afghanistan, including by US forces. Under the sanctions, the United States will bar entry of the ICC judges to the United States and block any property they have in the world's largest economy – measures more often taken against US adversaries than individuals from close allies. Rubio also slapped sanctions on two deputy prosecutors – Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji and Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal. The State Department said the two were punished by the United States for supporting 'illegitimate ICC actions against Israel,' including by supporting the arrest warrants against Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant. The Trump administration has roundly rejected the authority of the court, which is backed by almost all European democracies and was set up as a court of last resort when national systems do not allow for justice. Trump on Friday welcomed Russian President Vladimir Putin to Alaska even though Putin faces an ICC arrest warrant, a factor that has stopped him from traveling more widely since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine. Rubio slapped sanctions on four other ICC judges in June.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Minister admits loopholes in implementation of laws
ISLAMABAD: Minister for Law and Justice Azam Nazeer Tarar, on Monday, admitted that loopholes in the implementation of existing laws were allowing perpetrators of crimes such as honour killings to escape punishment. He cited cases where families misused reconciliation provisions under Section 345 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to protect offenders. Winding up a Senate debate on a motion moved by Senator Sherry Rehman regarding the rise in gender-based violence (GBV), the minister said the statistics shared in the House were 'deeply concerning' but stressed the need for a balanced approach. He noted that Pakistan already had an overburdened legal framework and said private member bills, particularly those related to criminal law, must be carefully reviewed. On domestic violence, he pointed out that while all provinces had enacted relevant laws, Islamabad was still awaiting its own legislation. The minister admitted that weak investigations, poor case preparation, and lack of coordination between police and prosecution were major reasons for low conviction rates. He urged that prosecutors should be involved from the investigation stage to ensure fair trials. He also acknowledged that family pressure and societal attitudes often forced survivors to withdraw complaints. Other senators, including Mohsin Aziz, Syed Ali Zafar, Danesh Kumar, Rubina Khalid, and Bilal Ahmed Khan, called for stronger implementation of laws and better protection for vulnerable groups. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
